Citations

Abstract Background The mechanisms underlying metastatic latency in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remain poorly understood. Methods This study evaluated 2 large independent cohorts for differences in tumor biology between patients who developed metastases early (≤1 year after nephrectomy) and those with late onset (>3 years). Results In the discovery cohort (n = 161), late metastatic RCC was associated with clear cell histology (88.9% vs 78.7%), lower pathological stage (pT1-2; 40.3% vs 18.0%), and favorable histopathological features including low grade (40.0% vs 2.3%), less sarcomatoid (5.6% vs 21.8%), and reduced necrosis (37.7% vs 78.3%; all P < .02). Late metastatic RCC tumors exhibited increased angiogenesis (63.5% vs 19.4%) and reduced inflammation (78.8% vs 50.0%; all P < .02) profiles. Genomic driver analyses revealed comparable rates of PBRM1 and SETD2 loss in late and early metastatic RCC, while BAP1 loss was significantly less common in late metastatic RCC (7.5% vs 27.1%; P < .02). In multivariable models, BAP1/PBRM1/SETD2 status and tumor necrosis emerged as key discriminators of late metastatic RCCs. These findings were confirmed in the second cohort (n = 307). Late metastatic RCC was enriched for fatty acid oxidation and angiogenesis pathways, supporting a less aggressive phenotype. This was further evidenced by a lower engraftment rate in murine models (0% vs 36.5%; P < .001) and significantly longer overall survival from the time of metastasis (median survival doubled, P < .001). Interestingly, late metastatic RCC shared genomic and phenotypic features with RCC that metastasizes to the pancreas, suggesting a common underlying biology influencing both metastatic latency and pancreatic tropism. Conclusions Overall, these findings advocate for recognition of late metastatic RCC because of its distinct biology and improved prognosis.

BACKGROUND: Despite favorable hemodynamic and neurohormonal effects, endothelin receptor antagonists have not improved outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF), possibly because they cause fluid retention. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial (SERENADE [Macitentan in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction and Pulmonary Vascular Disease]), we evaluated the effects of an endothelin receptor antagonist, macitentan, in patients with HF, left ventricular ejection fraction ≥40%, and pulmonary vascular disease. After a 4-week placebo run-in (to ensure clinical stability), followed by a 5-week single-blind macitentan run-in, patients who did not exhibit fluid retention were randomized to macitentan or placebo. The primary end point was change in NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; baseline to 24 weeks); secondary end points included change in KCCQ (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire) clinical summary score (baseline to 24 weeks) and time to worsening HF by 52 weeks. RESULTS: Of 230 patients enrolled, 28 were excluded during the placebo run-in, 60 excluded during the macitentan run-in, and 142 were randomized. Macitentan had no effect on change in NT-proBNP (geometric mean ratio [macitentan/placebo], 1.02 [90% CI, 0.88–1.19]; P =0.79) or on secondary end points (placebo-corrected change in KCCQ clinical summary score, −3.5 [90% CI, −8.2 to +1.2]; P =0.22). Worsening HF occurred in 20 (28%) patients assigned to macitentan and 13 (18%) assigned to placebo (hazard ratio, 1.48 [90% CI, 0.83–2.67]; P =0.24). More macitentan-treated patients developed fluid retention (16 [23%] versus 10 [14%]) and cardiac adverse events (33 [46%] versus 22 [31%]) versus placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a novel enrichment trial design to target pulmonary vascular disease and exclude treatment-related fluid retention in patients with HF and preserved/mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, macitentan neither lowered NT-proBNP nor improved HF outcomes. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifiers: NCT03153111 and NCT03714815.

Abstract Alzheimer’s disease (AD) affects 40 million individuals globally and is characterized by the accumulation of amyloid-beta (Aβ) proteins, which aggregate and form plaques. BBB dysfunction drives AD cerebrovascular pathology and BBB integrity is maintained by neurovascular unit (NVU). Specifically, within the NVU, the cerebral endothelial cells maintain vascular homeostasis. In this study, we isolated endothelial-enriched regions of interest (ROIs) using the Nanostring GeoMx digital spatial profiler and employed a deconvolution model to evaluate transcriptomic changes. We observed dysregulation of cellular signaling potentially disrupting the APP+ BBB integrity. Analysis of ligand-receptor pairings that are the foundation of the NVU intercellular signaling indicated that the endothelial vasculature completes a feedback loop with the NVU to the regulating astroctyes. Further, we identified potentially antagonistic signaling roles for opioid receptor species that should be further investigated for potential therapeutic targets. Graphical Abstract

Abstract Background With progressive accumulation of knowledge on SARS-CoV-2 infection clinical management, treatment guidelines recommended several options including remdesivir, a broad-spectrum antiviral. Given the evolving nature of coronavirus disease 2019, capturing the totality of scientific evidence from clinical trials and observational studies is critical to inform clinical decision making. We conducted a systematic literature review with meta-analysis to summarize the effectiveness of remdesivir among hospitalized adults. Methods We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library databases for interventional and observational studies examining remdesivir efficacy. A rigorous double-reviewer approach was used for source identification, screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment. A hierarchical random-effects model meta-analysis was used, with subgroup analyses for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world (RW) studies. Results From January 2019 to December 2023 >18 000 sources were screened, and 122 unique studies were identified, reporting on 25 174 participants in RCTs and 1 279 859 in RW studies. Remdesivir significantly increased survival in the overall population (odds ratio, 0.69 [95% confidence interval, .55–.86]; P = .001] across SARS-CoV-2 variants and disease severity levels: no supplemental oxygen (0.81 [.75–.88]), low-flow oxygen (0.71 [.64–.79]), high-flow oxygen (0.87 [.83–.91]), and invasive mechanical ventilation (0.78 [.68–.90]). Rehospitalization risk was significantly reduced in patients receiving remdesivir (odds ratio, 0.72 [95% confidence interval, .64–.81]). Conclusions Our comprehensive systematic literature review, capturing the totality of evidence, showed a significant survival benefit among patients hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 infection and receiving remdesivir, across all disease severity levels. To assure that healthcare providers are aware of and deploy evidence-based optimal care, recommendations should rely on both RCT and RW data.

Community Outreach and Engagement (COE) ought to be prioritized, resourced, and supported to appropriately fulfill the Cures Act and tackle Catchment Community cancer burden and disparities. COE is not a person but the vision of community/public cancer prevention and control that surpasses both political and institutional leaders.

Objective: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a frequent adverse event after bariatric surgery and is associated with patient dissatisfaction and increased health care burden. Aggressive multimodal antiemetic prophylaxis and the use of propofol infusion during anesthesia are associated with the reduction of PONV. In this study, we examined the use of rescue antiemetics following bariatric surgery performed with 3 different anesthetic strategies designed to reduce PONV: (1) primary volatile (VOL) anesthetic and propofol (PROP) infusion (VOL+PROP), (2) volatile anesthetic with propofol and dexmedetomidine (DEX) infusions (VOL+PROP+DEX), or (3) opioid-sparing total intravenous anesthesia (PROP+DEX). Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we included patients undergoing bariatric surgery from 2018-2022 who received 1 of 3 anesthetics: (1) VOL+PROP, (2) VOL+PROP+DEX, or (3) opioid-sparing PROP+DEX without a VOL. Inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis determined the association between the need for rescue-antiemetics in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and following PACU discharge. Results: Three hundred thirty-two patients received VOL+PROP, 354 VOL+PROP+DEX, and 166 PROP+DEX, and all received prophylactic antiemetics during surgery. After surgery, the PROP+DEX patients received fewer rescue antiemetics in the PACU compared with VOL+PROP (11% vs. 24%, P=0.002), and VOL+PROP+DEX fewer compared with VOL+PROP (16% vs. 24%, P=0.023). This differential antinausea effect was limited to PACU stay only. Rescue antiemetic use increased across all anesthetic management groups following PACU discharge until midnight on the day of surgery (ranging from 38% to 46% across groups, P=0.71) and through the first postoperative day (ranging from 47% to 57% across groups, P=0.20). Conclusions: The benefit associated with anesthetic strategies designed to reduce PONV was present but did not persist past PACU discharge. This finding suggests that aggressive perioperative multimodal antiemetic prophylaxis combined with anesthetic strategies designed to prevent PONV after bariatric surgery have only a short-lived effect, thus health care staff in hospital wards may expect to encounter high rates of PONV in these patients. There is a need for the development of novel antinausea treatments to reduce the rate of this frequent postoperative complication.

Abstract Objectives Studies on the impact of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have been investigated in the past. This study aims to further address this topic using a large population dataset of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial (NIH, USA). Methods Multivariable logistic regression was used for the analysis of women in the entire PLCO cohort. Results A non-significant reduction in the risk of developing HCC was observed in women using HRT compared to never users (OR=0.61, 95 % CI: 0.21–1.79, p=0.367). Oral contraceptive use was significantly associated with reduced risk of HCC in the HRT group, (OR=0.17, 95 % CI: 0.00–0.82, p=0.028), and there was a nearly-significant interaction between HRT use and oral contraceptive use (p=0.054). Regardless of HRT use, those with pre-existing liver comorbidities of hepatitis or cirrhosis were at the highest risk of developing HCC (OR=5.09, 95 % CI: 1.13–22.81, p=0.034). However, liver comorbidities of hepatitis or cirrhosis and exposure to HRT showed a significant interaction (p=0.0001). Conclusions In those taking HRT, oral contraceptive use was significantly protective against HCC, suggesting that a longer period of hormone use (oral contraceptive plus HRT) provides additional protection against HCC than HRT alone. Overall, the low numbers of HCC diagnoses, which reflect the wider healthy female population, limited our ability to establish statistical significance regarding the impact of HRT on HCC incidence, which requires further prospective studies of larger populations.

The 2024 Annual Congress of the International Liver Transplantation Society (ILTS) was from May 1–4 in Houston, Texas, USA, under the theme “Liver Disease and Transplantation: Breaking Barriers and Exploring New Frontiers.” In addition to a robust scientific program, the congress also hosted a hands-on cadaveric robotic liver surgery course, a machine perfusion workshop, and a transesophageal echocardiography course. In this report, the ILTS Vanguard and Basic Sciences Committees present a summary of the congress proceedings.

ABSTRACT Myelofibrosis (MF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm that is accompanied by driver JAK2 , CALR , or MPL mutations in more than 90% of cases, leading to constitutive activation of the JAK–STAT pathway. MF is a multifaceted disease characterized by trilineage myeloid proliferation with prominent megakaryocyte atypia and bone marrow fibrosis, as well as splenomegaly, constitutional symptoms, ineffective erythropoiesis, extramedullary hematopoiesis, and a risk of leukemic progression and shortened survival. Therapy can range from observation alone in lower‐risk and asymptomatic patients to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, which is the only potentially curative treatment capable of prolonging survival, although burdened by significant morbidity and mortality. The discovery of the JAK2 V617F mutation prompted the development of JAK inhibitors (JAKi) including the first‐in‐class JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib and subsequent approval of fedratinib, pacritinib, and momelotinib. The latter has shown erythropoietic benefits by suppressing hepcidin expression via activin A receptor type 1 (ACVR1) inhibition, as well as reducing splenomegaly and symptoms. However, the current JAKi behave as anti‐inflammatory drugs without a major impact on survival or disease progression. A better understanding of the genetics, mechanisms of fibrosis, cytopenia, and the role of inflammatory cytokines has led to the development of numerous therapeutic agents that target epigenetic regulation, signaling, telomerase, cell cycle, and apoptosis, nuclear export, and pro‐fibrotic cytokines. Selective JAK2 V617F inhibitors and targeting of mutant CALR by immunotherapy are the most intriguing and promising approaches. This review focuses on approved and experimental treatments for MF, highlighting their biological background.