Citations

Background Intracranial occlusions in embolic stroke of undetermined source are histopathologically similar to cardiac sources of embolism. Whether patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source and intracranial occlusion benefit from anticoagulation is unknown. Methods A multicenter retrospective cohort of adults with cryptogenic stroke was queried for patients with proximal or medium/distal vessel occlusion. The primary outcome was recurrent ischemic stroke, which was assessed in unadjusted and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models and repeated following 1:1 propensity score matching and biweight kernel density matching. Results Of the 2328 patients who were followed over a median of 1.31 years (interquartile range, 0.34–2.85), 999 (42.6%) had an intracranial occlusion. When compared with patients without an intracranial occlusion, those with an occlusion had fewer atherosclerotic vascular risk factors, more severe symptoms, and less severe cerebral microvascular disease. The rate of recurrent stroke was similar between patients with versus without an intracranial occlusion (6.8%/year [95% CI, 5.7–8.2] versus 7.0%/year [95% CI 6.0–8.1]; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.09 [95% CI, 0.77–1.55]). There was no association between occlusion and recurrent stroke in the adjusted propensity score matching (HR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.64–1.59]) or kernel density models (HR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.62–1.45]). There was no interaction between occlusion and treatment with anticoagulation, sex, age, or high‐risk sources of embolism for the primary outcome in the unmatched and matched analyses. Conclusions Intracranial occlusion in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source is not associated with a greater risk of recurrence when compared with patients without an intracranial occlusion. There was no difference in rate of recurrent stroke with anticoagulation when stratified by presence or absence of occlusion.

The FAITH! (Fostering African-American Improvement in Total Health) Cardiovascular Health and Wellness Program is more than a decade-long community-based participatory research initiative aimed at addressing cardiovascular health disparities among African-Americans in Minnesota. Founded in 2013, the program employs a culturally tailored, community-driven approach by partnering with African-American faith communities to promote cardiovascular health through education, digital health tools, and multilevel interventions targeting the social determinants of health. Grounded in community-based participatory research principles, FAITH! prioritizes equitable academic-community partnerships, co-learning, community capacity building, and shared ownership in all aspects of research and implementation. The program’s exemplary innovations include the NIH-funded FAITH! Trial, a randomized clinical trial, testing a mobile health intervention (the FAITH! App) co-created with the African-American community, and the Techquity by FAITH! study. Techquity by FAITH! evaluates the effectiveness of a culturally relevant, community-informed mHealth intervention supported by a Digital Health Advocate network to improve overall cardiovascular health and digital health literacy. During its evolution, FAITH! has addressed emergent public health crises, including the COVID-19 pandemic, by adapting programming to provide emergency preparedness resources, health education, and vaccine outreach. Key outcomes include sustainable church-based health ministries, increased research participation, and successful translation of research into practice. The program has also contributed to research workforce development by mentoring and training diverse early-career scholars and community leaders in community-based participatory research and cardiovascular health equity research. Lessons learned highlight the transformative impact of community-based participatory research in building trust, facilitating culturally relevant dissemination, and sustaining health equity initiatives. The FAITH! model demonstrates a scalable, community-led strategy for advancing cardiovascular health in underserved populations and provides a blueprint for future initiatives aiming to reduce racial health disparities.

Abstract Objective The objective of this study is to characterize contemporary surgical management practices and factors influencing surgical decision‐making in the management of Lennox–Gastaut Syndrome (LGS) across pediatric epilepsy centers in the United States. Methods A 45‐item cross‐sectional survey was developed and distributed to Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium centers. Domains included institutional demographics, surgical evaluation timing and goals, presurgical workup, procedural utilization and outcomes, and barriers to surgery. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were performed. Results Thirty‐two pediatric epilepsy centers participated (38% response), the majority comprising pediatric epileptologists at Level 4 National Association of Epilepsy Centers. Most centers (66%) considered surgery after failure of 3–4 antiseizure medications. Presurgical workup typically included brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), long‐term electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring, and neuropsychological assessment, while use of functional imaging, magnetoencephalography, and intracranial EEG varied considerably. All centers offered vagus nerve stimulation and corpus callosotomy; 80%–90% offered resection, hemispherectomy, responsive neurostimulation (RNS); 60%–65% offered deep brain stimulation (DBS) and laser ablation. Among centers offering RNS, half targeted thalamic structures exclusively, and the remainder targeted cortical or combined cortical‐thalamic structures; the centromedian nucleus was the preferred thalamic target for RNS and DBS. Surgical decision‐making was influenced by patient characteristics, procedural considerations, and systemic factors. Seizure frequency, family preference, and multidisciplinary input were highly rated across all interventions. Etiology was critical for resection and hemispherectomy, while financial constraints, insurance barriers, and the need for future neuroimaging impacted neuromodulation selection. Scenario‐specific trends included less frequent consideration of DBS and RNS in children under five years, less use of hemispherectomy in older children, preference for corpus callosotomy in children with predominantly drop seizures, and procedural selection based on MRI findings. Significance Substantial variability exists in the surgical management of LGS. These findings highlight critical opportunities to harmonize practices, reduce disparities, and guide comparative effectiveness research to optimize outcomes. Plain Language Summary Lennox–Gastaut Syndrome (LGS) is a severe form of epilepsy that may require surgery when medications are not effective. This study found that surgical care for LGS varies widely across pediatric epilepsy centers in the United States, including when surgery is recommended, how patients are evaluated, and which procedures are available. Newer approaches such as brain stimulation are being used more often, although access remains inconsistent. These findings highlight the need for clearer treatment pathways to ensure that children with LGS have equitable access to the best possible care.

Abstract OBJECTIVES: · To determine if patients with knee flexion contracture after distal femur fracture have poorer outcomes than patients who regain full knee extension. · To determine if factors such as patient age, gender, open fracture or implant used favors knee flexion contracture. METHODS: Design: Prospective, multicenter trial Setting: Twenty academic level I trauma centers Patient Selection Criteria: Patients with a distal femur fracture. Patients were evaluated for knee flexion contracture at 3, 6 and 12 months post-operatively. Outcome Measures and Comparisons: SMFA, Bother Index and EQ Health Index scores were recorded. Walking and stair climbing ability were assessed. RESULTS: · 126 patients had radiographic follow up for 12 months. There was clinical follow-up for 99 patients at 3 months, 90 patients at 6 months and 74 pts at 12 months. · Patients with full knee extension had better SMFA scores at 12 months than patients with knee flexion contracture (p = 0.308). · Bother Index (p = 0.29) and EQ Health State (p = 0.12) scores did not demonstrate a difference between patients with or without knee flexion contracture at any time point. · Patients with full knee extension had improved walking ability compared to patients with flexion contracture (p = 0.008). Patients with full knee extension had better stair climbing ability than patients with flexion contracture (p = 0.02). · Only older patient age showed a difference in likelihood of flexion contracture (p = 0.01) The rates of flexion contracture in women versus men (p = 0.51), RIMN versus LLP (p = 0.74) and open versus closed fracture (p = 0.24) were not statistically different. CONCLUSIONS: · Patients with knee flexion contractures after distal femur fracture do worse than patients who regain full extension. · Older patients with distal femur fractures are at greater risk for knee flexion contracture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I

Abstract Next-generation sequencing has transformed cancer care by providing essential insights for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. However, variability in testing timing, reporting practices, and interpretation challenges limits its clinical impact. This article highlights key opportunities to optimize somatic reporting, emphasizing the importance of timely testing throughout the cancer care continuum to maximize the diagnostic and therapeutic relevance of findings. Technical factors such as test design, sequencing depth, and the use of liquid biopsy substantially influence result accuracy and interpretation, underscoring the need for careful integration with clinical history. Standardized reporting practices that clearly delineate diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic findings can enhance the clinical utility of next-generation sequencing results. Streamlined formats and curated clinical trial data further support actionable decision making. Additionally, direct patient engagement and education are essential for empowering patients to navigate genomic testing and make informed decisions about their care. By leveraging multidisciplinary tumor boards, decision-support tools, and emerging artificial intelligence technologies, clinicians can better navigate the complexities of somatic reports. Standardization and clarity in reporting are critical to advancing precision oncology, empowering providers and patients to make informed treatment decisions and improve outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Single-session stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has limited role for large arteriovenous malformations (AVM). Volume-staged SRS (VS-SRS) is used to optimize outcomes, but studies reporting results are limited. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective cohort of 378 patients from 21 centers reports results of VS-SRS for the entire AVM nidus. We report favorable outcome, obliteration, hemorrhage, and permanent symptomatic adverse radiation effect rates. RESULTS: The median age was 31 years (IQR: 19-44) at the first volume stage, with patients treated in 2–4 stages. The median total nidus volume was 21 cm 3 (IQR: 13.9-30.1 cm 3 ), and a median prescription dose of 17 Gy (IQR: 16-18 Gy) was used. The median radiographic and clinical follow-up were 48 and 55 months, respectively. Seventy-seven patients (20.4%) had a favorable outcome, with the 3-year and 5-year rates being 3.9% and 18%, respectively. 127 patients (33.6%) achieved obliteration, with the 3-year and 5-year rates being 6.8% and 26%, respectively. Obliteration rates of AVMs <15 cm 3 were 81% and 31%, respectively. The latency period hemorrhage incidence rate was 3.02 cases per 100 patient-years; 52 patients (13.8%) had a bleed. Seventy-two patients (19%) had symptomatic adverse radiation effect; in 38 patients (10.1%), these were permanent. Total nidus volume, prescription dose at first stage, diffuse nidus, and prior hemorrhage were all independent affecting outcome rates. CONCLUSION: VS-SRS can be used to treat large AVMs as a standalone treatment. Obliteration rates and favorable outcomes are lower than that with smaller AVMs, and repeat treatment is often required. Optimizing treatment plans, by increasing prescription doses, reducing treatment volume at each stage, and increasing the number of stages, may lead to better outcomes.

Background Delirium is a state of acute brain failure causing confusion, reduced focus, and changes in alertness. It is common in older patients, occurring in 6-38% of older emergency department (ED) patients. Evidence suggests that systematic screening improves detection rates and early detection, management and reporting are critical. However, examples of operationalizing this in clinical non-research care are scarce. Objective To describe and disseminate examples of best practices for delirium screening, management, and monitoring within the ED. Methods A group of emergency physicians interested in geriatric emergency medicine (GEM) and evidence-based medicine gathered monthly to discuss ways of implementing delirium care. Members were asked to submit any electronic health record (EHR)-based interventions for delirium in current use at their institutions. One group member categorized the EHR tools by their use for screening, prevention, management, and monitoring of delirium. As a group, categorizations were reviewed and agreed upon and similarities, differences and themes were identified. Results Current EHR interventions from 5 EDs were included. We found that: 1) Screening for delirium in EDs is challenging due to the nature of the environment and the variety of tools available. 2) Prevention tools included order sets. 3) Management was accomplished with best practice alerts and order sets to help screen, prevent, address underlying causes, and manage agitation. Delirium prevention order sets emphasize optimizing patient mobility, comfort, and communication. Assessment order sets include routine labs and consultations, while management order sets for agitation provide safe medication options considering older adults’ unique physiology. 4) Utilizing dashboards for compliance monitoring offers real-time feedback, and provides an overview of adherence to clinical guidelines, regulatory standards, and patient safety protocols. Conclusion These real-world examples can be used in EDs implementing delirium programs. Further studies on how EHR interventions impact screening, diagnosis, and treatment of delirium in the ED are needed.

ABSTRACT Background Geriatric screening and multidisciplinary assessment of older adults in the Emergency Department (ED) decrease hospitalizations and ED revisits. The impact on patient‐reported outcomes of health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) and functional status is not known. Methods A hybrid type II implementation/effectiveness prospective cohort study was conducted in an academic ED. The intervention bundle was geriatric screening for delirium, fall risk, and transition of care needs, and multidisciplinary assessment. All older adults (≥ 65 years) placed in the ED observation unit were eligible. HRQoL and functional status were obtained at the ED visit, 30, and 90 days, and were compared between the pre‐ and post‐intervention implementation cohorts. Secondary outcomes included ED revisits, falls, mortality, and intervention adoption measures. Results From 2019 to 2023, 368 adults participated in the study: Most were community‐dwelling (97%) and had multiple comorbidities. The pre ( n = 138) and post ( n = 230) cohorts did not differ in baseline functional status or HRQoL. The rate of geriatric screening improved from 12.3% in the pre‐implementation cohort to 91.3% in the post‐implementation cohort ( p < 0.01). Multispecialty consultation also increased (68.1%–91.3%, p < 0.01). The proportion who had a post‐ED visit decline in functional status did not differ between cohorts. Physical HRQoL declined similarly in both cohorts (−0.73 vs. −0.33, p = 0.61) at 90 days. Mental HRQoL improved in both cohorts; improvement was greater in the pre‐cohort (2.35 vs. 0.32, p = 0.02). ED revisits and re‐hospitalizations were unchanged (30 days: 23.0% vs. 17.2%, p = 0.18, and 90 days: 37.8% vs. 34.8%, p = 0.57). The intervention decreased falls at 30 and 90 days (30 days: 9.7% vs. 3.2%, p = 0.04; 90 days: 22.1% vs. 7.9%, p < 0.01). Conclusions Geriatric screening in the ED increased identification of geriatric syndromes and multidisciplinary consultation. The intervention was associated with decreased falls but did not affect HRQoL or reduce functional decline post ED visit. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov : NCT04068311