Citations

Abstract Background : Sex is recognized as a significant determinant of outcome among glioblastoma patients, but the relative prognostic importance of glioblastoma features has not been thoroughly explored for sex differences. Methods : Combining multi-modal MR images, biomathematical models, and patient clinical information, this investigation assesses which pretreatment variables have a sex-specific impact on the survival of glioblastoma patients (299 males and 195 females). Results : Among males, tumor (T1Gd) radius was a predictor of overall survival (HR=1.027, p=0.044). Among females, higher tumor cell net invasion rate was a significant detriment to overall survival (HR=1.011, p<0.001). Female extreme survivors had significantly smaller tumors (T1Gd) (p=0.010 t-test), but tumor size was not correlated with female overall survival (p=0.955 CPH). Both male and female extreme survivors had significantly lower tumor cell net proliferation rates than other patients (M p=0.004, F p=0.001, t-test). Additionally, extent of resection, tumor laterality, and IDH1 mutation status were also found to have sex-specific effects on overall survival. Conclusion : Despite similar distributions of the MR imaging parameters between males and females, there was a sex-specific difference in how these parameters related to outcomes.

Abstract Purpose: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a highly lethal malignancy that often presents at advanced stages. Gemcitabine/cisplatin (GP) represents the standard-of-care but provides only a modest response rate and survival benefit. Loss of the CDK4/6 inhibitor CDKN2A is a prevalent genetic event in CCA, thus CDK4/6 inhibitors, FDA-approved in some breast cancer regimens, are hypothesized to have a role in treating CCA. Clinical challenges to target cell cycle dysregulation and exploit cytotoxic chemotherapy include predictive biomarkers for selecting patients most likely to respond. We hypothesized autophagy is involved in therapeutic resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors, and plays a role in the activity of GP in CCA. Thus, we investigated CDK4/6 inhibitors as monotherapy, and combined with GP in CCA, measuring multiple readouts pertaining to drug synergy, putative pathway biomarkers and autophagy. Methods: The activity of 3 FDA approved CDK4/6 inhibitors, palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib, as monotherapy (N=24), and combined with GP (N=10), was assessed in CCA cell lines by measuring relative cell number with Cell TiterGlo, and apoptosis with Annexin/PI and cleaved caspase3 quantification via flow cytometry. To characterize RB status for biomarker potential, protein levels of CCND1, CDK4, CDK6, RB, and CDKN2A were measured by western blot. Autophagy was measured using an autophagy flux assay, LysoTracker confocal staining, and by quantifying protein levels of LC3B, p62 and Beclin1A. Results: 22/24 (92%) of CCA cell lines were found to have at least one defect likely relevant to CDK4/6 inhibition: CDKN2A (92%), Rb1 (63%), CDK4 (23%) and cyclin D1 (32%). Protein levels of CDKN2A and RB1 showed moderate correlation with CDK4/6 inhibitor activity. Abemaciclib was the most potent CDK inhibitor in vitro (IC50≤0.5uM; palbociclib IC50&gt;1uM; ribociclib IC50&gt;5uM). Combined abemaciclib and GP showed higher cytotoxicity and synergy at lower doses compared to chemotherapy alone or single-agent abemaciclib. Compared to CDK4/6 inhibitors or chemotherapy alone, combination therapy enhanced growth inhibition, cell cycle arrest and caspase-dependent apoptotic cell death. Abemaciclib triggered autophagy mediated by significant increases in reactive oxygen species (ROS). Combination therapy reduced ROS production and thus autophagy, as seen by reduced autophagic flux, reduced LysoTracker mean fluorescence intensity, a decrease in the expression of LC3B-II, Beclin1A and an increase in p62. Conclusion: These results suggest CDK4/6 inhibitors interact synergistically with GP in CCA and mechanistically disrupt autophagy. This suggests potential to further explore CDKN2A and RB as biomarkers for preclinical sensitivity in CCA. Pre-clinical data supports ongoing clinical studies of this concept, as well as planned clinical studies of GP and alternative CDK4/6 inhibitors. Citation Format: Mansi Arora, James Bogenberger, Nagalo Bolni, Yumei Zhou, Latha Kannan, Jan Egan, Raquel Yokoda, Daniel H. Ahn, Mitesh J. Borad. Synergy of cyclin dependentkinase 4/6 inhibitors with cytotoxic chemotherapy in cholangiocarcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4417.

Although glioblastoma (GBM) is a fatal primary brain cancer with short median survival of 15 months, a small number of patients survive >5 years after diagnosis; they are known as extreme survivors (ES). Because of their rarity, very little is known about what differentiates these outliers from other patients with GBM. For the purpose of identifying unknown drivers of extreme survivorship in GBM, the ENDURES consortium (ENvironmental Dynamics Underlying Responsive Extreme Survivors of GBM) was developed. This consortium is a multicenter collaborative network of investigators focused on the integration of multiple types of clinical data and the creation of patient-specific models of tumor growth informed by radiographic and histologic parameters. Leveraging our combined resources, the goals of the ENDURES consortium are 2-fold: (1) to build a curated, searchable, multilayered repository housing clinical and outcome data on a large cohort of ES patients with GBM; and (2) to leverage the ENDURES repository for new insights into tumor behavior and novel targets for prolonging survival for all patients with GBM. In this article, the authors review the available literature and discuss what is already known about ES. The authors then describe the creation of their consortium and some preliminary results.

AbstractBackgroundGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is highly prevalent and has both short- and long-term implications for mother and infant.Sources of dataLiterature search using PubMed with keywords ‘Gestational diabetes’ and ‘diabetes in pregnancy’ together with published papers known to the authors.Areas of agreementThe cornerstone of management is medical nutrition therapy with regular self-monitoring of capillary blood glucose levels and intensification of therapy if glycaemic goals are not achieved. Post-partum, annual assessment for type 2 diabetes is recommended.Areas of controversyDiagnostic criteria and new biomarkers for GDM and the clinical and economic benefits of treating women with milder levels of glucose intolerance during pregnancy.Growing pointsWomen with GDM are a heterogeneous group with varying degrees of insulin resistance and beta cell dysfunction.Areas timely for developing researchDevelopment of alternative diagnostic markers and application of novel technologies for GDM management.

Abstract Background: Sex is recognized as a significant determinant of outcome among glioblastoma patients, but the relative prognostic importance of glioblastoma features has not been thoroughly explored for sex differences. Methods: Combining multi-modal MR images, biomathematical models, and patient clinical information, this investigation assesses which pretreatment variables have a sex-specific impact on the survival of glioblastoma patients (299 males and 195 females). Results: Among males, tumor (T1Gd) radius was a predictor of overall survival (HR=1.027, p=0.044). Among females, higher tumor cell net invasion rate was a significant detriment to overall survival (HR=1.011, p<0.001). Female extreme survivors had significantly smaller tumors (T1Gd) (p=0.010 t-test), but tumor size was not correlated with female overall survival (p=0.955 CPH). Both male and female extreme survivors had significantly lower tumor cell net proliferation rates than other patients (M p=0.004, F p=0.001, t-test). Additionally, extent of resection, tumor laterality, and IDH1 mutation status were also found to have sex-specific effects on overall survival. Conclusion: Despite similar distributions of the MR imaging parameters between males and females, there was a sex-specific difference in how these parameters related to outcomes.