Citations

Clear

3941 citation(s) found for "To, Van".

Multiparameter antigen-specific immunoprofiling in subjects with negative IGRA and TST results with potential M. tuberculosis exposures
Pathakumari, Balaji , Gutierrez, Luis E., Faisal, Shaji Ahmed, Sánchez, Pedro Arias, Daniel, Kale, Keulen, Virginia P. Van , Hilgart, Heather, Reddy, Manik R., Theel, Elitza, Laniado-Laborin, Rafael, Clain, Jeremy M., Peikert, T, Escalante, Patricio , Hilgart, Heather R, Faisal, Shaji , Sanchez, Pedro Arias, Theel, Elitza S. , Laniado-Laborin, Rafael, Bailey, Ryan C

Mayo Clinic

Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology | May 1, 2026 | Volume: 16 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.3389/fcimb.2026.1837269 | PMID 42146104 Get It

Introduction Asymptomatic individuals with negative Interferon-γ release assay (IGRA) and tuberculin skin test (TST) results are often labeled as tuberculosis-unexposed individuals. We hypothesize that flow cytometric (FC) detection of antigen-stimulated T-cells in peripheral blood can differentiate IGRA(-)/TST(-) individuals with and without prior potential M. tuberculosis (Mtb) exposure. Methods We used FC multiparameter profiling of T-cell activation markers in TST/IGRA-negative individuals at risk for Mtb exposure and in unexposed controls. Results We studied 54 IGRA(-)/TST(-) subjects, including 27 individuals at risk for prior Mtb exposure. While quantitative IGRA results were negative in all patients, FC profiling of CD3/CD4 + IFN-γ + HLA-DR + T-cells after stimulation with a pool of Mtb-specific region of difference-1 (RD1) peptides, mycobacterial (PPD and MTB300), or Candida antigens, statistically differentiated between unexposed and potentially exposed individuals (P<0.05). ROC analysis showed PPD and RD1 peptides responses had AUCs >0.7 (sensitivity of 55.5–74% and specificity of 66.6–85.1%). The presence of a polyfunctional RD1-reactive CD3/CD8 + IFN-γ + TNF-α + T-cell subset also significantly differentiated these groups (AUC 0.66). Other T-cell markers demonstrated no significant differences. Conclusions FC detection of antigen-specific IFN-γ + HLA-DR + CD4+T-cells and IFN-γ + TNF-α + CD8 + T-cells can differentiate IGRA(-)/TST(-) individuals at risk of Mtb exposure from unexposed controls. Further validation is needed to determine whether this immunoprofiling approach can improve detection of Mtb infections and identification of unexposed individuals for future biomarker studies and vaccine trails.
Vitamin D deficiency and systemic inflammation in hidradenitis suppurativa: clinical correlates in a retrospective cohort
Shrestha, Raslina , Van, Duc L., Tran, Hue T T, Ma, Jun, Alavi, Afsaneh, Davis, Mark, Wetter, David A, Lu, Kurt Q. , Nguyen, Giang H, Nguyen, Giang Huong , Tran, Hue T, Nguyen, Giang H , Tran, Hue T.T. , Alavi, Afsáneh , Davis, Mark D.P. , Wetter, David A.

Mayo Clinic

British Journal of Dermatology | April 30, 2026 | Volume: 195 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 339-341

10.1093/bjd/ljag157 | PMID 42056003 Get It

Vitamin D deficiency is frequently reported in hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), but its clinical significance remains unclear. In a retrospective cohort of 503 patients, deficiency was common and associated with demographic and metabolic factors but not with treatment-defined severity. Vitamin D deficiency was independently associated with elevated C-reactive protein, suggesting a link with systemic inflammation.
The impact of lipoprotein(a) on coronary atherosclerotic plaque phenotype in primary prevention
Verpalen, Victor A. , Coerkamp, Casper F. , Malkasian, Shant , Gaillard, Émilie , Beverloo, C Y Y, Ibrahim, Shirin , Vijver, Willem van de, Claessen, Bimmer E P M , Knaapen, Paul, Takx, R A P, Planken, R Nils, Stroes, Erik S G, Jp, Henriques, Nurmohamed, N S, Takx, Richard A. P. , Beverloo, Cheyenne Y Y , van de Vijver, Willem R , Knaapen, Paul , Takx, Richard A P , Planken, R Nils , Henriques, José P S , Nurmohamed, Nick S , Gaillard, Emilie L, Knaapen, Paul , Planken, R. Nils , Stroes, Erik S.G.

Mayo Clinic

European Journal of Preventive Cardiology | April 29, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1093/eurjpc/zwag243 | PMID 42054506 Get It

Abstract Aims Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a causal risk factor for cardiovascular events. However, the effect of Lp(a) on coronary plaque composition and high-risk plaque features has not been fully characterized. This study aimed to investigate the association between Lp(a) and coronary atherosclerotic plaque phenotype at the plaque level. Methods and results This study included 710 patients who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and had Lp(a) measured between 2008 and 2024. CCTA scans were analysed with a previously validated artificial intelligence-based algorithm (AI-QCT, Cleerly Inc.). The association of Lp(a) with non-calcified and calcified plaque volumes and HRP features was evaluated at the plaque level using generalized estimating equation models adjusted for traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Among the 710 patients, the mean age was 56 ± 10 years and 379 (53%) were male. In total, 3642 plaques were identified. In the adjusted plaque-level analysis, elevated Lp(a) (≥150 nmol/L) was associated with an increase in non-calcified plaque volume per plaque (P = 0.009), but not with an increase in calcified plaque volume (P = 0.81). Furthermore, elevated Lp(a) (≥150 nmol/L) was strongly associated with the presence of high-risk plaque at the plaque level (adjusted odds ratio: 1.78, 95% CI: 1.25–2.54, P = 0.001), whereas low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein were not (P > 0.05). Conclusion In this plaque-level CCTA study of 3642 individual plaques, elevated Lp(a) levels were independently associated with increased non-calcified plaque volume and with the presence of high-risk plaque, but not with calcified plaque volume. These findings elucidate the impact of Lp(a) on unstable plaque phenotypes, even in patients without prior cardiovascular events.
Current Understanding and Craniofacial Considerations of Biparietal Osteodystrophy
Gharavi, Aidin , Ward, Cameron, Dale, Erica , Wermers, Robert A. , Malbas, Marjorie Ann, Gharavi, Aidin , Gompel, Jamie J. Van , Malbas, Marjorie Ann , Mardini, Samir , Sharaf, Basel , Gibreel, Waleed

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery | April 24, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1097/scs.0000000000012800 | PMID 42029231 Get It

Biparietal osteodystrophy, also known as bilateral parietal calvarium bone thinning, is a rare calvarial condition characterized by loss of diploic bone within the parietal region. Although historically described in anthropologic and radiologic literature, current understanding of its epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical relevance, and management remains fragmented. This review synthesizes current evidence and highlights emerging studies on biparietal osteodystrophy. Epidemiologic reports indicate that biparietal osteodystrophy affects a broad age range but appears most frequently in older adults, with several series suggesting a slight female predominance. Prevalence is difficult to estimate due to incidental detection, though modern imaging has increased recognition of the condition. Histologically and anatomically, biparietal osteodystrophy is marked by thinning of the outer table and loss of the diploic space, with little osteoblastic or osteoclastic remodeling. Proposed pathogenic mechanisms include chronic degenerative change, impaired vascular supply to the diploë, and other theories, although no single explanation fully accounts for its complete presentation. Clinically, most patients remain asymptomatic, with complications such as calvarial fractures and traumatic brain injury being rare but highlighting the structural vulnerability associated with severe thinning. Management strategies are not standardized, and the use of anti-osteoporotic drugs and cranioplasty has been reported to offer benefit in select cases, although no treatment has been formally validated for biparietal osteodystrophy. As the understanding of biparietal osteodystrophy continues to evolve, future research is needed to clarify its natural history, identify potential etiologic pathways, and establish evidence-based management guidelines.
Omission and hallucination prevalence of clinical guidelines in diagnostic large language model outputs
Kessel, Robin van , Anderson, Michael, McMillan, Brian; id_orcid 0000-0002-0683-3877, Matthews, Marc R, Rust, Paul , Pearcy, Pauline , Nasir, Khurram, Mossialos, Elias, Mossialos, Elías , van Kessel, Robin , McMillan, Brian , Anderson, Michael , Matthews, Marc R. , Nasir, Khurram

Mayo Clinic

BMJ Health & Care Informatics | April 24, 2026 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 1 | Pages: e101959

10.1136/bmjhci-2025-101959 | PMID 42031418 Get It

Objective Meaningful assessments of how large language models (LLMs) incorporate clinical guidelines require large-scale testing over many queries. Here, we evaluate the prevalence of clinical guideline omissions and hallucinations in a large sample of diagnostic LLM outputs. Methods We used simulated case vignettes and zero-shot prompting to generate diagnostic outputs and rationales from GPT-4.1 and DeepSeek-V3. English case vignettes were created for hypercholesterolaemia and type-2 diabetes mellitus. Each vignette contained identical medical information, while sociodemographic characteristics varied in terms of sex, ethnicity and location. We calculated the prevalence of existing and hallucinated clinical guidelines in LLM outputs across disease, LLM and sociodemographic characteristics. Results We analysed a total of 12 197 LLM outputs, which quantifies three hazard areas: omissions (up to 97% for DeepSeek-V3 and 46% for GPT-4.1), hallucinations (up to 9%) and inconsistencies (guideline citation rate ranging from 0% to 78.39% across sociodemographic vignettes). Omission and hallucination rates were generally similar across vignettes with different sex or ethnicity data, yet were particularly sensitive to patient location. Discussion This study highlights significant variability in clinical guideline prediction across two different diseases, three different sociodemographic variables and two LLMs, even when the LLMs were instructed by identical prompts, establishing clinical guideline prediction in LLM outputs as a stochastic event. Conclusion The stochastic nature of LLMs creates a unique challenge for evidence generation and clinical deployment. Being able to measure and capture this stochasticity within high-quality research designs will be a prerequisite to advancing the responsible deployment of LLMs in healthcare.
A Prediction Model for Risk of Death in Kidney Transplant Recipients
Debiais-Deschamps, Charlotte, Raynaud, Marc , Truchot, Agathe , Rudrapatna, Vivek A., Kers, Jesper, Vries, Aiko P. J. de, Gueguen, Juliette , Bouquegneau, Antoine , Legendre, Christophe, Jouven, Xavier, Mussell, Adam, McCauley, Brian, Emms, Sabrina, Mapchan, Shristi, Heilman, Raymond L. , Das, Devika , Kamar, Nassim, Anglicheau, Dany , Fowler, Kevin J., Naesens, Maarten, Lefaucheur, Carmen, Aubert, Olivier, Das, Devika , Debiais, Charlotte , Lombardi, Yannis , Divard, Gillian , Rudrapatna, Vivek A , Meziyerh, Soufian , Kers, Jesper , Helm, Danny van der , Vries, Aiko P. J. de , Bello, Arnaud Del , Loon, Elisabet Van , Legendre, Christophe , Jouven, Xavier , McCauley, Brian Daniel , Jadlowiec, Caroline C. , Kamar, Nassim , Fowler, Kevin John , Naesens, Maarten , Lefaucheur, Carmen , Aubert, Olivier , Reese, Peter P. , Loupy, Alexandre

Mayo Clinic

JAMA Network Open | April 23, 2026 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 4 | Pages: e267452

10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.7452 | PMID 42024384 Get It

Importance Accurate prediction of patient mortality after kidney transplant is an unmet need. Objective To develop and validate an integrative prediction model that predicts short- and long-term patient mortality for kidney recipients. Design, Setting, and Participants This international cohort study included patients who underwent transplants between 2004 and 2023 from 14 academic medical centers from Europe and the US. The derivation cohort consisted of 1566 consecutive adult kidney recipients in a deeply phenotyped cohort prospectively recruited in 1 French center between 2004 and 2014. External validation cohorts consisted of 10 951 kidney recipients from 7 centers in France, 3 centers in Europe, and 3 centers in North America who underwent kidney transplants between 2006 and 2023. Data were analyzed from January 2023 to June 2025. Main Outcome and Measures All-cause mortality was assessed, and 121 candidate prognostic factors, comprising demographics and clinical, biological, imaging, and immunological parameters, were collected. Results Among 12 517 kidney transplant recipients, including 1566 in the derivation cohort (mean [SD] age, 50.05 [14.31] years; 942 male [60.15%]) and 10 951 in validation cohorts (mean [SD] age, 53.32 [13.97] years; 6766 male [61.78%]), 2486 patients (19.9%) died after a median (IQR) follow-up of 5.08 (2.97-7.00) years. Fourteen prognostic factors (including clinical, biological, and imaging risk factors) were independently associated with patient death (eg, patient age: hazard ratio per 1-year increase in age, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.06-1.08]; P < .001) and were combined into a risk prediction model (mBox). The model exhibited accurate calibration and discrimination in the derivation cohort, with C statistics of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.77-0.87) and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.78-0.82) at 1 and 10 years, respectively, after the transplant. Abbreviated models were developed and validated to ensure model generalizability. Performance of abbreviated models was confirmed in external validation cohorts from France (C statistic, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.73-0.78]), Europe (C statistic, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.72-0.76]), the US (C statistic, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.70-0.78]), the Greater Paris University Hospital database (C statistic, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.77-0.81]), and the University of California at San Francisco database (C statistic, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.65-0.74]). The model was also validated in a series of subpopulations (eg, women vs men: C statistic, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.77-0.84] vs 0.79 [95% CI, 0.77-0.82]) and clinical scenarios (eg, before COVID-19 era: C statistic, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.77-0.81]) with good and stable performance. Conclusions and Relevance In this study, an accurate prediction model for mortality among kidney recipients, computable at the time of transplant, was developed and externally validated. Results suggest that this model may help stratify patient risk of death, allowing for improved medical decisions.
Amyloid‐related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) in anti‐amyloid therapies for Alzheimer's disease: An update from the Alzheimer's Association ARIA workgroup
Grill, Joshua D., Salloway, Stephen, Atri, Alireza, Cogswell, Petrice M., Benzinger, Tammie L. S., Iwatsubo, Takeshi, Greenberg, Steven M., Carrillo, Maria C., Jack, Clifford R., Sperling, Reisa A., Carrillo, María C. , Etten, Ellis S. van , Mahinrad, Simin , Grill, Joshua D. , Salloway, Stephen , Atri, Alireza , Cogswell, Petrice M. , Benzinger, Tammie L.S. , Iwatsubo, Takeshi , Iadecola, Costantino , Lemere, Cynthia Ann , Nicoll, James A. R. , Greenberg, Steven M. , Jack, Clifford R. , Sperling, Reisa Anne

Mayo Clinic

Alzheimer's & Dementia | April 22, 2026 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.71361 | PMID 42015334 Get It

Abstract In 2011, a workgroup of the Alzheimer's Association Research Roundtable introduced recommendations for detecting and monitoring amyloid‐related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) in Alzheimer's disease (AD) clinical trials. Since then, anti‐amyloid immunotherapies have received regulatory approval for AD treatment and are beginning to enter clinical practice, underscoring the importance of informing healthcare providers, researchers, and patients about ARIA's implications in real‐world settings. In response, the Alzheimer's Association convened a new workgroup to review current knowledge of ARIA, including underlying mechanisms, clinical presentations, associated risk factors, mitigation strategies, radiologic detection methods, patients’ perspectives in treatment decision‐making, and outstanding challenges. Here, we outline key insights from this workgroup, highlighting that effective ARIA detection and monitoring in clinical practice requires adherence to robust protocols to mitigate risks and enhance patient safety. Limited availability of clinical and pathologic data on predictors of symptomatic and severe ARIA underscores the importance of continued real‐world data collection.
Cell-type specific allelic dampening of sex-linked genes in sex chromosome aneuploidy
Filippova, G. N. , Sanger, Elliott M., MacDonald, James, Fang, He, Groneck, Camille, Takasaki, Masaya, Meleshko, A. N., Liu, Yajuan , Li, Gang , Dyke, Daniel Van, Gravholt, Claus H., Bammler, Theo K. , Young, Jessica E., Berletch, Joel B. , Van Dyke, Daniel, Gravholt, Claus H , Noble, William S , Deng, Xinxian , Berletch, Joel B , Sanger, Elliott, Fang, He, Ma, Wenxiu , ZHANG, RAN, Murry, Charles E. , Dyke, Daniel L. Van , Skakkebæk, Anne , Gravholt, Claus Højbjerg , Distèche, Christine M.

Mayo Clinic

No container title available | April 21, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.64898/2026.04.16.719032 | PMID 42079153 Get It

Common sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) often present with cognitive and cardiovascular dysfunction in humans. To address SCA effects on gene expression and DNA methylation in relevant cell types, we differentiated neural precursor cells (NPCs) and cardiomyocytes (CMs) from human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) with different numbers of sex chromosomes, including isogenic and independent lines. As expected, the expression of genes that escape X inactivation (escapees) mostly increases with the number of inactive X chromosomes (Xi). However, allelic analysis shows dampening of escapees specifically on the Xi in XXY compared to XX in both NPCs and CMs, revealing a novel type of dosage compensation in SCA. In contrast, Y-linked gene expression is higher in XXY versus XY NPCs, but the opposite is observed in CMs. This may explain the greater number of differentially expressed autosomal genes in NPCs versus CMs with an added Y chromosome, while effects of added X chromosomes are similar between cell types. Concordantly, changes in autosomal DNA methylation are mainly driven by the presence of a Y chromosome. These findings highlight the cell-type specificity of sex-linked and autosomal gene regulation in SCA conditions.
Standardized Perioperative Protocols Are Associated With Reduced Length of Stay and Readmission in Cushing Disease: Results From the Multicenter RAPID Study
Suryadevara, Carter M. , Salcedo-Sifuentes, Jorge E., Little, Andrew S., Yuen, Kevin C. J., Mendoza, Michelle Magana, Gardner, Paul, Zenonos, Georgios, Silverstein, Julie M., Kim, Albert H., Evans, James J., Barkhoudarian, Garni, Fernandez-Miranda, Juan C., Couldwell, William T., Rennert, Robert C., Kim, Won, Kshettry, Varun R., Wu, Kyle, BENJAMIN, CAROLINA, Zada, Gabriel, Gompel, Jamie Van, Catalino, Michael P., Karsy, Michael, Rosenberg, Yaakov, Mamelak, Adam N, Agrawal, Nidhi , Pacione, Donato , Karsy, Michael , Van Gompel, Jamie, Karsy, Michael , Salcedo-Sifuentes, Jorge E. , Little, Andrew S. , Yuen, Kevin C.J. , Zenonos, Georgios A, Silverstein, Julie , Kim, Albert H , Evans, James J., Barkhoudarian, Garni , Fernandez‐Miranda, Juan C. , Couldwell, William T. , Rennert, Robert C , Kshettry, Varun R. , Zada, Gabriel , Chicoine, Michael , Gompel, Jamie J. Van , Catalino, Michael Paul, Agrawal, Nidhi

Mayo Clinic

Neurosurgery | April 21, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1227/neu.0000000000003992 | PMID 42012163 Get It

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Perioperative protocols facilitate earlier discharge without compromising safety in nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas, but no large multicenter studies in the United States have investigated protocols regarding Cushing disease (CD). We sought to characterize perioperative protocols and how their implementation influences clinical outcomes in patients with CD. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted using data from the Registry of Adenomas of the Pituitary and Related Disorders consortium comprising 13 US academic pituitary centers. Institutions were surveyed regarding perioperative procedures for patients undergoing transsphenoidal tumor resection for CD. The impacts of institutional procedures and approaches to implementation on length of stay (LOS) and unplanned 90-day readmission were evaluated. RESULTS: Thirteen institutions contributed survey responses and clinical data for a total of 832 patients meeting inclusion criteria. Ten (76.9%) institutions reported having a postoperative protocol, 9 (69.2%) used a formal document to outline their protocol, and 3 (23.1%) had protocols implemented into hospital policy. Mean LOS was significantly reduced in centers with an established protocol (3.14 vs 3.42 days, P = .032), and more so with a formal document (3.10 vs 3.48 days, P = .001) or hospital policy (2.72 vs 3.36 days, P < .001). Patients treated after protocol implementation experienced shorter LOS ( P < .001). Other factors associated with reduced LOS were presence of a separate CD pathway, intraoperative checklist specific to pituitary surgery, non-narcotic pain regimen, Foley removal order, dedicated outpatient advanced practice provider follow-up, and target discharge date ≤2 days. Intraoperative checklist ( P = .045), non-narcotic pain regimen ( P = .048), nasal packing ( P = .005), and 1-day target discharge date ( P = .032) were important factors against readmission. Compared with microscopic surgery, endoscopic surgery was associated with shorter LOS but increased readmission odds. CONCLUSION: This is the first multicenter study to illustrate that implementation of perioperative protocols is associated with a reduction in LOS and readmission risk in patients with CD.
Fast Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing for Gram-Negative Bacteremia
Banerjee, Ritu, Komarow, Lauren , Li, Yixuan, Mau, Donald, Geres, Holly, Greenwood-Quaintance, Kerryl, Adler, Amos , Baliga, S, Chrysos, George , Zarkotou, Olympia , Paul, Mical, Regueiro, Dolores Sousa, Chambers, Henry, Fowler, Vance G., Patel, Robin, Group, Antibacterial Resistance Leadership, Chambers, Henry F. , Cross, Heather, Harris, Anthony D. , Duin, David van, Boucher, Helen W., Huntley, Clayton C., Raterman, Erica L., Samuel, Tamika, Moon, Kyung, Holland, Thomas L., Lodise, Thomas, Shelburne, Samuel A. , Cosgrove, Sara E., Lautenbach, Ebbing , Mehigan, Maureen, Doernberg, Sarah B. , Perdue, Sam, Singh, Tara A. , Wickward, Cathy, Souto, David A., Waller, Jason, Evans, Scott R , Banerjee, Ritu , Dodd, Andrew, Geres, Holly, Greenwood‐Quaintance, Kerryl E. , Baliga, Shrikala , Chowers, Michal , Paul, Mical, Pournaras, Spyros , Fowler, Vance G. , Patel, Robin , Evans, Scott , Hamasaki, Toshimitsu , Pettigrew, Melinda M. , Hanson, Kimberly E. , Doi, Yohei , Holland, Thomas L. , Cosgrove, Sara E. , Paterson, David L.

Mayo Clinic

JAMA | April 18, 2026 | Volume: 335 | Issue: 20 | Pages: 1762

10.1001/jama.2026.5487 | PMID 41999287 Get It

Importance Novel blood culture diagnostics provide rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) results for bacteria causing bloodstream infections (BSIs) but have unclear clinical impact. Objective To evaluate clinical outcomes of blood culture testing using a rapid AST method compared with standard AST in patients with BSIs caused by gram-negative bacilli in regions with high prevalence of antimicrobial resistance. Design, Setting, and Participants Open-label randomized clinical trial that enrolled participants from December 2023 to May 2025 (final follow-up, June 18, 2025) at 7 medical centers in Greece (n = 2), India (n = 1), Israel (n = 3), and Spain (n = 1). Hospitalized patients (adults and children) with BSIs caused by gram-negative bacilli were eligible. Statistical analysis was conducted from August 2025 to January 2026. Intervention Patients were randomized to undergo blood culture evaluation using rapid, phenotypic AST directly from positive blood cultures plus standard susceptibility testing (n = 413) vs standard susceptibility testing alone (n = 437). Local antimicrobial stewardship teams reviewed all patients and provided treatment recommendations. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was a desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) at day 30, with 3 categories (alive without deleterious events, alive with deleterious events, and death). The difference between rapid and standard testing was summarized as the probability that the DOOR outcomes were more desirable in the rapid testing group. Superiority was concluded if the lower limit of the 95% CI exceeded 50%. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, length of hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, acquisition of hospital-acquired infections, time to effective antibiotic therapy within 3 days, and time to antibiotic escalation or deescalation within 3 days. Results Of the 899 patients randomized, 850 were included in the primary outcome analysis (median [IQR] age, 72 [21] years; 43% female). The probability that DOOR outcomes were more favorable in the rapid testing group was 48.8% (95% CI, 45.3%-52.4%). Median time to effective antibiotic therapy was not different between the groups in the as-randomized population. Median time to antibiotic escalation or deescalation was faster in the rapid testing group by 14 hours (95% CI, 6-22) in the as-randomized population. There were no differences between the groups in other secondary outcomes. In the prespecified subgroup with carbapenem-resistant infections, median time to effective therapy was 9.5 hours in the rapid testing group vs 28 hours in the standard testing group (difference, −18 hours [95% CI, −42 to 6]). Conclusions and Relevance Among patients with gram-negative bacilli BSIs, rapid blood culture AST was not superior to standard testing by DOOR. When considered with other efficacy and safety outcomes, these findings may help inform the use of rapid susceptibility testing in clinical practice. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06174649