Citations

Objective To evaluate cochlear implant speech perception among patients with sporadic inner ear schwannoma who underwent ipsilateral implantation. Study Design Retrospective multi-institutional cohort study. Setting Eleven tertiary academic medical centers across Germany, Denmark, and the United States. Patients One hundred six patients with sporadic inner ear schwannoma who received an ipsilateral cochlear implant from 2011 to 2022. Interventions Ipsilateral cochlear implantation with observation, stereotactic radiosurgery, or microsurgery for tumor management. Main Outcome Measures Monosyllabic speech perception testing scores and rates of open-set speech perception. Results Among 106 patients studied, 101 (95%) achieved open-set speech perception with a median of 24 months (interquartile range [IQR] 12–42 mo) of audiometric follow-up. Median ipsilateral monosyllabic speech perception testing achieved was 72% (IQR 54–85%), and median ipsilateral AzBio in quiet was 75% (IQR 46–90%). Most (91 of 106 [86%]) underwent microsurgery for tumor control, with cochlear implantation performed simultaneously in 98% (89 of 91) of these patients. The ability to achieve gross total resection significantly differed by tumor complexity, with 97% of low-complexity tumors, 100% of intermediate complexity, and 0% of high-complexity tumors undergoing gross total resection (p < 0.001). However, among patients managed with microsurgery, there was not a statistically significant difference in post-cochlear implantation monosyllabic speech perception scores across complexity groupings, with median scores of 75 and 70% for patients with tumors of low or intermediate complexity and those with tumors of high complexity, respectively (p = 0.5). Eight of 102 patients (8%) assessed experienced deterioration in cochlear implant performance over time. Among the subset of 39 patients with available MRI to review, the region of surveillance interest could be visualized postoperatively on MRI in all cases. Conclusions Open-set speech perception is achieved in most patients with inner ear schwannoma undergoing ipsilateral cochlear implantation. Although cochlear implantation in high-complexity inner ear schwannomas is only possible with incomplete tumor resection, long-term open-set speech perception outcomes are similar to lower-complexity tumors.

Background: The term classical hematology (CH), referring to a subspecialty focusing on non-cancer blood disorders, was officially adopted by the American Society of Hematology (ASH) in 2022. There is a perceived shortage of classical hematologists, although data are limited (Winter JN, Hematologist 2022). Prior studies have shown that &lt;6% of hematology-oncology fellows pursue a practice subspecializing in CH after training (Todd RF, Blood 2004; Marshall Al, Blood Adv 2018). Moreover, mentorship is consistently cited as the most important factor guiding fellows' career decisions (Sharma D, Blood Adv 2019; Masselink LE, Blood Adv 2019). To help bridge the CH workforce gap, ASH has supported additional hematology-focused fellowship programs (HFFP) within select hematology-oncology fellowship programs. CH constitutes a large proportion of consults in US National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated cancer centers (West CV, JCO Oncol Pract 2024). The goals of our study were: 1) to determine the proportion of adult hematologist-oncologists within NCI cancer centers who practice CH; and 2) to describe the physician characteristics of cancer centers with HFFP and compare these centers to those without HFFP. Methods: We included all NCI-designated cancer centers with a clinical program as of April 1, 2024. The only exception was St Jude Children's Hospital due to its pediatric focus. We obtained the practice profile of each internal medicine-trained adult hematologist-oncologist (henceforth, physician) as well as the availability of HFFP from the respective cancer center websites. We also searched the corresponding department of medicine and division of hematology at each affiliated academic institution to ensure inclusion of all physicians practicing CH. Each physician was classified into one of the following categories: classical hematologist (attending to only non-cancer conditions), general hematologist-oncologist (cancer and non-cancer conditions), and oncologist (cancer only). The number of hematology-oncology fellowship programs in the US was obtained from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Results: We included 64 NCI-designated cancer centers, 55 of which were considered as comprehensive cancer centers. There was a total of 4,616 physicians (3,891 oncologists [84.3%], 487 hematologists-oncologists [10.6%], and 238 classical hematologists [5.1%]). The median numbers of physicians, oncologists, general hematologist-oncologists, and classical hematologists per center were 55 (range, 16-275), 45 (range, 12-270), 5 (range, 0-48), and 3 (range, 0-13), respectively. The median proportions of classical hematologists and physicians practicing CH (general hematologist-oncologists plus classical hematologists) were 5.1% (range, 0-20.0) and 14.9% (range, 0-55.6%), respectively. There were 12 HFFP within NCI-designated cancer centers (18.8%). Most (11/12) centers with HFFP had &gt;50 physicians (median 95 [range, 38-185]) and &gt;5% classical hematologists (median 6% [range, 3.8-13.5%]); 11 centers with similar characteristics did not have HFFP. Centers with HFFP have significantly higher numbers of physicians (median 95.0 [range, 38-185] vs 49.5 [range, 16-275]; P=0.001) and classical hematologists (median 6.0 [range, 3-13] vs 2.0 [range, 0-11]; P&lt;0.001) but similar proportions of classical hematologists (median 6.0% [range, 3.8-13.5] vs 4.5% [range, 0-20.0]; P=0.078) and physicians practicing CH (median 12.3% [range, 6.5-47.7] vs 15.7% [range, 0-55.6]; P=0.402) compared to those without HFFP. Conclusions: Among adult hematologist-oncologists at NCI-designated cancer centers, only 1 in 20 are classical hematologists, although 1 in 7 have CH as part of their practice. Within NCI-designated cancer centers, only 1 in 5 have an HFFP. These findings suggest that there is an opportunity for NCI-designated cancer centers to encourage and recruit physicians subspecializing in CH and a rationale to create additional HFFPs. These measures may help further alleviate CH workforce shortages and expand CH mentorship to meet the needs of an increasingly complex subspecialty within hematology.

Background The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) launched the Diversity in Oncology initiative in 2017 to address the need for increased minority representation in the hematology-oncology workforce. A recent series of reports, titled “State of the Oncology Workforce in America,” published in JCO Oncology Practice in 2021 and 2022, focused on this issue. Notably, these reports did not include any data regarding the representation of Asian minorities in the field. Therefore, our objective was to assess the proportion of Asian professionals within the hematology-oncology workforce, encompassing both practitioners and trainees. Methods We conducted a comprehensive search for publicly available data regarding Asian representation among US hematology-oncology practitioners and trainees in both adult and pediatric fields. Our primary data sources included the 2020 US Census, the Association of American Medical Colleges, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, and various professional societies. We defined practitioners to include hematologist-oncologists, gynecologic oncologists, radiation oncologists, surgical oncologists, hematopathologists, hematology-oncology nurse practitioners, hematology-oncology physician assistants, and nurses specializing in hematology-oncology. Trainees encompassed fellows and residents. Additionally, we gathered comparable data on the US population, medical students, adult internal medicine residents, gynecology residents, pediatric residents, pathology residents, surgery residents, nurses, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. To provide a comprehensive overview of the hematology-oncology workforce, we utilized data from 2020 to 2022, and whenever possible, we collected longitudinal data on trainees over the years. Results As of 2020, Asians represented 6.2% of the US population. Among hematology-oncology physician practitioners, the percentage of Asian individuals ranges from 14.7% to 32.1%, including 32.1% of adult hematologist-oncologists, 20.4% of pediatric hematologist-oncologists, 25.9% of radiation oncologists, 14.7% of gynecologic oncologists, and 7.0% of hematology-oncology physician assistants. In the realm of physician trainees, Asian representation is between 17.9% and 35.3%, with 35.3% of adult hematology-oncology fellows, 20.0% of pediatric hematology-oncology fellows, 26.4% of radiation oncology residents, and 17.9% of gynecologic oncology fellows. Additionally, the proportion of Asian residents from which hematology-oncology fellows are drawn ranges from 14.9% to 35.9%. Specifically, 35.9% of internal medicine residents, 22.0% of pediatric residents, 14.9% of gynecology residents, 26.6% of pathology residents, and 19.2% of surgical residents are Asian. Furthermore, 26.7% of medical students identify as Asian. Notably, the proportions of Asian hematology-oncology trainees and medical students have remained relatively stable from 2005 to 2022. Data on hematopathologists, surgical oncologists, and non-physician practitioners are limited, although Asian representation among hematology-oncology physician assistants is 7.0% and among nurses is 7.2%. Conclusions Asians comprise a large segment of the hematology-oncology workforce in the US. While only 1 in 20 people in the US are Asians, between 1 in 3 and 1 in 5 hematology-oncology physician practitioners and trainees, are Asians. Data are limited for non-physician practitioners. Asian minority representation should be highlighted and considered as an example of success in diversity in hematology-oncology workforce. This framework should be embraced moving forward to continue advancing minority representation throughout the field of hematology-oncology.

Abstract Glioblastoma, the most common malignant primary adult brain tumor, poses significant diagnostic and treatment challenges due to its heterogeneous molecular and micro-environmental profiles. To this end, we organize the BraTS-Path challenge to provide a public benchmarking environment and a comprehensive dataset to develop and validate AI models for identifying distinct histopathologic glioblastoma sub-regions in H&E-stained digitized tissue sections. We identified 188 multi-institutional diagnostic slides of glioblastoma (IDH-wt, Gr.4) cases, from the TCGA-GBM and TCGA-LGG data collections, following their reclassification according to the 2021 WHO classification criteria. Sub-regions were selected according to distinctive morphology of histopathologic features and included aggressive tumor biology and areas consistent with potential treatment effect. Selected sub-region annotations included cellular tumor, geographic necrosis, cortical infiltration, pseudopalisading necrosis, microvascular proliferation, white matter penetration, regions dense with macrophages, leptomeningeal infiltration, and presence of lymphocytes. We obtained 107,340 patches of size 512x512 from the 9 sub-regions. A global network of board-certified expert neuropathologists defined and followed a systematic annotation protocol based on clinical definitions and only delineated sub-regions with high confidence, thus ensuring high-quality standardized data. Each tissue section was assigned to an annotator-approver pair, with the annotator delineating sub-regions and the approver ensuring the consistency of the annotations. By crowdsourcing annotations, the BraTS-Path challenge harnesses the collective expertise of clinical neuropathologists and fosters a collaborative environment to advance the neuro-oncology field. The anticipated developed algorithms are expected to integrate state-of-the-art computational methods, achieving high accuracy in identifying diverse histopathologic features and advancing clinical decision-making processes. The BraTS-Path challenge aims to bridge the gap between research and clinical practice by promoting the development of AI-driven tools for precise tumor characterization. This collaborative effort can significantly enhance our understanding of glioblastoma, improve diagnostic accuracy, and inform treatment strategies, thereby contributing to better patient outcomes.

Abstract Improved response assessment methods are needed for patients with gliomas. Intracranial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is longitudinally accessible and provides an abundance source of candidate biomarkers, such as cell-free DNA (cfDNA), for disease monitoring. To evaluate the clinical feasibility of molecular profiling from longitudinal intracranial CSF, CSF was acquired from patients with CSF access devices, including Ommaya reservoirs and ventriculoperitoneal shunts. cfDNA was extracted and analyzed via PredicineCARE (Next Generation sequencing) or PredicineSCORE (low pass whole genome sequencing). Five patients (2 females, 3 males; median age: 40 years, range 32-64 years) underwent longitudinal intracranial CSF collection via Ommaya reservoirs (n=4) or VP shunt (n=1). In total, forty-eight CSF samples were obtained (median volume: 4.00 mL; 0.5-5 mL), with 39 samples (81.3%) yielding sufficient cfDNA for variant profiling. Our initial findings suggest that tumor fraction increased by 6.28x, 2.87x, and 8.31x with radiographic progression in three patients. Tumor fraction decreased by 0.08x and 0.04x in two patients with paired immediate pre-versus-post chemoradiation samples. Despite ongoing pseudoprogression in one patient, tumor fraction decreased to unmeasurable levels from a post-resection baseline of 0.26. Patient-specific tumor-associated variant allelic frequencies (VAFs), including TP53, PTEN, TERT, and CDKN2A/B, decreased within individual patients after resection and chemoradiation. In two patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant gliomas, decreasing IDH1 VAF after resection and chemoradiation correlated with decreased CSF D-2-hydroxyglutarate (D-2-HG) levels (0.64x and 0.62x, respectively, for the first patient, and 0.01x and 0.07x for the other patient). Both CSF IDH1 VAF and CSF D-2-HG increased a patient who had radiographic progression (2.56x and 9.21x, respectively). Moreover, CNB decreased below the limit of quantification during treatment and increased above the limit at progression. In conclusion, longitudinal CSF cfDNA can feasibly be obtained via CSF access devices in patients with gliomas during their disease course toward evaluating candidate monitoring biomarkers.

Abstract While serial sampling of glioma tissue is rarely performed before recurrence, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) can be acquired serially to evaluate candidate monitoring and pharmacodynamic biomarkers in patients with gliomas. However, the impact of key variables to consider in longitudinal CSF, including anatomical location and post-surgical changes, remains unknown. To that end, pre- versus post-resection intracranial CSF samples from patients with gliomas were obtained at early (1-16 days; n=20) or delayed (86-153 days; n=11) timepoints, as well as lumbar-versus-intracranial glioma CSF samples (n=14). Using aptamer-based proteomics, we identified significant differences in the glioma CSF proteome between lumbar, subarachnoid, and ventricular CSF. Indeed, intracranial CSF in paired lumbar/intracranial samples had nearly 1600 unique aptamers, regardless of which intracranial location was compared to the paired lumbar CSF, including in enrichment style analyses that evaluated the overlap between protein states. Importantly, resection had a significant, evolving longitudinal impact on the CSF proteome, with subsets of proteins associated with early versus delayed post-resection changes, many of which were enriched for inflammatory-related pathways. Interestingly, despite increased contamination from surgical debris, enrichment for plasma-associated proteins decreased with resection (FDR: 0.000), suggesting that a portion of the baseline glioma panel could be derived from plasma-originating analytes due to blood-brain barrier disruption. Despite these challenges, our data still revealed preliminary candidate monitoring biomarkers, such as brevican, that increased with progression (example patient: fold-change of 3.58x and 2.08x through lomustine and bevacizumab, respectively), but not pseudoprogression (Fold change less than 1.5). Serial intracranial CSF samples suggested the early potential for disease monitoring and evaluation of pharmacodynamic impact of targeted therapies, including bevacizumab and pembrolizumab. In conclusion, our available data to date suggest that the intracranial glioma CSF proteome provides an abundant and evolving source of candidate biomarkers to longitudinally discern the impact of resection and systemic treatments.

Abstract Targeted gene expression profiling improves risk stratification for meningiomas, but the utility of this approach for low grade meningiomas is incompletely understood. To address this, 466 meningiomas that were initially used to validate a 34-gene expression biomarker were combined with 270 previously unpublished samples for an analysis of biomarker performance in newly diagnosed (n=691) or recurrent (n=45) WHO grade 1 meningiomas treated with gross total (GTR) or subtotal resection (STR), and newly diagnosed WHO grade 2 meningiomas treated with GTR. Prediction of local freedom from recurrence (LFFR) or overall survival (OS) was measured using Cox proportional hazards models and the Kaplan-Meier method. The cohort included 736 patients, 69.4% female, with a median age at diagnosis of 58 years. There were 635 WHO grade 1 meningiomas, 498 with GTR and 133 with STR, and 101 WHO grade 2 meningiomas with GTR. The median follow-up was 4.6 years, the local recurrence rate was 12.0% and the rate of death was 8.4%. The biomarker classified 51.5% of meningiomas as intermediate risk and 9.6% as high risk. Combining the biomarker with extent of resection identified 19.7% as unfavorable (intermediate molecular risk with STR or high molecular risk), including 7.4% of newly diagnosed WHO grade 1 meningiomas with GTR. The risk score was prognostic for LFFR overall (hazard ratio per 0.1 increase in risk score 1.89, 95% confidence interval 1.58-2.25) and across WHO grades, extents of resection, and newly diagnosed or recurrent settings. Gene expression risk groups were prognostic for LFFR, with improved outcomes among low molecular risk compared to intermediate molecular risk (Log-rank, p=0.0002) and high molecular risk meningiomas (Log-rank, p&lt;0.0001). These data suggest that a targeted gene expression biomarker can identify low grade meningiomas that are more likely to recur after surgery, possibly changing management for approximately one-fifth of cases.

Abstract Safe delivery of mRNA to the brain will revolutionize the treatment of brain tumors. While lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are clinically most advanced non-viral delivery vehicles for therapeutic mRNA, LNP-mediated mRNA delivery to the brain remains challenging. We hypothesized that rationally designed LNPs based on extracellular vesicle mimicry would enable efficient delivery of RNA therapeutics to brain cells without undue toxicity. We engineered LNPs consisting of four components similar to the formulation used in the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines (Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech): ionizable lipid, cholesterol, helper lipid and polyethylene glycol (PEG)-lipid. We screened ten classes of helper lipids based on lipids enriched in extracellular vesicles to engineer biomimetic LNPs and tested their GFP mRNA delivery efficacy in SIM-A9 mouse microglia cell line. Several unique LNP formulations with potent delivery efficacy (&gt;90% cells transfected) and stable GFP expression kinetics (5 days) were identified. LNP formulations with high transfection efficacy were then tested in vivo for luciferase mRNA delivery via intrathecal injection in C57BL/6 mice. Luciferase expression in vivo confirmed widespread mRNA delivery in the brain. We then tested Cre recombinase mRNA delivery in Ai9 mouse to identify LNP-targeted cells via flow cytometry and histology. Flow cytometry and expansion microscopy confirmed Cre recombinase mRNA delivery to a variety of brain cells, including microglia (75-90%), neurons (31-40%), neural stem cells (39-62%), oligodendrocytes (70-90%), and astrocytes (44-76%). LNPs were further evaluated for Cas9 mRNA and CD81 sgRNA delivery in C57BL/6 mouse brains to assess brain-targeted gene editing. Sanger sequencing showed that CRISPR-Cas9 editing was successful in ~40% of cells in the mouse brain. In summary, we engineered extracellular vesicle-based LNP library that can deliver RNA therapeutics to a variety of brain cells in vivo. With further development, this technology could potentially enable genetic and epigenetic therapies targeting drivers of brain tumors.

Abstract Current standard of care for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma (GBM) includes maximal safe resection, adjuvant radiation, and chemotherapy with the alkylating agent temozolomide. A subset of gliomas treated with temozolomide develop somatic hypermutation with a predominance of C&gt;T transitions due to the alkylation effects on DNA. However, the frequency of occurrence, clinical ramifications, and predictive biomarkers for developing temozolomide-induced hypermutation (TMZ-HM) in GBM are unknown. Here we performed comprehensive histopathologic, genomic, and epigenomic evaluation of paired initial and recurrent GBM from 106 patients. Seven patients (7%) developed hypermutation at time of first recurrence, while an additional five patients (5%) developed hypermutation at a subsequent recurrence. Patients who developed TMZ-HM had a significantly longer interval between initial surgery and first recurrence (27.8 vs. 9.9 months, p&lt;0.001). In contrast to IDH-mutant gliomas where TMZ-HM is associated with poor prognosis, those patients with IDH-wildtype GBM who developed TMZ-HM had significantly longer overall survival from both initial surgery (67.9 vs. 20.3 months, p&lt;0.001) and from time of recurrence after development of hypermutation (30.9 vs. 9.5 months, p=0.001). There was no difference in oncogenic alteration frequency in initial GBM that subsequently developed TMZ-HM. However, 4 specific CpG sites out of 12 total interrogated sites in the promoter region of MGMT (a DNA repair enzyme) and 5 specific CpG sites in the promoter region of KCNQ1DN (a negative regulator of c-Myc) were significantly more hypermethylated in those GBM that developed TMZ-HM. We then generated a weighted risk score across these CpG sites that can be used to prospectively identify GBM likely to develop TMZ-HM associated with favorable survival. In summary, patients with GBM that develop TMZ-HM follow a more favorable clinical course, and specific MGMT and KCNQ1DN promoter hypermethylation patterns could serve as a biomarker to identify these patients who may potentially benefit from extended alkylating chemotherapy treatment.

Abstract BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GBM), one of the deadliest primary tumors of the central nervous system, is characterized by a highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). Tumor-associated macrophages and microglia (TAMs) are a dominant population of immune cells in the GBM TME and substantially contribute to immunosuppression, tumor progression, and treatment resistance. Elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying TAM behavior is crucial to the development of effective immuno-therapeutic strategies for treating GBM. The adaptor protein, Caspase Recruitment Domain-containing protein 9 (CARD9) is primarily expressed in myeloid cells and its activation triggers assembly of the CARD9-BCL10-MALT1 (CBM) complex, which then promotes activation of NF-κB and/or MAPK pathways. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of the CBM complex in the GBM TME and assess its potential as a therapeutic target. METHODS/RESULTS In silico analyses revealed that GBM tumors demonstrate increased CARD9 and MALT1 expression in comparison to non-tumor brain tissue, with CARD9 expressed only within the myeloid compartment. Using co-culture, scratch wound, and transwell assays, we found that GBM tumor cells induce macrophage M2 polarization and migration via a mechanism that is dependent on CARD9/MALT1 signaling within macrophages. scRNA-Seq and flow-cytometric analysis of orthotopic syngeneic immunocompetent GBM tumor models revealed that the GBM TME is dominated by macrophages. Disruption of MALT1 protease activity within the TME leads to reduced tumor infiltration by immunosuppressive TAMs, remodeling of TAMs toward an immunoreactive anti-tumor phenotype, and improved survival of GBM-bearing mice. Additionally, we found that tumor growth was abrogated when GBM-bearing mice were treated with either a MALT1-protease inhibitor or a CARD9 inhibitor. CONCLUSIONS Our study suggests that blockade of the CARD9-MALT1 signaling axis impairs GBM-induced macrophage recruitment and M2 polarization and inhibits tumor progression. These findings nominate the CARD9-MALT1 signaling axis as a new target for TAM-directed immunotherapy for the treatment of GBM.