Citations

Showing 10 of 107961 citations.

Transforming Health Care — Shared Commitments for a Learning Health System
Madara, James, Miyamoto, Suzanne, Dowdy, Sean C. , Greene, Sarah M. , Tarrant, Julie, Margolis, Peter A. , Tarrant, Julie

Mayo Clinic

New England Journal of Medicine | June 25, 2025 | Volume: 393 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 192-197

10.1056/nejmsb2507600 | PMID 40561191 Get It

Helping Each Other Help Our Patients: A Moral Imperative
Overman, David M.

Mayo Clinic

World Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery | June 25, 2025 | Volume: 16 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 719-728

10.1177/21501351251341240 | PMID 40560169 Get It

Genomic dimensions deconstruct the clinical heterogeneity of bipolar disorder
Veen, Tracey van der , Tesfaye, Markos , Yang, Jessica , Boltz, Toni , David, Friederike S. , Crinion, Shane , Koromina, Maria , Bigdeli, Tim B., Coombes, Brandon J., Panagiotaropoulou, Georgia, Parker, Nadine, Sung, Heejong , Bass, Nicholas, Coleman, Jonathan R. I., Guzman-Parra, José , Kálmán, János , McGrouther, Caroline C., Rangan, Aaditya V. , Scott, Katie , Vreeker, Annabel , Bauer, Michael , Brunkhorst-Kanaan, Nathalie, Byerley, William , Cervantes, Pablo , Chatzinakos, Chris , Claus, Isabelle , Cruceanu, Cristiana , Cuellar-Barboza, Alfredo, Dafnas, Konstantinos , Degenhardt, Franziska, Fanous, Ayman H. , Ferrier, I. Nicol , Forty, Liz , Frank, Josef , Freimer, Nelson B. , Hamshere, Marian L., Harder, Arvid , Hautzinger, Martin , Hellgren, Dennis, Hoffmann, Per, Jönsson, Lina , Kittel‐Schneider, Sarah , Knowles, James A. , Lavebratt, Catharina , Lawrence, Jacob , Leber, Markus , Lucae, Susanne , Lundberg, Martin , Maier, Wolfgang , Maihofer, Adam X. , Maratou, Eirini , McKay, James , Medeiros, Helena , Meyer‐Lindenberg, Andreas , Moutsatsou, Paraskevi , Mühleisen, Thomas W. , O’Connell, Kevin S. , Papiol, Sergi , Perry, Amy , Pisanu, Claudia , Potash, James B. , Rapaport, Mark Hyman , Regeer, Eline J. , Rice, John P. , Schulte, Eva C. , Senner, Fanny , Shilling, Paul D. , Sirignano, Lea , Slaney, Claire , Smeland, Olav B. , Sobell, Janet L. , Stein, Dan J. , Vawter, Marquis P. , Vedder, Helmut , Witt, Stephanie H. , Zandi, Peter P. , Investigators, Genomic Psychiatry Cohort (GPC), Psychiatry, HUNT All-In, Bengesser, Susanne , Berrettini, Wade H. , Blackwood, Douglas, Boehnke, Michael , Catts, Stanley V. , Craddock, Nicholas , Dikeos, Dimitris , Ferentinos, Panagiotis , Frye, Mark A. , Gawlik, Micha , Kahn, René S., Landén, Mikael , Lenger, Melanie , Loughland, Carmel , Melle, Ingrid , Myers, R , Müller‐Myhsok, Bertram , Neale, Benjamin M. , Øedegaard, Ketil J. , Paciga, Sara A. , Pato, Carlos N. , Pawlak, Joanna , Perlis, Roy H. , Reif, Andreas , Schalling, Martin , Scott, Laura J. , Scott, Rodney J., Stahl, Eli A. , Stordal, Eystein , Sullivan, Patrick F., Vaaler, Arne E. , Waldman, Irwin D. , Ophoff, Roel A. , Mullins, Niamh , Forstner, Andreas J. , van der Veen, Tracey , Yang, Jessica Mei Kay , Alda, Martin , Ophoff, Roel A , O'Connell, Kevin S , Mullins, Niamh , Forstner, Andreas J , Grigoroiu-Serbanescu, Maria , Edenberg, Howard J , McMahon, Francis , Andreassen, Ole A , Di Florio, Arianna , McQuillin, Andrew , Witt, Stephanie H , Meyer-Lindenberg, Andreas , Stein, Dan J , Papiol, Sergi , Cruceanu, Cristiana , Schulte, Eva , Kittel-Schneider, Sarah , Lavebratt, Catharina , Pisanu, Claudia , Reif, Andreas , Perlis, Roy H , Andlauer, Till F. M. , Bigdeli, Tim B. , Coombes, Brandon J. , Greenwood, Tiffany A. , Panagiotaropoulou, Georgia , Parker, Nadine , Bass, Nicholas, Coleman, Jonathan Ri , Mitchell, Brittany L. , Shadrin, Alexey A. , Smith, Daniel J. , Adorjan, Kristina , Albani, Diego , Alemany, Silvia , Alliey‐Rodriguez, Ney , Antoniou, Anastasia , Beins, Eva Carolina , Boks, Marco P. , Bosch, Rosa , Brumpton, Ben , Budde, Monika , Cabana‐Domínguez, Judit , Cairns, Murray J. , Carpiniello, Bernardo , Casas, Miguel , Clarke, Toni‐Kim , Cuéllar‐Barboza, Alfredo B. , Czerski, Piotr M. , Dale, Anders M. , Dalkner, Nina , DePaulo, J Raymond , Djurovic, Srdjan , Escott‐Price, Valentina , Fellendorf, Frederike T. , Frei, Oleksandr , Garnham, Julie , Gizer, Ian R. , Gordon, Scott D. , Gordon‐Smith, Katherine , Hahn, Tim , Hamshere, Marian L. , Heilbronner, Urs , Herms, Stefan , Hickie, Ian Bernard , Hoffmann, Per , Holmans, Peter , Jamain, Stéphane , Kennedy, James L. , Koch, Elise , Kogevinas, Manolis , Kranz, Thorsten M. , Kushner, Steven A. , Lind, Penelope A. , Lundberg, Martin, MacIntyre, Donald J. , Malaspina, Dolores , Manchia, Mirko , Martinsson, Lina , McInnis, Melvin G. , Millischer, Vincent , Morris, Derek W. , Olsen, Catherine M. , Pardiñas, Antonio F. , Pfennig, Andrea , Quested, Digby J. , Rivera, Margarita , Sindermann, Lisa , Siskind, Dan , Artigas, María Soler , Stein, Frederike , Świątkowska, Beata , Thorp, Jackson G. , Toma, Claudio , Tondo, Leonardo , Tooney, Paul A. , Walters, James , Young, Allan H. , Zillich, Lea , Adolfsson, Rolf , Alfredsson, Lars , Backlund, Lena , Baune, Bernhard , Bellivier, Frank , Biernacka, Joanna M. , Blackwood, Douglas , Breen, Gerome , Carr, Vaughan J , Cichon, Sven , Corvin, Aiden , Dannlowski, Udo , Esko, Tõnu , Étain, Bruno , Fullerton, Janice M. , Gershon, Elliot S. , Goes, Fernando , Green, Melissa J. , Hauser, Joanna , Henskens, Frans A , Hjerling‐Leffler, Jens , Jones, Ian Richard , Jones, Lisa Anne , Kahn, René S. , Kelsoe, John R , Kircher, Tilo , Kirov, George , Kobayashi, Nene, Leboyer, Marion , Li, Qingqin S. , Lissowska, Jolanta , Loughland, Carmel M. , Luykx, Jurjen J. , Martin, Nicholas G. , Mathews, Carol A. , Mayoral, Fermín , McElroy, Susan L. , McIntosh, Andrew M. , Medland, Sarah E. , Mitchell, Philip B , Morken, Gunnar , Möser, Chiara, Nievergelt, Caroline M , Nurnberger, John I , Nöthen, Markus M. , O‘Donovan, Michael , Olsson, Tomas , Owen, Michael J. , Pantelis, Christos , Pato, Michele T. , Patrinos, George P. , Ramos‐Quiroga, Josep Antoni , Reininghaus, Eva , Ribasés, Marta , Rietschel, Marcella , Ripke, Stephan , Rouleau, Guy Armand , Schall, Ulrich , Schofield, Peter R. , Schulze, Thomas , Scott, Rodney J. , Serretti, Alessandro , Smoller, Jordan W. , Squassina, Alessio , Streit, Fabian , Turecki, Gustavo , Vieta, Eduard , Vincent, John B. , Weickert, Cynthia Shannon , Weickert, Thomas Wesley , Whiteman, David C. , Alda, Martin , Grigoroiu‐Serbânescu, Maria , McMahon, Francis J. , Andreassen, Ole A. , McQuillin, Andrew

Mayo Clinic

No container title available | June 25, 2025 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1101/2025.06.23.25330155 | PMID 40666370 Get It

ABSTRACT Bipolar disorder’s (BD) clinical heterogeneity has an unresolved genetic basis. We meta-analyzed genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of 16 BD subphenotypes in 226,032 individuals from 57 cohorts (38,022 cases); 10 advanced to multivariate and multi-trait analyses. Four factors (compulsive, psychotic, dysregulated, internalizing) explained 82.8% of shared genetic variance. BD1 and BD2 loaded on distinct factors despite a high genetic correlation; 87.0% of common-factor loci were significant in neither subtype. Unipolar mania aligned with psychosis over internalizing, and was distinguishable from BD1, and rapid cycling showed heritable cross-domain liability. We identified 356 risk loci, 158 novel, including the first univariate-GWAS associations for psychosis, unipolar mania, rapid cycling and schizoaffective disorder—and 249 credible genes (89 high-confidence), 12 with approved-drug or clinical-phase annotations. Cell-type association showed a midbrain dopaminergic–GABAergic gradient along the psychotic factor. BD’s genetic architecture appears hierarchical—a general liability resolving into dimensions of course and comorbidity beyond diagnostic subtypes.
Consensus guideline for the management of gastric cancer with synchronous peritoneal metastases
Butensky, Samuel D. , Bansal, Varun , Su, David , Waheed, Muhammad Talha , Nikiforchin, Andrei , Gomez‐Mayorga, Jorge L. , Radomski, Shannon N. , Sun, Beatrice J. , Turaga, Kiran K. , Gunderson, Craig G. , Lacy, Jill , In, Haejin, Kennedy, Timothy J., Yoon, Harry H. , Sundar, Raghav , Ly, Quan P. , Fackche, Nadege , Chan, Carlos H.F. , Maron, Steven B. , Hoehn, Richard S. , Bansal, Varun V , Su, David G , Radomski, Shannon N , Turaga, Kiran K , Badgwell, Brian D , Yoon, Harry H , Chan, Carlos H F , Hoehn, Richard , Olecki, Elizabeth Josephine , Badgwell, Brian D. , In, Haejin , Greer, Jonathan B. , Woo, Yanghee

Mayo Clinic

Cancer | June 25, 2025 | Volume: 131 | Issue: 13 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/cncr.35870 | PMID 40558029 Get It

AbstractBackgroundGastric cancer with synchronous peritoneal metastases is a debilitating disease with limited treatment options. This article describes an update of the 2018 Chicago Consensus guidelines addressing the management of gastric cancer with synchronous peritoneal metastases in line with the most recent evidence.MethodsA clinical management pathway was updated through two rounds of a Delphi consensus to assess agreement levels with pathway blocks. Supporting evidence underwent evaluation using a rapid literature review. Meta‐analyses were performed as appropriate.ResultsOverall, the level of evidence in this disease subset was low to moderate. Of 124 participants in the first round, 109 (88%) responded in the second round. Strong consensus (>90%) was achieved in six of eight blocks (75%) in rounds 1 and 2. A multidisciplinary preoperative assessment and diagnostic laparoscopy should be offered to all patients, whereas patients with a high burden of disease or progression should undergo nonsurgical management. Patients with stable/responsive disease and a low peritoneal carcinomatosis index should subsequently be offered treatment with regional therapeutic interventions and cytoreductive surgery. In patients who are cytology‐positive, systemic therapy can be used to convert them to cytology‐negative, with subsequent surgery offered according to the patient's goals of care. Meta‐analysis of observational and randomized control trials revealed a survival benefit with the addition of intraperitoneal chemotherapy to cytoreductive surgery (hazard ratio, 0.52).ConclusionsThe consensus‐driven clinical pathway for gastric cancer with synchronous peritoneal metastases offers vital clinical guidance for practitioners. There is a growing body of high‐quality evidence to support management strategies, and future clinical trials are eagerly awaited.
Extended Sural Nerve Harvest: A Technique to Gain Additional Graft Length
Millesi, Elena , Gates-Tanzer, Lauren, Felzen, Antonia , Wang, Huan, Gibreel, Waleed , Mardini, Samir

Mayo Clinic

Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery | June 25, 2025 | Volume: 157 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 99e-107e

10.1097/prs.0000000000012270 | PMID 40558058 Get It

Background: The sural nerve is widely used as a nerve graft for various types of peripheral nerve repair due to its ease of harvest and acceptable donor-site morbidity. Nevertheless, certain clinical scenarios, such as cable grafting or multiple cross-face nerve grafts, require grafts longer than the typical 35 cm. This study aims to investigate the anatomic feasibility and clinical safety of an extended sural nerve harvest above the popliteal crease by interfascicular dissection. Methods: An anatomic study using 5 fresh-frozen cadaver legs was conducted, focusing on identifying the anatomic relationship of the sural nerve above the popliteal crease to its surrounding structures and nerve histopathology. A retrospective review was performed of all patients who underwent an extended sural nerve harvest, and patient outcomes, including nerve graft length and postoperative complications, were reviewed to evaluate the clinical feasibility of the extended harvest technique. Results: Anatomic dissection revealed that interfascicular dissection allowed for an additional 14.3 ± 6 cm of nerve length, achieving a total graft length of 49.1 ± 5 cm. Histologic analysis showed no significant differences in fascicle number or axon count along the nerve. A retrospective review, which included 7 adults and 2 pediatric patients, demonstrated that an extended sural nerve harvest was feasible and safe. The maximum graft length was 55 cm, and no intraoperative complications or functional deficits were reported. Conclusion: The extended sural nerve harvest above the popliteal crease with a step-incision approach was both anatomically feasible and clinically safe, providing additional graft length without increasing donor-site morbidity.
Consensus guideline for the management of peritoneal metastases from neuroendocrine neoplasms
Su, David , Brown, Leanne , Bansal, Varun , Bakkila, Baylee , Turaga, Kiran K. , Gunderson, Craig G. , Bergsland, Emily K. , Metz, David C. , Kunz, Pamela L. , Gangi, Alexandra , Ly, Quan P. , Fackche, Nadege , Chan, Carlos H.F. , Sundar, Raghav , Hoehn, Richard S. , Dillon, Joseph S. , Su, David G , Brown, Leanne M , Bansal, Varun V , Turaga, Kiran K , Chan, Carlos H F , Dillon, Joseph S , Hoehn, Richard , Concors, Seth Jason , Strosberg, Jonathan , Hálfdánarson, Þorvarður R. , Kunstman, John W.

Mayo Clinic

Cancer | June 25, 2025 | Volume: 131 | Issue: 13 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/cncr.35871 | PMID 40558053 Get It

AbstractNeuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) with peritoneal metastases (PM) represent a complex clinical challenge because of low incidence and heterogeneous phenotypes. This commentary describes the results of a national consensus aimed at addressing clinical management of patients with NENs and PM. An update of the 2018 Chicago consensus guidelines was conducted with a modified Delphi technique, which encompassed two rounds of voting. The levels of agreement for various pathway blocks were assessed, and key systemic therapy concepts were summarized by content experts. Supporting evidence was evaluated via a rapid literature review. Overall, the level of evidence for the management of PM in this disease was universally low. In total, 107 participants responded in the first round, with 88 of 107 (82%) participating in the second round. Strong consensus (>90%) was achieved in five of seven (71%) and seven of seven (100%) blocks in rounds 1 and 2, respectively. A multidisciplinary approach including psychosocial and wellness assessments received a strong positive recommendation. Management of NENs with PM was organized according to disease grade and symptom profiles. In grade 1 and 2 well‐differentiated NENs, cytoreductive surgery received strong support (>95%) after the management of functional syndromes (if present). For grade 3 well‐differentiated NENs, systemic therapy is the primary recommendation, with surgical resection considered in select cases. Given the limited evidence, the consensus‐driven clinical pathway offers vital clinical guidance for the management of NENs with PM. The need for high‐quality evidence remains critical to the field.
Anti-Neoplastic Activity of Estrogen Receptor Beta in Chemoresistant Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Wang, Xiyin , Emch, Michael J. , Hawse, John R. , Hawse, John R , Goetz, Matthew P.

Mayo Clinic

Cancers | June 25, 2025 | Volume: 17 | Issue: 13 | Pages: 2132

10.3390/cancers17132132 | PMID 40647431 Get It

Background: Targeted therapies, such as endocrine agents, have significantly improved outcomes for patients with estrogen receptor alpha-positive (ERα+) breast cancer. Unfortunately, for patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), which lack expression of ERα and HER2, there remains a dearth of targeted adjuvant agents. We discovered that estrogen receptor beta (ERβ) is expressed in approximately 20% of TNBC cases, and its activation has been shown to inhibit proliferation, invasion, and migration in preclinical models. However, it remains unclear whether ERβ-targeted therapies maintain efficacy following the development of chemoresistance. Methods: To address this question, we generated ERβ+ TNBC cell line models with acquired resistance to paclitaxel or doxorubicin. We then assessed their response to ERβ-targeted therapies and analyzed transcriptomic changes associated with chemoresistance and ERβ ligand treatment. Results: Chemotherapy-resistant ERβ+ TNBC cells retained sensitivity to ERβ-targeted therapies and, in some cases, exhibited enhanced responsiveness. ERβ expression did not compromise chemotherapy efficacy in treatment-naïve cells. Chemotherapy-resistant cells had a vastly altered transcriptome and surprisingly, a heavily reduced ERβ transcriptome, compared to sensitive cells despite the maintenance of ERβ-driven anti-neoplastic activity. Conclusions: These findings suggest that ERβ remains a relevant drug target in chemotherapy-refractory disease and has aided in the refinement of a minimal ERβ transcriptomic signature associated with response to ERβ-targeting agents, further informing the primary mechanisms through which ERβ elicits its tumor suppressive effects.
The Role of Organoids in Advancing Colorectal Cancer Research: Insights and Future Directions
Heydari, Zahra , Balaya, Rex Devasahayam Arokia , Sarkar, Gobinda , Boardman, Lisa, Devasahayam Arokia Balaya, Rex , Boardman, Lisa

Mayo Clinic

Cancers | June 25, 2025 | Volume: 17 | Issue: 13 | Pages: 2129

10.3390/cancers17132129 | PMID 40647428 Get It

Organoids are three-dimensional (3D) structures that mimic the architecture and functionality of human organs, providing a novel approach to study diseases such as colorectal cancer (CRC). This review aims to explore the impact of organoids on understanding CRC and their potential use in exploring therapeutic outcomes. Colorectal cancer, characterized by the transformation of colonic epithelial cells into adenomas and carcinomas, remains one of the top causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide. Traditional two-dimensional (2D) cell cultures fail to replicate the tumor microenvironment in an effective manner, which highlights the need for advanced 3D models. Organoids preserve the genetic and phenotypic properties of the original tumors, allowing for improved disease modeling, drug screening, and personalized medicine applications. When using patient-derived organoids (PDOs), researchers can gain insights into CRC initiation, progression, and treatment outcome. Ultimately, organoids represent an encouraging platform for improving therapeutic strategies for CRC, potentially leading to better patient outcomes through tailored treatment approaches.
Lichen planus pemphigoides: a retrospective single-centre cohort over two decades and comparison of idiopathic vs. drug-induced cases
Yang, Eilene, Lehman, Julia S. , Aghazadeh, Nessa , Todd, Austin, Damodaran, Sindhuja Sominidi, Lehman, Julia, Aghazadeh Mohandesi, Nessa , Sominidi Damodaran, Sindhuja , Lehman, Julia S , Imhof, Reese L. , Tekin, Burak

Mayo Clinic

British Journal of Dermatology | June 25, 2025 | Volume: 193 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 784-786

10.1093/bjd/ljaf240 | PMID 40557943 Get It

We performed a retrospective review of patients with lichen planus pemphigoides (LPP) over almost a 23-year period to gather clinical, histopathological, immunological and treatment-related information and to compare idiopathic LPP with drug-induced LPP. This study represents the largest single-institution case series of LPP to date and includes novel findings related to mucosal involvement, autoantibody profiles and the value of monitoring bullous pemphigoid (BP) autoantibodies in predicting treatment response. This study also includes characteristic histopathological findings that can aid in the diagnosis and differentiation of LPP from BP, in addition to comparisons between idiopathic LPP and drug-induced LPP.
The hope and the hype of artificial intelligence for syncope management
Johnston, Samuel L. , Barsotti, Ercole John , Fedorowski, Artur , Ricci, Fabrizio , Heller, Eric G, Sheldon, Robert S. , Sutton, Richard , Shen, Win‐Kuang , Thiruganasambandamoorthy, Venkatesh , Adhaduk, Mehul , Parker, William H. , Aburizik, Arwa , Haselton, Corey R, Cuskey, Alex J, Johansson, Madeleine , Dominic, Paari , Rao, B. Hygriv , Mudireddy, Avinash , Statz, Giselle M., Benditt, David G. , Gatti, Mauro , Menè, Roberto , Shiffer, Dana , Vassilikos, Vassilios , Bakogiannis, Constantinos , Fedorowski, Artur , Ricci, Fabrizio , Sheldon, Robert , Sutton, Richard , Shen, Win-Kuang , Thiruganasambandamoorthy, Venkatesh , Adhaduk, Mehul , Parker, William H , Aburizik, Arwa , Lee, Sangil , Johansson, Madeleine , Macfarlane, Donald , Dominic, Paari , Abe, Haruhiko , Rao, B Hygriv , Mudireddy, Avinash , Sonka, Milan , Sandhu, Roopinder K , Kenny, Rose Anne , Gopinathannair, Rakesh , Benditt, David , Dipaola, Franca , Gatti, Mauro , Giaj Levra, Alessandro , Furlan, Raffaello , Ruwald, Martin H , Vassilikos, Vassilios , Gebska, Milena A , Olshansky, Brian , Cuskey, Alex, Lee, Sangil , Kenny, Rose Anne , Gopinathannair, Rakesh , Dipaola, Franca , Costantino, Giorgio , Furlan, Raffaello , Olshansky, Brian

Mayo Clinic

European Heart Journal - Digital Health | June 25, 2025 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 1046-1054

10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf061 | PMID 40984999 Get It

Abstract Aims Syncope remains a diagnostic challenge despite advancements in testing and treatment. Cardiac syncope is an independent predictor of mortality and can be difficult to distinguish from other causes of transient loss of consciousness (TLOC). This paper explores whether artificial intelligence (AI) can improve the evaluation and management of patients with syncope. Methods and results We conducted a literature review and incorporated the opinions of experts in the fields of syncope and AI. The cause of TLOC is often unclear, hospitalization criteria are ambiguous, diagnostic tests are frequently non-informative, and assessments are costly. Patients are left with unanswered questions and limited guidance. Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to optimize syncope evaluation by processing large data sets, detecting imperceptible patterns, and assisting clinicians. However, AI has limitations, including errors, lack of human empathy, and uncertain clinical utility. Liability issues further complicate its integration. We present three viewpoints: (i) AI is crucial for advancing syncope management; (ii) AI can enhance the patient experience; and (iii) AI in syncope care is inevitable. Conclusion Artificial intelligence may improve syncope diagnosis and management, particularly through machine learning–based test interpretation and wearable device data. However, it has yet to surpass human clinical judgment in complex decision-making. Current challenges include gaps in understanding syncope mechanisms, AI interpretability, generalizability, and clinical integration. Standardized diagnostic approaches, real-world validation, and curated data sets are essential for progress. Artificial intelligence may enhance efficiency and communication but raises concerns regarding confidentiality, bias, inequities, and legal implications.