Citations

AbstractThe primary objective of treatment in myelofibrosis (MF) is prolongation of life, which is currently accomplished only by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT). Determination of optimal timing for AHSCT is facilitated by molecular risk stratification. Non‐transplant treatment options in MF are palliative in scope and include Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) inhibitors (JAKi): momelotinib (FDA approved on September 15, 2023), ruxolitinib (November 16, 2011), fedratinib (August 16, 2019), and pacritinib (February 28, 2022); all four JAKi are effective in reducing spleen size and alleviating symptoms, considered a drug class effect and attributed to their canonical JAK–STAT inhibitory mechanism of action. In addition, momelotinib exhibits erythropoietic effect, attributed to alleviation of ineffective erythropoiesis through inhibition of activin A receptor type‐I (ACVR1). In transplant‐ineligible or deferred patients, the order of treatment preference is based on specific symptoms and individual assessment of risk tolerance. Because of drug‐induced immunosuppression and other toxicities attributed to JAKi, we prefer non‐JAKi drugs as initial treatment for MF‐associated anemia that is not accompanied by treatment‐requiring splenomegaly or constitutional symptoms. Otherwise, it is reasonable to consider momelotinib as the first‐line JAKi treatment of choice, in order to target the triad of quality‐of‐life offenders in MF: anemia, splenomegaly, and constitutional symptoms/cachexia. For second‐line therapy, we favor ruxolitinib, over fedratinib, based on toxicity profile. Pacritinib and fedratinib provide alternative options in the presence of severe thrombocytopenia or ruxolitinib‐resistance/intolerance, respectively. Splenectomy remains a viable option for drug‐resistant symptomatic splenomegaly and cytopenia.

SummaryAmong 210 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) with del(5q), molecular information was available at diagnosis or at least 3 months before leukaemic transformation in 146 cases. Multivariate analysis identified therapy‐related setting (p = 0.02; HR 2.3) and TP53 variant allele frequency (VAF) ≥22% (p < 0.01; HR 2.8), but not SF3B1 mutation (p = 0.65), as independent risk factors for survival. Median survival was 11.7 versus 4 years (5/10‐year survival 73%/52% vs. 42%/14%) in the absence (N = 112) versus presence (N = 34) of ≥1 risk factors; leukaemia‐free survival was affected by TP53 VAF ≥22% (p < 0.01). Such information might inform treatment decision‐making in MDS‐del(5q) regarding allogeneic stem cell transplant.

Abstract Venetoclax + hypomethylating agent (Ven‐HMA) is currently the standard frontline therapy for older/unfit patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (ND‐AML). Our objective in the current retrospective study of 301 adult patients (median age 73 years; 62% de novo) with ND‐AML was to identify molecular predictors of treatment response to Ven‐HMA and survival; European LeukemiaNet (ELN) genetic risk assignment was favorable 15%, intermediate 16%, and adverse 69%. Complete remission, with (CR) or without (CRi), count recovery, was documented in 182 (60%) patients. In multivariable analysis, inclusive of mutations only, “favorable” predictors of CR/CRi were NPM1 (86% vs. 56%), IDH2 (80% vs. 58%), and DDX41 (100% vs. 58%) and “unfavorable” TP53 (40% vs. 67%), FLT3‐ ITD (36% vs. 63%), and RUNX1 (44% vs. 64%) mutations; significance was sustained for each mutation after adjustment for age, karyotype, and therapy‐related qualification. CR/CRi rates ranged from 36%, in the presence of unfavorable and absence of favorable mutation, to 91%, in the presence of favorable and absence of unfavorable mutation. At median follow‐up of 8.5 months, 174 deaths and 41 allogeneic stem cell transplants (ASCT) were recorded. In multivariable analysis, risk factors for inferior survival included failure to achieve CR/CRi (HR 3.4, 95% CI 2.5–4.8), adverse karyotype (1.6, 1.1–2.6), TP53 mutation (1.6, 1.0–2.4), and absence of IDH2 mutation (2.2, 1.0–4.7); these risk factors were subsequently applied to construct an HR‐weighted risk model that performed better than the ELN genetic risk model (AIC 1661 vs. 1750): low ( n = 130; median survival 28.9 months), intermediate ( n = 105; median 9.6 months), and high ( n = 66; median 3.1 months; p < .001); survival in each risk category was significantly upgraded by ASCT. The current study identifies genotype signatures for predicting response and proposes a 3‐tiered, CR/CRi‐based, and genetics‐enhanced survival model for AML patients receiving upfront therapy with Ven‐HMA.

Background: The 2022 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) genetic-risk stratification for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), assigns favorable prognosis to t(8;21)(q22;q22.1)/ RUNX1:: RUNX1T1, inv(16)(p13.1q22) or t(16;16)(p13.1;q22)/ CBFB:: MYH1, NPM1 mutations without FLT3-ITD or adverse karyotype, and bZIP in-frame CEBPA mutations (Döhner , Blood, 2022 ). This risk stratification was derived from intensively treated patients; accordingly, prognostication in ELN favorable genetic risk AML, following venetoclax and hypomethylating agent (VEN-HMA) therapy, remains unclear and was the subject of the current study. Methods: Under an institutional review board approved minimum risk protocol, the Mayo Clinic database was searched to identify AML patients with favorable genetic risk, who received treatment with VEN-HMA in the frontline setting. All patients received at least one cycle of either azacitidine 75 mg/m 2 days 1-7 or decitabine 20 mg/m 2 days 1-5 with VEN dose adjusted based on azole antifungal prophylaxis. Genetic risk stratification and treatment response were assessed according to the 2022 ELN criteria. Survival was estimated from the time of VEN-HMA treatment start to last follow-up or death. Results: Patient characteristics A total of 46 newly-diagnosed AML patients with ELN 2022 favorable genetic risk [ NPM1 mutation, n=36 (78%), CEPBA bZIP mutation, n=7 (15%) and t(8;21)(q22;q22.1)/ inv(16)(p13.1q22), n=4 (9%)] received a median of 4 cycles (range 1-32) of VEN-HMA. Median age was 71 years, with 63% males, and 87% de novo AML. Additional mutations frequently involved TET2 in 17/43 (40%), DNMT3A in 14/45 (31%), SRSF2 in 10/43 (23%), K/NRAS in 10/45 (22%), IDH1 in 8/46 (17%), FLT3-TKD in 7/46 (15%), ASXL1 in 6/43 (14%) and IDH2 in 6/46 (13%),of informative cases.Myelodysplasia (MDS)-related gene mutations ( ASXL1, RUNX1, BCOR, EZH2, SRSF2, U2AF1, SF3B1, STAG2, and/or ZRSR2) were present in 15 of 40 (38%) of patients (93% males). Predictors of response Of the 39 (85%) patients that achieved complete remission, with (CR) ( n=24; 52%), or without count recovery (CRi) ( n=15; 33%); CR/CRi rates were not significantly higher in patients with NPM1 mutations (89%), t(8;21)(q22;q22.1)/ inv(16)(p13.1q22) (75%), or CEPBA bZIP mutations (67%) ( p=0.37). Among patients achieving CR/CRi, measurable residual disease by multiparametric flow cytometry was negative in 15 of 16 (94%) of evaluable cases after cycles 1 or 2. In addition, NPM1 qPCR was negative in 15 of 24 (63%) informative patients. Median time to response was 1.2 months with median response duration of 9.4 months. CR/CRi rates were significantly higher in females vs males (100% vs 76%, p=0.01), and in the absence vs presence of MDS-related gene mutations (96% vs 60%, p=0.004). Multivariable analysis confirmed superior response in the absence of MDS-related gene mutations ( p=0.04). Predictors of survival At a median follow-up of 10.6 months (range; 1.1-51 months), 21 patients (46%) have died, 9 relapsed (23% of those achieving CR/CRi), and 6 (13%) underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Median overall survival was 21 months with 1/2/3-year survival rates of 65%/41%/41% (Figure 1a); median relapse-free survival (RFS) was not reached; 1/2/3-year RFS rates were 81%/66%/57% (Figure 1b). Overall survival was superior in patients achieving CR/CRi (23 months vs 5.6 months; p&lt;0.01), in females vs males (not reached vs 9.7 months; p&lt;0.01), and in the absence of MDS-related gene mutations (not reached vs 5.6 months; p=0.01) (Figure 1c). Subsequent multivariable analysis identified female gender ( p=0.01), and absence of MDS-related mutations ( p=0.17) as independent predictors of superior survival. Similar results were obtained when analysis was restricted to NPM1 mutated patients. Conclusions: In the current retrospective study, VEN-HMA therapy in elderly/unfit AML patients with ELN 2022 favorable genetic risk, resulted in response rates that were comparable to those previously appreciated from published reports of patients receiving intensive induction therapy; however, follow-up in the current study was too short to accurately assess long-term overall and relapse-free survival impact. Our study also highlights the adverse prognosis retained by MDS-related gene mutations.

Background: Non-transplant treatment options in myelofibrosis MF are palliative in scope and include Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) inhibitors (JAKi). FDA-approved JAKi for the treatment of MF include ruxolitinib, fedratinib, and pacritinib. A fourth JAKi, momelotinib, is currently under review. We have previously reported long-term survival data on momelotinib and drug survival that was significantly longer, retrospectively compared to ruxolitinib ( AJH. 2022;97:E433). In the current study, we focused on molecular predictors of drug survival (i.e., drug retention) and longevity without allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant AHSCT (transplant-censored survival). Methods : The current study included data from Mayo Clinic patients who participated in a phase-1/2 core study of momelotinib (NCT00935987). Study design, drug doses and schedule, and additional details on treatment effect and side effects have previously been published. Drug survival was calculated from time of initiation of momelotinib to time of treatment discontinuation. Survival analysis required censoring of patients at time of AHSCT. Conventional statistical methods were applied using JMP Pro 16.0.0 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Results : 79 JAKi-naïve patients with MF were considered: median age 67 years; males 54%; PMF 65%, post-PV MF 20%, post-ET MF 15%; JAK2 71%, type 1/like CALR ( CALR-1) 14%, CALR-2 3%, MPL 8%, triple-negative 5%. Risk category according to DIPSS was high/intermediate in 80% of the patients and unfavorable karyotype in 29%. Non-driver mutation information was available in a subset of patients and included ASXL1 22% and SRSF2 18%. Median time from diagnosis to study entry was 25.2 months; patients were enrolled between November 2009 and March 2011 with follow-up information updated through July 2023; during this period, 68 (86%) deaths, 13 (16%) leukemic transformations, and 7 (9%) AHSCTs were recorded. Median follow-up for alive patients was 12.5 years (range 11.3-13.1). Anemia response rate was 48% and spleen 47%. Median treatment duration was 25 months (range 0.1-157); the proportion of patients remaining on active therapy was 68% at 1 year, 30% at 3 years, 16% at 5 years, and 7% at 10 years (Figure 1a). At the time of this writing, 5 (6.3%) patients were still receiving momelotinib therapy with treatment durations of 152 to 157 months. In univariate analysis, molecular predictors of drug survival included CALR-1 (p=0.006) but not ASXL1 (p=0.6) or SRSF2 (p=0.3) mutation, or unfavorable karyotype (p=0.08). The 3-, 5-, and 10-year drug survival rates for CALR-1-mutated patients were 64%, 40%, and 18%, respectively, and for CALR-1 wild-type 25%, 11%, and 4% (p=0.01, Figure 1b). CALR-1 independent association with longer drug survival was also appreciated for younger age (p&lt;0.01) and absence of baseline transfusion dependency at time of study entry (p=0.02); all three risk factors remained significant during multivariable analysis with HR (95% CI) rates of 0.4 (0.2-0.87) for CALR-1, 0.5 (0.3-0.89) for age &lt;63 years, and 0.6 (0.3-0.9) for absence of transfusion-dependency. Spleen response (p&lt;0.01) but not anemia response (p=0.23) was also associated with longer drug survival; in multivariable analysis all 4 risk factors retained significance. Multivariable analysis of genetic variables for transplant-censored survival identified absence of CALR-1 (HR 3.5, 95% CI 1.2-10.5; p=0.03) and presence of high molecular risk (HMR; ASXL1/ SRSF2) mutations (HR 2.3, 95% CI 1.1-4.6; p=02) to independently predict inferior survival. Among 11 patients with CALR-1 mutation, median transplant-censored survival was 125 months with 10-year survival rate of 60% (Figure 1c); by contrast, the corresponding figures were 37 months and 12%, in the 68 patients not harboring CALR-1 mutation (Figure 1c). In multivariable analysis, absence of CALR-1 (HR 2.9, 95% CI 1.02-8.1), age ≥63 years (HR 3.0, 95% CI 1.5-6.0), and absence of spleen response (HR 2.6, 95% CI 1.5-4.5) were identified as being most significant in predicting inferior transplant-censored survival. Conclusions : CALR-1 mutation is the most important risk factor for both drug survival and longevity without AHSCT, in momelotinib-treated patients with MF. Such information might help identify MF patients who might benefit from treatment with momelotinib and in whom AHSCT might be deferred or not.

Background Venetoclax (Ven) in combination with hypomethylating agent (HMA) is the standard treatment for newly diagnosed elderly/unfit patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Treatment options for patients with relapsed/refractory (RR) disease following Ven-HMA are limited in the absence of targetable mutations. In a recent phase 2 study, the addition of Ven to cladribine (CDA) plus low-dose cytarabine (LDAC), in newly-diagnosed elderly/unfit AML, resulted in complete remission with (CR) or without (CRi) count recovery rate of 93% ( J Clin Oncol 20;40(33)). In the current study, we share our experience with this regimen in patients relapsed or refractory to Ven-HMA, treated outside of clinical trials. Methods Under an institutional review board approved minimum risk protocol, the Mayo Clinic (MN, AZ, FL) database was searched to identify patients with AML who failed treatment with Ven-HMA and subsequently received at least one cycle of salvage therapy with Ven-CDA-LDAC: Ven 100-400 mg, dose adjusted, d1-21, CDA 5 mg/m 2 d1-5, LDAC 20 mg twice daily d1-10, outside of clinical trials. Cytogenetic and molecular studies were performed at the time of Ven-CDA-LDAC initiation in most cases, by conventional karyotype and next-generation sequencing, respectively. The 2022 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) criteria were applied to define risk and response. Survival was calculated from the time of Ven-CDA-LDAC treatment start to last follow-up or death. Results Patient characteristics A total of 39 RR AML patients (median age 65 years, 67% male, 64% de novo), with prior exposure to Ven-HMA, received Ven-CDA-LDAC (median 1 cycle; range 1-5). Study patients had received one ( n=16), two ( n=14), three ( n=5), four ( n=2), five ( n=1) or nine ( n=1) prior therapies, including Ven-HMA. Nine (23%) patients had relapsed following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT). ELN cytogenetic risk included intermediate (46%, n=18), and adverse (54%, n=21). Mutations involved TP53 in 9 patients (23%), K/ NRAS in 8 (21%), RUNX1 in 7 (18%), TET2 in 6 (15%), ASXL1 in 5 (13%), and STAG2 in 5 (13%). Response and toxicity Eleven (28%) patients achieved CR ( n=2; 5%) or CRi ( n=9; 23%); median time to response was 1 month and median response duration 3.4 months. In addition, 2 (5%) patients each experienced partial remission (PR) and bone marrow aplasia without fulfilling criteria for morphologic leukemia free state. Measurable residual disease (MRD) was negative by multiparametric flow cytometry in 2 of 7 (29%) informative CR/CRi cases. CR/CRi rates were higher in females (54% vs 15%; p=0.01), de novo vssecondary AML (40% vs 7%; p=0.02), and absence of adverse karyotype (50% vs 9%; p&lt;0.01), K/NRAS (35% vs 0%, p=0.01), ASXL1 (32% vs 0%, p=0.05), or STAG2 mutations (32% vs 0%, p=0.05) (Table 1). Multivariable analysis confirmed superior response in de novo AML (p&lt;0.01), absence of adverse karyotype, (p&lt;0.01), and absence of K/NRAS mutations (p=0.02). CR/CRi rates were not significantly affected by relapsed vs refractory setting ( p=0.95), number of prior therapies ( p=0.51), prior AHSCT ( p=0.64), or TP53 mutations ( p=0.64) (Table 1). Treatment-emergent toxicities included infections (49%, n=19), comprising bacteremia ( n=11), pneumonia ( n=10), peri-rectal abscess ( n=6), and laboratory evidence of tumor lysis syndrome (3%, n=1). Survival At a median follow-up of 3.9 months, from initiation of Ven-CDA-LDAC, 31 deaths (79%), 6 relapses (15%), and 7 AHSCT (18%; including 5 in CR/CRi, 1 in aplasia) were documented. Median survival following Ven-CDA-LDAC was 4.6 months, and superior in the presence vs absence of CR/CRi (8.1 vs 2.9 months; p=0.01), and in patients receiving AHSCT (10.5 vs 3.4 months; p=0.02). Absence of adverse karyotype was also associated with superior survival (6 vs 3.4 months; p=0.05). Multivariable analysis confirmed the favorable survival impact of CR/CRi ( p=0.03) and AHSCT ( p=0.05); survival impact was not apparent for secondary AML ( p=0.29) or K/NRAS ( p=0.70) or TP53 ( p=0.10) mutations. Conclusions The current study suggests transplant bridging value for Ven-CDA-LDAC in AML patients relapsed or refractory to Ven-HMA, especially in the absence of adverse karyotype or K/NRAS mutation. AHSCT and achievement of CR/CRi appear to be indispensable for favorable post-Ven-CDA-LDAC survival.

INTRODUCTION: The Stromal Antigen 2 ( STAG2), on Xq25, is the most common cohesin complex gene mutated in myeloid neoplasms (MN) (5-10%). STAG2 mutations ( STAG2m) were incorporated in the ELN2022 as AML-MDS defining genetic mutations inferring poor prognosis and is a genetic marker in IPSS-M risk stratification. The PHD-finger protein 6 ( PHF6) gene, on Xq26.3, is a tumor suppressor gene, mutated in 3% of MN, and is more common in T-ALL. PHF6m is believed to be a late event in MN with little data on its prognostic implications in MN. Both STAG2m and PHF6m are more prevalent in males, but their implications on the clinical presentation of MN have not been compared prior. METHOD: Our study is a multicenter study at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Florida, Arizona). After IRB approval, we retrospectively analyzed charts of 7935 patients who had NGS between 2016-2022. STAG2m was found in 96 patients, and PHF6m in 116 (including 3 with concurrent STAG2m and PHF6m). We excluded 4 PHF6m patients who had T-ALL. Data was captured at time of NGS. MDS risk stratification was by IPSS-M and AML by ELN2022. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from date of NGS to date of last follow-up. BlueSky Software was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Characteristics: We compared 96 STAG2m vs 112 PHF6m MN patients. Of STAG2m cases, 78% were male vs 76% in PHF6m MN. Median age was 72 vs 73 years, respectively. Diagnoses included AML (29% of STAG2m vs 34% of PHF6m MN), MDS (54% vs 28%), MDS/MPN (10% vs 21%) and MPN (3% vs 9%). MDS was more common among STAG2m MN (p&lt;.001) while MDS/MPN was more common among PHF6m MN (=.05). MDS-IB was the most common subtype in both (69% vs 52% in STAG2m vs PHF6m MDS). MDS-LB and 5q subtypes were only found in PHF6m MDS, and there was more PHF6m MDS-RS (13% vs 2%). Median IPSS-M score was 0.9 vs 0.8 in STAG2m vs PHF6m MDS (both high-risk). Majority of STAG2m AML were adverse risk (96%) while PHF6m AML were intermediate (79%) (p&lt;.001). AML cases included 43% vs 30% secondary AML (sAML) in STAG2m vs PHF6m AML. Among STAG2m and PHF6m MN, 17% of each were tMN. Cytogenetic abnormalities were more common in PHF6m MN (50% vs 31%, p=.005). The median bone marrow (BM) blasts count among STAG2m MN was 7% vs 4% in PHF6m MN (p=.03). Genetic characteristics: STAG2m were nonsense, frameshift and splice site (54%, 36% and 11%). PHF6m were nonsense, frameshift, splice site, missense and start loss variant mutations (44%, 33%, 12%, 10% and 1%). The median variant allele frequency (VAF) of STAG2m MN was 50% compared to 32% in PHF6m MN (p=.008). Co-mutations: The median number of co-mutations was 3 in STAG2m and 4 in PHF6m MN (p=.04). The most common were TET2m (37% in STAG2m MN vs 45% in PHF6m MN), RUNX1m (31% in both), SRSF2m (39% vs 20%), ASXL1m (66% vs 38%), BCORm (19% vs 6%), U2AF1m (13% vs 14%) and IDH2m (18% vs 7%). ASXL1m, SRSF2m, BCORm, IDH2m and SF3B1m were more common among STAG2m MN (p=&lt;.001, .003, .006, .02, .09). JAK2m, IDH1m are more common among PHF6m MN (p=.02, .06). Survival: Of STAG2m and PHF6m MN, 70% and 72% of patients received treatment. HSCT was performed in 23 (24%) and 23 (21%) of STAG2m and PHF6m patients, including AML (n=9, n=10), MDS (n=12, n=8), MDS/MPN (n=2, n=2). OS among STAG2m and PHF6m MN was 20.5 and 22.1 months, respectively. OS among AML cases was 13.5 vs 21 months (p=.6) in STAG2m vs PHF6m, was NR vs 22 months (p=.4) in MDS, 11.7 vs 17.6 months in MDS/MPN (p=.4), and 10.4 vs 27.4 months (p=.5) in MPN. There was no difference between males and females in either STAG2m or PHF6m MN. HSCT led to longer OS among both STAG2m (NR vs 19.9 months, p=.01) and PHF6m MN patients (NR vs 17.6 months, p=.07). Among AML patients, HSCT did not significantly impact OS (18 vs 9.6 months, p=.3 and 25.1 vs 21 months, p=.2, in STAG2m and PHF6m). HSCT improved OS in STAG2m MDS (NR vs 20.5 months, p=.03). In PHF6m MDS, OS was 22.1 vs 13.1 months in HSCT vs non-HSCT (p=.3). CONCLUSION: STAG2m and PHF6m are 2 X-linked mutations that occur in MN. Both commonly occur in elderly males. MDS was the most common diagnosis in STAG2m MN. STAG2m co-occurred particularly with SRSF2m ASXL1m and BCORm, which are associated with poor prognosis. In our cohort, STAG2m AML carried a poorer prognosis than PHF6m AML. Our study confirms the ELN2022 AML risk stratification. MDS risk classification and OS did not differ between STAG2m and PHF6m in our cohort. A larger cohort is required to confirm our findings and may provide stronger validation.

Introduction The advent of venetoclax (VEN) based chemotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of elderly acute myeloid leukemia (AML), with improvement in remission rates from historical 10%-20% to 60%-70%. However, remission duration is short-lived in patients (pts) with high-risk AML with consequent dismal outcome. As our knowledge of genomic landscape of AML expands and more immunotherapies become available, exploration of the immune tumor microenvironment (TME) of AML may allow identification of subsets of pts that may benefit from immune based therapy. We conducted an investigator initiated prospective study to evaluate TME of pts receiving VEN plus hypomethylating agent (HMA; azacitidine or decitabine) combination. We hypothesize that these pts will cluster into immune-infiltrated vs. immune-depleted sub-types by high-definition immune cell profiling. Methods In 26 newly diagnosed AML pts, who were planned to receive VEN plus HMA therapy, we isolated bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) derived mononuclear cells (MC) by density gradient centrifugation and cryopreserved. We performed CyTOF (cytometry time-of-flight) analysis to study their immune signatures. Thawed cells were labeled with metal-conjugated antibodies that bind CD33, CD196, CD19, CD127, CD11b, CD4, IgD, CD11c, CD14, CD56, CD123, TCRgd, CD185/CXCR5, CD45RA, CD27, CD28, CD66b, CD183 (CXCR3), CD161, CD45RO, CD197 (CCR7), CD8a, CD25, CD3, CD20, CD38, HLA-DR, CD194 (CCR4), CD57, CD16 and CD45. We performed a Rphenograph clustering on 25 paired BMMC and PBMC samples (one patient only had PBMC) to create 35 unique clusters for each ( Figure 1). Then we broke down the distribution of cluster by two different groupings: pts with TP53 mutation (m) and those who achieve complete remission. Statistical significance of clusters calculated using t-test. We performed Pearson correlation test on the paired BMMC and PBMC samples to assess correlation between BMMC and PBMC samples. Results Baseline characteristics The median age of the pts was 74 years (range, 53-88), and 17 (65%) pts were male. Ten (37%) pts had secondary AML, and 12 (46%) pts had ELN adverse risk disease (n=6; TP53m). There was no significant difference in median age (p= &gt;0.99), proportion of pts with secondary AML (p= 0.64), acute myelomonocytic leukemia (p= 0.14) white blood cell count (WBC) ≥ 100 (10 9/L) (p= &gt;0.99), and frequency of commonly occurring co-mutations ( ASXL1 [p=0.35]), FLT3 ITD [p=0.54], splicing [p=0.29], IDH1/2 [p=0.28], DNMT3A [p=0.29], NPM1 [p=0.29], TET2 [p=0.35]) in TP53m and TP53 wild-type group. Response 12/20 (60%) evaluable pts achieved complete remission with or without count recovery (CR/CRi). There was no significant difference in median age (p= 0.06), proportion of pts with secondary AML (p= 0.16), therapy related AML (p= 0.60) WBC ≥ 100 (10 9/L) (p= 0.40), and frequency of commonly occurring mutations ( TP53 [p=0.60], ASXL1 [p &gt; 0.99]), FLT3 ITD [p=0.54], splicing [p &gt; 0.99], IDH1/2 [p=0.60], DNMT3A [p=&gt;0.99], NPM1 [p=0.61], TET2 [p &gt;0.99]) in CR/CRi and no-CR/CRi group. CyTOF analysis and Rphenograph clustering on 25 paired BMMC and PBMC samples We found significant clustering with high expression of B-cell activated (cluster 2; p= 0.005), NK cell rich (cluster 1; p= 0.005, cluster 35; p= 0.0009), CD8 T-cells (cluster 31; p= 0.01) and CD4 effector cells (cluster 17; p= 0.005) phenotype among TP53m AML ( Table 1). Among pts who achieved CR/CRi, significant clustering with low expression of B-cell activated (cluster 29; p= 0.01), CD8 cytotoxic (cluster 14; p= 0.01) CD4 activated (cluster 21; p= 0.03) phenotypes observed. Correlation between BMMC and PBMC clustering Among clusters which showed significance for a particular phenotype, we performed Pearson correlation (R 2) and observed strong correlation between BMMC and PBMC samples clustering in cluster 1 (R 2 = 0.99), cluster 2 (R 2 = 0.95), cluster 17 (R 2 = 0.96), cluster 21 (R 2 = 0.99) and cluster 29 (R 2 = 0.93). Conclusion In this single institutional study using CyTOF analysis we have identified novel clustering with immune- infiltrated phenotype among pts with TP53m AML and conversely immune-depleted phenotype among AML pts who responded to VEN plus HMA. Moreover, we found strong correlation in CyTOF analysis conducted from BMMC and PBMC samples. Future studies with larger sample size needed to validate our findings.

Introduction Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) can be classified into dysplastic (dCMML) and proliferative (pCMML) subtypes based on a white blood cell count (WBC) ≥ 13 x 10 9/L for pCMML. Though this cutoff may seem arbitrary, there is evidence that pCMML is a unique biological entity with a distinct molecular profile and worse outcomes (Carr RM, et al. Nat Commun. 2021). We hypothesized that contemporary CMML prognostic scoring systems - such as the Mayo Molecular Model (MMM; Patnaik MM, et al. Leukemia. 2014) and the CPSS-Molecular Model (CMM; Elena C, et al. Blood. 2016) - would not adequately risk-stratify pCMML patients. Moreover, while truncating ASXL1 mutations are considered a high-risk feature in CMML, their prognostic relevance in pCMML is unknown. Methods After IRB approval, we compiled a large (n = 888), molecularly-annotated database of CMML patients seen at two US medical centers (Mayo Clinic and MD Anderson) via retrospective chart review. All statistical analyses considered the clinical and laboratory parameters obtained at the time of presentation. The cohort was divided into dCMML and pCMML subgroups, which were analyzed independently alongside the entire cohort. Categorical variables were compared by Fisher exact or Pearson χ 2 tests and continuous variables by Mann-Whitney U tests. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Survival was assessed via the Kaplan-Meier method. P-values &lt; 0.05 were considered significant. Calculations were performed using the BlueSky Statistics (v10.3.1) interface for R. Results We identified 474 (54%) dCMML cases and 410 (46%) pCMML cases with median age 71 years and 67% males. Patients with pCMML were more likely to have higher AMC (5.1 vs 1.5 x 10 9/L, p &lt; 0.0001), circulating immature myeloid cells (IMC; 65% vs 36%, p &lt; 0.0001) and abnormal karyotypes (37% vs 30%, p = 0.0187). They were also overrepresented in higher-risk categories of the MMM and CMM compared to dCMML (p &lt; 0.0001 for each model). The number of somatic mutations was higher in pCMML than dCMML (mean 3.0 vs 2.6, p = 0.0050). Mutations in ASXL1 (53% vs 39%), NRAS (21% vs 11%), CBL (18% vs 12%), SETBP1 (14% vs 7%), JAK2 (10% vs 3%), CEBPA (5% vs 2%), GATA2 (3% vs 0%), and FLT3 (3% vs 1%) were more frequent while mutations in TET2 (38% vs 48%), SF3B1 (2% vs 8%), ZRSR2 (2% vs 8%), and NPM1 (1% vs 3%) were less frequent in pCMML compared to dCMML, respectively (p &lt; 0.05 for all). Though the MMM and CMM effectively stratified the dCMML group, they did not provide meaningful risk stratification in the pCMML group (MMM p &lt; 0.05 overall but could not distinguish between low and intermediate-1/2 or intermediate-1 and high risks; CMM p &gt; 0.05). Likewise, there was no difference in the median overall survival (OS) or leukemia free survival (LFS) when pCMML patients were stratified by truncating ASXL1 mutations( Figure 1A). We then sought to better risk stratify pCMML. Univariate analysis identified increasing age, male gender, abnormal karyotype, and elevated WBC, ANC, and AMC as adverse predictors for OS. In addition, the presence of IMC and peripheral blood (PB) blast % were adverse factors for LFS, while age was not significant for LFS. None of the aforementioned mutations were significant in the univariate model for OS, whereas GATA2 and NPM1 mutations were significant for LFS. In multivariate analysis for OS, only male gender and AMC ≥ 10 x 10 9/L retained significance. In multivariate analysis for LFS, male gender, AMC ≥ 10 x 10 9/L, and peripheral blasts ≥ 5% remained significant; GATA2 and NPM1 mutations were not significant. These variables risk-stratified pCMML patients based on the presence of 0, 1, or ≥ 2 risk factors ( Figure 1B). In comparison, OS was 40.7 months (95% CI 35.2 - 50.1 mo.) for dCMML patients, 20.1 months (95% CI 18.2 - 22.7 mo.) for pCMML patients, and 31.8 months (95% CI 28.4 - 33.5 mo.) for the entire cohort. At last follow up, 586 deaths (66%) and 168 AML transformations (19%) were recorded in the cohort. Deaths in dCMML vs pCMML were 294 (62%) vs 291 (71%; p = 0.0067), with AML transformations in 83 (18%) vs 84 (21%; p = 0.2055) patients, respectively. Conclusions Truncating ASXL1 mutations, along with ASXL1-mutation weighted CMML prognostic models failed to effectively risk stratify pCMML patients. In pCMML, male gender and AMC ≥ 10 x 10 9/L, effectively risk stratified for OS, while these factors along with PB blasts ≥ 5% effectively risk stratified for LFS.