Citations

AbstractBackgroundResting state functional connectivity (rsfMRI) studies have shown functional network disruptions in logopenic progressive aphasia (LPA) (reduced connectivity within the left temporal language network) and posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) (reduced connectivity within ventral visual network). However, little is known about how these networks compare and how connectivity differs within and between networks in these atypical Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) phenotypes.MethodFifty‐nine amyloid‐positive PCA patients and eighty‐five amyloid‐positive LPA patients were recruited by the Neurodegenerative Research Group at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, and underwent structural and resting state functional MRI. Spatially preprocessed data was analyzed using the CONN functional connectivity toolbox to explore the default mode network (DMN), salience, sensorimotor, left language, visual and memory networks, which were generated by averaging multiple regions‐of‐interest (ROI) within each network. The data was analyzed at both the voxel‐level and network‐level (ROI‐ROI).ResultVoxel‐level differences in functional connectivity between PCA and LPA were observed in all networks (p<0.05; cluster size, FWE=0.05). PCA showed reduced connectivity in the occipital lobe in visual and memory networks, parietal lobe in language and DMN, and sensorimotor strip in sensorimotor network, particularly on the right, compared to LPA. Conversely, LPA showed reduced connectivity in the frontal cortex in salience, memory, visual and sensorimotor networks, inferior parietal lobe in visual network, and anterior temporal pole and sensorimotor cortex in the language network, compared to PCA. Between network differences (p<0.05; cluster size, FDR=0.05) were observed between groups, with PCA showing reduced connectivity between the visual and sensorimotor networks, while LPA showed reduced connectivity between the language and sensorimotor networks. The DMN was anti‐correlated to the language network in PCA, while it was positively correlated to the language network in LPA. In both phenotypes, the DMN was anticorrelated with the salience network. The visual network in PCA showed connections to all networks, while in LPA, it was only connected to the salience, language and DMN.ConclusionThe atypical AD phenotypes were associated with multiple disruptions in connectivity, both within and between brain networks. Phenotype specific differences in connectivity patterns were noted in visual network for PCA and language network for LPA.

ObjectiveThis study was undertaken to assess cross‐sectional and longitudinal [18F]‐flortaucipir positron emission tomography (PET) uptake in pathologically confirmed frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) and to compare FTLD to cases with high and low levels of Alzheimer disease (AD) neuropathologic changes (ADNC).MethodsOne hundred forty‐three participants who had completed at least one flortaucipir PET and had autopsy‐confirmed FTLD (n = 52) or high (n = 58) or low ADNC (n = 33) based on Braak neurofibrillary tangle stages 0–IV versus V–VI were included. Flortaucipir standard uptake value ratios (SUVRs) were calculated for 9 regions of interest (ROIs): an FTLD meta‐ROI, midbrain, globus pallidum, an AD meta‐ROI, entorhinal, inferior temporal, orbitofrontal, precentral, and medial parietal. Linear mixed effects models were used to compare mean baseline SUVRs and annual rate of change in SUVR by group. Sensitivity and specificity to distinguish FTLD from high and low ADNC were calculated.ResultsBaseline uptake in the FTLD meta‐ROI, midbrain, and globus pallidus was greater in FTLD than high and low ADNC. No region showed a greater rate of flortaucipir accumulation in FTLD. Baseline uptake in the AD‐related regions and orbitofrontal and precentral cortices was greater in high ADNC, and all showed greater rates of accumulation compared to FTLD. Baseline differences were superior to longitudinal rates in differentiating FTLD from high and low ADNC. A simple baseline metric of midbrain/inferior temporal ratio of flortaucipir uptake provided good to excellent differentiation between FTLD and high and low ADNC (sensitivities/specificities = 94%/95% and 71%/70%).InterpretationThere are cross‐sectional and longitudinal differences in flortaucipir uptake between FTLD and high and low ADNC. However, optimum differentiation between FTLD and ADNC was achieved with baseline uptake rather than longitudinal rates. ANN NEUROL 2022;92:1016–1029

Background: Observational studies suggested that dementia risk in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is higher than in the general population. Objective: To examine the associations of RA with cognitive decline and dementia, and neuroimaging biomarkers of aging, Alzheimer’s disease, and vascular pathology in adult participants in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA). Methods: Participants with RA were matched 1:3 on age, sex, education, and baseline cognitive diagnosis to participants without RA. RA cases with MRI were also matched with non-cases with available MRI. All available imaging studies (i.e., amyloid and FDG PET, sMRI, and FLAIR) were included. The study included 104 participants with RA and 312 without RA (mean age (standard deviation, SD) 75.0 (10.4) years, 33% male and average follow-up (SD) 4.2 (3.8) years). Results: Groups were similar in cognitive decline and risk of incident dementia. Among participants with neuroimaging, participants with RA (n = 33) and without RA (n = 98) had similar amyloid burden and neurodegeneration measures, including regions sensitive to aging and dementia, but greater mean white matter hyperintensity volume relative to the total intracranial volume (mean (SD)% : 1.12 (0.57)% versus 0.76 (0.69)% of TIV, p = 0.01), and had higher mean (SD) number of cortical infarctions (0.24 (0.44) versus 0.05 (0.33), p = 0.02). Conclusion: Although cognitive decline and dementia risk were similar in participants with and without RA, participants with RA had more abnormal cerebrovascular pathology on neuroimaging. Future studies should examine the mechanisms underlying these changes and potential implications for prognostication and prevention of cognitive decline in RA.

BackgroundFocally enlarged sulci (FES) are areas of proposed extraventricular fluid entrapment that may occur within idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) with radiographic evidence of disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid‐space hydrocephalus (DESH), and should be differentiated from atrophy.PurposeTo evaluate for change in FES size and pituitary height after shunt placement in iNPH.Study typeRetrospective.SubjectsA total of 125 iNPH patients who underwent shunt surgery and 40 age‐matched controls.Field Strength/Sequence1.5 T and 3 T. Axial T2w FLAIR, 3D T1w MPRAGE, 2D sagittal T1w.AssessmentFES were measured in three dimensions and volume was estimated by assuming an ellipsoid shape. Pituitary gland height was measured in the mid third of the gland in iNPH patients and controls.Statistical testsWilcoxon signed‐rank test for comparisons between MRI measurements; Wilcoxon rank sum test for comparison of cases/controls. Significance level was P < 0.05.ResultsFifty percent of the patients had FES. FES volume significantly decreased between the pre and first postshunt MRI by a median of 303 mm3 or 30.0%. Pituitary gland size significantly increased by 0.48 mm or 14.4%. FES decreased significantly by 190 mm3 or 23.1% and pituitary gland size increased significantly by 0.25 mm or 6% between the first and last postshunt MRI.Data ConclusionDecrease in size of FES after shunt placement provides further evidence that these regions are due to disordered cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics and should not be misinterpreted as atrophy. A relatively smaller pituitary gland in iNPH patients that normalizes after shunt is a less‐well recognized feature of altered CSF dynamics.Evidence Level3Technical EfficacyStage 2

AbstractBackground and purposeAutoimmune encephalitis (AE) is a potentially treatable cause of rapidly progressive dementia that may mimic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (CJD). Alzheimer disease (AD) cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers may discriminate CJD from AD, but utility in discriminating CJD and AE is unclear. This study compared AD CSF biomarkers in CJD and AE.MethodsPatients with probable or definite CJD and probable or definite AE who underwent Roche Elecsys AD CSF biomarker testing at Mayo Clinic from March 2020 through April 2021 were included. Total‐tau, phosphorylated181 tau and amyloid‐β42 levels were compared.ResultsOf 11 CJD cases, four were autopsy proven; the rest had positive real‐time quaking‐induced conversion testing. Disease‐associated autoantibodies were detected in 8/15 cases of AE: leucine‐rich glioma‐inactivated 1 and neuronal intermediate filaments (two cases each), and N‐methyl‐d‐aspartate receptor, contactin‐associated protein‐like 2, dipeptidyl‐peptidase‐like protein 6 and immunoglobulin‐like cell adhesion molecule IgLON family member 5. Total‐tau provided excellent discrimination between CJD and AE in a univariate model (odds ratio 1.46 per 100 pg/ml, 95% confidence interval 1.17–2.11, p < 0.05, c = 0.93). Total‐tau was elevated in 91% of CJD cases (median > 1300, range 236–>1300 pg/ml), of which 55% were above the limit of assay measurement (>1300 pg/ml). Total‐tau was elevated in 20% of AE cases (median 158, range 80–>1300 pg/ml).ConclusionTotal‐tau was greater in CJD than AE. Given that amyloid‐β42 and phosphorylated181 tau were comparable, the ratio differences were probably driven by elevated total‐tau in CJD. This study supports the role for AD biomarker testing in patients with rapidly progressive dementia.

Abstract Objective Individuals with early-onset dysexecutive Alzheimer’s disease (dAD) have high rates of failed performance validity testing (PVT), which can lead to symptom misinterpretation and misdiagnosis. Method The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate rates of failure on a common PVT, the test of memory malingering (TOMM), in a sample of clinical patients with biomarker-confirmed early-onset dAD who completed neuropsychological testing. Results We identified seventeen patients with an average age of symptom onset at 52.25 years old. Nearly fifty percent of patients performed below recommended cut-offs on Trials 1 and 2 of the TOMM. Four of six patients who completed outside neuropsychological testing were misdiagnosed with alternative etiologies to explain their symptomatology, with two of these patients’ performances deemed unreliable based on the TOMM. Conclusions Low scores on the TOMM should be interpreted in light of contextual and optimally biological information and do not necessarily rule out a neurodegenerative etiology.

Background: Alzheimer’s disease can present atypically as a progressive dysexecutive syndrome (dAD), an entity that preferentially affects younger individuals and is frequently misdiagnosed, highlighting the imperative for additional research. Objective: The objective of this study is to characterize the clinical, antemortem neuroimaging, and postmortem neuropathologic features of two cases of young-onset dAD who displayed evidence of Lewy body disease (LBD) co-pathology at autopsy. Methods: Clinical histories, antemortem MRI and PET imaging, and postmortem neuropathologic data were reviewed for each patient. Case Descriptions/Results: Canonical features of dAD were observed in both cases, including progressive and predominant impairment in tasks related to working memory and cognitive flexibility, a lack of major behavioral/personality changes, and evidence of abnormal amyloid and tau deposition by antemortem amyloid and tau PET and postmortem neuropathology. Relative sparing of hippocampal involvement was observed in both individuals, in keeping with many cases of clinically atypical AD. One of the patients developed subtle parkinsonian signs as well as paranoia and irritability in the years prior to passing. In both cases, transitional (brainstem and limbic) LBD co-pathology was observed at autopsy. Discussion: Although LBD co-pathology is not uncommon in AD overall, the presence of LBD pathology in these young-onset cases of dAD (including a case with apparent symptomatic correlate) warrants further investigation for broader frequency and underlying pathophysiology. Conclusion: A better understanding of which specific young-onset AD phenotypes are associated with LBD co-pathology would have important implications for counseling, treatment, clinical trial enrollment, and knowledge on disease mechanisms.