Citations

Background: Graduates of U.S. dental schools must meet curriculum and competency requirements set by the school and by the Commission on Dental Accreditation. Little is known about the impact of this training on recent alumni in practice. This cross-sectional study surveyed recent alumni about their preparedness and comfort in treating the oral health needs of children before and after a curriculum change in the predoctoral pediatric dental clinical course. Results were used to inform future curriculum improvement. Methods: Five classes of dental school alumni were surveyed at least 6 mo after graduation. Information about their practice setting, patient pool demographics, comfort and preparedness in diagnosing and treating common pediatric oral health conditions, and open-ended thoughts on caring for the oral health needs of children were obtained. Responses were analyzed before and after a curriculum change that introduced predoctoral students to patient care in the graduate pediatric dental clinic. Results: Electronic and mailed paper surveys were sent to 552 alumni, with 218 (39.3%) returned. A majority (91.1%) reported seeing pediatric dental patients in practice. There was no difference in the incidence of seeing pediatric patients before or after the curriculum change. Participants reported high comfort and confidence in diagnosing pediatric oral health conditions, and there were no significant differences seen pre or post intervention. Conclusions: Surveyed alumni reported similar comfort levels in diagnosing and treating common pediatric oral health conditions both before and after the curriculum change. General dentist alumni still struggle with recommending that the first dental visit happen at the eruption of the first tooth or the child’s first birthday. More information is needed to assess how to educate competent clinicians in a predoctoral setting. Knowledge Transfer Statement: The recommendations from this article can be used by dental educators to improve clinical and didactic teaching and to ensure dental learners’ education and competency.

Background: U.S. dental school graduates must complete competencies in oral health care across the life course. While they have met these requirements, little is known about graduates’ assessment of how this training prepared them for practice. Future practice setting may affect the training needs of dental school graduates. This quality improvement survey looked at alumni narratives regarding their predoctoral training in pediatric dentistry, the adequacy of this training, how practice setting influenced their training needs, and what recommendations they would make for curriculum change. Methods: As part of a larger survey, semi-structured interviews were conducted of 14 recent alumni in general dental practice; the questions covered their graduation year, current practice setting, recollection of their predoctoral pediatric dental training, the adequacy of that training, and recommendations on how to prepare future graduates to care for pediatric dental patients. Interviews were transcribed and assessed for these themes. Results: Half of the practitioners were in private practice, and half worked in rural or community clinics. Recent alumni felt comfortable and confident treating the oral health needs of a pediatric population but overwhelmingly said that they wanted more hands-on experience in dental school. They especially highlighted the need to see patients with challenging behavior and more complex operative treatment needs. Alumni working in rural areas or community clinics emphasized the need for these skills because of the lack of referral options. Conclusions: Recent alumni wish they had had more hands-on pediatric dental experiences in dental school to better prepare them for the challenges they face in practice. These experiences may be limited, and one suggestion would be to channel these opportunities to practitioners who will work in areas where there are insufficient resources and fewer options for referral. Knowledge Transfer Statement: The recommendations from this article can be used by dental educators to improve clinical and didactic teaching and to ensure dental learners’ education and competency.

ABSTRACTBackgroundAdvances in fibril typing by mass spectrometry have improved the accuracy of amyloidosis diagnosis. Dual amyloidogenic proteins have been reported in deposits in sole and multiple different organs.MethodsFive patients with dual amyloidoses were diagnosed between 1995 and 2022 by Congo red staining and fibril typing using the best available methods at the time of evaluation. Sequencing of TTR and GSN genes was performed. Literature search identified 46 additional cases.ResultsThree patients exhibited Waldenström macroglobulinemia‐associated AL (n = 3) amyloidoses in conjunction with ATTRwt or AGel amyloidosis; two patients featured AL/ATTRwt and AA/ATTRwt amyloidoses. One patient demonstrated dual amyloidoses within one anatomical site; three patients featured two amyloidosis types at different anatomical sites; and one patient had dual amyloid deposits in a single anatomical site along with different sites. The time interval between diagnoses was 0–288 months, with the heart and kidneys being the most affected organs.ConclusionsOur findings underscore the complexity of clinical presentation in amyloidosis, as multiple amyloid types can co‐exist in a single individual and affect various anatomical sites. Accurate assessment of the clinical phenotype and thorough amyloid fibril typing from the target organs are essential for precise diagnosis and tailored treatment. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00898235

ObjectivesThe four‐repeat (4R) tauopathies are a group of neurodegenerative diseases, including progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), corticobasal degeneration (CBD), and globular glial tauopathy (GGT). This study aimed to characterize spatiotemporal atrophy progression using structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to examine its relationship with clinical course and neuropathology in a cohort of autopsy‐confirmed 4R tauopathies.MethodsThe study included 85 autopsied patients (54 with PSP, 28 with CBD, and 3 with GGT) who underwent multiple 3T MRI scans, as well as neuropsychological, neurological, and speech/language examinations, and standardized postmortem neuropathological evaluations. An unsupervised machine‐learning algorithm, Subtype and Stage Inference (SuStaIn), was applied to the cross‐sectional brain volumes to estimate spatiotemporal atrophy patterns and data‐driven subtypes and stages in each patient. The relationships among estimated subtypes, pathological diagnoses, and longitudinal changes in clinical testing were examined.ResultsThe SuStaIn algorithm identified 2 distinct subtypes: (1) the subcortical subtype, in which atrophy progresses from the midbrain to the cortex, and (2) the cortical subtype, in which atrophy progresses from the frontal cortex to the subcortical regions. The subcortical subtype was more associated with typical PSP, whereas the cortical subtype was more associated with atypical PSP with a cortical distribution of pathology and CBD (p < 0.001). The cortical subtype had a faster rate of change on the PSP Rating Scale than the subcortical subtype (p < 0.05).InterpretationSuStaIn analysis revealed 2 MRI‐driven subtypes with distinct spatiotemporal atrophy patterns, clinical courses, and neuropathology. Our findings contribute to a comprehensive and improved understanding of disease progression and its relationship to tau pathology in 4R tauopathies. ANN NEUROL 2025;98:492–507

ABSTRACTOverviewBlastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is a rare, aggressive hematologic neoplasm that involves multiple organs, including the skin, bone marrow and blood, lymph nodes, and central nervous system. Violaceous tumors or plaques appearing in sun‐exposed areas are characteristic and present in most patients. The disease typically affects adult men aged 60–70 years, although children and younger adults may also be affected.DiagnosisDiagnosis is based on biopsy of an involved site and is typically based on the identification of blastoid cells displaying the classical immunophenotypes CD123, CD4, and CD56 in addition to specific pDC markers.PrognosisThe median overall survival is 18–24 months. Potential risk factors for shortened survival include older age, overt bone marrow involvement, and genetic abnormalities.Therapy and ManagementEither chemotherapy‐based regimens or tagraxofusp, a CD123‐directed interleukin 3 conjugated with diphtheria toxin, may be used for upfront therapy. Eligible patients are recommended to be consolidated with hematopoietic allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Assessment and treatment of the central nervous system is mandatory, and careful monitoring of skin disease in conjunction with dermatology is essential.

Abstract Purpose Clozapine is primarily metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2 and to a lesser extent by CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4. The global pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and use of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir brought forth new challenges for those caring for patients prescribed clozapine. Prescribing information describes a consideration for a clozapine dose reduction while monitoring for adverse reactions when clozapine is used with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. Other drug information resources consider the combination a contraindication. A case is reported in which therapeutic drug monitoring demonstrated a lack of interaction between clozapine and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. The complexities of infection-associated clozapine toxicity are discussed and a review is provided of CYP3A4 drug and gene interactions with clozapine. Summary A 75-year-old woman with schizophrenia, prescribed clozapine 200 mg by mouth at bedtime, was initiated on nirmatrelvir/ritonavir after developing a mild COVID-19 infection. Two days later, the patient was brought to the emergency department after an unwitnessed fall. Clozapine toxicity was included in the differential diagnosis, although no other signs or symptoms of elevated clozapine levels were present. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was discontinued. Clozapine was withheld for 1 day while a clozapine level was pending, but this measurement revealed no interaction when compared to a baseline level of clozapine. Conclusion Although there are hypothetical concerns when initiating a CYP3A4 inhibitor with concomitant clozapine, the information derived from this case does not clearly support an interaction with the addition of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir during mild COVID-19 infection. It is important to understand the risks of withholding clozapine, although fortunately no psychiatric concerns developed. In reviewing the literature, CYP3A4 inhibitors or genetic polymorphisms seem to have a minimal impact on clozapine levels, although clinical monitoring is warranted.

Background: As more healthcare institutions consider providing preemptive pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing to greater numbers of their patients, it will be important to consider the potential concerns patients may have about the generation of preemptive PGx information. To date, few studies have examined the nature and incidence of patient concerns about preemptive PGx testing. Methods: We conducted a longitudinal survey study of 5000 patients receiving preemptive PGx testing in the Mayo Clinic RIGHT study. We assessed patient concerns regarding issues of data confidentiality, cost implications, comprehension of results, and potential disruption of pre-existing medication regimens. Participants were surveyed before and after they received PGx results from the RIGHT study. Results: We achieved 92.8% and 74.4% response rates on the pre- and post-results surveys, respectively. Participants had low levels of concern about PGx testing overall. However, 25.5% of participants were “quite/extremely concerned” about insurance implications, and 30.1% were “quite/extremely” concerned about increased out-of-pocket costs for prescription medications that might result from PGx testing. These same concerns were significantly reduced on the post-results survey. Patients who initially expressed concerns regarding their ability to understand PGx results were more likely to report having difficulty understanding results on the post-results survey. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that as healthcare institutions look to increase preemptive PGx screening, attention should be given to potential concerns patients may have around such testing. Educational interventions aimed at supporting patient understanding of PGx results and addressing potential concerns will be important elements of a successful PGx program.