Citations

Extramedullary multiple myeloma (EMM), defined in this review as soft tissue plasmacytomas resulting from hematogenous spread, is characterized by the ability of MM cells to proliferate outside of the bone marrow microenvironment. It is aggressive, often associated with high-risk cytogenetics and early relapse, and independently portends significantly shorter progression-free and overall survival, even in the era of highly effective immunotherapies. The molecular and microenvironmental factors underlying extramedullary MM dissemination continue to be studied to inform the development of better treatments. In this review, we discuss our current understanding of the biology of EMM, focusing on its distinct molecular and microenvironmental characteristics vis-à-vis MM. We also review the current treatment strategies, acknowledging the paucity of large, randomized studies specific to this population.

Interest in Current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP)-grade extracellular vesicles (EVs) is expanding. Some obstacles in this new but rapidly growing field include a lack of standardization and scalability. This review focuses on automated biomanufacturing of EVs in conditioned media collected from cultured mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs). Different automated cell culture systems are discussed, including factors affecting EV quantity and quality, isolating EVs manufactured in an automated system, and validations needed. The ultimate goal when manufacturing cGMP-grade EVs is to identify a specific application and characterize the EV population in detail. This is achieved by validating every step of the process, choosing appropriate release criteria, and assuring batch-to-batch consistency. Due to the lack of standards in the field, it is critical to ensure that the cGMP-grade EVs meet FDA standards pertaining to identity, reproducibility, sterility, safety, purity, and potency. A closed-system automated bioreactor can be a valuable tool to generate cGMP-EVs in a scalable, economical, and reproducible manner.

Abstract Background The treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer now includes “watch-and-wait” (WW) management for patients who exhibit a clinical complete response (cCR) to total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). We assessed patients’ knowledge and preferences regarding WW with the goal of incorporating patient input into clinical trial design. Methods Rectal cancer patients in advocacy groups (COLONTOWN/Rectalburgh and Fight CRC) were surveyed regarding perceptions about treatment strategies, tolerable risks of treatment failure, and preferences on clinical trial design. Surveys were initially distributed in 2019, with the shift toward WW prompting re-survey of select questions in 2023. Results All respondents preferred enrollment in trials that incorporated patient input. Most respondents (76%) preferred treatment that incorporated chemotherapy escalation over radiation escalation. Furthermore, when presented with a hypothetical patient who developed a cCR after chemoradiation (without the option for WW), 58% of patients chose surgical treatment (with 100% risk of permanent ostomy and 80% chance of cure) over omission of surgery (with <80% chance of cure). In contrast, when the hypothetical patient developed a cCR after TNT (with an option for WW), 82% of patients opted for selective WW over surgery. Conclusions This work successfully integrated patient advocacy groups as a resource for obtaining patient input. Surveys revealed patients had a strong preference for chemotherapy escalation, for selective WW when offered, and for incorporation of input into future clinical trial design. These findings describe how well-informed patients approach complex medical decision-making and serve as a starting point for future studies seeking to incorporate patient voices.

AbstractINTRODUCTIONAlzheimer's disease (AD) pathology causes corticobasal syndrome (CBS) in 21%–50% of patients. Studies have assessed hypometabolism in CBS according to β‐amyloid (A) positron emission tomography (PET), but the understanding of the association of both AD‐tau (T) and A with hypometabolism is incomplete.METHODSThirty‐three CBS patients and 45 controls underwent fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), flortaucipir, and Pittsburgh compound‐B PET and were classified as A± and T±. FDG‐PET uptake was extracted for 12 regions‐of‐interest in dominant (most affected) and non‐dominant hemispheres and compared across A/T groups.RESULTSA+T+ patients had greater hypometabolism in temporo‐parieto‐occipital cortices than A+T‐ and A‐T‐ groups, with no differences observed between the A+T‐ and A‐T‐ groups. FDG asymmetry was more accentuated in A+T+ patients. Medial temporal and basal ganglia metabolism were similar across AT groups.DISCUSSIONAmyloid and tau positivity contribute synergistically to hypometabolism and asymmetry in temporo‐parieto‐occipital cortices in CBS, with AD‐like patterns of hypometabolism observed only in A+T+ patients.Highlights Amyloid (A) and tau PET (T) status can be used to stratify CBS patients. A+T+ CBS patients show more hypometabolism in temporo‐parieto‐occipital cortices. Medial temporal metabolism (typical AD pattern) is similar across AT groups. Parieto‐occipital cortices should be assessed when investigating AT pathology in CBS. Amyloid and tau positivity contribute synergistically to hypometabolism and asymmetry in CBS.

ABSTRACTForensic anthropology must embrace standards and credentialing that align with other medicolegal disciplines, such as forensic pathology and forensic odontology. This involves establishing itself more firmly as an essential specialty in the medicolegal system and limiting practice to qualified professionals. Without educational or professional requirements to practice forensic anthropology, the competencies of those involved in medicolegal cases vary, despite the potentially serious legal impact of errors. Negligent work can impede decedent identification or wrongly convict or free a suspect. Erroneous and unprofessional work also misrepresents the field and may deter agencies from utilizing forensic anthropologists. This commentary aims to convey the need to further professionalize forensic anthropology through the standardization of education, qualifications, and practice. Differences between certification and licensure and their implications are discussed. Recent and upcoming developments in the field highlight progress, including the development of a multi‐level certification system and list of core competencies by the American Board of Forensic Anthropology (ABFA). Additionally, the Anthropology subcommittee of the Organization of Scientific Area Committees for forensic science (OSAC) is developing a standard for qualifications in forensic anthropology. These developments emphasize the importance of certification and standardization in education and training for the advancement of forensic anthropology. Standardization efforts such as these will foster a cohesive, respected practice to serve the evolving needs of the medicolegal system.

Abstract Introduction While certainty of evidence assessment is key to a rigorous and transparent systematic review, it is unknown how – and how frequently – it is assessed in systematic reviews. The objective of this study was to examine the prevalence and approaches used for certainty of evidence assessment in systematic reviews published in high‐impact medicine journals over the past 11 years. Methods A PubMed search and hand‐searching of relevant journal websites identified systematic reviews published between 24 January 2013 and 23 January 2024 in any of the ten highest‐impact journals in the General and Internal Medicine category of the Journal Citation Report. Two reviewers independently selected any systematic review related to health outcomes assessing certainty of evidence using any method. We extracted data related to review characteristics, certainty of evidence and risk of bias/methodological quality assessment frameworks, and reported consideration of certainty of evidence domains. Logistic regression examined year of publication to determine whether the prevalence of certainty of evidence assessment changed over time. Results Of 1,023 included reviews, 346 (33.8%) assessed certainty of evidence. Prevalence of certainty of evidence assessment increased over time (0.16 ± 0.2; p < .001). Most (89.3%) of reviews used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework to assess certainty of evidence. Conclusion Only one in three systematic reviews published in the highest‐impact medical journals over the past 11 years assessed certainty of evidence, though prevalence increased over time. The use of specific domains within each certainty of evidence framework was not clearly described in all reviews.

AbstractAlthough electricity has been used in medicine for thousands of years, bioelectronic medicine for treating epilepsy has become increasingly common in recent years. Invasive neurostimulation centers primarily around three approaches: vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), responsive neurostimulation (RNS), and deep brain stimulation (DBS). These approaches differ by target (e.g., cranial nerve, cortex, or thalamus) and stimulation parameters (e.g., triggered stimulation or continuous stimulation). Although typically noncurative, these approaches can dramatically reduce the seizure burden and offer patients new treatment options. There remains much to be understood about optimal targets and individualized stimulation protocols. Objective markers of seizure burden and biomarkers that quickly quantify neural excitability are still needed. In the future, bioelectronic medicine could become a curative approach that remodels neural networks to reduce pathological activity.

Abstract “Nonclassical” myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPNs) represent a heterogeneous group of malignancies characterized by a wide range of clinical manifestations. Unlike classical MPNs, there is no standardized management approach for these conditions, particularly concerning the indications for and management of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. To address this gap, the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Practice Harmonization and Guidelines (PH&G) Committee and the Chronic Malignancies Working Party (CMWP) have collaborated to develop shared guidelines aimed at optimizing the selection and management of patients with these rare forms of neoplasms. A comprehensive review of the literature from the publication of the revised fourth edition of the (2016) World Health Organization classification onward was conducted. A multidisciplinary group of experts in the field convened to produce this document, which was developed through multiple rounds of draft circulation. Key recommendations include the early identification of potential transplant candidates, particularly in cases of chronic neutrophilic leukemia, chronic eosinophilic leukemia (CEL)/CEL, not otherwise specified (CEL-NOS), myeloid/lymphoid neoplasm with eosinophilia and tyrosine kinase gene fusions with FGFR1, JAK2, ABL1, and FLT3 rearrangements, MDS/MPN with neutrophilia/atypical chronic myeloid leukemia, and MDS/MPN, NOS. For patients with MPN, NOS/MPN unclassifiable, standard recommendations for myelofibrosis should be applied. Similarly, in MDS/MPN with thrombocytosis, transplantation is recommended on the basis of established MDS guidelines. Given the current lack of robust evidence, this document will serve as a valuable resource to guide future research activities, providing a framework for addressing critical unanswered questions and advancing the field.