Citations

757 Background: Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) appear to differ across trials, even when pts receive the same regimen (REG). This analysis aimed to benchmark the clinical outcomes in the 2nd line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods: Individual patient (pt) data was available on 6,462 pts with mCRC enrolled in 7 2ndline clinical trials (8 REGs) in the ARCAD database. Regimens used in at least two trials included FOLFIRI +/- an EGFR inhibitor (EGFRi), FOLFOX +/- a VEGF inhibitor (VEGFi), and irinotecan (IRI). Descriptive statistics were used to describe pt demographics. Multivariable Cox models were used to assess differences (DIFFs) in PFS and OS, while p-value <0.05 were considered statistically significant (SS). Results: 500-1400 pts received each REG (see Table). Median OS and PFS differed by 0.2 to 4.6 months (mo) and 0.8 to 2.5 mo across trials within the same REG. These DIFFs were SS except for PFS in REGs containing FOLFIRI +/- EGFRi. After multivariable adjustment, all DIFFs in OS were attenuated and non-significant. DIFFs in PFS attenuated for most REGs but remained SS for FOLFOX and IRI. Conclusions: After multivariable adjustment, there were no SS DIFFs in outcomes across trials within the same REG, with the exception of PFS in FOLFOX and IRI. The initial observed DIFFs in outcomes could be due to confounding factors and the remaining SS DIFFs in PFS in FOLFOX and IRI may be due to variation in definition of progression across trials. Therefore, caution is warranted when using historical data to design future trials.[Table: see text]

714 Background: Mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) colorectal cancer (CRC) has been shown to be responsive to blockade with anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) antibodies. We describe a cohort of 17 patients with dMMR mCRC receiving treatment with pembrolizumab. Methods: Patients were identified through review of the Mayo Clinic electronic medical record (EMR) and chemotherapy administration records from May 2015 through September 2016. All patients with dMMR mCRC who received treatment with pembrolizumab were included. The EMR was reviewed to identify demographic, clinical, pathologic and treatment details. Overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS) and disease control rate (DCR=CR+PR+SD) are reported. Time to event analysis was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: A total of 17 patients were included in this analysis; median age at diagnosis was 48.5 years (range 25-93); 59% were female. Most primary tumors were right sided (n=12; 71%), 4 (24%) were left sided and 1 (5%) was a tumor of unknown primary within the bowel. Thirteen (75%) patients received 2 or more lines of therapy prior to pembrolizumab (range 1-4). All patients received 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks, with the exception of two patients on a clinical trial; one who received 200 mg every 3 weeks, the other received 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks. The most common mutations (mut) identified were loss of MLH1 (9/12) and PMS2 (10/12), 4 patients had germline mut. KRAS mut was identified in 6/15 patients and only 1 patient had BRAF mut. Number of cycles of pembrolizumab ranged from 1 to 35, with 10 (59%) patients receiving 6 or more cycles. DCR at first assessment was 57%, with 7% CR and 50% PR. Median follow-up was 28 months (95% CI 18-55). Median OS was 103 months (95% CI NR-NR); 12-month OS was 88% and 24-month OS was 81%. Median OS post-PD-1 therapy was NR (95% CI 2-NR). Median PFS was 19 months (95% CI 5-19); 12-month PFS was 64% and 24-month PFS was 0%. At time of analysis, 11 patients remain on PD-1 therapy; 4 patients have died. Conclusions: Anti-PD1 blockade with pembrolizumab can provide long lasting benefit in dMMR mCRC, even in heavily pretreated patients.

713 Background: Exploratory analyses from RAISE (NCT01183780), FOLFIRI with ramucirumab or placebo in previously treated mCRC pts, suggested pts with treatment-emergent neutropenia may have improved overall survival (OS) compared to pts who did not experience neutropenia on study (Ciuleanu T, et al. abst. 2475, ESMO 2016). Subsequent analyses suggested an even stronger association between baseline ANC and OS, with high baseline ANC associated with shorter OS. A retrospective observational study was conducted to test this association as a pre-specified hypothesis. Methods: The IMS Oncology Database (electronic medical record data from US community practices) was used to identify pts ≥ 18 yrs with mCRC (ICD-9 code 153.x, 154.0 or 154.1) who initiated second-line fluoropyrimidine and irinotecan (+/- bevacizumab; bev) in 2007-2013, following progression during or after first-line fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin (+/- biologic). Eligible pts had ≥ 1 ANC in the 60 days prior to second-line therapy. Pts were stratified by second-line bev use and high/low baseline ANC ( ≥ or < 5.5x109/L) and matched by propensity scores. OS based on a validated proxy was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and a Cox proportional hazards model, adjusted for age, gender, ECOG PS, stage, length of first-line treatment, and BMI. Results: 747 eligible pts were identified, of whom 617 were matched. Pts with baseline characteristic data had a median age of 59 yr, 57% were male, 67% were Caucasian, 74% had stage IV disease at diagnosis, and 63% had ECOG PS of 0/1 at start of second-line. Bev-treated pts with high baseline ANC (n = 122) had a median OS (mOS) of 7.7 mo vs 14.7 mo in pts with low baseline ANC (n = 323); adjusted HR 1.69 (95% CI, 1.35, 2.12; p < 0.0001). Pts with high baseline ANC not treated with bev (n = 59) had a mOS 5.4 mo vs 14.4 mo in pts with low baseline ANC (n = 113); adjusted HR 2.73 (95% CI, 1.89, 3.93; p < 0.0001). There was a modest interaction effect between bev treatment and baseline ANC (p = 0.012), indicating greater bev benefit in the high ANC group. Conclusions: Baseline ANC appears to be a strong prognostic factor and potentially a weak predictive factor for antiangiogenic therapy for OS in pts with previously treated mCRC.

677 Background: Napabucasin a first-in-class cancer stemness inhibitor in clinical development, suppresses cancer stemness by targeting Stat3-driven gene transcription. Preclinically, potent and broad-spectrum anti-cancer activity was observed in vitro and in vivo, alone and in combination with other agents. In a phase 1 study, napabucasin monotherapy was well tolerated with encouraging signs of anti-tumor activity at the RP2D of 500 mg BID. Methods: The current open-label, multi-center study includes phase II expansion in pts with refractory, K- Raswt mCRC to confirm safety and anti-tumor activity of napabucasin administered orally at 480mg BID in combination with panitumumab (6mg/kg bi-weekly). Results: 72 pts were enrolled, 48 pts were evaluable by RECIST of which 7 (15%) and 41 (85%) had 2 or >3 prior treatment lines, respectively. Of the 48 evaluable pts, 64.6% (31/48) were previously treated with an anti-EGFR agent. No new adverse events (AEs) were observed and most common AEs included grade 1/2 diarrhea, nausea, abdominal cramps, and vomiting. Among 48 pts enrolled who received RECIST evaluation, Disease Control Rate (DCR) was observed in 25 pts (52.1%) of which 3 pts achieved PR (6%) and 22 pts achieved SD (45%). Among 31 pts previously treated with anti-EGFR therapy, DCR was observed in 15 pts (48%) compared with DCR of 59% observed in 10 out of 17 anti-EGFR naïve pts receiving a scan. Conclusions: This phase II study confirmed that napabucasin can be safely combined with panitumumab at full dose and shows encouraging anti-tumor activity in pts with K- Ras wt mCRC, regardless of prior anti-EGFR exposure, suggesting that napabucasin may sensitize pts to repeat anti-EGFR therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT01776307. [Table: see text]

675 Background: Recent retrospective analysis of CALGB/SWOG 80405 showed that left-sided colon cancers (LCC) respond differently to biological therapy compared with right-sided tumors. However, differences between rectal cancers (RC) and LCC remain undefined. Herein, we report our exploration of differences between these two groups. Methods: Individual patient data from 4182 patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancers, enrolled onto 8 first-line randomized trials, were pooled. Only pts with tumor locations that were clearly defined as LCC (splenic flexure to sigmoid) or RC were included in this analysis. Differences in pt characteristics and disease factors according to LCC vs. RC were identified. The prognostic effect of primary tumor location on OS and PFS was quantified via multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling stratified by treatment arm within each study and adjusting for age, sex, performance status, and prior surgery. Results: In total, 2,479 (59%) pts with LCC and 1,703 (41%) pts with RC were identified. Pts with RC, compared with LCC, were more likely to be male (68% vs. 62%, p < 0.001), have lung metastases (mets) (56% vs. 37%, p < 0.001), and have 2 or more metastatic sites (64% vs. 60%, p < 0.02), whereas pts with LCC were more likely to have liver mets (84% vs. 76%, p < 0.001). RC had a greater frequency of KRAS mutations (41% vs. 37%, p = 0.04) than LCC but there were no differences in the frequency of BRAF mutations (5% vs. 4%, p = 0.2). In multivariable analysis, no differences in OS or PFS were observed between pts with LCC vs. RC. While risk of death did not differ by primary tumor location, across all pts with LCC or RC, those with liver mets had a 17% increased risk of death compared to those with lung mets (HR = 1.17, p = 0.03) after adjusting for effects of other variables. Forthcoming prognostic analysis of LCC vs. RC within grouped backbone treatments (e.g., FOLFOX and FOLFIRI) is underway. Conclusions: Tumors arising in the rectum may carry clinical and molecular features that are distinct from LCC. Further investigations are warranted to determine whether RC should be treated with the same chemo backbone and biological therapy as LCC.

668 Background: Ramucirumab is a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody antagonist of VEGFR-2. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in 2nd line FOLFIRI based treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) were improved with RAM therapy versus PBO in the RAISE trial. Recent work suggests mCRC primary tumor location is both prognostic and predictive; with improved OS and therapy-specific sensitivity observed in left (L)- vs right (R)-sided tumors. Given these findings, the RAISE trial data was subjected to post-hoc analysis to determine if sidedness influenced RAM efficacy. Methods: Primary tumor site was obtained. L-CRC was defined as the splenic flexure, descending and sigmoid colon, and rectum, while R-CRC included transverse, ascending colon and cecum. OS/PFS in L and R subgroups were analyzed via Kaplan-Meier method and unstratified log-rank test (treatments within subgroup), unstratified Cox proportional hazards model (estimate hazard ratio [HR] and 95% CI), and Wald test (treatment-by-subgroup interaction). Results: Tumor location was available for 1012/1072 (94%) patients, 699 L- and 313 R-CRC. Baseline characteristics were balanced between arms. RAM treatment enhanced L-CRC median OS by 2.5 mo (median 14.5 vs 12.0 mo) with a HR (95% CI) = 0.807 (0.675, 0.965), P = 0.019; compared to a 1.1 mo increase in median OS in R-CRC vs PBO (12.7 vs 11.6) with a HR (95% CI) = 0.971 (0.750, 1.258), P = 0.823; and, RAM enhanced L-CRC median PFS by 1.6 mo (6.0 vs 4.4 mo) and HR (95% CI) = 0.776 (0.664, 0.906), P = 0.001 compared to a 1.1 mo increase in median PFS R-CRC vs PBO (5.6 vs 4.5) with a HR (95% CI) = 0.855 (0.674, 1.084), P = 0.197. The treatment-by-subgroup interaction for both OS and PFS was not significant ( P = 0.276, 0.578, respectively). Conclusions: Despite L-CRC patients having longer OS/PFS and a seemingly stronger RAM treatment effect than R-CRC, the non-significant interaction test cannot verify sidedness as being predictive of RAM efficacy. The current study confirms ramucirumab benefits mCRC patients regardless primary tumor location. Clinical trial information: NCT01183780.

593 Background: Cancer stem cells or stemness-high cancer cells are considered to be fundamentally important for resistance to therapy, recurrence and metastasis. Napabucasin, a first-in-class cancer stemness inhibitor in clinical development, suppresses cancer stemness by targeting Stat3-driven gene transcription. Preclinical studies suggest that napabucasin sensitizes heterogeneous cancer cells to chemotherapeutics and targeted agents. Methods: This study was performed to assess signs of anti-tumor activity of napabucasin in combination with FOLFIRI +/- Bev in CRC pts. Napabucasin was administered at 240 mg BID. FOLFIRI (5-FU 400 mg/m2 bolus with 2400 mg/m2, irinotecan 180 mg/m2, and leucovorin 400 mg/m2 infusion) +/- Bev 5 mg/kg was administered biweekly until disease progression or other discontinuation criterion. pSTAT3 status of archival tumor tissue was assayed by immunohistochemistry using the H-score with pSTAT3highdefined as ≥ 5% pSTAT3+ cancer cells and tumor stroma staining at ≥ 2+ intensity. Results: 63 CRC pts with an average of >2 prior therapy lines were enrolled. No pharmacokinetic interactions or dose-limiting toxicity was observed. Most common adverse events (AEs) included grade 1/2 diarrhea, nausea, vomiting and fatigue. 25 pts had grade 3 AEs, including diarrhea (14), fatigue (4), dehydration (2), electrolyte imbalance (4), nausea (1) and weight loss (1) resolved with dose reduction and supportive care. Among 63 pts enrolled who received RECIST evaluation, disease control (CR+PR+SD) was observed in 49 pts (86%) with an overall response (CR+PR) of 28% with 1 pt achieving CR. Clinical trial information: NCT02024607. Conclusions: This phase Ib/II study suggests napabucasin may sensitize chemorefractory CRC to FOLFIRI +/- Bev. Encouraging signs of synergistic activity between napabucasin and FOLFIRI was observed in CRC pts regardless of pSTAT3 status.[Table: see text]

551 Background: Sorafenib inhibits various pro-angiogenesis pathways including PDGFR-B, a factor associated with resistance to anti-VEGF therapy. A previous phase II trial in patients with chemorefractory metastatic CRC demonstrated a 63% disease control rate with a combination of bevacizumab (BEV) and sorafenib. This phase I trial sought to determine the MTD of BEV and sorafenib combined with standard cytotoxic therapy for advanced gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. Methods: Patients with advanced GI malignancies appropriate for irinotecan-based therapy were enrolled (14 with CRC, 3 gastroesophageal). A standard 3 + 3 design was used with 3 escalating sorafenib dose levels (DL): (1) 200 mg po daily, days 3-7, 10-14; (2) 200 mg po twice daily, days 3-6, 10-13; and (3) 200 mg po twice daily, days 3-7, 10-14. FOLFIRI: irinotecan 180 mg/m2 d1, leucovorin 400 mg/m2 d1, 5-fluorouracil (FU) bolus 400 mg/m2 d1, 5-FU infusion 2400 mg/m2d1-2 and BEV 5 mg/kg d1. 1 cycle = 14 days. Results: Seventeen pts were enrolled, median age of 56 (range 32 and 81). Two pts were replaced, as they did not complete DLT evaluation, leaving 15 evaluable pts. Four evaluable pts at DL1 and 6 pts at DL2 had no DLTs. At DL 3, the first cohort of 3 pts did not experience any DLTs. In the second cohort of 3 pts, 2 pts experienced DLTs (asymptomatic G3 hypophosphatemia, G3 dehydration and diarrhea). MTD was determined to be DL2: sorafenib 200 mg PO twice daily, days 3-6, 10-13 combined with FOLFIRI and BEV at standard doses. Of the 15 evaluable pts, 4 pts had PR, 8 pts had SD as best response, 1 pt had PD, and 2 pts discontinued treatment prior to first tumor assessment. The median number of cycles was 10 (range 1-37). Three pts with CRC had disease control > 12 months. Conclusions: The MTD of this regimen is sorafenib 200 mg PO twice daily, days 3-6,10-13 combined with standard doses of FOLFIRI and BEV. Dual VEGF inhibition combined with cytotoxic therapy may provide prolonged disease stabilization for select patients with advanced GI malignancies. Supported by CA69912 and CA15083. Clinical trial information: NCT01383343.

522 Background: Metformin inhibits mTOR and downstream pathways involved in cell proliferation and survival by inducing AMPK activation. Although its use has been associated with decreased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC), the effect of metformin on cancer related mortality is unclear. We performed a meta-analysis of published observational studies evaluating metformin use in patients with CRC and its association with overall and CRC-specific survival. Methods: Through a systematic search of PubMed and conference presentations (cut-off: August 2013), we identified 8 observational studies (18,537 total patients with CRC; 6242 CRC patients with DM) reporting the association between metformin use and survival after diagnosis of CRC. Summary hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was estimated using the random effects model, and heterogeneity was measured using the inconsistency index (I2). Results: On meta-analysis, metformin use was associated with a 34% reduction in mortality in CRC patients as compared to non-use (adjusted HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.54-0.81), albeit with high heterogeneity (I2=66.9%). After exclusion of one study, which contributed to considerable heterogeneity, a 28% reduction in mortality was considered a more conservative, consistent effect estimate (adjusted HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.64-0.81), with minimal heterogeneity (I2=16.2%). On restricting analysis only to patients with DM, use of metformin (vs non-use) was associated with decreased all-cause mortality (6 studies; adjusted HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.49-0.81) and CRC-specific mortality (3 studies; adjusted HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.50-0.87). Conclusions: Based on meta-analysis of observational studies, the use of metformin in diabetic patients with CRC appears to be associated with reduced all-cause mortality and CRC-specific mortality. Further prospective investigation of metformin’s effect on outcome in CRC patients is warranted.

514 Background: Randomized trials and OCSs have demonstrated that BV treatment in 1st-line (1L), in 2L, and across multiple lines is associated with longer survival in patients (pts) with mCRC. This analysis was aimed at comparing the effectiveness of BV after 1st disease progression (PD) between male and female mCRC pts who received 1L BV-containing therapy in a real-world setting. Methods: ARIES is a large, prospective OCS that enrolled pts who received BV and chemotherapy (CT) for 1L mCRC. Post-PD effectiveness was assessed for men and women characterizing BV use by cumulative and dichotomous approaches. The primary analysis treated BV exposure as cumulative BV doses after 1st PD and post-progression overall survival (ppOS) as the time from 1st PD to death. A time-dependent Cox regression model was fitted to assess the effect of cumulative BV exposure on ppOS, while controlling for potential confounders. A dichotomous secondary analysis characterized BV exposure as receipt of CT + BV (BBP) or CT alone (No BBP) within 2 months after PD and ppOS as time from 1st PD + 2 months to death. Results: Among the 1,550 1L mCRC pts enrolled, 1,199 (532 women) had PD. In the primary analysis, hazard ratios (HRs) for ppOS decreased, on average, by 1.2% with each additional BV dose. When stratified by sex, the average risk reduction per BV dose over 15 doses was 1.8% in women and 0.7% in men. In the secondary analysis that included 331 women (BBP, 180; No BBP, 151) and 417 men (BBP, 245, No BBP, 172) who received BV ± CT within 2 months post-PD, the HRs for ppOS with BBP treatment were 0.46 (95% CI, 0.35–0.59) in women and 0.52 (95% CI, 0.41–0.67) in men. Statistical interaction tests for differences in the effectiveness of BV between men and women were negative for primary and secondary analyses (P of 0.58 and 0.77). Protocol-specified adverse events occurred in 17.8% of women and 10.2% of men in the BBP population; this difference was largely related to rates of hypertension (8.3% vs 2.4%, respectively). Conclusions: In ARIES, the effectiveness of BV after first PD was not statistically different between women and men with mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT00388206.