Citations

Clear

632 citation(s) found for "Green, B".

Clinical neurocardiology: defining the value of neuroscience‐based cardiovascular therapeutics – 2024 update
Aksu, Tolga , Arora, Rishi , Chen, Peng‐Sheng , Fudim, Marat , Herring, Neil , Po, Sunny S. , Stavrakis, Stavros , Somers, Virend K. , Tan, Alex Y. , Valderrábano, Miguel , Shivkumar, Kalyanam , Shivkumar, Kalyanam , Ajijola, Olujimi A. , Biaggioni, Italo , Ferrari, Gaetano Maria De , Dusi, Veronica , Goldberger, Jeffrey J , Green, Alexander L. , Khalsa, Sahib S. , Kumar, Rajesh , Lakatta, Edward G. , Mehra, Reena , Meyer, Christian , Somers, Virend K.

Mayo Clinic

The Journal of Physiology | March 12, 2025 | Volume: 603 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1781-1839

10.1113/jp284741 | PMID 40056025 Get It

AbstractThe intricate role of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) in regulating cardiac physiology has long been recognized. Aberrant function of the ANS is central to the pathophysiology of cardiovascular diseases. It stands to reason, therefore, that neuroscience‐based cardiovascular therapeutics hold great promise in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases in humans. A decade after the inaugural edition, this White Paper reviews the current state of understanding of human cardiac neuroanatomy, neurophysiology and pathophysiology in specific disease conditions, autonomic testing, risk stratification, and neuromodulatory strategies to mitigate the progression of cardiovascular diseases. image
Sex Differences in Longitudinal Tau-PET in Preclinical Alzheimer Disease
Coughlan, Gillian , Klinger, Hannah M , Boyle, Rory , Binette, Alexa Pichet , Christenson, Luke R., Chadwick, Trevor, Healy, Brian C. , Jonaitis, Erin M. , Jack, Clifford R. , Johnson, Keith A. , Langhough, Rebecca E., Properzi, Michael J , Seto, Mabel , Johnson, Sterling C., Shirzadi, Zahra , Yau, Wai‐Ying Wendy , Initiative, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging, Hurko, Orest, Black, Sanra E, Doody, Rachelle S., Doraiswamy, Murali, Gamst, Anthony, Scharre, Doug, Sperling, Reisa, Weiner, Michael W. , Green, Robert C, Christenson, Luke, Jack, Clifford R , Pichet Binette, Alexa , Betthauser, Tobey J. , Hansson, Oskar , Harrison, Theresa M. , Jacobs, Heidi I.L. , Hanseeuw, Bernard , Rentz, Dorene M. , Schultz, Aaron P. , Smith, Ruben , Johnson, Sterling C. , Mielke, Michelle M. , Manson, JoAnn E. , Sperling, Reisa Anne , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Buckley, Rachel F. , Initiative, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging, Black, Sanra E, Kaye, Jeffrey , Obisesan, Thomas O. , Rusinek, Henry

Mayo Clinic

JAMA Neurology | March 3, 2025 | Volume: 82 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 364

10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.0013 | PMID 40029638 Get It

Importance Alzheimer disease (AD) predominates in females at almost twice the rate relative to males. Mounting evidence in adults without AD indicates that females exhibit higher tau deposition than age-matched males, particularly in the setting of elevated β-amyloid (Aβ), but the evidence for sex differences in tau accumulation rates is inconclusive. Objective To examine whether female sex is associated with faster tau accumulation in the setting of high Aβ (as measured with positron emission tomography [PET]) and the moderating influence of sex on the association between APOE ε4 carrier status and tau accumulation. Data Sources This meta-analysis used data from 6 longitudinal aging and AD studies, including the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, Berkeley Aging Cohort Study, BioFINDER 1, Harvard Aging Brain Study, Mayo Clinic Study of Aging, and Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer Prevention. Longitudinal data were collected between November 2004 and May 2022. Study Selection Included studies required available longitudinal [ 18 F]flortaucipir or [ 18 F]-MK-6240 tau-PET scans, as well as baseline [ 11 C] Pittsburgh Compound B, [ 18 F]flutemetamol or [ 18 F]florbetapir Aβ-PET scans. Recruitment criteria varied across studies. Analyses began on August 7, 2023, and were completed on February 5, 2024. Data Extraction and Synthesis In each study, primary analyses extracted estimates for the sex (female or male) and the sex by baseline Aβ-PET status (high or low) association with longitudinal tau-PET using a series of mixed-effects models. Secondary mixed-effects models extracted the interaction estimate for the association of sex by APOE ε4 carrier status with longitudinal tau-PET. Study-specific estimates for each mixed-effects model were then pooled in a meta-analysis, and the global fixed effect (β) and total heterogeneity ( I 2 ) across studies were estimated. This study is reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Main Outcomes and Measures Seven tau-PET outcomes that showed cross-sectional sex differences were examined across temporal, parietal, and occipital lobes. Results Among 6 studies assessed, there were 1376 participants (761 [55%] female; mean [range] age at first tau scan, 71.9 [46-93] years; 401 participants [29%] with high baseline Aβ; 412 APOE ε4 carriers [30%]). Among individuals with high baseline Aβ, female sex was associated with faster tau accumulation localized to inferior temporal (β = −0.14; 95% CI, −0.22 to −0.06; P = .009) temporal fusiform (β = −0.13; 95% CI, −0.23 to −0.04; P = .02), and lateral occipital regions (β = −0.15; 95% CI, −0.24 to −0.06; P = .009) compared with male sex. Among APOE ε4 carriers, female sex was associated with faster inferior-temporal tau accumulation (β = −0.10; 95% CI, −0.16 to −0.03; P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance These findings suggest that sex differences in the pathological progression of AD call for sex-specific timing considerations when administrating anti-Aβ and anti-tau treatments.
Bacteriophage therapy for multidrug-resistant infections: current technologies and therapeutic approaches
Pérez-Rodríguez, Saumel , Dharmaraj, Tejas , Chang, Tony H. , Green, Sabrina I. , Sacher, Jessica , Kim, Minyoung Kevin , Suh, Gina A. , Cullen, Grace , Li, Zhiwei , Chen, Qingquan , Lavigne, Rob , Pirnay, Jean‐Paul , Bollyky, Paul L.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Investigation | March 2, 2025 | Volume: 135 | Issue: 5 | Pages: No page available

10.1172/jci187996 | PMID 40026251 Get It

Bacteriophage (phage) therapy has emerged as a promising solution to combat the growing crisis of multidrug-resistant (MDR) infections. There are several international centers actively engaged in implementation of phage therapy, and recent case series have reported encouraging success rates in patients receiving personalized, compassionate phage therapy for difficult-to-treat infections. Nonetheless, substantial hurdles remain in the way of more widespread adoption and more consistent success. This Review offers a comprehensive overview of current phage therapy technologies and therapeutic approaches. We first delineate the common steps in phage therapy development, from phage bank establishment to clinical administration, and examine the spectrum of therapeutic approaches, from personalized to fixed phage cocktails. Using the framework of a conventional drug development pipeline, we then identify critical knowledge gaps in areas such as cocktail design, formulation, pharmacology, and clinical trial design. We conclude that, while phage therapy holds promise, a structured drug development pipeline and sustained government support are crucial for widespread adoption of phage therapy for MDR infections.
Phase I Trial of Selinexor in Pediatric Recurrent/Refractory Solid and CNS Tumors (ADVL1414): A Children’s Oncology Group Phase I Consortium Trial
Green, Adam L. , Minard, Charles G. , Liu, Xiaowei , Pinkney, Kerice , Harris, Lauren S., Link, Gabrielle, DeSisto, John , Voss, Stephan D. , Nelson, Marvin D. , Fox, Elizabeth , Weigel, Brenda J. , Bender, Julia Glade , Safgren, Stephanie L , Pinkney, Kerice , Harris, Lauren , Link, Gabrielle , DeSisto, John , Voss, Stephan D , Nelson, Marvin D , Reid, Joel M , Fox, Elizabeth , Weigel, Brenda J , Glade-Bender, Julia , Safgren, Stephanie L. , Reid, Joel M.

Mayo Clinic

Clinical Cancer Research | February 25, 2025 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1587-1595

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-2754 | PMID 39998852 Get It

Abstract Purpose: Selinexor is a first-in-class, central nervous system (CNS)–penetrant, oral inhibitor of exportin 1 (XPO1), the main nuclear exporter of many key tumor suppressors. We report a phase I trial of selinexor in children and adolescents with recurrent CNS and solid tumors (NCT02323880). Patients and Methods: A rolling six design was used to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and first dose pharmacokinetics of selinexor administered once (35–45 mg/m2) or twice (20–35 mg/m2) weekly during a 28-day cycle (part A). Ten additional patients with high-grade glioma (HGG) were treated at the MTD administered once weekly (part B). Results: In part A, 49 patients were enrolled. Continuous twice weekly dosing was limited by extended hematologic toxicity. The MTD on a twice weekly schedule for 3 weeks on/1 week off (twice weekly 3/1) was 20 mg/m2/dose. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) on this schedule included fatigue, acute reversible neurologic changes, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase increase. On a continuous once weekly schedule, the MTD was 35 mg/m2/dose; DLTs included seizure and thrombocytopenia. In part B (HGG expansion), there were no additional DLTs observed. Non-DLTs included lymphopenia, leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anorexia, fatigue, hypophosphatemia, nausea, and vomiting. There were no objective responses. The median number of cycles received was 1 (range, 1–9); eight of 59 patients (13.5%) received 5 to 9 cycles, five of whom had HGG. Conclusions: Selinexor-related toxicities were primarily hematologic and neurologic, requiring dose or dose-frequency reduction. The MTD and recommended initial phase II dose of selinexor in children and adolescents with recurrent solid and CNS tumors is 35 mg/m2/dose once weekly.
A phase Ib window of opportunity study of atezolizumab administered intravesically or direct injection in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: Results of the single dose cohorts.
Oughton, Jamie B. , Whelan, Ruby Smith , Green, Angela , Hubbard, Rachel, Kennish, Steven, McCready, Dominic, Senior, Ethan R, Bowler, Helen, Kendall, Jessica , Collinson, Fiona , Catto, James W.F. , Lister-Whelan, Ruby , Hussain, Syed A. , Riaz, Irbaz Bin , Griffin, Jon

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 18, 2025 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 5_suppl | Pages: 773-773

10.1200/jco.2025.43.5_suppl.773 Get It

773 Background: BCG-unresponsive High-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (HRNMIBC) tumours have an ominous prognosis and require effective, tolerable treatments. Uptake remains low for FDA approved agents (including systemic pembrolizumab, nogapendekin alfa inbakicept-pmln or N-803) due to toxicity concerns. We hypothesize direct intravesical administration of a PDL1 inhibitor could be effective with less systemic toxicity. However, it is unknown whether antibodies delivered via this route can reach tumor vasculature. INVEST is a phase Ib window of opportunity study investigating the safety and preliminary activity of passive instillation and direct injection of intravesical atezolizumab into the tumour/bladder wall. Methods: Eligible participants (ECOG performance status 0-2) are awaiting radical cystectomy (RC) for any stage urothelial cell carcinoma. Participants with muscle invasive bladder cancer, must be ineligible for/ refuse cisplatin based neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Atezolizumab (600mg or 1200mg) is administered via direct injection into the tumour/bladder or by instillation into the bladder. The 3+3 design is utilised in the dose confirmation stages where participants receive either Single or Multiple (between 3 and 6) dose(s) of treatment before RC. Efficacy signals are derived from pathological complete response at RC and progression-free survival at 2 years. Primary endpoint, Dose confirmation stage: The number of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) observed from first dose of trial treatment to RC. Results: Enrolment began in May 2023. 13 participants were recruited to the single dose cohorts: 11 male, and 2 female. Age (Range; 43-86); median 70y, 9 NMIBC, 4 MIBC. 7 for direct injection (4 at 600mg and 3 at 1200mg dose) and 6 for passive instillation (3 at 600mg and 3 at 1200mg). Due to technical issues (syringe size) the first direct injection participant did not receive the full 600mg and were replaced. 12 participants received trial treatment as planned. There were no DLTs; 5 participants experienced non-trial treatment related SAEs (4 infections, 2 ileus, 2 renal impairment; 7/8 events occurred post-RC and all SAEs resolved). All participants underwent planned RC within the protocol stipulated timeline. Median time from last treatment to RC was18 days. 5 of 13 participants had downstaging of tumour in cystectomy specimen. Following independent Safety Review Committee review, recruitment is now open for the dose confirmation phase (Multiple 1200mg dose) in both treatment routes. Conclusions: Single dose atezolizumab treatment at a dose of 600mg and 1200mg in passive instillation and direct injection cohorts was well tolerated. Early efficacy data is encouraging. Multiple weekly doses of 1200mg in each treatment route are now being investigated within the INVEST trial. Clinical trial information: ISRCTN15842444 .
Exploring Access to Care in Zimbabwe Using the 3‐Delay Model
Green, Katerina J. , Matinhira, Naboth, Vallecillo, Tissiana , Arya, Priya , Katiro, Munyaradzi , Nyamurowa, Tafadzwa , Douse, Dontre’ M. , Wiedermann, Joshua P. , Vallecillo, Tissiana , Arya, Priya , Candelo, Estephanía , Green, Katerina , Jain, Amiti

Mayo Clinic

Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology | February 14, 2025 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/lio2.70091 | PMID 39958943 Get It

ABSTRACTObjective(s)We aim to identify the diversity of barriers to care for otolaryngology‐head and neck surgery patients in Harare, Zimbabwe.MethodsInterviews were conducted at four general otolaryngology clinics in Harare in October 2022.The patient population included children and adults presenting to either government or private clinics. Via interpreter, six standardized questions were discussed with each patient. Survey responses were used to categorize patients into one or more of three types of delays: (1) deciding to seek care, (2) reaching the appropriate healthcare facility, and (3) receiving adequate care after reaching that facility.ResultsForty‐six patients participated in this survey. The average time from problem presentation to treatment in this population was 16.3 months. Twenty‐six percent of patients experienced more than one type of delay. The most common type of delay was Type 3 (67%). Many of these patients reached appropriate facilities but could not receive timely treatment due to lengthy wait times. Type 1 delays affected 35% of patients. Notable causes were fear of doctors, preference for traditional healing, or ignorance to a treatable problem. Type 2 delays were also reported in 37%, commonly due to long distance and time to travel and insufficient finances for these journeys.ConclusionsENT patients in Zimbabwe experience a myriad of delays to receiving appropriate care. Systemic issues, including backlogged surgical lists, convoluted referral patterns, and poor transportation infrastructure, are significant contributors to patient delays. The 3‐delay model is useful for identifying barriers to care for future efforts to improve patient access to safe and affordable surgical care.Level of EvidenceLevel VI.
Examining the Obstacles to Timely Otolaryngology Care in Ethiopia and Zimbabwe: A Comparative Analysis
Eyassu, Daniel G. , Candelo, Estephanía , Green, Katerina J. , Wallerius, Katherine P. , Asgedom, Brhanu H. , Wiedermann, Joshua P. , Gomez, Estephania Candelo , Green, Katerina

Mayo Clinic

OTO Open | February 7, 2025 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/oto2.70078 | PMID 39927147 Get It

AbstractThis study compares delays in otolaryngologic care between patients in Mekelle, Ethiopia and Harare, Zimbabwe using the Three Delays model. Patient surveys conducted among 46 patients in Zimbabwe during October 2022 and 105 patients in Ethiopia during June 2023 revealed a significantly higher prevalence of delays in seeking and reaching care in Ethiopia. This was in the aftermath of the Tigray War, which damaged the region's health care infrastructure and diminished the trust of patients. In Zimbabwe, there was poor awareness among patients and nonotolaryngologist providers of otolaryngology disease and care capacity leading to delays in seeking and reaching care. Patients in both countries faced delays in receiving appropriate care due to resource limitations, with Ethiopia's constraints worsened by the recent war and Zimbabwe's by consistent health care underfunding. The longest delays were observed in head and neck oncology care. These findings provide a foundation for understanding otolaryngologic care delays in these low‐ and middle‐income countries.
Evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods for Burkholderia cepacia complex isolates from people with and without cystic fibrosis
Jorth, Peter , Manuel, Carmila , McLemore, Tracey, Humphries, Romney M. , Cole, Nicolynn C., Schuetz, Audrey N. , Garica, Dennis, Maldonado, Maria, Rivero, Natasha, Galdino, Anna Clara Milesi , Celedonio, Diana, Green, Daniel A. , Zlosnik, James E. A. , Traczewski, Maria M., Huse, Holly, LiPuma, John J. , Green, Daniel A , Zlosnik, James E A , Huse, Holly K , Schuetz, Audrey N , Humphries, Romney , Jorth, Peter Allan , McLemore, Tracey, Rivero, Natasha

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Microbiology | January 22, 2025 | Volume: 63 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1128/jcm.01480-24 | PMID 39840992 Get It

ABSTRACT The Burkholderia cepacia complex (BCC) is a group of Gram-negative bacteria that cause opportunistic infections, most notably in people with cystic fibrosis (CF), and have been associated with outbreaks caused by contaminated medical products. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is often used to guide treatment for BCC infections, perhaps most importantly in people with CF who are being considered for lung transplant. However, recent studies have highlighted problems with AST methods. Here, we address limitations from previous studies to further evaluate BCC AST methods. We assessed the performance of reference broth microdilution (BMD), disk diffusion (DD) using Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA) from three manufacturers, agar dilution (AD), and gradient diffusion (ETEST) for ceftazidime (CAZ), levofloxacin (LVX), meropenem (MEM), minocycline (MIN), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) on a set of 205 BCC isolates. The isolate set included 100 isolates from people with CF and 105 isolates from people without CF from a variety of sources, which enabled us to systematically evaluate whether specimen source impacts AST performance. For all BCC isolates, BMD reproducibility was 93%, 98%, 99%, 98%, and 96% for CAZ, LVX, MEM, MIN, and TMP-SMX, respectively. Using BMD as the comparator method, we show that DD, AD, and ETEST perform poorly, with neither MHA manufacturer nor specimen source significantly impacting method performance. Based on our data, we recommend that routine AST should not be performed for BCC isolates. If a provider requests AST, clinical microbiology laboratories should perform Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute reference methodology for BMD (stored frozen) and report MIC only. IMPORTANCE Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for the Burkholderia cepacia complex (BCC) is often used to determine eligibility for lung transplant in people with cystic fibrosis. However, problems with method performance have been reported. Here, we systematically evaluate the performance of reference broth microdilution, disk diffusion, agar dilution, and gradient diffusion (ETEST) for BCC organisms isolated from people with and without cystic fibrosis. We show that broth microdilution reproducibility is acceptable for levofloxacin, meropenem, minocycline, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, while ceftazidime was just below the acceptability cut-off. Regardless of specimen source, the results from disk diffusion, agar dilution, and ETEST do not correlate with broth microdilution. Based on these findings, we recommend that antimicrobial susceptibility testing should not be routinely performed for BCC, and if requested by the provider, only broth microdilution following Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines should be used. Providers should be aware of the significant limitations of antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods for BCC.
Five-Year Results With Patisiran for Hereditary Transthyretin Amyloidosis With Polyneuropathy
Wixner, Jonas , Polydefkis, Michael , Ueda, Mitsuharu , Bender, Shaun, Jay, Patrick Y. , Yureneva, Elena, group, patisiran Global OLE study, Vita, Giuseppe, Rizzo, Vincenzo , Wiesman, Janice F. , Lau, Vincent , DeLong, Douglas, May, John J., Delmont, Émilien , Pouget, Jean, Grapperon, Aude‐Marie , Campana-Salort, Emmanuelle, Coutinho, Conceição de Azevedo, Campos, Catarina Falcão de , Coelho, Teresa , Reis, Antonio Hipólito, Pérez, Javier Martínez , Silva, Ana Martins da, Alves, Cristina , Cardoso, Márcio , Valdrez, Kátia, Monte, Julia R, Novais, Marta , Guimarães, Nádia, Cardoso, Inês , Freitas, Mónica, Ferreira, Natália , Kuzume, Daisuke , Morimoto, Yuko, Gauvain, Clément , Migaud-Chervy, Maria-Claire, Deplanque, Dominique , Jozefowicz, Elsa, Théaudin-Saliou, Marie, Cauquil-Michon, Cécile, Labeyrie, Céline , Not, Adeline , Lecoq, Anne-Lise , Stephant, Maeva, Echaniz‐Laguna, Andoni , Becquemont, Laurent , Beaudonnet, Guillemette , Eliahou, Ludivine , Slama, Michel , Signaté, Aïssatou , Darche, Paola, Grimaud, Jérôme, Berthelot, Emeline, Inamo, Jocelyn , Gendre, Thierry , Arrouasse, Raphaele , Ernande, Laura , Salhi, Hayet, Choumert, Ariane , Charlin, Cyril, Megelin, Thomas, Brannagan, Thomas H., Tsang, Steven, Wajnsztajn, Fernanda, Shije, Jeffrey, Ulane, Christina, Kleyman, Inna , Weimer, Louis H., Cioroiu, Comana , Kleopa, Kleopas A. , Zamba‐Papanicolaou, Eleni , Tada, Satoshi , Nagai, Masahiro , Ando, Rina, Yamanishi, Yuki , Overcash, J. Scott , Green, Sinikka, Coskun, Derya J, Manos, Paul S. , Zepeda, Karla A, O’Riordan, William, Cortese, Andrea , Bernardo, Daniela, Paolantonio, Andrea Di , Guglielmino, Valeria , Kristen, Arnt V. , Nagel, Christian , Siepen, Fabian aus dem , Hein, Selina , Campistol, Josep M. , Marín, Lida María Rodas, Pelicano, Josep Miquel Blasco, Dávila, Lucía Galán, Cordoba, Vanesa Pytel, Sola, A. Guerrero, Feijoo, Julián García, Isla, Leopoldo Pérez de , Moreira, Carolina Lavigne , Marques, Vanessa Daccach , Beamud, Francisco Muñoz, Borrachero, Cristina, Sanz, Mónica, Oliver, E, Moreno, Juan González, Martinez, J. Michael, Descals, Cristina, Usón, Mercedes, Vega, Francisco Jose, Figuerola, Antoni, Montalà, Carles, Abreu, Aline França de , Silva, Moises Dias da, Rosa, Renata Gervais de Santa, Berensztejn, Amanda Cardoso, Guedes, Mariana de Andrade, Lautre, Andrea, Orellana, Lucas, Briseño, Maria Alejandra González-Duarte, Parra, David Rivera de la, Reyes, Jose Pablo Hernandez, Alba, Maria del Mar Saniger, Parman, Yeşim , Serbest, Nail Güven , Durmuş, Hacer , Karamürsel, Saçit , Elitok, Ali, Inan, Nermin G Sirin, Altinkurt, Emre, Polydefkis, Michael, Allen, Adriane C, Chaudhry, Vinay , Jarrett, R. J., Bressler, Neil M. , Khoshnoodi, Mohammad , Lui, Alvin T, Chung, Tae , Vista, Geno, Shah, Syed Mahmood , Hamaguchi, Hirotoshi , Oda, Tetsuya , Shimomura, Masahiro, Kim, Hee Jin, Misumi, Yohei , Nomura, Toshiya , Tateishi, Takahisa , Mauricio, Elizabeth A. , Dimberg, Elliot L., Fonder, Amie , Hobbs, Miriam, Dyck, P. James B. , Leung, Nelson , Hwa, Yi L. , Kapoor, Prashant , Kumar, Shaji , Dingli, David , Gove, Linde E., Dalia, Samir , Croy, David, Holding, Tim, Gorevic, Peter D., Su, Jen-Jen , Lin, Chao-Wen, Ajroud‐Driss, Senda , Sufit, Robert , Li, John-Michael, Freimer, Miriam , LoRusso, Samantha, Aso, Yasuhiro , Kim, Byoung‐Joon , Kim, JuHyeon, Jeon, Eun‐Seok , Seok, Jin Myoung , Park, Jae Hong , Sekijima, Yoshiki , Kato, Naga-aki, Hineno, Akiyo , Kodaira, Minori , Yoshinaga, Tsuneaki , Takasone, Ken, Miyahara, Teruyoshi, Takahashi, Yusuke , Matsumoto, Kazuhiko , Lin, Kon-Ping, Lee, Yi‐Chung , Wixner, Jonas, Pilebro, Björn, Nordh, Erik, Chermenina, Maria, Nygren, Anneli, Tournev, Ivaylo, Zhelyazkova, Sashka , Cherneva, Zheyna , Sarafov, S., Cherninkova-Gopina, Sylvia, Vorona, Elena, Huesing-Kabar, Anna, Schilling, Matthias , Kabar, Iyad , Martinez–Naharro, Ana , Chacko, Liza , Cohen, Oliver , Law, Steven , Rezk, Tamer , Quan, Dianna , Dixon, Stacy, Fridman, Vera , Low, Soon-Chai , Mezei, Michelle M. , Jack, Kristin, Wade, N. Kevin, Lopate, Glenn, Geisler, Stephanie , Sommerville, R. Brian, Florence, Julaine, Stewart, Graeme J., Taylor, Mark , Suan, Daniel, Dingli, David , Gillmore, Julian D , Lee, Yi-Chung , Karamursel, Sacit , Adams, David , Berk, John L. , Conceição, Isabel , Dispenzieri, Angela , Peltier, Amanda , Bender, Shaun , Capocelli, Kelley, Obici, Laura , group, patisiran Global OLE study, Vita, Giuseppe, Russo, Massimo , Mazzeo, Anna Teresa , Gentile, Luca, Kaku, Michelle C. , Lau, Vincent, Dalton, James, May, John, Attarian, Shahram , Verschueren, Annie , Campana-Salort, Emmanuelle, Neves, Carlos, Santos, Miguel Oliveira , Coelho, Teresa, Correia, Nuno, Perez, Javier M, Silva, Ana Martins da, Ramalho, Joana, Yamasaki, Masahiro , Morimoto, Yuko, Tard, Céline , Hachulla, É. , Lebellec, Loïc , Théaudin, Marie , Al‐Salameh, Abdallah , Algalarrondo, Vincent , Rousseau, Antoine , Planté‐Bordeneuve, Violaine , Ayache, Samar S. , Corvoisier, Philippe Le , Waters, Michael, Manos, Paul, Lozza, Alessandro , Merlini, Giampaolo , Rosti, Vittorio , Sabatelli, Mario , Bisogni, Giulia , Luigetti, Marco , Romano, Ângela , Nienhuis, Hans L. A. , Neshige, Shuichiro , Horga, Alejandro , Feijoo, Julián García, Marques, Wilson , López, Inés AL, Sanz, Monica, Martinez, Jose M Gamez, Waddington‐Cruz, Márcia , Abreu, Aline Souza de, Silva, Moises Dias da, Pinto, Marcus Vinícius , Pinto, Luiz Felipe , Barroso, Fábio , Briseno, Maria Alejandra Gonzalez Duarte, Cárdenas‐Soto, Karla , Cantú-Brito, Carlos Gerardo , Şahin, Erdi , Çakar, Arman , İNAN, NERMİN GÖRKEM ŞİRİN, Polydefkis, Michael, Jarrett, Raquel, Singh, Mandeep , Judge, Daniel P. , Lui, Alvin T, Vista, Geno, Shimomura, Masahiro, Scheid, Christof , Holtick, Udo , Oh, Jeeyoung , Kim, Hee Jin, Shin, Hyun Jin , Choi, Kyomin , Mauricio, Elizabeth A. , Cooper, Leslie T. , Gonsalves, Wilson I. , Witzig, Thomas E. , Lin, Yi , Rajkumar, S. Vincent , Gertz, Morie A. , Chao, Chi‐Chao , Lee, Ming‐Jen , Hsieh, Sung‐Tsang , Tsai, Li‐Kai , Yeh, Shin‐Joe , Yang, Chih‐Chao , Lee, Ga-Yeon , Cho, Eun Bin , Min, Ju‐Hong , Lee, Hye Lim , Kishida, Dai , Imai, Akira, Lin, Kon‐Ping, Wixner, Jonas, Suhr, Ole B. , Anan, Intissar , Nordh, Erik, Domellöf, Fátima Pedrosa , Chamova, Teodora , Schmidt, Hartmut , Tepasse, Phil‐Robin , Gillmore, Julian D. , Lachmann, Helen J. , Goh, Khean Jin , Geisler, Stephanie, Taylor, Mark, Suan, Dan

Mayo Clinic

JAMA Neurology | January 13, 2025 | Volume: 82 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 228

10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.4631 | PMID 39804640 Get It

Importance There is a lack of long-term efficacy and safety data on hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis with polyneuropathy (hATTR-PN) and on RNA interference (RNAi) therapeutics in general. This study presents the longest-term data to date on patisiran for hATTR-PN. Objective To present the long-term efficacy and safety of patisiran in adults with hATTR-PN. Design, Setting, and Participants This global open-label extension (OLE) of the APOLLO randomized clinical trial and phase 2 OLE study enrolled patients from 43 hospitals or clinical centers across 19 countries between July 2015 and August 2017, with follow-up until November 2022. Of 212 eligible patients with hATTR who completed the phase 3 APOLLO or phase 2 OLE parent studies, 211 enrolled in and 138 completed the global OLE. Intervention Patisiran, 0.3 mg/kg, intravenously once every 3 weeks for up to 5 years. Main Outcomes and Measures Outcomes evaluated at year 5 of the global OLE included disability (polyneuropathy disability [PND] score); polyneuropathy severity (Neuropathy Impairment Score [NIS]), nutritional status (modified body mass index [mBMI]), quality of life (Norfolk Quality of Life–Diabetic Neuropathy [Norfolk QOL-DN]), and Rasch-Built Overall Disability Scale (R-ODS), with no statistical hierarchy. Safety, survival probability, and mortality were also assessed. Results At the global OLE baseline, the mean (SD) age was 61.3 (12.3) years, and 156 patients (73.9%) were male. In 138 patients completing the study, PND scores remained stable or improved in 89 patients (65.0%), NISs showed a mean (SD) change of 10.9 (14.7), and mean (SD) mBMI (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared times serum albumin in grams per liter) increased by 46.4 (120.7) over 5 years from baseline. Norfolk QOL-DN and R-ODS scores showed mean (SD) changes of 4.1 (16.7) and –3.7 (6.2), respectively. Adverse events (AEs) leading to study withdrawal occurred in 47 patients (22.3%). Infusion-related reactions were the most common treatment-related AE (n = 34 [16.1%]). Overall, 41 patients (19.4%) died during the study. Patisiran treatment in the parent study and low familial amyloid polyneuropathy score at parent study baseline were associated with significantly improved survival. Conclusions and Relevance In the longest study of an RNAi therapeutic for any disease, patisiran treatment resulted in modest changes for patients with hATTR-PN with an acceptable safety profile. These results highlight the importance of initiating early treatment for hATTR and the potential of RNAi therapeutics in medicine. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02510261
Quantifying capacity of otolaryngology‐head and neck surgery in Zimbabwe
Green, Katerina J. , Eyassu, Daniel G. , Arya, Priya , Douse, Dontre’ M. , Matinhira, Naboth, Chidziva, Clemence, Wiedermann, Joshua P. , Arya, Priya , Candelo, Estephanía , Green, Katerina , Jain, Amiti

Mayo Clinic

Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology | January 7, 2025 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/lio2.70062 | PMID 39780860 Get It

AbstractObjective(s)To evaluate the otolaryngology surgical capacity in Harare, Zimbabwe by analyzing procedural volumes across four hospitals, one private and three public, from 2019 to 2022.MethodsA retrospective review of hand‐written surgical case logs was conducted at Harare Eye, Ear, Nose, and Throat Institute (HEENT), Parirenyatwa Group of Hospitals (PGH), Sally Mugabe Children's Hospital (SMCH), and Sally Mugabe Adult's Hospital (SMAH). Patient age and surgical intervention for all otolaryngology surgeries performed in the operating room from 2019 to 2022 were recorded. Procedures were categorized into six groups: head and neck malignancy, laryngeal surgery, oropharyngeal surgery, otologic surgery, rhinology/sinus surgery, and other. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics to identify trends in surgical volume and types of procedures across hospitals.ResultsA total of 2626 procedures were recorded: 1470 at HEENT, 377 at PGH, 625 at SMCH, and 154 at SMAH. Of these, 39.5% were performed on pediatric patients and 60.5% on adult patients. The most common procedures were adenotonsillectomy/adenoidectomy/tonsillectomy (38.9%), diagnostic endoscopies (10.4%), and endoscopic sinus surgery (8.3%). HEENT performed the highest volume and widest range of procedures. HEENT had higher surgical volumes across all groups of procedure, except for laryngeal surgery.ConclusionThis study found disparities in otolaryngology surgical capacity between a private hospital, HEENT, and three public tertiary hospitals—SMCH, SMAH, and PGH, the largest hospital in the country—in Harare, Zimbabwe. Additionally, it highlights areas for targeted interventions in capacity building. This study establishes a foundation for understanding otolaryngologic surgical capacity in the country, supporting international collaboration, guiding future research, and serving as a model for similar assessments in other LMICs.Level of evidenceLevel VI.