Citations

Abstract Background Alpha‐emitting radionuclides enable precise cancer therapy through high linear energy transfer and limited tissue penetration, damaging tumor cells while sparing healthy tissue. Diffusing Alpha‐emitters Radiation Therapy (Alpha DaRT) features Ra‐224 sources that are implanted directly into the tumor and emit alpha particles during radioactive decay. Alpha DaRT has demonstrated efficacy and safety in preclinical and early clinical trials across multiple tumor types, including skin, head and neck, and pancreatic cancers. Purpose Reliable and efficient methods for verifying Alpha DaRT source activity prior to treatment can help support accurate and consistent radiation delivery. The direct measurement of alpha particles from sources within an Alpha DaRT applicator is impractical due to their short range; however, gamma emissions from the Ra‐224 sources can be used to infer radioactivity. This study established a protocol for verifying the source activity within Ra‐224 Alpha DaRT applicators using a reentrant well‐type ionization chamber, providing users with a practical method for detecting errors in source manufacturing or certificate paperwork without compromising applicator sterility. Methods Ra‐224 Alpha DaRT sources in sterile packaging (Flex and Needle applicators with 1–4 sources) were assessed. Source energy spectra and activities were verified using a high‐purity germanium (HPGe) radiation detector. Calibration factors (kBq/pA) were established using an IVB1000 well‐type ionization chamber with measurements conducted by placing single applicator sterile packages into the chamber with sources centered in the chamber's sweet spot and corrected for temperature, pressure, and leakage current. Quality assurance was performed on 26 Flex applicators using the established calibrations before the first clinical procedure. Results HPGe measurements agreed with vendor‐stated activities. The average calibration coefficient using the IVB1000 chamber was 233 ± 3 kBq/pA for Flex and 597 ± 7 kBq/pA for Needle applicators. Calibration coefficients were consistent across two IVB1000 chambers. Source number dependence was observed, with calibration factors increasing by 1.7% ± 0.7% per source (Needle) and 2.7% ± 0.6% per source (Flex). Measurement repeatability was 3.3%. Applying the calibration to 26 Flex applicators before the first patient treatment yielded a 1.1 ± 5.8% (range: −7.5% to 11.4%) difference relative to the vendor's stated activity. Conclusion A reentrant well‐type ionization chamber is suitable for pre‐treatment quality assurance of Ra‐224 Alpha DaRT applicators, enabling verification of the vendor‐stated activity while maintaining sterility within sealed packaging.

Abstract Background Cumulative head trauma, encompassing repetitive head impacts (RHI) and traumatic brain injury (TBI), has been associated with later‐life neurodegenerative disease. Studies on parkinsonism/Parkinson's disease (PD) have evaluated RHI and TBI in isolation, yielding mixed results. Cumulative head trauma may better predict PD risk. Objective To examine independent and cumulative effects of RHI through soccer participation and TBI history on PD diagnosis and age at diagnosis. Methods We used a cross‐sectional cohort design with data from the Fox Insight study. Participants completed self‐report questionnaires on PD diagnosis, TBI (no TBI, TBI with loss of consciousness [LOC], TBI without LOC), and sport participation. Multivariable logistic regressions examined the effects of soccer, TBI group, and their interaction on PD diagnosis. Cox proportional hazards examined associations with time to PD diagnosis. Covariates included age, sex, race, education, income, body mass index, heart disease/diabetes, and family PD history. Results Among 1231 participants (mean[SD] age = 66.12[10.60]), 278 played soccer (953 non–contact and collision sport [CCS] athletes). Participants reported no TBI (390[33%]), TBI without LOC (495[43%]), or TBI with LOC (258[23%]). Overall, 768(62%) reported a PD diagnosis (mean[SD] age at diagnosis = 59.02[9.86]). A significant soccer × TBI interaction indicated that soccer players with TBI with LOC had 2.6× higher odds of PD compared to non‐CCS athletes without TBI (OR [95% CI] = 2.600[1.085–6.305], P = 0.033). Former soccer players with TBI with LOC had a 15.6% higher hazard of early PD diagnosis (HR = 1.469, P = 0.027) compared to non‐CCS athletes with no TBI. Conclusion Cumulative head trauma (RHI + TBI) increased PD risk and lowered age at onset. © 2026 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) is a relatively common, under-recognised and lethal condition. Yet, current management remains anchored on absolute diameter for prophylactic repair, despite many dissections occurring below surgical thresholds—particularly in women. This review synthesises evidence showing that while rigorous standardisation of imaging is foundational, diameter alone is insufficient for accurate risk prediction. We appraise clinically available biomarkers beyond size: indexed metrics (Aortic Size Index, Aortic Height Index, Indexed Aortic Area) that adjust for body habitus—especially relevant in women; morphological descriptors (ascending length, arch tortuosity, aortic volume) that capture geometry; dynamic and biomechanical measures (growth rate, regional deformation, distensibility/stiffness) that reflect disease activity and advanced modalities (four-dimensional flow MRI, vascular deformation mapping) that quantify haemodynamics such as flow displacement and wall shear stress. Functional aortic markers—including central blood pressure, aortic stiffness, pulsatile arterial load and arterial age—independently predict expansion and improve risk stratification when combined with diameter. Furthermore, recognition of sex differences in TAA growth and outcomes supports sex-informed, precision aortic imaging and functional approaches to risk assessment. Future priorities include prospective multicentre validation, actionable sex-specific thresholds and multidisciplinary collaboration to translate these tools into personalised surveillance and timely intervention.

Abstract This literature‐based systematic review and associated guidelines provide evidence‐based paradigms for the management of locoregionally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). This multispecialty committee included gastrointestinal radiation and medical oncology, gastroenterology, radiology, and colorectal surgery. As is the standard, the previously described American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria methodology for this project was followed rigorously, with the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, Timing, and Study Design framework and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses methodology to assess the evidence. RAND/University of California Los Angeles consensus methodology (modified Delphi) was used to rate the appropriateness of treatment options. Published between January 1, 2013, and July 16, 2025, 116 peer‐reviewed trials provided the evidence: 10 were well‐designed randomized phase 2/3 trials, 29 were moderately well designed trials that accounted for most common biases (matched cohort and phase 2), 76 trials had design limitations (retrospective), and one was a meta‐analysis. Clinical cases were created as examples to illustrate current acceptable management of LRRC. Treatment and prognosis are influenced by prior therapy and the site(s) and extent of LRRC. The ability to achieve a margin‐negative surgical resection is the ultimate determinant of survival and local control. Preoperative systemic therapy, radiation therapy, or a combination of the two can facilitate tumor downsizing and improve the likelihood of a margin‐negative resection. An individualized multidisciplinary approach is required to ensure the best outcome. Although this review does not suggest a major alteration of current practice, it provides reassuring evidence of the importance of combined‐modality therapy.

The 2026 ASAHP (Association of Schools Advancing Health Professions) Clinical Education Committee recommendations present a framework for advancing clinical education across health professions. This report emphasizes the importance of expanding clinical education settings, integrating artificial intelligence and telehealth into curricula, ensuring alignment of interprofessional competencies with accreditation standards, and continuing to facilitate collaborative practice across disciplines. These efforts are essential to training a workforce that is not only clinically competent but also adaptable, mindful of equity, and capable of thriving in diverse, team-based care settings. Equally critical is the call to elevate research and scholarly activity within clinical education. The report emphasizes the need for academic-clinical partnerships that support and complete an inquiry into the value, effectiveness, and innovation of clinical training. These recommendations aim to advance a responsive, inclusive, and outcomes-driven clinical education system that benefits students, educators, healthcare systems, and the communities they serve. These efforts reflect ASAHP's name and mission to advance health professions.

ABSTRACT One quarter of patients with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who achieve a complete response following front‐line therapy will eventually experience disease relapse. Existing prognostic models use baseline factors to predict outcomes from the start of initial therapy and are not intended for use following completion of treatment. We developed a conditional event‐free survival (cEFS) tool that predicts a patient's risk of lymphoma recurrence after completing front‐line therapy taking into consideration baseline risk characteristics plus the time the patient has been in remission. Model development used pooled and harmonized data from two observational cohorts and four randomized trials of patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL treated with immunochemotherapy and either achieving a complete response or not experiencing an event within 12 weeks of end of therapy. Cox proportional‐hazards regression modeling with backwards stepwise selection was utilized for model development. External validation was performed using a large independent data registry. In total, data from 2757 patients were used for model development. The risk of experiencing an event at a time point after having survived a period of time could be computed parsimoniously using four basic predictors: age, ECOG performance status grade, Ann Arbor stage, and lactate dehydrogenase level. C‐index in the model development cohort was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.63–0.68), compared to 0.64 (95% CI, 0.62–0.66) in the external validation cohort. We believe that this dynamic risk prediction tool will not only aid clinicians in providing data‐driven recommendations for surveillance, but also assist patients themselves with key decisions, such as family planning.

Abstract Objective This study was undertaken to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of responsive thalamic stimulation as adjunctive therapy for drug‐resistant idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) with generalized tonic–clonic seizures (GTCSs). Methods NAUTILUS is a prospective, multicenter, single‐blind, randomized sham‐controlled pivotal trial. Patients were ≥12 years of age with drug‐resistant IGE and ≥2 GTCSs over a 3‐month baseline. Bilateral depth leads were targeted to the centromedian thalamus. One month later, patients were randomized to Active (responsive stimulation, n = 44) or Sham (no stimulation, n = 43). The effectiveness evaluation period (EEP) began 3 months postimplant through 1 year. After a second GTCS in the EEP, patients transitioned to open‐label active stimulation. The primary safety endpoint was the serious adverse device‐related event (SADE) rate at 84 days postimplant. The primary effectiveness endpoint was time‐to‐second‐GTCS during the EEP. Additional endpoints included median percent change in days with any generalized seizure, GTCS frequency, and responder rate (RR). Results Eighty‐seven patients were implanted across 23 US centers. The SADE rate was significantly below the performance goal (6.9%, p < .0001), with no adverse effects on cognition, mood, or sleep. The prespecified primary effectiveness endpoint was not significant. However, a post hoc mixed‐effects model considering all EEP days demonstrated greater GTCS reduction in the originally randomized Active group (61%) compared to patients originally randomized to Sham (49%, p = .030). Eighteen‐month outcomes included 76.8% median GTCS reduction, 62.5% RR, 40% GTCS‐free at that timepoint, and 77.8% median reduction in days with any generalized seizure. More than 90% of patients and 86% of physicians reported improvement on Global Impression of Change scales. Significance NAUTILUS is the first randomized controlled neuromodulation trial in IGE. Responsive thalamic stimulation provided a clinically meaningful and durable reduction in seizures with an acceptable safety profile, offering a much‐needed option for drug‐resistant IGE.

LBA7000 Background: ~40% of DLBCL pts are not cured with first-line (1L) R-CHOP, underscoring a significant unmet need for more effective 1L regimens. Tafa (anti-CD19 mAb) + Len-R-CHOP in the phase 1b First-MIND study demonstrated safety and efficacy in pts with newly diagnosed disease. frontMIND, a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, compared Tafa-Len-R-CHOP vs R-CHOP in pts with high-risk aggressive BCLs. Methods: Pts aged 18–80 y with newly diagnosed, high-intermediate/high-risk DLBCL or HGBL (IPI 3–5, aaIPI 2–3 if ≤60 y) and ECOG PS 0–2 were randomized 1:1 to Tafa-Len-R-CHOP or R-CHOP. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed PFS; secondary endpoints included: EFS, OS, CR, ORR, safety. Results: At primary analysis (data cutoff Oct 20, 2025), 899 pts were randomized to Tafa-Len-R-CHOP (n=448) or R-CHOP (n=451); baseline characteristics were similar between arms. With a median follow-up of 35.2 mo, Tafa-Len-R-CHOP achieved a statistically significant improvement in PFS vs R-CHOP (HR 0.75 [95% CI: 0.59, 0.96]; P =0.019) in the overall population; in pts with centrally confirmed lymphoma subtypes (n=773), PFS HR was 0.68 (95% CI: 0.52, 0.88) and 24-mo PFS was 72.7% vs 62.2%. PFS benefit was observed with Tafa-Len-R-CHOP in both molecular COO subtypes, ABC and GCB (data will be presented). Tafa-Len-R-CHOP significantly improved EFS vs R-CHOP; CR and ORR were similar between arms and HR for OS was 0.85 (final OS planned at 5y) (Table). Any-grade TEAEs were similar in treatment arms (98.6% vs 97.1%); more grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred with Tafa-Len-R-CHOP vs R-CHOP (86.7% vs 76.1%). Discontinuations due to TEAEs occurred in 25.7% vs 17.9% and deaths due to TEAEs in 5.9% vs 3.8% of pts for Tafa-Len-R-CHOP vs R-CHOP. Overall, there were fewer deaths with Tafa-Len-R-CHOP vs R-CHOP (18.5% vs 21.7%). Conclusions: The primary endpoint of frontMIND was met; Tafa-Len-R-CHOP resulted in a significant 25% reduction in risk of disease progression or death compared with R-CHOP, with an 8.2% difference in 24-month PFS rate in the overall population and 10.5% difference in pts with centrally confirmed lymphoma subtypes. TEAEs were manageable and consistent with the expected safety profile. Tafa-Len-R-CHOP represents a potential new 1L standard of care for pts with both COO subtypes of high-risk DLBCL or HGBL. Clinical trial information: NCT04824092 . Efficacy outcomes by treatment arm.* Variable Tafa-Len-R-CHOP(n=448) R-CHOP(n=451) HR or OR(95% CI) P value PFS, # events (%) † 121 (27.0) 155 (34.4) 0.75 (0.59, 0.96) 0.019 PFS rate at 24 mo, % 71.1 62.9 − − PFS rate at 36 mo, % 67.3 60.7 − − EFS, # events (%) 154 (34.4) 191 (42.4) 0.79 (0.64, 0.97) 0.026 OS, # events (%) 82 (18.3) 95 (21.1) 0.85 (0.63, 1.14) 0.270 CR at EOT, n (%) 292 (65.2) 294 (65.2) 0.998 (0.76, 1.31) 0.987 ‡ ORR at EOT, n (%) 360 (80.4) 343 (76.1) 1.290 (0.94, 1.78) 0.120 ‡ *Investigator-assessed. † Progressive disease or death from any cause. ‡ Nominal P value.