Citations

Objectives: This practice parameter was revised collaboratively by the American College of Radiology (ACR), and American Radium Society (ARS). Image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) uses various imaging modalities to maximize the accuracy and precision of radiation treatment delivery. Methods: This practice parameter was developed according to the process described under the heading The Process for Developing ACR Practice Parameters and Technical Standards on the ACR website (https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Practice-Parameters-and-Technical-Standards) by the Committee on Practice Parameters–Radiation Oncology of the ACR Commission on Radiation Oncology in collaboration with the ARS. Results: This practice parameter for IGRT addresses qualifications and responsibilities of personnel, clinical IGRT implementation, documentation, quality control and improvement, safety, and patient education. Since the publication of the ACR–ASTRO Practice Parameter in 2019, there is now more clarity as to what criteria and parameters need to be documented in the medical record, a better appreciation of the large amount of imaging data, how to interpret such data, as well as the complex interactions of multiple systems in the implementation of IGRT. Conclusions: This practice parameter assists practitioners in the clinical use of IGRT. IGRT should complement and be used in combination with other quality assurance processes. IGRT is a rapidly evolving field, and practitioners should have a thorough understanding of its strengths and potential limitations.

Abstract Background Small studies suggest that constipation is a common symptom associated with a worse prognosis in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Objectives The aim was to compare the association between constipation, motor, and other non‐motor symptoms (NMS) in PD patients at baseline and in future. Methods Using the Fox Insight database, we compared baseline characteristics, risk of progressive motor symptoms, and incidence of NMS between PD patients with versus without constipation. Results Of 20,352 participants, 16,611 (82%) reported infrequent bowel movements and/or excessive straining, 15,594 (77%) had incomplete evacuation, and 14,165 (70%) reported both symptoms. Patients with constipation were generally older, white, women, had PD >5 years, and had higher NMS and comorbidity scores ( P < 0.001). Constipation was significantly associated with worse motor symptoms and most NMS , especially fecal incontinence (odds ratio [ OR] = 1.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.49–1.82), dysphagia ( OR = 1.20; 95% CI = 1.12–1.29), talking/moving during sleep ( OR = 1.39; 95% CI = 1.30–1.48), and urinary urgency ( OR = 1.23; 95% CI = 1.16–1.32). Constipation was associated with a small, but statistically significant increased risk of some progressive motor symptoms. At a mean median follow‐up of 2.8 years, constipation was associated with an increased risk of incident gastrointestinal, autonomic, neuropsychiatric, sleep‐related, sensory NMS , such as dysphagia (hazard ratio [ HR] = 1.43; 95% CI = 1.35–1.51), fecal incontinence ( HR = 1.87; 95% CI = 1.74–2.01), falls ( HR = 1.44; 95% CI = 1.35–1.52), hallucinations ( HR = 1.65; 95% CI = 1.52–1.79), cognitive impairment ( HR = 1.38; 95% CI = 1.30–1.47), and talking/moving during sleep ( HR = 1.65; 95% CI = 1.55–1.75). Conclusions Constipation is a common symptom associated with severity of motor and other NMS and portends a worse prognosis in persons with PD.

Abstract Single‐molecule immunoassay is a reliable technique for the detection and quantification of low‐abundance blood biomarkers, which are essential for early disease diagnosis and biomedical research. However, current single‐molecule methods predominantly rely on endpoint detection and necessitate signal amplification via labeling, which brings a variety of unwanted effects, like matrix effect and autofluorescence interference. This study introduces a real‐time mass imaging‐based label‐free single‐molecule immunoassay (LFSMiA). Featuring plasmonic scattering microscopy‐based mass imaging, a 2‐step sandwich assay format enables background reduction, minimization of matrix effect by dynamic tracking of single binding events, and fully leveraging real‐time data for improved measurement precision through a Bayesian Gaussian process model, the LFSMiA enables ultra‐sensitive and direct protein detection at the single‐molecule level in neat blood sample matrices. LFSMiA measurement is demonstrated for interleukin‐6 and prostate‐specific antigen in buffer, undiluted serum, and whole blood with sub‐femtomolar detection limits and eight logs of dynamic ranges. Moreover, comparable performance is achieved with an inexpensive miniaturized setup. To show its translational potential to clinical settings and point‐of‐care diagnostics, N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide is examined in patient whole blood samples using the LFSMiA and results in a strong linear correlation (r > 0.99) with standard clinical lab results.

Purpose To establish international expert consensus on surgical techniques, complications, and rehabilitation protocols for lateral extra‐articular procedures (LEAPs) performed adjunctively with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Methods Fifty‐five knee surgeons from 17 countries on 5 continents completed a 3‐round modified Delphi process. In the final round, 16 statements on LEAP techniques and complications were scored on a 5‐point Likert scale; ≥75% “agree/strongly agree” constituted consensus. When appropriate, strength of recommendation was graded. Statements lacking support were revised until consensus or abandonment. Results Six statements achieved unanimous consensus (100%), 2 had strong consensus (90%‐99.9%), and 3 reached consensus (75%‐89.9%); 4 were removed. Key technical recommendations were as follows: (1) in iliotibial band procedures, the graft strip should pass beneath the lateral collateral ligament; (2) an anatomic technique is mandatory for anterolateral ligament reconstruction; and (3) no single LEAP is clinically superior to another. Unanimous agreement indicated that modern LEAPs do not increase lateral compartment osteoarthritis risk, carry a low complication rate, and do not necessitate changes to rehabilitation or return‐to‐play timelines. Conclusions Consensus defined core surgical principles and confirmed the safety of adding LEAPs to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. When an iliotibial band graft is used, it should be routed deep to the lateral collateral ligament and fixed between 0° and 60° of knee flexion under low tension. For anterolateral ligament reconstruction, femoral fixation should be in full extension at a posterior‐proximal point relative to the lateral epicondyle. Although no single LEAP proved superiority, adherence to these principles permits safe, effective surgery without altering standard rehabilitation or return‐to‐sport protocols and without increasing osteoarthritis risk. Level of Evidence Level V, expert opinion.

Purpose To define expert consensus on whether and how lateral extra‐articular procedures (LEAPs) should accompany anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction to optimize outcomes in ACL‐deficient knees. Methods Fifty‐five knee surgeons from 17 countries on 5 continents completed a 3‐round modified Delphi process. Twenty‐one statements on patient selection for combined ACL reconstruction (ACLR) + LEAPs were graded on 5‐point Likert scales; ≥75% “agree/strongly agree” signified consensus. Strength of recommendation was ranked, and statements failing the threshold were revised or discarded after discussion. Results One statement achieved unanimous agreement (100%): it is strongly recommended to add a LEAP for active patients ≤25 years receiving hamstring‐autograft ACLR to reduce graft failure. Strong consensus (≥90%) supported LEAPs in primary ACLR when grade 3 pivot shift (97.9%), knee hyperextension (97.9%), skeletally immature status (79.5%), revision ACLR (91.5%), return to pivoting sports (93.2%), active patients ≤25 years using nonhamstring grafts (90.7%), grade 3 Lachman test (90%), and when multiple relative risk factors coexist (statement 36, 97.1%). Consensus (75%‐89.9%) favored LEAPs for chronic symptomatic ACL deficiency (86.1%), posterior tibial slope >12° (85.7%), and a history of contralateral ACL injury (88.9%). Eight statements did not reach consensus regarding small‐diameter autografts, female athletes, imaging signs of anterolateral injury (e.g., Segond fracture, lateral femoral‐notch sign), and concomitant meniscal procedures. One statement on LEAPs with primary ACL repair was withdrawn because the project focused on reconstruction. Conclusions International experts strongly recommend adding a LEAP in young active patients undergoing hamstring‐autograft ACLR and in cases of high‐grade rotational or anterior laxity, knee hyperextension, revision surgery, or returning to pivoting sports. Unresolved issues include small graft size, female athletes, imaging findings of rotational instability, and concurrent meniscal procedures, highlighting priorities for future research. Level of Evidence Level V, expert opinion.

ABSTRACT Objective Despite high stand‐alone performance, studies demonstrate that artificial intelligence (AI)‐supported endoscopic diagnostics often fall short in clinical applications due to human‐AI interaction factors. This video‐based trial on Barrett's esophagus aimed to investigate how examiner behavior, their levels of confidence, and system usability influence the diagnostic outcomes of AI‐assisted endoscopy. Methods The present analysis employed data from a multicenter randomized controlled tandem video trial involving 22 endoscopists with varying degrees of expertise. Participants were tasked with evaluating a set of 96 endoscopic videos of Barrett's esophagus in two distinct rounds, with and without AI assistance. Diagnostic confidence levels were recorded, and decision changes were categorized according to the AI prediction. Additional surveys assessed user experience and system usability ratings. Results AI assistance significantly increased examiner confidence levels ( p < 0.001) and accuracy. Withdrawing AI assistance decreased confidence ( p < 0.001), but not accuracy. Experts consistently reported higher confidence than non‐experts ( p < 0.001), regardless of performance. Despite improved confidence, correct AI guidance was disregarded in 16% of all cases, and 9% of initially correct diagnoses were changed to incorrect ones. Overreliance on AI, algorithm aversion, and uncertainty in AI predictions were identified as key factors influencing outcomes. The System Usability Scale questionnaire scores indicated good to excellent usability, with non‐experts scoring 73.5 and experts 85.6. Conclusions Our findings highlight the pivotal function of examiner behavior in AI‐assisted endoscopy. To fully realize the benefits of AI, implementing explainable AI, improving user interfaces, and providing targeted training are essential. Addressing these factors could enhance diagnostic accuracy and confidence in clinical practice.

Abstract Purpose: Adolescents with chronic orthostatic intolerance (COI) experience symptoms related to impaired tolerance of upright posture. Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS) is a specific type of COI, marked by an excessive increase in heart rate (≥40 bpm or an absolute HR >120 bpm) when standing. This study compares Functional Disability Inventory (FDI) scores between adolescents with COI with and without excessive postural tachycardia (POTS subtype). Methods: Patients ≤19 years referred to our POTS program (Aug 2024–Mar 2025) with orthostatic symptoms for>3 months were included. Based on active stand HR, patients were categorized as POTS (HR ≥40 bpm) or COI without excessive postural tachycardia (HR <40 bpm). FDI scores were collected. Chi-square tests assessed group differences. A two-sample t-test compared FDI severity. Linear regression evaluated the association between HR change and FDI score. Results: All data were normally distributed, allowing the use of parametric analyses. Of the 92 patients (46 per group), 78% were female. The mean age was 16.0 ± 1.48 years in the COI group and 16.3 ± 1.7 years in the POTS group, with no significant sex differences between groups. The COI group had a higher mean FDI score than the POTS group, but this difference was not statistically significant. The distribution of FDI severity (mild, moderate, severe) was similar between groups. Linear regression showed a non-significant trend of a 1 bpm increase in heart rate associated with a 0.1055-point decrease in FDI score Conclusion: Functional disability was similar between the COI and POTS groups.