Citations

Purpose: MRI-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) uses real-time MR thermometry feedback to target prostate disease. We systematically review the literature to synthesize efficacy, functional, and safety outcomes and assess the influence of planned ablation fraction on outcome. Materials and Methods: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to June 2021 following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies reporting at least one efficacy, functional, or safety outcome after a single TULSA treatment were included. The relationship of freedom from salvage treatment and potency preservation with planned ablation volume was modeled. Results: Two hundred twenty-four patients were treated in 10 studies with up to a 5-year follow-up, mainly for primary localized prostate cancer (PCa) plus smaller cohorts with recurrent PCa, and locally advanced PCa (LAPC). The prostate-specific antigen decline from baseline up to 2 years, including focal to whole-gland ablation plans, was 54% to 97%. The rate of salvage treatment after one TULSA treatment for primary PCa was 7% to 17%. Continence and potency preservation were from 92% to 100% and from 75% to 98%. Urinary symptoms were stable in men with good voiding function at baseline, and 85% of men with concurrent PCa and lower urinary tract symptoms met the criteria for improvement. Symptom relief in a small cohort of men with LAPC was observed. Grade III adverse events were incurred by 13/224 men (6%), with no rectal injury/fistula or Grade IV complication. The planned ablation fraction was linearly related to salvage-free survival. The relationship between potency preservation and planned ablation fraction followed a sigmoid curve. Conclusions: As an alternative to conventional treatments, TULSA is safe and effective for prostate tissue ablation in men with primary PCa. There is also evidence that TULSA delivers effective relief of urinary symptoms while treating PCa in a single, low-morbidity procedure. The likelihood of freedom from additional treatment or potency preservation is associated with the planned ablation fraction.

Abstract Background Previous prospective studies highlighted dairy intake as a risk factor for Parkinson's disease (PD), particularly in men. It is unclear whether this association is causal or explained by reverse causation or confounding. Objective The aim is to examine the association between genetically predicted dairy intake and PD using two‐sample Mendelian randomization (MR). Methods We genotyped a well‐established instrumental variable for dairy intake located in the lactase gene (rs4988235) within the Courage‐PD consortium (23 studies; 9823 patients and 8376 controls of European ancestry). Results Based on a dominant model, there was an association between genetic predisposition toward higher dairy intake and PD (odds ratio [OR] per one serving per day = 1.70, 95% confidence interval = 1.12–2.60, P = 0.013) that was restricted to men (OR = 2.50 [1.37–4.56], P = 0.003; P ‐difference with women = 0.029). Conclusions Using MR, our findings provide further support for a causal relationship between dairy intake and higher PD risk, not biased by confounding or reverse causation. Further studies are needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms. © 2022 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society

BACKGROUND: Increases in the extent of resection of both contrast-enhanced (CE) and non–contrast-enhanced (NCE) tissue are associated with substantial survival benefits in patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase wild-type glioblastoma. The fact, however, remains that these lesions exist within the framework of complex neural circuitry subserving cognition, movement, and behavior, all of which affect the ultimate survival outcome. The prognostic significance of the interplay between CE and NCE cytoreduction and neurological morbidity is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: To identify a clinically homogenous population of 228 patients with newly diagnosed isocitrate dehydrogenase wild-type glioblastoma, all of whom underwent maximal safe resection of CE and NCE tissue and adjuvant chemoradiation. We then set out to delineate the competing interactions between resection of CE and NCE tissue and postoperative neurological impairment with respect to overall survival. METHODS: Nonparametric multivariate models of survival were generated via recursive partitioning to provide a clinically intuitive framework for the prognostication and surgical management of such patients. RESULTS: We demonstrated that the presence of a new postoperative neurological impairment was the key factor in predicting survival outcomes across the entire cohort. Patients older than 60 yr who suffered from at least one new impairment had the worst survival outcome regardless of extent of resection (median of 11.6 mo), whereas those who did not develop a new impairment had the best outcome (median of 28.4 mo) so long as all CE tissue was resected. CONCLUSION: Our data provide novel evidence for management strategies that prioritize safe and complete resection of CE tissue.

OBJECTIVE At present, females constitute less than 10% of neurosurgeons in the US, despite representing approximately half of all medical students. Multiple barriers have been described for females entering the neurosurgical field, particularly academic neurosurgery. Understanding the environment that female neurosurgeons face and any potential barriers preventing career advancement is needed to recruit, promote, and retain females in neurosurgery. METHODS The gender composition of editorial boards for 5 high-impact neurosurgery journals was analyzed from 2000 to 2020. The names of editorial board members were obtained directly from the journal administration, physical copies of the published journal, or publicly available data through each journal’s website. The gender, degrees, academic titles, H-index, and country were determined for each individual and statistical tests were performed to identify significant differences. RESULTS Of the 466 identified individuals that served on at least one editorial board between 2000 and 2020, there were 36 females (7.7%) and 430 males (92.3%). There were no significant differences between males and females serving on multiple editorial boards. Most females possessed an additional graduate degree (58.3%), while only one-third of males (33.5%) obtained such a degree (p = 0.002). In addition, males had significantly higher average H-indices than females (p = 0.002). These trends were also observed when analyzing only US-based editorial board members. Although females were more likely overall to be identified as associate professors, males were more likely to be appointed as full professors (p = 0.001); this trend did not remain true in the US-based cohort. When analyzing the editorial boards for individual journals, all 5 journals experienced an increase of female representation since 2000 or since their inception after 2000. The highest proportion of females for a single journal was 27.3% in 2020. All other journals ranged from 11.0% to 13.5% in 2020. CONCLUSIONS When entering the field of neurosurgery, females continue to face significant social and academic barriers. While the proportion of females on editorial boards for neurosurgery journals in 2020 is consistent with the proportion of practicing female neurosurgeons, there is a statistically significantly higher likelihood that females possess additional graduate degrees and lower H-indices compared to their male counterparts. The authors encourage neurosurgical journals to continue expanding female representation on editorial boards.

Abstract IntroductionRadiotherapy is considered standard of care for adjuvant peri-operative treatment of many spinal tumors, including those with instrumented fusion. Unfortunately, radiation treatment has been linked to increased risk of pseudoarthrosis. Newerfocused radiotherapy strategies with enhanced conformalitycould offer improved fusion rates for these patients, but this has not been confirmed.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of patients at three tertiary care academic institutions withprimary and secondary spinal malignancies that underwent resection, instrumented fusion, and peri-operative radiotherapy. Two board certified neuro-radiologists used theLenke fusion score to grade fusion status at6 and 12-months after surgery. Secondary outcomes includedclinical pseudoarthrosis, wound complications, and the effect of radiation timing, radiobiological dose delivered, the use of photons versus protons, tumor type, tumor location,and use of autograft on fusion outcomes.ResultsAfter reviewof 1252 spinal tumor patients, there were 60 patients with at least 6 months follow-up that were included in our analyses. Twenty-five of these patients received focused radiotherapy,20 patients received conventional radiotherapy, and 15 patients were treated with protons. There was no significant difference between the groups for covariates such assmoking status,obesity, diabetes, intraoperative use of autograft, and use of peri-operative chemotherapy. There was a significantly higher rate of fusion for patients treated with focused radiotherapy compared to those treated with conventional radiotherapy at 6-months (64.0% versus 30.0%, Odds ratio: 4.15, p=0.036) and 12-months (80.0% versus 42.1%, OR: 5.50, p=0.022). There was a significantly higher rate of clinical pseudoarthrosis in the conventional radiotherapy cohortcompared to patients in the focused radiotherapy cohort (19.1% versus 0%,p=0.037). There was no difference in fusion outcomes for any of the secondary outcomes except for use of autograft. The use ofintra-operative autograft was associated with an improved fusion at 12-months (66.7% versus 37.5%, OR: 3.33, p=0.043). ConclusionFocused radiotherapy may be associated withan improved rate of fusion and clinical pseudoarthrosis when compared to conventional radiation delivery strategiesin patients with spinal tumors.Use of autograft at the time of surgery may be associated with improved 12-month fusion rates.Further large-scale prospective and randomized controlled studies are needed to better stratify the effects of radiation delivery modality in these patients.

INTRODUCTION: Functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) panometry can evaluate esophageal motility in response to sustained esophageal distension at the time of sedated endoscopy. This study aimed to describe a classification of esophageal motility using FLIP panometry and evaluate it against high-resolution manometry (HRM) and Chicago Classification v4.0 (CCv4.0). METHODS: Five hundred thirty-nine adult patients who completed FLIP and HRM with a conclusive CCv4.0 diagnosis were included in the primary analysis. Thirty-five asymptomatic volunteers (“controls”) and 148 patients with an inconclusive CCv4.0 diagnosis or systemic sclerosis were also described. Esophagogastric junction (EGJ) opening and the contractile response (CR) to distension (i.e., secondary peristalsis) were evaluated with a 16-cm FLIP during sedated endoscopy and analyzed using a customized software program. HRM was classified according to CCv4.0. RESULTS: In the primary analysis, 156 patients (29%) had normal motility on FLIP panometry, defined by normal EGJ opening and a normal or borderline CR; 95% of these patients had normal motility or ineffective esophageal motility on HRM. Two hundred two patients (37%) had obstruction with weak CR, defined as reduced EGJ opening and absent CR or impaired/disordered CR, on FLIP panometry; 92% of these patients had a disorder of EGJ outflow per CCv4.0. DISCUSSION: Classifying esophageal motility in response to sustained distension with FLIP panometry parallels the swallow-associated motility evaluation provided with HRM and CCv4.0. Thus, FLIP panometry serves as a well-tolerated method that can complement, or in some cases be an alternative to HRM, for evaluating esophageal motility disorders.