Gomez, Estephania Candelo

Abstract Objective Recurrent acute rhinosinusitis (RARS) significantly decreases quality of life. Transplant recipients (TR) are particularly vulnerable to rhinologic conditions. There is a lack of guidelines for managing RARS in this population. Our study aims to determine the prevalence of and risk factors for RARS among TR and assess the need for sinus surgery within this group. Study Design Retrospective cohort. Setting Mayo Clinic between 2017 and 2022. Methods A total of 1116 patients met the inclusion criteria and were divided based on the presence or absence of a new incident RARS diagnosis during the posttransplant period and frequency of sinus surgery. Logistic regression (LR) analysis was performed to identify the odds ratio. Results In total, 111/1116 (9.95%) had RARS. Patients with RARS had an increased history of asthma, viral infection, and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) ( P = .003) in the pretransplant period. According to the LR analysis, patients with neutropenia, RA, and mantle cell lymphoma were 1.91, 2.71, and 4.02 times more likely to develop RARS (95% CI: 1.19‐3.05, P = .01), (95% CI: 0.90‐8.14, P = .07), and (95% CI: 1.16‐13.89, P = .02) during the posttransplant period, respectively. In those that developed RARS, only 5.5% failed medical therapy and required surgery. Conclusion This is the first cohort to investigate the incidence of RARS in TR and the predictive factors associated with its development posttransplant. We found that patients with pretransplant comorbidities such as RA, viral infections, hematologic deficiencies, and malignancies were at an increased risk for developing RARS, though this is not linked to an increased necessity for sinus surgery.

AbstractThis study compares delays in otolaryngologic care between patients in Mekelle, Ethiopia and Harare, Zimbabwe using the Three Delays model. Patient surveys conducted among 46 patients in Zimbabwe during October 2022 and 105 patients in Ethiopia during June 2023 revealed a significantly higher prevalence of delays in seeking and reaching care in Ethiopia. This was in the aftermath of the Tigray War, which damaged the region's health care infrastructure and diminished the trust of patients. In Zimbabwe, there was poor awareness among patients and nonotolaryngologist providers of otolaryngology disease and care capacity leading to delays in seeking and reaching care. Patients in both countries faced delays in receiving appropriate care due to resource limitations, with Ethiopia's constraints worsened by the recent war and Zimbabwe's by consistent health care underfunding. The longest delays were observed in head and neck oncology care. These findings provide a foundation for understanding otolaryngologic care delays in these low‐ and middle‐income countries.

AbstractObjectiveThis study aims to document and analyze the challenges and outcomes of performing complex airway surgery in a low‐resource, post‐war setting in Mekelle, Ethiopia.MethodsThis prospective case series examines clinical data from five patients who underwent airway reconstruction surgeries and one patient who underwent total laryngectomy at Ayder Comprehensive Specialized Hospital in Mekelle. Data included patient demographics, airway stenosis etiology and severity, operative details, postoperative outcomes, complications, and hospital length of stay. Ethical approval was obtained from institutional review boards at Mayo Clinic and Mekelle University.ResultsThe study included six patients aged 9–62 years, with surgeries comprising three cricotracheal resections, two tracheal resections, and one laryngectomy. Three reconstructions were for war‐related injuries. Challenges included power outages during surgeries, limitations in medical supplies and equipment, and inadequate perioperative care. Despite these, three patients requiring tracheostomies were successfully decannulated within a year. However, complications such as restenosis, infections, and the need for reintubation were common.ConclusionAirway surgeries in a low‐resource, post‐war setting face significant hurdles, including perioperative care quality, resource limitations, and infrastructure issues. Successful outcomes require multidisciplinary training tailored to local contexts, investments in hospital infrastructure and reliable electricity, and proper perioperative nutrition. This study highlights the need for comprehensive interventions to improve surgical care in such settings.Level of evidence: IV.

AbstractObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the impact of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) on asthma severity up to 12 months after surgical intervention.Study DesignRetrospective cohort.SettingTertiary care center.MethodsPatients with a history of asthma and Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) who underwent ESS between 2013 and 2023 were included. Asthma severity was assessed according to current Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines, classifying patients into mild, moderate, and severe based on medication requirements. Asthma severity was evaluated up to 3 months prior to ESS and 1‐year post‐ESS. Patients with aspirin‐exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) were excluded. Statistical analysis was performed using McNemar test and Wilcoxon signed‐rank test to assess differences in asthma severity, medication doses, and number of medications.ResultsSixty‐five patients were included, of which 44 (67.7%) had CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and 21 (32.3%) had CRS without nasal polyps (CRSsNP). No significant differences were found in asthma severity pre‐ and post‐ESS (P = .175). Similarly, no differences were found in ICS doses (P = .999), total number of prescribed medications (P = .157) or presence of exacerbations before and after ESS (P = .078). However, a significant increase in time from last rescue inhaler use was noted after ESS, increasing from a median of 6.71 to 23.1 weeks (P = .004).ConclusionThis study is the first to assess the impact of ESS on asthma severity in a real‐world setting. Our findings suggest that ESS does not impact asthma severity classification. However, it might provide relief of asthma symptoms in the early postoperative period.

AbstractObjectiveThis scoping review aims to contribute a descriptive analysis of the craniomaxillofacial trauma (CMF trauma) literature in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs) to identify knowledge gaps, direct future research, and inform policy.Data SourcesPubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Review, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar from January 1, 2012 to December 10, 2023.Review MethodsThe Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA‐ScR) guided reporting, and the PRISMA flowchart documented database searches. Specific, predefined search terms and inclusion criteria were used for screening, and the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist was used for quality assessment. The search yielded 54 articles, with 13 meeting the inclusion criteria. Key findings were summarized and divided into 7 categories.ResultsThere were 10,420 patients (7739 [74.3%] male, 2681 [25.7%] female) with a male‐to‐female ratio of 2.9:1. The mean peak age of incidence of CMF trauma was 30.8 years, ranging from 20 to 40 years. Road traffic accidents were the leading cause (60.4%), followed by assault (27.2%) and falls (12.2%). The most common injuries were soft tissue injury (31.7%), isolated mandibular fracture (22.8%), and isolated middle‐third of mandible fracture (18.1%). The most common treatments were closed reduction and immobilization (29.5%), conservative management (27.6%), and open reduction and internal fixation (19.6%). Most patients (77.8%) experienced a treatment delay due to a lack of fixation materials (54.8%) or surgeon unavailability (35.7%).ConclusionCMF trauma remains a significant cause of global morbidity, yet there remains a lack of high‐quality, CMF trauma‐specific data in LMICs. Country‐specific investigations are required to enhance knowledge and inform novel interventions. Implementing policy change must be community‐specific and account for unique cultural barriers, attitudes, and behaviors to maximize patient care outcomes.

Objectives Studies suggest that transplant patients are at a higher risk of developing chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). However, there is a dearth of studies describing the factors that may be linked to the development of CRS in this population. Our objective is to identify the risk factors associated with the development of CRS in transplant recipients. Study design Retrospective cohort. Setting Tertiary care center. Methods This cohort included 3347 transplant recipients seen between 2017 and 2022. Of these, 2128 patients met the inclusion criteria and were grouped according to whether they were diagnosed with CRS during the post-transplant period. The analysis included both univariate and multivariate analysis to ascertain the odds ratio (OR) and predictive factors. Results Of the 2128 patients, 649/2128 (30.4%) had CRS. CRS patients had an increased prevalence of previous endoscopic sinus surgery, allergic rhinitis, and recurrent acute rhinosinusitis in the pre-transplant period compared to the non-CRS group. According to the multivariate analysis, patients with primary immunodeficiency and additional transplant were 1.9 and 3.1 times more likely to develop CRS during the posttransplant period (95% CI: 1.3–2.6, p < .0001), (95% CI: 1.3 −7.3, p = .01), respectively. Sirolimus use was also associated with the development of CRS (OR = 1.4, 95% CI: 1.1–1.9, p = .01). Conclusion This study is the largest cohort aimed at determining the predictive factors associated with the development of CRS. Patients with pretransplant rhinologic conditions, hematologic deficiencies, and the utilization of specific immunosuppressants were found to have a higher likelihood of developing CRS following transplantation.

Key points The study found a higher incidence of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and recalcitrant CRS in cadaveric organ transplant recipients compared to those receiving living donor transplants. Recipients of cadaveric transplants were 1.32 times more likely to develop CRS and 1.68 times more likely to develop medically recalcitrant CRS. Living kidney transplants significantly reduced the risk of developing CRS (OR = 0.12) and recalcitrant CRS (OR = 0.11), highlighting a potentially protective effect against these conditions. In contrast, cadaveric liver transplants were associated with an increased risk of CRS and medically recalcitrant CRS. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis indicated a significant difference in time to CRS onset between cadaveric and living donor transplants. Median time to CRS onset was longer for living donor recipients (21.1 months) compared to cadaveric recipients (15.6 months). This study underscores the need for transplant teams and otolaryngologist to consider donor type during transplant follow‐up due to differing risks of CRS development.

AbstractObjectiveCartilaginous tumors of the larynx are rare, representing less than 1% of all laryngeal tumors. Chondromas are benign mesenchymal tumors characterized by a slow‐paced growth, primarily originated in the cricoid cartilage, followed by the thyroid, arytenoid, and epiglottic cartilages. This scoping review aims to understand the extent of evidence on the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, morbidity, and recurrence of the laryngeal chondroma (LC).Data sourcesMEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier), Web of Science (Clarivate), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Systematic Reviews, Lilacs, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases.Review methodsThe scoping review was conducted from 1816 to 2023, for observational studies describing LC. Titles and abstracts were screened for relevance, followed by an evaluation of the full text for eligibility. The data were collected from the qualifying articles, and a narrative summary of the outcomes was prepared.ResultsOne hundred and nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Ninety‐four case reports, 22 case series, and 3 cohorts. Two hundred and four participants with a diagnosis of LC were described. Male:female ratio was 2.8:1. The most common localization was the cricoid (113; 47.08%), followed by the thyroid (45; 18.75%), and the arytenoid cartilage (27; 11.25%). Dyspnea (78.85%) and hoarseness (74.28%) were the most reported symptoms. The recurrence rate was 11.25%, and complications were uncommon following the resection.ConclusionThis scoping review found a low‐frequency rate over all the cartilaginous laryngeal tumors. Most patients were treated with resection, with a low rate of malignancy conversion. This population has low attributable mortality, morbidity, and recurrence according to the current literature.