Citations

Abstract Obesity has emerged as one of the most significant health challenges, with prevalence rates exceeding 30% in many regions and contributing substantially to the burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD). This review synthesized findings from clinical trials, systematic reviews, and narrative reviews. Key outcomes assessed included heart failure symptoms, echocardiographic parameters, incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF), inflammation biomarkers, and overall cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Across studies, obesity was consistently linked with elevated risk of coronary heart disease, AF, stroke, and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Central adiposity and ectopic fat depots, especially epicardial fat, emerged as critical mediators of CVD progression. Semaglutide, tirzepatide, and other agents have demonstrated robust effects in reducing weight, improving functional capacity, and attenuating cardiac remodeling, with additional benefits in lowering inflammation markers and natriuretic peptides independent of weight loss. Notably, patients with AF and obesity-related HFpEF appeared to experience greater symptomatic and functional improvements with semaglutide compared with those without AF. Conversely, evidence on the obesity paradox and metabolically healthy obesity revealed heterogeneity, with some subgroups demonstrating preserved or even improved survival despite excess adiposity, though these effects may be confounded by differences in cardiorespiratory fitness and lead time biases. Obesity remains a powerful risk factor for CVD, mediated through both metabolic and structural pathways. The advent of anti-obesity pharmacotherapies represents a watershed moment for cardiology, offering disease-modifying potential in obesity-related heart failure and beyond. Future research should refine the understanding of obesity phenotypes, and the role of fat distribution and cardiorespiratory fitness.

PURPOSE Deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability (dMMR, MSI-H) in biliary tract cancers (BTCs) is observed in 1%-5% of tumors. MSI-H across solid tumors has demonstrated durable response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) regardless of the anatomic location. Here, we describe clinical outcomes and surgical conversion of MSI-H BTC treated with ICIs. Patients and Methods We conducted a multicenter, retrospective analysis of BTC patients with dMMR/MSI-H between 2017 and 2024 at Mayo Clinic, University of Michigan, and University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center. Outcomes of interest were surgical resection rate, rate of pathologic response, 2-year overall survival (OS; time from initiation of treatment to death/last follow-up), and time to treatment discontinuation (TTD; time from initiation of treatment to cessation because of any cause). Analyses were descriptive. RESULTS Thirty patients with MSI-H BTC were identified: 19 with cholangiocarcinoma, three with gallbladder cancer, and 8 with BTC undefined. The median age at diagnosis was 61.5 years (range, 26-86). Twenty-six (86.7%) patients had advanced stage at diagnosis. Twenty-seven patients (90%) received first-line systemic therapy, and 13 (48.1%) continued onto second line. Six patients (23.1%) were restaged to resectable from advanced disease after ICI therapy and underwent resection; all remained recurrence-free at last follow-up. Of these six patients, 3 (50%) achieved a pathologic complete response. Among those receiving first-line therapy, the median TTD was 9.9 months (95% CI, 5.7 to 14.5 months) and the 2-year OS was 73% (95% CI, 56% to 94%). CONCLUSION ICI therapy in patients with MSI-H BTC demonstrated durable response and downstaged some BTC to a resectable stage. dMMR/MSI-H should be performed up-front to guide treatment decisions.

Pre-hospital use of whole blood is becoming increasingly prevalent in EMS and military medicine. Technologies to store, transport, warm up, and transfuse the blood are now available, and the outcome of whole blood transfusion seems to be superior to infusion of crystalloid solutions or plasma and at least equivalent to packed cells with plasma. The auto-transfusion tourniquet (A-TT®, Oneg HaKarmel Ltd., Tirat Carmel, Israel) is a non-invasive device that shifts the patient’s own blood from the legs to the core and blocks its reentry. The A-TT consists of an elastic ring made of a stainless-steel coil, wrapped by an elastic sleeve and pulling straps. When rolled up the leg(s), it squeezes the soft-tissues’ blood into the central circulation, and the ring stops the return of blood to the leg. The application time of the A-TT is less than 20 s per leg, and the A-TT transfers more than 500 mL of blood from each leg to the core. The auto-transfused blood is of the patient’s own type, has full oxygen carrying capacity, is normothermic, and is not anticoagulated. The device can be applied by a trained first responder, even during transport, and its use can be titrated to avoid overshooting the patient’s blood pressure. The device can be kept on the leg for up to 2 h, and as such, can serve as a bridge to blood or a bridge to definitive care. This paper is a hypothesis-generating review that defines the potential role of the A-TT in settings where blood is not available and is a call for others to help generate more data.

Autoimmune diseases arise from a breakdown of immune tolerance and complex interplay of genetic susceptibility, environmental triggers, tissue-specific immune responses, microbiota, and regulatory pathways. Mouse models remain essential for dissecting these mechanisms, but no single model fully reproduces the heterogeneity, chronicity, and immune complexity of autoimmune disease in humans. This review summarizes classical murine and humanized mouse models used to study inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), multiple sclerosis (MS), type-1 diabetes (T1D), and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We also highlight disease-specific scoring systems, including clinical indices, histopathology, imaging, cytokine profiling, autoantibody assessment, and human immune-cell readouts, as essential tools for standardized interpretation. Conventional murine models provide experimental control and mechanistic clarity, whereas humanized models improve assessment of human immune responses, patient-specific biology, and therapeutic translation. However, humanized systems remain limited by incomplete immune reconstitution, graft-versus-host disease, donor variability, cost, and incomplete tissue architecture. By providing a comparative framework spanning both conventional and humanized models, this review aims to guide informed model selection tailored to specific research questions in autoimmune disease biology and translational therapeutic development.

ABSTRACT Objective To provide expert recommendations for the development of a specialty bipolar clinic that promotes best clinical practices for the delivery of safe and effective care. Methods Members of the National Network of Depression Centers (NNDC) Bipolar Clinics Work Group met in a series of 1‐h monthly video calls over 18 months to discuss all aspects of their respective institution's bipolar clinics, including services provided, administrative processes, staffing models, characteristics of patients treated, patient volumes, finances, and research. The group also invited psychiatrists from outside of the NNDC who ran large bipolar clinics to contribute their thoughts and experiences on the subject. In addition, the NNDC sent a 20‐question survey to all 27 sites asking clinic directors specific questions about their bipolar clinics, if applicable. Further meetings and discussions incorporating results from the survey took place to produce a comprehensive set of recommendations. Results Twenty‐one of 27 NNDC sites (81%) responded to the survey. Twelve of 21 (57%) sites had a specific bipolar clinic, and another 4 (19%) were looking to start one. Clinics were based in university settings. The meetings, clinic survey, and discussions resulted in 10 recommendations describing services and operations for bipolar specialty clinics. Conclusions Given the complexity of bipolar disorder, specialty clinics are important to enhance care. Clinics with a wide array of services that include consultation, medication management, bipolar‐specific psychotherapies, and patient/family psychoeducation provide the most comprehensive care. Challenges to these clinics include maintaining ongoing patient access as well as ensuring long‐term financial stability.