Citations

Developmental/epileptic encephalopathy with spike-wave activation in sleep (DEE-SWAS) is newly proposed nomenclature put forth by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) to replace the problematic electrographic and/or clinical phenotypes of electrical status epilepticus of sleep (ESES) and continuous spike-wave in sleep (CSWS). The nomenclature update represents a noble effort to minimize the confusion of how to define and appropriately utilize this alphabet soup of acronyms, thereby aiding in future clinical and research efforts. The name change fails to capture greater challenges within the field, which still plague diagnosis and treatment and stagnates substantive research advancements. Through a directed literature review of DEE-SWAS with emphasis on the new ILAE nomenclature and the RESCUE-ESES trial, we will highlight major persistent quandaries in the field. These include inadequate or insufficient diagnostic biomarkers (ie, the spike wave index), the highly variable clinical manifestations, ranging from dubious associations to profound developmental regression, presumptively caused by spike-wave activation in sleep, and variable and often ineffective treatment paradigms. We will also review the broader diagnostic evaluation of DEE-SWAS. By doing so, we aim to shed light on crucial research and clinical questions that could advance our understanding of diagnosing and treating children with DEE-SWAS, as well as addressing the uncertainty surrounding the neurological effects of sleep-activated epileptiform discharges.

Numerous factors including social determinants of health, knowledge gaps, economic challenges, workforce limitations, and health system deficiencies are associated with significant disparities in access to health care services and health outcomes for people with epilepsy (PWE). The American Epilepsy Society (AES) and the International League Against Epilepsy—North America (ILAE-NA) established a joint task force to explore and develop recommendations to address health care disparities experienced by PWE. The task force gathered foundational knowledge through meetings, public and patient organization comments and discussions to develop consensus recommendations. We enumerate the recommendations and discuss the rationale behind them to reduce disparities in epilepsy care through comprehensive research, inclusive clinical practices, robust advocacy, and targeted educational initiatives. While our recommendations are focused on the United States, we acknowledge that similar barriers and limitations exist for PWE globally and that these also need to be addressed within their local domains and with attention to unique factors therewithin.

Abstract There is a general separation between medical and business education, despite the substantial intersection of these fields in hospital and industry settings. This separation hinders medical innovators, who rarely have opportunities to see how entrepreneurial concepts apply to the translation of medical innovation. To address this, the Office of Entrepreneurship at Mayo Clinic Florida provides experiential entrepreneurial training through an internal pitch competition: the alligator tank (AT). This study evaluates the impact and efficacy of the first seven years of the AT. Key metrics include a modified technology readiness level (TRL), determined by the presence of a disclosure, prototype, and preliminary data. A high TRL is not indicative of success in the pitch competition, leveling the playing field for early-stage inventions. The AT is characterized by broad representation across academic and professional ranks, departments, and genders, as well as strong participant retention. Innovators with prior disclosures are more likely to win the AT, presumably due to their experience. The AT serves as an institution-wide initiative that cultivates an inclusive, supportive innovation culture, fosters interdisciplinary medical innovation, and helps advance innovation maturity. Adopting the AT framework may help similar medical systems build an innovation ecosystem within their institutions.

Abstract Background High-grade gliomas (HGG) have a poor prognosis despite aggressive treatment. Severe, persistent lymphopenia occurring in HGG patients after concurrent chemoradiation is associated with worse survival. NT-I7, a long-acting interleukin-7 analog, has been shown to increase CD4 and CD8 counts in healthy, septic, and HIV-positive adults. This multi-institutional, NCI-funded dose-escalation trial is the first to evaluate NT-I7 safety and activity in HGG patients with severe treatment-related lymphopenia (TRL) and the effect of co-administered glucocorticoids. Methods Eligible HGG patients had CD4 counts <300 cells/mm3 after 5 weeks of standard chemoradiation and were receiving either ≤0.75 or ≥4 mg/day of dexamethasone. Patients received a single intramuscular dose of NT-I7 (60 or 360 µg/kg) post-chemoradiation, followed by safety evaluation and multi-parameter, longitudinal monitoring of lymphocyte populations and immunologic function. Results NT-I7 was well tolerated in all 12 patients (median age 64; median CD4 count 161 cells/mm³) before the study closed prematurely. Absolute lymphocyte counts doubled in 83% (10/12; 95% CI: 51.6%-97.9%) of patients, and CD4 counts doubled in 42% (5/12; 95% CI: 15.2%-72.3%) of patients. Glucocorticoid use did not significantly affect CD4 or lymphocyte increases. Correlative immune profiling revealed increased Ki67 expression in CD4 (P < .005) and CD8 (P < .05) after one week, along with the expansion of CD4 and CD8 T-cell subsets and CD56 + natural killer cells. Conclusions NT-I7 is well tolerated and effectively increases lymphocyte and CD4 counts in severe TRL patients, regardless of glucocorticoid use, suggesting its potential to mitigate TRL and improve outcomes in HGG.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a prevalent condition impacting physical and mental health, characterized by symptoms like heartburn and acid regurgitation. GERD affects 18.1–27.8% of North Americans, rising to ~ 50% under less strict criteria. Effective management of GERD is critical to improving patients’ quality of life. Traditional treatments range from lifestyle modifications and pharmacological interventions to surgical approaches like laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery (LARS). Patients with erosive esophagitis receive a near 70–80% rate of “complete” symptom relief by 4 weeks using PPIs, in contrast to patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), who demonstrate an intermediate response on the order of 50–60%. However, the invasiveness and associated side effects of surgical options have spurred the development of endoscopic techniques, including anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) and transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF). This review evaluates ARMS and TIF as therapeutic interventions for GERD, focusing on their risks, benefits, outcomes, and complications. ARMS is noted for shorter procedure times and fewer complications, particularly dysphagia and bleeding, making it an efficient choice for symptom control. TIF, while associated with a higher recurrence and reoperation rate, demonstrates superior long-term efficacy in medication reduction and sustained quality-of-life improvements, especially in patients without prior anti-reflux surgeries. Emerging advancements in endoscopic technologies, such as improved suturing techniques and refinements in mucosal resection, hold promise for reducing recurrence rates and enhancing procedural durability. The choice between ARMS and TIF should be tailored to individual patient needs, taking into account GERD severity, comorbidities, and surgical history. Both procedures exemplify significant advancements in minimally invasive GERD management, and ongoing innovations in endoscopic technologies are expected to further refine their safety and effectiveness. This comparative analysis provides insights into optimizing treatment selection and underscores the importance of personalized care in managing GERD.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for mechanical complications following complex spinal reconstruction for spondylectomy of primary spinal column tumors. METHODS A retrospective chart review identified patients treated with spondylectomy for primary spinal column tumors in the thoracic or lumbar spine followed by posterior instrumentation and anterior column reconstruction. Variables collected included basic demographics, smoking status, chronic steroid use, frailty (Charlson Comorbidity Index), extent of resection, Weinstein-Boriani-Biagini classification, tumor volume, Spine Instability Neoplastic Score, anterior column reconstruction and fixation techniques, rod characteristics, Hounsfield units (HUs), and neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemoradiation. RESULTS Twenty-five patients were included (14 men, 11 women) with an average (± SD) age of 45 ± 18 years, BMI of 28 ± 5.7, and follow-up of 6.0 ± 6.2 years. Primary spinal column tumor pathology included chordoma (40%), chondrosarcoma (16%), giant cell tumor (16%), osteosarcoma (16%), osteoblastoma (8%), and aneurysmal bone cyst (4%). Six patients (24%) experienced mechanical complications, including rod fractures (n = 5) and distal junctional failure (n = 1). Of the 6 patients with mechanical complications, 4 (67%) underwent reoperation. The length of follow-up was the only statistically significant risk factor for patients with mechanical complications (average 11 years) compared to those without complications (average 4.4 years, p = 0.047). Average HUs were 144 for mechanical complication patients versus 180 for those without (p = 0.08). Anterior column reconstruction materials included a titanium cage (13 patients, 3 failures), structural allograft (6 patients, 2 failures), vascularized fibular strut autograft (6 patients, no failures), nonvascularized structural autograft (5 patients, 1 failure), vascularized rib autograft (5 patients, 2 failures), and a polyetheretherketone cage (2 patients, no failures). The vascularized fibular strut autograft had a 0% mechanical failure rate, but this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.28). Twelve patients (48%) had anterior fixation placed, with a 17% rate of mechanical complications (p = 0.65). Five patients (20%) had > 2-rod constructs, with a 20% mechanical complication rate (p = 0.99). CONCLUSIONS Reconstruction following primary spinal column tumor resection is a significant challenge, as evident by a high rate of mechanical complications and instrumentation failure. Future studies are needed with larger sample sizes to identify techniques that may mitigate the risk of failure.

OBJECTIVE The principal tenet of minimally invasive neurosurgery is to limit approach-related tissue trauma, and a major assumption is that shorter incisions and smaller openings, in addition to protecting the brain, also have some perceptible benefits for the patient. This study tests the assumption of patient benefit and tries to define its significance. METHODS Procedures that fit the inclusion criteria of minimally invasive transcranial "keyhole" surgery were sought in the principal investigator’s archives. Each case was then paired with a classic procedure performed within the study time frame by the two senior authors, matched for pathology, size, location, and complexity. These pairs were then compared using a statistical tool (i.e., the Wilcoxon signed-rank test) designed for matched samples. Differences in estimated blood loss, duration of surgery, and length of hospital stay were examined. The narcotic needs during hospitalization were also examined as morphine milligram equivalent (MME). RESULTS Ninety patients were included in this study, evenly split between the minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and classic cohorts. Comparison of the 45 pairs showed no significant difference in estimated blood loss, though the operative times favored the MIS cohort significantly (mean ± SEM 310 ± 17 minutes vs 383 ± 24 minutes, p = 0.02). The length of stay was shorter for MIS, but the difference reached statistical significance only when cases with complications were excluded. The most important finding was that significantly less narcotic was needed during hospitalization in the MIS cohort (83 ± 15 MME vs 257 ± 47 MME). CONCLUSIONS The large difference in narcotic needs points to enhanced recovery from MIS techniques. While the difference in operative time did not lead to significantly shorter hospital stays, data suggest that minimally invasive technique may benefit the patient during recovery. This inspires further investigations to define the potentially positive impact on hospital and healthcare systems.

OBJECTIVE Calcium phosphate cement (CPC) use has been previously described as a strategy to reduce the rates of pseudomeningocele and CSF leakage following skull base surgery. The authors aimed to present their institutional experience with CPC in retrosigmoid craniotomy and perform a systematic review of the literature to determine the effectiveness of CPC in reducing postoperative complications, including pseudomeningocele and craniotomy-site CSF leakage. METHODS A retrospective single-institution cohort study of patients who underwent retrosigmoid craniotomy with and without CPC cranioplasty from January 2017 to April 2024 was performed. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of CPC use in retrosigmoid craniotomy was also performed. RESULTS Of 336 patients who underwent retrosigmoid craniotomy, 193 (57%) were female and the median age at surgery was 55 years (range 18–81 years). The median follow-up duration was 23 months (range 3–80 months). CPC was used to seal the edge of the craniotomy in 66 patients (20%). Among all patients, 50 (15%) experienced a postoperative complication, and 28 (8%) were wound-specific complications. Patients in the non-CPC group experienced significantly more postoperative wound-specific complications than those in the CPC group (10% vs 0%, p = 0.002). Specifically, pseudomeningocele occurred in 0 patients (0%) in the CPC group compared with 24 patients (9%) in the non-CPC group (p = 0.006), which progressed to CSF leaks at the craniotomy site in 6 patients (p = 0.60). Additionally, no patients (0%) in the CPC group experienced wound infection, dehiscence, or breakdown compared with 10 patients (4%) in the non-CPC group (p = 0.22). Five patients (8%) in the CPC group reported prolonged mild incisional pain at the craniotomy site, and there were no instances of major complications related to the CPC. In the meta-analysis, 10 studies met the inclusion criteria, yielding a total of 2166 patients (including the current study), 1101 of whom received CPC. In the pooled analysis, CPC was significantly associated with lower risk of CSF leakage at the craniotomy site (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.13–0.42; p < 0.01) and lower risk of infection (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.08–0.38; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS CPC use in retrosigmoid craniotomies could be a safe and effective strategy to reduce the incidence of pseudomeningocele and craniotomy-site CSF leakage, leading to lower rates of wound-related complications and infection.