Citations

Motility disorders, particularly gastroparesis, are prevalent complications following solid organ transplantation, significantly impacting quality of life, nutritional status, graft survival, and mortality. This comprehensive review synthesises evidence from PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases on pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, management, and prognostic factors across transplant types. Mechanisms include vagal nerve injury (highest in lung transplants, prevalence 40–91%), immunosuppressive effects (e.g., tacrolimus accelerates motility; mycophenolate impairs it), surgical trauma, microbiome dysbiosis (reduced Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio), and metabolic factors like post-transplant diabetes (OR 5.17 in kidney recipients). Pediatric and thoracic recipients face the highest risks, with lung transplant gastroparesis conferring a 2.7-fold increased mortality/retransplantation hazard (p < 0.05). Diagnosis relies on gastric emptying scintigraphy (gold standard, sensitivity 85–95%) and wireless motility capsules (100% sensitivity for delay), while management encompasses prokinetics (60–80% response), endoscopic G-POEM (85% success), gastric electrical stimulation (100% quality-of-life improvement in series), and nutritional support. Prognostic factors include younger age (better intervention response), aetiology (anatomical worse than metabolic), and early therapy success. Outcomes vary: lung recipients experience severe impacts on chronic allograft dysfunction (83% oesophageal motility abnormalities correlate with 66–67% rejection). Future directions emphasise microbiome therapies, AI predictive models (AUC 0.85), and wearables for continuous monitoring. Multidisciplinary approaches are essential to balance immunosuppression with GI management, addressing ethical dilemmas like drug interactions and access disparities. Ultimately, early screening and personalised interventions can mitigate complications, enhancing long-term transplant success.

This case report discusses a patient with vertebral pseudoaneurysm that spontaneously ruptured and led to vertebro-vertebral arteriovenous fistula requiring endovascular therapy.

Objective: Evaluate patient-reported symptoms and quality of life (QOL) before and after female sterilization device (Essure) removal. Design: Multicenter prospective study. Setting: Three academic institutions. Population or Sample: Patients with device-attributed symptoms undergoing Essure removal. Methods: Symptoms were measured using a study-specific questionnaire and Short Form-8 (divided into Physical and Mental Component Scores). Scores at 4 months postoperative were compared to baseline using a mixed effects logistic regression and linear mixed model. Subgroup analysis was performed for hysterectomy and uterine-preserving groups. Main Outcome Measures: Patient-reported symptoms and Short Form-8 4 months after Essure removal compared to baseline. Results: A total of 80 patients enrolled in the study and underwent Essure removal: 53 (66.3%) with laparoscopic hysterectomy and 27 (33.8%) with laparoscopic bilateral salpingectomy or bilateral cornuectomy. Fifty-one participants (63.8%) completed the 4-month postoperative questionnaire. Of the 17 device-attributed symptoms evaluated, participants reported clinically important improvement in 16 of the symptoms postoperatively. QOL improved significantly following device removal, with the Physical Component Score improving by 9.9 points (95% CI: 7.0–12.9) and the Mental Component Score by 13.8 points (95% CI: 10.4–17.2). QOL improved in both physical and mental score domains after device removal with no difference between hysterectomy and uterine-preserving groups ( p = 0.83 and p = 0.06, respectively). Of the entire cohort, 92.2% ( n = 47) were satisfied with their surgical results. Conclusions: Patients undergoing Essure removal for device-attributed symptoms report improved symptoms and QOL following surgery. Device removal may benefit those experiencing device-attributed symptoms and is associated with high patient satisfaction.

Abstract Disclosure: A. Prete: HRA Pharmaceuticals, Lundbeck, Diurnal. L. Adbi: None. J.T. Bain: None. F. Shaheen: None. O. Suntornlohanakul: None. E. Deflorenne: None. A. Blanchard: None. M. Nestola: None. C. Pamporaki: None. I. Tizianel: None. E. Nowak: None. J. Bertherat: None. D.A. Vassiliadi: None. I. Bancos: None. C.M. Dennedy: None. D. Kastelan: None. M. Fassnacht: None. P. Mulatero: None. U. Ambroziak: None. A. Tabarin: None. M. Quinkler: None. S. Puglisi: None. J. Deinum: None. G.Å. Ueland: None. L. Lenzini: None. F. Beuschlein: None. M. Reincke: None. F. Ceccato: None. G. Eisenhofer: None. S.M. Corsello: None. L. Amar: None. M. Zennaro: None. N. Karavitaki: None. A.E. Taylor: None. W. Arlt: None. Introduction: Twenty-four-hour urinary free cortisol is used to diagnose Cushing’s syndrome (CS); amongst its limitations is failure to differentiate ACTH-dependent CS (AD-CS) from ACTH-independent CS (AI-CS). We tested the performance of urine steroid metabolomics (USM), the computational analysis of 24-hour urine steroid metabolome data by machine learning, for the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of CS. Given the physiological diurnal rhythm of cortisol secretion and its loss in CS, we also hypothesised that the difference in glucocorticoid excretion between CS and controls should be higher during nighttime, thereby facilitating more sensitive detection of CS. Methods: 264 subjects completed a 24-hour urine collection (40 AD-CS, 103 AI-CS due to adrenocortical adenoma or hyperplasia, 121 healthy subjects). A subset of 52 individuals (13 CS, 39 healthy) provided a nighttime urine collection and a daytime urine collection. Mass spectrometry-based multi-steroid profiling was used to quantify the urinary excretion of 27 steroid metabolites. Data were analysed by generalised matrix learning vector quantisation (a prototype-based supervised machine learning approach), multiple linear regression adjusted for age, sex, and BMI, and multiple logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, and BMI. Results: Twenty-four-hour USM demonstrated very high accuracy in differentiating CS from healthy individuals (AUC-ROC 0.99, 95%CI 0.99-0.99), reflected by higher urinary excretion of glucocorticoid and glucocorticoid precursor metabolites in CS. USM yielded high accuracy in differentiating AD-CS from AI-CS (AUC-ROC 0.91, 95%CI 0.89-0.94), with androgen metabolites being the most discriminatory. We observed significant sex differences in steroid excretion in both healthy individuals and those with CS. Women exhibited markedly lower excretion of both glucocorticoids and mineralocorticoids compared to men: average glucocorticoid excretion was reduced by 43% in healthy women and 30% in CS women, while average mineralocorticoid excretion was 29% lower in healthy women and 51% lower in CS women (results adjusted for age and BMI). Timed steroid excretion in healthy individuals reflected the diurnal pattern of adrenal steroid secretion, with lower nighttime than daytime excretion of glucocorticoid metabolites. Nighttime glucocorticoid metabolite excretion (AUC-ROC 1.00, 95%CI 0.99-1.00) performed better than daytime (AUC-ROC 0.91, 95%CI 0.77-1.00) and 24-hour excretion (AUC-ROC 0.94, 95%CI 0.86-1.00) in separating CS cases from healthy individuals. Conclusions: USM is a non-invasive, one-step candidate test for the accurate diagnosis and differential diagnosis of CS. Timed nighttime urine collection leverages cortisol circadian rhythmicity and improves the diagnostic accuracy of the current reference standard 24-hour collection. Presentation: Sunday, July 13, 2025

Importance Contemporary guidelines recommend sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for patients with melanoma with predicted risk of SLN metastasis greater than 10% and consideration of SLNB when the risk is 5% to 10%. A gene expression profile (GEP)–based test that can accurately identify patients with a low risk of SLN metastasis would refine selection for SLNB. Objective To establish the predictive capability of the combined clinicopathological factors and GEP (CP-GEP) test to identify patients with primary cutaneous melanoma who can safely forgo SLNB and to investigate the prognostic value of CP-GEP regarding the outcome in patients with cutaneous melanoma after a negative SLNB (not reported herein). Design, Setting, and Participants This prognostic study was conducted from September 2021 to June 2024 at 9 academic medical centers with experienced melanoma surgeons. Included were patients with biopsy-proven invasive cutaneous melanoma with T1 to T3 tumors and clinically negative regional LNs. All patients were deemed candidates for SLNB using standard clinical criteria. GEP was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue from the primary melanoma biopsy. Analyses were performed from December 2024 to August 2025. Intervention CP-GEP testing to determine risk of having a positive SLNB in patients with T1 to T3 cutaneous melanoma who were considered appropriate candidates for the procedure based on standard clinical parameters. Main Outcomes and Measures CP-GEP results were reported as low risk or high risk; the primary outcome measure was negative predictive value (NPV) in low-risk cases. Analyses included NPV assessment by tumor (T) subcategory, primary site, and age. Results A total of 1761 patients (median [IQR] age, 64 [53-72] years; 997 male [56.6%]) underwent SLNB (310 [17.6%] SLN positive) and had a successful CP-GEP test; GEP was successful in 97.7% of samples. A total of 651 patients (37.0%) were considered low risk by CP-GEP. Among low-risk cases, 46 (7.1%) were SLN positive, and NPV was 92.9% (95% CI, 90.7%-94.8%). High-risk cases had a 23.8% (264 of 1110) SLN-positive rate. The percentage of cases with low-risk CP-GEP declined with increasing T category (T1 = 346 of 507 [68.2%]; T2 = 295 of 897 [32.9%]; T3 = 10 of 357 [2.8%]). CP-GEP results were consistent in discriminating SLN-positive rates across primary sites, histologic subtypes, and mitotic count categories. In 2 large subsets, clinical stage IB (n = 1187) and patients 65 years and older (n = 832), 6.5% (95% CI, 4.6%-8.8%) of low-risk clinical stage IB cases and 6.6% (95% CI, 4.2%-9.7%) of all low-risk cases in patients 65 years and older were SLN positive vs 18.3% (95% CI, 15.3%-21.6%) and 20.3% (95% CI, 16.8%-24.2%) for high-risk cases, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance In this multicenter, prospective, blinded, prognostic study, the CP-GEP test reliably identified patients with melanoma with less than 10% SLN metastasis risk. SLN metastasis rates were approximately 3-fold greater for high-risk vs low-risk CP-GEP cases. In appropriately selected patients, the CP-GEP test may add value for shared patient-surgeon decision-making.

Stereotactic radiosurgery was associated with a higher obliteration rate compared with embolization in patients with eloquent brain arteriovenous malformations, whereas there was no evidence of a difference in functional outcomes or complications after adjustment.

Importance The effect of cornea donor diabetes on endothelial cell density (ECD) and morphometry after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is not known. Objective To determine whether endothelial cell loss (ECL) and morphometric changes 1 year after successful DMEK are related to cornea donor’s diabetes status. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a multicenter, double-masked, randomized clinical trial conducted from February 2022 to July 2024 at 28 US clinical sites (46 surgeons) and 13 eye banks. Included in the trial were the eyes of recipients (some of whom received tissue from donors without diabetes and others who received tissue from donors with diabetes) who underwent successful DMEK, primarily for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy, and had at least 1 analyzable postoperative endothelial image. Intervention DMEK performed with a cornea from a donor without or with diabetes, assigned using a minimization procedure to achieve an approximate 2:1 distribution. Main Outcomes and Measures ECD, ECL, coefficient of variation in cell area (CV), and percentage of hexagonal cells (HEX) at 1 year from eye bank and postoperative specular central endothelial images. Results A total 1274 eyes of 982 recipients (mean [SD] age, 70 [8] years; 569 female [57.9%]; 816 [64.1%] with tissue from donors without diabetes and 458 [35.9%] with tissue from donors with diabetes) were included in the study. Preoperatively, mean (SD) central ECD in tissue from donors without diabetes and with diabetes were 2676 (290) cells/mm 2 and 2671 (286) cells/mm 2 , respectively. At 1 year, mean (SD) ECL was 28.3% (16.1%) and 28.0% (17.0%), in the donor groups without and with diabetes, respectively (adjusted mean difference = −0.4%; 95% CI, −2.3% to 1.4%), resulting in a mean (SD) 1-year ECD of 1927 (498) cells/mm 2 and 1920 (496) cells/mm 2 , respectively (adjusted mean difference = 10 cells/mm 2 ; 95% CI, −36 to 56; P = .95). No difference in ECD at 1 year associated with diabetes severity was noted ( P = .97). Mean (SD) CV did not differ at 1 year between the 2 groups of eyes (31.5% [4.1%] vs 31.4% [4.1%]; adjusted mean difference = −0.4%; 95% CI, −0.9% to 0.1%; P = .51), and mean (SD) HEX did not differ at 1 year between the 2 groups of eyes (57.7% [5.8%] vs 57.2% [5.8%]; adjusted mean difference = 0.1%, 95% CI, −0.8% to 0.9%; P = .33). Conclusions and Relevance This randomized clinical trial found that ECL and morphometry 1 year after DMEK were not affected by cornea donor diabetes status. With comparable 1-year graft success with tissue from donors with and without diabetes demonstrated in this trial, these findings support the use of corneas from donors with diabetes for endothelial keratoplasty procedures. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05134480

Importance If the success of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is not affected by whether the donor has diabetes, then the donor pool should expand. Objective To determine whether the 1-year DMEK success rate is affected by the presence of diabetes in the donor. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a multicenter, double-masked, randomized clinical trial conducted from February 2022 to July 2025 at 28 clinical sites (46 surgeons), with donor corneas provided by 13 eye banks in the US. Included in the study were individuals undergoing low to moderate risk DMEK (95% for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy). Study data were analyzed from April to September 2025. Intervention DMEK performed with a cornea from a donor without or with diabetes, assigned using a minimization procedure (comparable with randomization) to achieve an approximate 2:1 distribution, respectively. Main Outcomes and Measures Graft success at 1 year Results A total of 1097 individuals (1421 study eyes; median [IQR] age, 71 [66-76] years; 631 female [57.5%]) were included in the study. The 1-year cumulative probability of graft success was 96.3% (95% CI, 95.0%-97.5%) among 912 study eyes (64.2%) receiving tissue from donors without diabetes and 97.1% (95% CI, 95.5%-98.4%) among 509 study eyes (35.8%) receiving tissue from donors with diabetes (difference between groups = 0.7 percentage points; 95% CI, −1.2 to 2.6; P = .63). The 1-year cumulative probability of graft success was 96.5% (95% CI, 93.6%-98.9%) in the mild donor diabetes severity subgroup (n = 173) and 97.3% (95% CI, 95.4%-98.8%) in the moderate to severe donor diabetes severity subgroup (n = 336), using a diabetes severity rating scale based on medical history. The rates of primary donor failure, early failure related to surgical complications, and subsequent failure were as follows: 2.5% (23 of 912), 0.7% (6 of 912), and 0.3% (3 of 912), respectively, in recipients of tissue from a donor without diabetes, and 2.6% (13 of 509), 0.4% (2 of 509), and 0%, respectively, among recipients of tissue from a donor with diabetes. There were no failures due to graft rejection. Conclusions and Relevance The 1-year success rate in eyes undergoing DMEK with successfully prepared tissue was very high regardless of donor diabetes status. These results, supported by the separately reported finding that endothelial cell loss and cornea morphometry after 1 year were not affected by donor diabetes status, provide strong support for having no restrictions on the use of tissue from donors with diabetes for DMEK. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05134480

Abstract Molecular profiling reveals that up to 40% of advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs) harbor actionable genomic alterations amenable to matched targeted therapies. However, conventional trial designs typically evaluate these agents in pretreated populations, resulting in approvals for later-line use. Notably, 25–44% of patients with advanced BTC may become ineligible for treatment after first-line therapy due to disease progression or functional decline, thus the real-world survival outcomes with matched therapies remains poorly characterized. This international collaborative study includes data from Mayo Clinic, Duke Cancer Institute, and National Cancer Center East (Japan), as well as a combined dataset from the SCRUM-Japan GOZILA, MONSTAR-SCREEN-1, and MONSTAR-SCREEN-2 projects. We assessed overall survival (OS) of patients based on the presence of actionable alterations and the receipt of matched therapy. To adjust for confounding, we applied propensity score weighting with inverse probability of treatment and multivariate Cox regression modeling, controlling for age, sex, tumor location, prior resection, and mutational subgroup. Among 1,049 patients that were analyzed, 358 (34.1%) harbored actionable alterations, with 160 (44.7%) receiving matched targeted therapy. The matched group (patients with actionable tumors who received a matched therapy) were significantly associated with longer median OS (23.3 months; 95% CI: 19.5–30.4) compared to the unmatched group (14.7 months; 95% CI: 12.8–17.9) and those with non-actionable tumors (17.1 months; 95% CI: 15.5–18.7; HR 0.57, 95% CI: 0.46–0.71; p < 0.0001). The unmatched group also was associated with the lowest three-year OS rate (13% vs. 35% in matched and 19% in actionable groups, respectively; p<0.0001). On multivariable analysis with patients who received ≥2 lines of therapy, receipt of matched therapy remained an independent predictor of improved OS (HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.43–0.90). These findings support the early integration of targeted therapies in BTC management and underscore the need to overcome systemic barriers to treatment access.

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT) provide expert, multidisciplinary recommendations for autologous and allogeneic HCT based on current evidence. The NCCN Guidelines focus on pretransplant recipient evaluation, hematopoietic cell mobilization, conditioning, and the diagnosis and management of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), a common complication of allogeneic HCT that is associated with significant morbidity. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for HCT focuses on the diagnosis, workup, and management of acute and chronic GVHD, as well as important supportive care considerations.