Citations

There is considerable interest in harnessing innate immunity to treat Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Here, we explore whether a decoy receptor strategy using the ectodomain of select TLRs has therapeutic potential in AD. AAV-mediated expression of human TLR5 ectodomain (sTLR5) alone or fused to human IgG4 Fc (sTLR5Fc) results in robust attenuation of amyloid β (Aβ) accumulation in a mouse model of Alzheimer-type Aβ pathology. sTLR5Fc binds to oligomeric and fibrillar Aβ with high affinity, forms complexes with Aβ, and blocks Aβ toxicity. Oligomeric and fibrillar Aβ modulates flagellin-mediated activation of human TLR5 but does not, by itself, activate TLR5 signaling. Genetic analysis shows that rare protein coding variants in human TLR5 may be associated with a reduced risk of AD. Further, transcriptome analysis shows altered TLR gene expression in human AD. Collectively, our data suggest that TLR5 decoy receptor–based biologics represent a novel and safe Aβ-selective class of biotherapy in AD.

Abstract Genome-wide association studies of colorectal cancer (CRC) have identified over 50 susceptibility loci. These variants represent only a small fraction of total heritability for CRC. Gene-environment (GxE) interaction studies may help identify novel loci and biological interactions that give insight to the pathogenesis of CRC. Previous genome-wide GxE studies with dietary factors have identified interactions between loci and processed meat consumption and alcohol; however, limited statistical power remains a primary concern. Set-based SNP testing has the potential to increase statistical power to detect GxE interactions by aggregating functionally relevant SNPs. In this large pooled analysis using 14 case-control and nested case-control studies, we incorporated functional information from the transcriptome prediction tool, PrediXcan, into a novel set-based approach for testing GxE interactions. We used variant weights from the PrediXcan models of tissue-specific gene expression in the transverse colon as a priori variant information for a set-based GxE approach. We restricted our analysis to variants in the PrediXcan transverse colon gene models (n = 4,842). This discovery phase included 10,360 CRC and advanced adenoma cases, and 11,183 controls of European ancestry from the Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium (GECCO) and the Colon Cancer Family Registry. All 14 studies were analyzed together in a pooled data set using the Mixed Effects Score Tests for interactions. We tested for gene interactions with sex- and study- specific quartiles of dietary intake of red meat (servings/day), processed meat (servings/day), vegetables (servings/day), fruits (servings/day), and fiber (g/day). We detected two genes with suggestive interactions (false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.2) with intake of red meat and risk of CRC: Superoxide Dismutase 2 (SOD2) and Ubiquitin Conjugating Enzyme E2 H (UBE2H). No interactions at FDR < 0.2 were observed for processed meat, vegetables, fruits, or fiber. The SOD2 gene, which encodes an enzyme important in apoptotic signaling and clearing of reactive oxygen species, may regulate response to colonic exposure to heme iron or increased bile acid from high-fat content in red meat. UBE2H is part of the ubiquitin-proteasome system that has a role in Wnt signaling, which can be mediated by heme iron in red meat and is commonly found dysregulated in cancer. These findings highlight the efficacy of integrating functional information and set-based testing for novel discovery of genes interacting with known dietary risk factors of CRC. We plan to replicate these findings in additional studies. Citation Format: Paneen S. Petersen, Yu-Ru Su, Sonja I. Berndt, Stephanie A. Bien, Hermann Brenner, Graham Casey, Andrew T. Chan, Jenny Chang-Claude, Jane C. Figueiredo, Steven J. Gallinger, Robert W. Haile, Tabitha A. Harrison, Michael Hoffmeister, Mark A. Jenkins, Amit D. Joshi, Sébastien Küry, Loic Le Marchand, Yi Lin, Noralane M. Lindor, Polly A. Newcomb, John D. Potter, Robert Schoen, Martha L. Slattery, Stephen N. Thibodeau, Emily White, Li Hsu, Ulrike Peters, CCFR, GECCO. Interactions between genetic predictors of gene expression and dietary factors associated with risk of colorectal cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 5268.

Abstract RNA sequencing detects estrogen receptor alpha gene (ESR1) fusion transcripts in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer but their role in disease pathogenesis remains unclear. Herein we examined multiple in-frame and out-of-frame ESR1 fusions and found only two, both identified in advanced endocrine treatment resistant disease, encoded stable and functional in-frame fusion proteins. In both examples, ESR1-e6>YAP1 and ESR1-e6>PCDH11X, the N-terminal, DNA binding and dimerization motifs encoded by exons 2-6 were fused to C-terminal sequences from the partner gene. Functional properties included estrogen-independent growth, constitutive expression of ER target genes, anti-estrogen resistance, induction of cellular motility in vitro and the development of lung metastasis in vivo. Chromatin immunoprecipitation and RNA sequencing experiments showed both fusions uniquely activated a metastasis-associated transcriptional program. ESR1-e6>YAP1 and ESR1-e6>PCDH11X-induced growth remained sensitive to a CDK4/6 inhibitor, palbociclib, and a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) expressing the ESR1-e6>YAP1 fusion was also responsive. Transcriptionally active ESR1 fusions therefore trigger both endocrine therapy resistance and metastatic progression explaining the association with fatal disease progression, although CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment is predicted to be effective. Citation Format: Jonathan T. Lei, Jieya Shao, Jin Zhang, Michael Iglesia, Doug W. Chan, Jin Cao, Meenakshi Anurag, Purba Singh, Xiaping He, Yoshimasa Kosaka, Ryoichi Matsunuma, Robert Crowder, Jeremy Hoog, Chanpheng Phommaly, Rodrigo Goncalves, Susana Romalho, Raquel M. Peres, Nindo Punturi, Cheryl Schmidt, Alex Bartram, Eric Jou, W V. Lai, Oliver Hampton, Anna Rogers, Ethan Tobias, Poojan Parikh, Sherri R. Davies, Shunqiang Li, Cynthia X. Ma, Vera Suman, Kelly K. Hunt, Mark A. Watson, Katherine A. Hoadley, E A. Thompson, Xi Chen, Shyam M. Kavuri, Chad J. Creighton, Christopher A. Maher, Charles M. Perou, Svasti Haricharan, Matthew J. Ellis. Functional and therapeutic significance of ESR1 gene fusions in breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 5240.

Abstract Background Regular use of aspirin and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is associated with lower risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). Genome-wide interaction analysis (GxE) has identified a few variants that may modify the effects of NSAIDs on CRC risk. However, limited statistical power remains a concern. Restricting analyses by using functional genomic information to aggregate variants into biologically relevant sets can reduce the number of tests, thereby increasing statistical power. We tested the interactions between variant models of gene expression and NSAIDs use on CRC risk. Methods Functional weights of each variant were estimated using PrediXcan based on jointly measured transcriptomes and genomes data of transverse colon tissues from the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) Project for all genes with sufficient heritability (≥1%). A mixed-effects model was used to assess the GxE effects in a gene among 9,917 incident CRC cases and 10,533 controls from 17 (nested) case-control studies from the Colon Cancer Family Registry (CCFR) and Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium (GECCO). GxE analysis was done by modeling the interaction between predicted gene expression and NSAID use (fixed effects), and residual variant-specific GxE effects that are not accounted for (random effects). Regular user of aspirin and/or non-aspirin NSAIDs was compared to non-regular users. False discovery rate (FDR) was used to account for multiple comparison and FDR≤0.2 was considered genome-wide significant. Secondary analysis was performed on significant genes and duration of use among users. Results Regular use of aspirin was higher among controls (30.3%) compared to cases (24.3%). Among the 4,842 genes tested, SORD significantly modified the effect of regular use of aspirin on CRC risk (p-interaction = 1.45×10-5; FDR=0.07). The SORD gene encodes sorbitol dehydrogenase (SORD), which oxidizes sorbitol to fructose in the polyol pathway. Decreased SORD concentrations were previously observed to dramatically increase in colorectal adenoma cells when compared to normal mucosa cells, suggesting the involvement of dysregulated polyol metabolisms in colorectal tumorigenesis. However, the duration of aspirin use was not statistically significantly associated with SORD gene expression on CRC risk (p=0.149) among 5,560 aspirin users. No significant interactions were observed between genetically determined colon gene expression levels and any NSAID use or non-aspirin NSAID use at FDR<0.2. Conclusions Incorporating functional information, we discovered a novel gene that may interact with aspirin use to confer CRC risk. These findings provide preliminary support for new biological insights that could help understand the chemopreventive mechanisms of aspirin on CRC. We aim to replicate these findings in additional studies. Citation Format: Xiaoliang Wang, Yu-Ru Su, Andrew T. Chan, Stephanie Bien, Sonja I. Bernt, Hermann Brenner, Graham Casey, Jenny Chang-Claude, Steven J. Gallinger, Robert W. Haile, Tabitha A. Harrison, Michael Hoffmeister, Mark A. Jenkins, Amit Joshi, Yi Lin, Noralane M. Lindor, Loic Le Marchand, Hongmei Nan, Polly A. Newcomb, John D. Potter, Martha L. Slattery, Steve N. Thibodeau, Emily White, Li Hsu, Ulrike Peters. Functionally informed genome-wide interaction analysis of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on colorectal cancer risk [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 2965.

Abstract Large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified approximately 35 loci associated with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) risk. The majority of GWAS-identified disease susceptibility variants are located in noncoding regions, and causal genes underlying these associations remain largely unknown. Here, we performed a transcriptome-wide association study to search for novel genetic loci and plausible causal genes at known GWAS loci. We used RNA sequencing data (68 normal ovarian tissue samples from 68 individuals and 6,124 cross-tissue samples from 369 individuals) and high-density genotyping data from European descendants of the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx V6) project to build ovarian and cross-tissue models of genetically regulated expression using elastic net methods. We evaluated 17,121 genes for their cis-predicted gene expression in relation to EOC risk using summary statistics data from GWAS of 97,898 women, including 29,396 EOC cases. With a Bonferroni-corrected significance level of P < 2.2 × 10−6, we identified 35 genes, including FZD4 at 11q14.2 (Z = 5.08, P = 3.83 × 10−7, the cross-tissue model; 1 Mb away from any GWAS-identified EOC risk variant), a potential novel locus for EOC risk. All other 34 significantly associated genes were located within 1 Mb of known GWAS-identified loci, including 23 genes at 6 loci not previously linked to EOC risk. Upon conditioning on nearby known EOC GWAS-identified variants, the associations for 31 genes disappeared and three genes remained (P < 1.47 × 10−3). These data identify one novel locus (FZD4) and 34 genes at 13 known EOC risk loci associated with EOC risk, providing new insights into EOC carcinogenesis. Significance: Transcriptomic analysis of a large cohort confirms earlier GWAS loci and reveals FZD4 as a novel locus associated with EOC risk. Cancer Res; 78(18); 5419–30. ©2018 AACR.