Citations

AbstractBackgroundThe language and visual variants are two common clinical phenotypes of atypical Alzheimer’s disease (AD). There are reports of overlap between these clinical phenotypes, however, the extent and frequency of overlap, and its neuroanatomical underpinnings remain unclear.MethodEighty‐two patients with biomarker‐confirmed AD who presented with either predominant language (n = 34) or visuospatial/perceptual (n = 48) deficits were recruited by the Neurodegenerative Research Group and underwent neurological and neuropsychological testing, MRI and [18F]flortaucipir‐PET. The clinical examination included testing for simultanagnosia, Gerstmann’s syndrome, ideomotor apraxia, visuospatial‐visuoperceptual function, confrontational naming, sentence repetition and letter and animal fluency. Cut‐points for abnormality were defined for each test and used to classify the following groups: language‐pure (no visual‐function deficit), language‐plus (impaired on one visual‐function), language‐mixed (impaired on two visual‐functions), visual‐pure (no language‐function deficit), visual‐plus (impaired on one language‐function) and visual‐mixed (impaired on two language‐functions). Patterns of relative volume loss and flortaucipir uptake were assessed using SPM12.ResultOf the 82 patients, 11 (13%) were language‐pure, 16 (20%) language‐plus, 7 (8%) language‐mixed, 10 (12%) visual‐pure, 17 (21%) visual‐plus and 21 (26%) visual‐mixed, with no difference in disease duration across groups. Visual deficits in the language‐plus group consisted of mild simultanagnosia in 29%, Gerstmann’s syndrome in 24%, and mild visuospatial deficits. In the language‐mixed group 86% had simultanagnosia and 43% had Gerstmann’s syndrome, with visuospatial‐visuoperceptual deficits comparable to the visual‐pure group. Language deficits in the visual‐plus group consisted of mild anomia and reduced letter and animal fluency. The visual‐mixed group reported naming and repetition deficits, and reduced fluency, comparable to the language‐predominant groups. All three language groups showed left temporal volume loss and flortaucipir uptake, with greater involvement of the parieto‐occipital and frontal lobes in language‐plus and language‐mixed groups. All three visual groups showed occipital volume loss and flortaucipir uptake, with greater involvement of the parieto‐temporal and frontal lobes in visual‐plus and visual‐mixed groups.ConclusionOnly 25% of our cohort showed a pure language or visual presentation, highlighting the high frequency of syndromic overlap in atypical AD and the diagnostic challenge of categorical phenotyping. Syndromic overlap was associated with neuroanatomical overlap and more widespread patterns of atrophy and tau deposition.

AbstractBackgroundPosterior cortical atrophy (PCA) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) show overlapping patterns of hypometabolism affecting posterior regions of the brain. Both syndromes show disruptions in functional connectivity, but it is unknown how patterns of disruption within and between networks compare between PCA and DLB.MethodThirty amyloid‐positive PCA, 27 amyloid‐positive DLB (DLB+), 24 amyloid‐negative DLB (DLB‐) patients and 30 cognitively normal amyloid‐negative (CN) individuals were recruited at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, and underwent structural and resting state functional MRI. Spatially preprocessed data was analyzed using the CONN functional connectivity toolbox to explore nine networks: visual, sensorimotor, dorsal‐attention, cerebellar, frontoparietal, memory, language, salience, and default mode networks (DMN). Multivariate linear regression models corrected for multiple comparisons and adjusted for age and sex were fit to analyze within‐network connectivity (Fisher’s R‐to‐Z transformations). Between‐network connectivity was assessed with group level difference maps (two‐sample t‐test) corrected for false discovery rate at p<0.05.ResultMultivariate linear regression models showed reduced within‐network connectivity across all DMN components, sensorimotor, and dorsal‐attention networks, with trends for the visual network in PCA compared to CN. Both DLB‐ and DLB+ showed reduced within‐network connectivity for the cerebellar network, with DLB+ showing reduced connectivity in the posterior‐DMN, memory, and salience networks compared to CN. DLB‐ showed increased connectivity in dorsal‐attention and DMN, while DLB+ showing reduced connectivity in the memory network compared to PCA. Between‐network analysis showed an increase in cerebellar‐to‐sensorimotor connectivity in all three groups, with increase in cerebellar‐to‐dorsal‐attention connectivity in DLB‐ and PCA compared to CN. DLB‐ showed a decrease in posterior‐DMN‐to‐sensorimotor connectivity, while PCA showed reduced connectivity between all DMN components and dorsal‐attention‐to‐sensorimotor connectivity compared to CN. There was an increase in connectivity between all DMN components and a reduction in dorsal‐DMN‐to‐sensorimotor connectivity in both DLB‐ and DLB+ compared to PCA.ConclusionPCA was associated with connectivity disruptions across all DMN components, sensorimotor, dorsal‐attention and visual networks, while both DLB groups showed disruptions in cerebellar networks, with DLB+ showing further disruptions in posterior‐DMN, memory and salience networks. These findings suggest that both PCA and DLB have unique brain network disruptions, with amyloid status influencing connectivity in DLB.

AbstractBackgroundThe NINDS criteria define Traumatic Encephalopathy Syndrome (TES) as the clinical manifestation of the neuropathologically diagnosed chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE). The core clinical features of TES include both cognitive and neuropsychiatric symptoms, the latter termed neurobehavioral dysregulation (NBD). We explored potential biological correlates of NBD by investigating fluid biomarkers of neuronal damage, astrogliosis, phosphorylated tau (pTau), neuroinflammation, and catecholamines in former American football players.MethodOur cohort consisted of former professional (PRO) and college (COL) American football players from the DIAGNOSE CTE Research Project. NBD was measured by four subscales (i.e., explosivity, emotional dyscontrol, impulsivity, affective lability) and a total NBD score, derived by factor analysis of multiple self‐report neuropsychiatric measures. Plasma neurofilament light (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), CSF total tau and pTau181/231/217, as well as CSF biomarkers related to neuroinflammation (IL‐6, CRP, TNF‐α, VEGF‐A), were measured with various well‐validated immunoassay methods. Catecholamines in CSF (dopamine, 3,4‐dihydroxyphenylacetic acid, 3,4‐dihydroxyphenylalanine, noradrenaline, 3,4‐dihydroxyphenylglycol) were measured with HPLC. Multivariate linear regression models assessed the relationships between biomarkers and NBD scales, adjusted for age, BMI, race, and APOE e4, including stratification by exposure group, i.e., PRO, COL.ResultDemographics and biomarker levels are displayed in Table 1. High levels of IL‐6 were significantly associated with higher scores of all NBD subscales, independent of exposure group. Other significant relationships included plasma NfL with emotional dyscontrol and impulsivity. Within the college group, CSF pTau181 was significantly associated with emotional dyscontrol and CSF noradrenaline with explosivity, emotional dyscontrol, impulsivity, and total NBD score. (Table 2 & Figure 1). IL‐6 models were repeated with measures of cognitive dysfunction (another core feature of TES) added as covariates; these analyses again found significant relationships between IL‐6 and NBD, irrespective of cognitive functioning.ConclusionWe observed specific fluid biomarkers related to NBD in former American football players. Of note were the associations between IL‐6 and all NBD subscales (and not with cognitive functioning), suggesting that neuroinflammation may be a specific component in the expression of NBD symptoms. Future studies will investigate how these neuroinflammatory processes are related to other biomarkers, level of RHI exposure, and neuropathology.

AbstractBackgroundChronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) is a neurodegenerative disease thought to be caused, in part, by repetitive head impact (RHI) exposure and characterized by phosphorylated tau deposition with varying patterns in the cerebral cortex. Flortaucipir tau PET data from the DIAGNOSE CTE Research Project was examined to investigate tau PET patterns and its relation to RHI exposure in former professional and college American football players.MethodIn this study, 218 DIAGNOSE CTE participants, ages 45‐74, with flortaucipir PET were included; 104 were former National Football League players (PRO), 58 were former college football players (COL), and 56 had no history of contact sports, other exposure to RHI, or traumatic brain injury (UE). Regional flortaucipir uptake was quantified using established procedures for three previously defined statistical regions (superior frontal, left parietal, and medial temporal) and compared across the three groups. Association analyses were also performed to examine the relationship between flortaucipir uptake and exposure to RHI using the cumulative head impact index for linear acceleration g‐force (CHII‐G). The potential clinical utility of flortaucipir PET for CTE was also investigated by examining its ability to differentiate participants meeting criteria for traumatic encephalopathy syndrome (TES) and probable or possible level of certainty for CTE pathology from those who do not meet those criteria.ResultSignificantly higher flortaucipir uptake was observed in former football players than in participants without RHI exposure, controlling for age and race for the superior frontal region (Fig. 1A), left parietal, and medial temporal regions. Association between regional flortaucipir uptake and CHII‐G was only observed in the superior frontal region in former players (PRO+COL) 60 years and older (Fig. 1B) and no association was observed in the full PRO+COL group. Flortaucipir PET was not able to differentiate TES groups in former football players (Fig. 1C).ConclusionElevated flortaucipir uptake was observed in former American football players to a group of unexposed men. The association between flortaucipir uptake and exposure to RHI may require a long latent period to manifest. Further investigation of more sensitive tau PET tracers and quantification techniques is warranted to better characterize CTE related tau pathology.

AbstractBackgroundDisruption of default mode network (DMN) connectivity is common in Alzheimer’s disease. We investigated cross‐sectional and one‐year longitudinal changes in DMN sub‐systems in atypical clinical presentations of AD, in relation to age and tau.MethodSixty‐four amyloid‐positive atypical AD (Aty‐AD) patients diagnosed with posterior cortical atrophy (n = 35) or logopenic progressive aphasia (n = 29) were recruited by the Neurodegenerative Research Group. Patients underwent structural and resting‐state functional MRI, and [18F]flortaucipir PET at baseline and one‐year follow‐up. 140 amyloid‐negative cognitively unimpaired (CU) individuals from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging were included as controls. Global tau SUVR was calculated in a meta‐ROI including parietal, temporal, and occipital regions. DMN connectivity was calculated in native space for posterior (pDMN), ventral (vDMN), anterior ventral (avDMN) and anterior dorsal (adDMN) DMN sub‐systems using the dual regression method. A global measure of DMN connectivity, the Network Failure Quotient (NFQ), was calculated as (vDMN_to_pDMN+ adDMN_to_pDMN)/(pDMN+vDMN). Linear mixed‐effects models were computed for each DMN connectivity measure, including diagnosis (Aty‐AD, CU), age, time and their interaction, and a per‐person random effect. SPM paired t‐tests were run to compare baseline and follow‐up images in Aty‐AD and CU separately. Linear mixed‐effect models were run in the Aty‐AD cohort only to investigate the effect of global baseline tau SUVR on each DMN connectivity measure.ResultMixed‐effects models showed evidence of lower cross‐sectional pDMN and higher adDMN connectivity in Aty‐AD relative to CU, with no significant time effects (Fig. 1). While connectivity in all DMN sub‐systems declined with age in CU, connectivity was higher in older Aty‐AD patients relative to younger, particularly in vDMN and pDMN. A similar trend was observed for NFQ, which was significantly higher in Aty‐AD, with a negative age effect (Fig. 1). In Aty‐AD, voxel‐based analyses showed moderate evidence of decline in vDMN connectivity and increase in avDMN connectivity over time (Fig. 2). Greater baseline global tau SUVR was associated with lower vDMN connectivity, cross‐sectionally and longitudinally (Fig. 3).ConclusionDMN connectivity was altered in Aty‐AD, with strongest alterations in younger patients. The vDMN declined over time, suggesting a shift in DMN connectivity with disease progression that was likely related to tau pathology.

AbstractBackgroundPosterior cortical atrophy (PCA) and logopenic progressive aphasia (LPA) are atypical variants of Alzheimer’s disease which typically show different cross‐sectional patterns of atrophy and tau deposition. Patterns of atrophy remain distinct longitudinally. A direct comparison of rates of atrophy and tau accumulation between these syndromes has not yet been reported.MethodWe evaluated 20 PCA and 20 LPA patients; all were amyloid‐positive on [11C]PiB‐PET. Structural MRI and tau‐PET were performed at baseline and one‐year follow‐up. Annualized rates of change in grey matter volume (log Jacobians from tensor‐based morphometry) and flortaucipir‐PET SUVRs were calculated at the lobar level. A global tau SUVR was calculated using parietal, temporal, and occipital regions. Lobar rates were compared between PCA and LPA with linear models, accounting for education, sex, age, baseline global tau SUVR (for tau‐PET), with significance set at p = 0.05. SPM voxel‐level comparisons were performed, with the same covariates, with significance set at p = 0.001.ResultGroups did not differ in age, Apoe status, baseline global tau SUVR or whole brain volume, or their annualized rates of change. LPA had shorter disease duration. In the lobar models, PCA had faster rates of atrophy in the occipital lobe and there were no significant differences on rates of tau accumulation, but a trend for LPA having faster rates of tau accumulation in all lobes. Baseline global tau SUVR was negatively associated with rate of tau accumulation in parietal and temporal lobes. Age was negatively associated with rates of tau accumulation in frontal, temporal and occipital lobes and with rates of atrophy in frontal and parietal lobes. Voxel‐level analysis confirmed these results, with PCA showing faster rates of occipital atrophy, and LPA showing subtle evidence for diffuse faster rates of tau accumulation (Figure 1).ConclusionLongitudinal patterns of neuroimaging abnormalities differ between PCA and LPA, although with divergent results for tau accumulation and atrophy that may reflect differences in disease stage. Rates of change are strongly influenced by age and severity of baseline tau, with faster rates of tau accumulation in patients with younger age and lower baseline tau deposition.

AbstractBackgroundThe spectrum of what is referred to as nonfluent/agrammatic primary progressive aphasia includes patients with isolated apraxia of speech (PPAOS), progressive agrammatic aphasia (PAA), or a combination thereof (AOS‐PAA). When AOS is present, there is typically an underlying 4R tauopathy (corticobasal degeneration; progressive supranuclear palsy); isolated PAA is more often associated with a 3R tauopathy (Pick’s disease). While pathological studies confirm the clinical syndrome is the sequela of these proteinopathies, beta‐amyloid (Aβ) deposition has also been observed. Given the growing number of treatment options, it is important to better understand the incidence of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in PPAOS‐PAA spectrum disorders.Methods65 patients recruited by the Neurodegenerative Research Group at Mayo Clinic underwent Aβ‐PET imaging using Pittsburgh Compound B (PiB) and tau‐PET imaging with [18F]flortaucipir at the same visit (PPAOS = 23; PAA = 6; AOS‐PAA = 36). A global PiB SUVR (standardized uptake value ratio)≥1.48 and temporal lobe tau meta‐ROI SUVR≥1.25 were deemed Aβ and tau positive, respectively. The incidence of Aβ and tau positivity and clinical‐demographic profiles were compared among groups.ResultsThere was no difference in age, sex, APOE status, tau/Aβ positivity or PET SUVRs across clinical groups (Table 1). Patients differed on indices of aphasia and AOS severity, in concordance with group membership; there was no difference on a memory measure. Eight patients (12%) were both Aβ and tau positive (indicative of the presence of AD), with an additional 20 patients (31%) positive on only one biomarker (Table 1). Of the eight Aβ and tau positive patients, seven had AOS (six prosodic predominant AOS). Aβ more than tau SUVRs increased with age and were related to each other (Figure 1).ConclusionsAβ and tau positivity is not uncommon in AOS and/or PAA patients, particularly in older patients. Enrollment criteria for Aβ or tau targeted pharmacological trials should consider concordance of biological variables and clinical presentations, rather than simply biological biomarkers. Alternatively, if such patients are enrolled, the outcome measures should reflect the clinical impairments, as it is not yet known if or how concomitant AD influences the clinical presentation.

AbstractBackgroundRepetitive head impacts (RHI) from American football can lead to tau and non‐tau pathologies that might present as white matter hyperintensities (WMH) on FLAIR MRI. In 2022, we published a study in Alzheimer’s & Dementia that examined WMH and their association with risk factors and clinical function in former elite football players. That study will be presented during this symposium along with new unpublished data that used imaging and fluid biomarkers to examine etiological correlates (tau, amyloid, neurodegeneration, axonal injury, neuroinflammation) of WMH in the same cohort.MethodsThe multi‐site DIAGNOSE CTE Research Project recruited 180 football players and 60 asymptomatic males without RHI (“controls”), all 45‐74 years (Table 1). Participants completed MRI, lumbar puncture, and neuropsychological testing. Lesion Segmentation Toolbox estimated FLAIR WMH, FreeSurfer derived total cortical thickness, and a diffusion pipeline derived average global FA. CSF was analyzed for p‐tau181, Aβ1‐42, NfL, and sTREM2. Tobit regressions compared football players (n = 149) and controls (n = 53) on total and regional log‐WMH and estimated the effects of years of football and age of first exposure (AFE) to football on log‐WMH. Linear regressions evaluated log‐WMH and clinical associations in football players. Structural equation modeling (SEM) examined effects between log‐WMH and cortical thickness, FA, and the CSF biomarkers. Analyses accounted for age, race, revised Framingham Stroke Risk Profile (rFSRP), body mass index, APOE ε4, and evaluation site.ResultsAlosco et al. (2022) found older (i.e., 60+) but not younger football players had greater total, frontal, temporal and parietal log‐WMH compared to controls (FDR‐adjusted p‐values<0.05; Table 2). Among older football players, younger AFE was associated with greater log‐WMH (beta = ‐0.13, 95% CI = ‐0.23,‐0.02). Greater log‐WMH corresponded to worse Trails A‐B (beta = ‐4.32, 95% CI = ‐8.59,‐0.05) and List Learning Long Delay scores (beta = ‐0.56, 95% CI = ‐0.93,‐0.19). Subsequent unpublished SEM analyses in football players (Figure 1) showed the following direct effects on log‐WMH: higher rFSRP, higher CSF p‐tau181, lower FA, and reduced cortical thickness. There were no indirect effects. Compared to controls, SEM associations were stronger in football players exception for cortical thickness.ConclusionsFLAIR WMH might have unique imaging characteristics, risk factors, and pathological underpinnings in people exposed to RHI.

AbstractBackgroundThe Alzheimer’s Association and Society for Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging convened a Workgroup to update previous Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for amyloid PET (Johnson 2013) and develop the first AUC for tau PET. The AUC represent general guidelines and should not be considered a substitute for clinical judgment exercised in the care of individual patients.MethodThe Workgroup included 14 researchers with multidisciplinary expertise. Meetings were held between June 2020 and August 2021. Key research questions were identified using the PICOTS framework, triggering an independent systematic literature review. Using established methods (Fitch 2001), the Workgroup identified 17 clinical scenarios in which amyloid/tau PET may be considered. Appropriateness of amyloid and tau PET as independent, stand‐alone modalities were ranked for each scenario using a 9‐point scale (Table 1). Consensus was achieved using a modified Delphi process. Online surveys were completed iteratively by Workgroup members, followed by discussion, until all votes for each scenario fell within one of the following categories: Appropriate/Uncertain/Rarely Appropriate.ResultAs an over‐arching principle, amyloid/tau PET should be considered in patients who: (1) have undergone a comprehensive assessment by a dementia expert; (2) Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a diagnostic possibility but uncertainty remains; and (3) knowledge of amyloid/tau PET results is expected to help establish diagnosis and guide patient management. Consensus ratings for clinical scenarios are shown in Table 2. More evidence was available to inform recommendations for amyloid than tau PET. Amyloid PET was considered “Appropriate” to inform diagnosis of MCI or dementia due to suspected AD; clarify diagnosis when CSF biomarkers are equivocal; to inform prognosis in MCI; and to determine eligibility for amyloid‐targeting therapies. Tau PET was considered “Appropriate” to clarify diagnosis in patients with MCI/dementia under age 65 or those with atypical presentations; and to inform prognosis in MCI or dementia due to suspected AD.ConclusionThe updated AUC highlight a growing role for amyloid PET and an emerging role for tau PET in the clinical evaluation of cognitively impaired patients. AUC are expected to further evolve based on data from ongoing studies of clinical utility and a rapidly developing therapeutic landscape.

AbstractBackgroundPredictive models of tau‐PET accumulation have largely relied on the functional connectome to estimate its spatial patterns in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Patterns of global functional organization represent a promising avenue as they encapsulate many biological properties relevant to neurodevelopment, cognition and degeneration. We compared approaches based on local connectivity (from task‐free fMRI) and global organization (from FDG‐PET) to predict regional tau‐PET across AD phenotypes.MethodWe included 430 cognitively unimpaired (CU) individuals (214 A+T‐, 216 A+T+) and 62 amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), 64 amnestic AD, 21 dysexecutive AD (dAD), 41 logopenic progressive aphasia (LPA) and 49 posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) patients (all A+T+) from the Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Mayo Clinic Study of Aging, and Neurodegenerative Research Groups (referred to as “Mayo cohort”). The connectivity approach consisted of assessing the relationship between a region’s tau level and its functional connectivity to the region of highest tau (epicenter). The global organization approach consisted of 1) performing a principal component analysis on 3000 FDG‐PET images that did not overlap with the Mayo cohort, 2) projecting FDG‐PET images of the Mayo cohort onto the low‐dimensional space generated in Step 1 and extracting corresponding weighted values across the first 100 components, 3) using these weighted values as predictors of regional tau‐PET in a linear model and determining optimal parameters based on predicted R 2 values, and 4) using the parameters from the model built in Step 3 to predict tau‐PET in the ADNI cohort (n = 86) (Fig.2).ResultThe connectivity‐based approach yielded adjusted R 2 values ranging from 0.19‐0.45 across diagnostic groups (Fig.1). The global organization approach yielded averaged adjusted R 2 and predicted R 2 values of 0.71 and 0.63, respectively, in the Mayo cohort. Out‐of‐sample median R 2 in the ADNI cohort was 0.41 (range 0.10‐0.60) (Fig.3).ConclusionAn unbiased approach based on the global functional organization of the brain and using an imaging modality widely used in clinical settings outperformed a connectome‐based one to predict regional tau‐PET across the AD phenotypic spectrum. Patterns of tau accumulation may better relate to the large‐scale physiology of the brain underlying specific mental functions rather than local connectivity factors.