Citations

Clear

7546 citation(s) found for "Ku, Matthew".

A Multi-Institutional Analysis of Device Failures in a Recent Cochlear Implant Series
Freeman, M.H. , Lindquist, Nathan R. , Dornhoffer, James R. , Siddiqui, Taimur , Saoji, Aniket A. , Kutz, Walter, Sweeney, Alex D. , Haynes, David S. , Carlson, Matthew L., Bennett, Marc , Freeman, Michael H , Yancey, Kristen L. , Patro, Ankita , Lovin, Benjamin D. , Holder, Jourdan Taylor , Carlson, Matthew L.

Mayo Clinic

Otology & Neurotology | March 10, 2025 | Volume: 46 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 789-795

10.1097/mao.0000000000004438 | PMID 40062369 Get It

Objective To assess Advanced Bionics (AB) HiRes Ultra and Ultra 3D initial version (V1) cochlear implant electrode failures over time at four large cochlear implant programs. Study Design Retrospective cohort. Setting Four tertiary referral centers. Patients Patients receiving AB HiRes Ultra and Ultra 3D initial version (V1) devices as of December 31, 2022. Main Outcome Measures Failure rate, revision surgery, speech recognition scores. Results Over a span of 7 years, 205 (42.6%) of 483 implanted V1 devices have failed. Device failure rate varied across institutions from 32 to 67%. Of the 205 detected failures, 163 (79%) have undergone revision surgery, with 94% of revisions being performed with Advanced Bionics devices. Average time from implantation to diagnosis of device failure was 2.7 ± 1.2 years. Most patients (89.8%) with available testing were matched or exceeded their best prefailure speech performance after implant revision. After revision, patients had an average CNC score improvement of 24.7 percentage points over their most recent pre-revision scores and demonstrated average datalogging of 12.7 ± 4.1 h/d at most recent evaluation. Conclusions Comparison of patients across multiple high-volume implant centers confirms the presence of ongoing device failures. There is variability across institutions in the rate of revision surgery once a patient is diagnosed with a V1 device failure, as well as in the rate of device failure detection. Inter-institutional variability in failure rates may be explained by the variation in the routine use of electrical field imaging. Reimplantation with a new device typically results in a return to prefailure peak performance. Professional Practice Gap & Educational Need To our knowledge, a comparison of AB HiRes (V1) device failures across multiple institutions has not been conducted. Learning Objective To identify device failure rate across multiple institutions with different testing protocols. Desired Result Providers will have an improved understanding of the trajectory of device failures for HiRes (V1) devices over time. Level of Evidence Level IV—Historical cohort or case-controlled studies. Indicate IRB or IACUC IRB #230017; IRB #22-000183; IRB #STU-032018-085; IRB #H-49479.
Longitudinal Trends in Cochlear Implant Programming from a Single-Institution Review of Over 400 Adult Implant Recipients: Evidence to Support Selective De-Escalation of Device Programming
Dornhoffer, James R. , Khandalavala, Karl R. , Saoji, Aniket A. , Lohse, Christine M. , Carlson, Matthew L., Carlson, Matthew L.

Mayo Clinic

Otology & Neurotology | March 10, 2025 | Volume: 46 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 796-801

10.1097/mao.0000000000004459 | PMID 40059752 Get It

Objective To examine comfort (C) and threshold (T) levels in adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients over the first 18 months postactivation. Study Design Retrospective review of longitudinal CI programming data. Setting Tertiary academic center. Patients A total of 480 CIs among 428 adult CI recipients. Interventions Cochlear implantation with Cochlear Ltd. devices with subsequent programming to behavioral standards using Custom Sound® fitting software. Main Outcome Measures Charge levels needed to achieve C and T levels were measured longitudinally using Custom Sound®, from time of activation to a minimum of 6 and a maximum of 18 months postactivation. Charge (nC) levels were calculated as the product of pulse width (μs) and current amplitude (μA) to standardize among implant models. Changes in C and T charge levels over time were evaluated using repeated-measures analysis of variance. Results When considering the entire electrode, the largest increases were seen at 1 month postactivation, and C and T charge levels did not increase significantly after 6 and 12 months, respectively. These findings were consistent across patient age at implantation and sex. When considering proximal electrodes only, C and T levels did not increase significantly after 6 months. In distal electrodes only, C levels did not increase significantly after 6 months, but T levels continued to demonstrate small, but statistically significant increases up to 18 months postactivation. Conclusions Across the entire electrode, we observed the largest changes in C and T charge levels at 1 month postactivation. Small increases in C and T levels continued out to 6 and 12 months, respectively, but may be of limited clinical significance. The stability of programming levels over time may support selective de-escalation of CI follow-up after the initial postactivation period, but, given small yet persistent increases with time, most notably in the distal electrodes, alternatives for follow-up or remote programming may still be encouraged.
Gallium-68-DOTATATE PET/CT for phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor localization in suspected tumor-induced osteomalacia
Hoong, Caroline Wei Shan , Hoong, Caroline W S , Sfeir, Jad , Drake, Matthew T. , Broski, Stephen M.

Mayo Clinic

JBMR Plus | March 9, 2025 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 5 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/jbmrpl/ziaf040 | PMID 40231307 Get It

Abstract Gallium-68-DOTA-Tyr3-Octreotate (Ga-68-DOTATATE) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has recently been shown to have utility for the localization of phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors (PMT) that cause tumor-induced osteomalacia (TIO), a rare renal phosphate-wasting disorder. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of Ga-68-DOTATATE PET/CT in localizing PMTs causing TIO and to compare its performance with other functional imaging modalities. Prospective recruitment and retrospective chart review of 30 patients with suspected TIO and evaluation with Ga-68-DOTATATE PET/CT between 2017 and 2023 were conducted at a tertiary medical center. True positive (TP) lesions were defined by histological confirmation of PMT. There were 22 TP lesions identified among 18 patients, with a mean SUVmax of 16.8 (±10.9). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of Ga-68-DOTATATE PET/CT were 85.7%, 77.8%, and 83.3% on patient-based analysis, and 84.6%, 56.3%, and 73.8% on lesion-based analysis. Lesions such as subacute fractures, parathyroid adenomas, thymus uptake, vertebral hemangiomas, bone enchondromas, liver hemangiomas, and avascular necrosis were some of the pitfalls in interpretation. Ga-68-DOTATATE PET/CT led to a significant impact on clinical management in 24 (80%) of patients. The presence of DOTATATE-avid fractures was significantly associated with a localizing scan on univariable (OR 15.0, 95% CI 2.80-110, p = .001) and multivariable analysis (OR 9.45, 95% CI 1.33-98.4, p = .003). Ga-68-DOTATATE PET/CT has good accuracy for the localization of TIO, with superior sensitivity compared to F-18-FDG PET/CT. This significantly impacted clinical treatment decisions. Although DOTATATE-avid fractures may be a source of false positives, they may also indicate a higher probability of a localizing study.
Analysis of the BraTS 2023 Intracranial Meningioma Segmentation Challenge
LaBella, Dominic , Baid, Ujjwal , Khanna, Omaditya , McBurney-Lin, Shan , McLean, Ryan, Rashid, Arif , Altes, Talissa A. , Bhalerao, Radhika , Dhemesh, Yaseen , Hilal, Fathi , Janas, Anastasia , Kazerooni, Anahita Fathi , Kent, Collin , Leu, Kevin , Maleki, Nazanin , Pajot, Maxence , Saluja, Rachit , Wang, Chunhao , Warman, Pranav , Adewole, Maruf , Albrecht, Jake, Anwar, Syed Muhammad , Bergquist, Timothy , Chen, Sully Francis, Conte, Gian-Marco, Eddy, J. Mark , Ezhov, Ivan , Jiang, Zhifan , Johanson, Elaine, Linguraru, Marius George , Liu, Xinyang , Meier, Zeke, Shinohara, Russell Takeshi, Abayazeed, Aly, Akinola, Rachel , Bilello, Michel , Verdier, Maria Correia de, Moassefi, Mana, Pease, Matthew W., Vollmuth, Phillipp, Diffley, David, Hussain, Ali , Fehringer, Pascal, Bronstein, Yulia, Deptula, Lisa, Stein, Evan G. , Taherzadeh, Mahsa , Oliveira, Eduardo Portela de, Haughey, Aoife , Kontzialis, Marinos , Saba, Luca , Turner, Benjamin , Brüßeler, Melanie, Gkampenis, Athanasios , Weiss, David Maximilian, Mansour, Aya, Shawali, Islam H., Yordanov, Nikolay , Hourani, Roula , Moshebah, Mohammed Yahya, Abouelatta, Ahmed Magdy, Willms, Klara, Martin, Dann C., Okar, Abdullah , Kite, Dominic , Haider, Muhammad Ammar , Aristizábal, Alejandro , Karargyris, Alexandros , Kassem, Hasan , Sheller, Micah , Alonso‐Basanta, Michelle , McLean, Ryan, Nedelec, Pierre , Rashid, Arif, Tahon, Nourel Hoda , Godfrey, Devon , Floyd, Scott , Kirkpatrick, John P. , Kofler, Florian , Menze, Bjoern H. , Reitman, Zachary J. , Rudie, Jeffrey D. , Velichko, Yury , Anazodo, Udunna , Chung, Verena , Chai, Rong, Dako, Farouk , Eddy, James, Khalili, Nastaran , Iglesias, Juan Eugenio , Leemput, Koen Van , Li, Hongwei , Mahtabfar, Aria , Moawad, Ahmed W. , Mongan, John , Piraud, Marie , Shinohara, Russell Taki , Wiggins, Walter F. , Jakab, András Áron , Verdier, Maria Correia de , Crivellaro, Priscila Sacilotto , Davatzikos, Christos , Farahani, Keyvan , Freymann, John , Hess, Christopher Paul , Huang, Raymond Y. , Lohmann, Philipp , Moassefi, Mana , Sollmann, Nico , Nandolia, Khanak , Warren, Daniel I, Saba, Luca , Ansari, Shehbaz , Stein, Joel M. , Rizvi, Tanvir , D’Anna, Gennaro , Taha, Ahmed , Sharifi, Yasaman , Faghani, Shahriar , Pinho, Marco C. , Pati, Sarthak , Villanueva-Meyer, Javier E. , Rauschecker, Andreas M. , Nada, Ayman , Aboian, Mariam , Flanders, Adam E , Wiestler, Benedikt , Bakas, Spyridon , Calabrese, Evan

Mayo Clinic

Machine Learning for Biomedical Imaging | March 7, 2025 | Volume: 3 | Issue: March 2025 | Pages: 38-58

10.59275/j.melba.2025-bea1 Get It

We describe the design and results from the BraTS 2023 Intracranial Meningioma Segmentation Challenge. The BraTS Meningioma Challenge differed from prior BraTS Glioma challenges in that it focused on meningiomas, which are typically benign extra-axial tumors with diverse radiologic and anatomical presentation and a propensity for multiplicity. Nine participating teams each developed deep-learning automated segmentation models using image data from the largest multi-institutional systematically expert annotated multilabel multi-sequence meningioma MRI dataset to date, which included 1000 training set cases, 141 validation set cases, and 283 hidden test set cases. Each case included T2, FLAIR, T1, and T1Gd brain MRI sequences with associated tumor compartment labels delineating enhancing tumor, non-enhancing tumor, and surrounding non-enhancing FLAIR hyperintensity. Participant automated segmentation models were evaluated and ranked based on a scoring system evaluating lesion-wise metrics including dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95% Hausdorff Distance. The top ranked team had a lesion-wise median dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.976, 0.976, and 0.964 for enhancing tumor, tumor core, and whole tumor, respectively and a corresponding average DSC of 0.899, 0.904, and 0.871, respectively. These results serve as state-of-the-art benchmarks for future pre-operative meningioma automated segmentation algorithms. Additionally, we found that 1286 of 1424 cases (90.3%) had at least 1 compartment voxel abutting the edge of the skull-stripped image edge, which requires further investigation into optimal pre-processing face anonymization steps.
Low-Dose Valacyclovir in Herpes Zoster Ophthalmicus
Cohen, Elisabeth J. , Liu, Mengling , Baratz, Keith H. , Mian, Shahzad I., Choulakian, Mazen Y., Warner, David B., Lu, Ying , Twi-Yeboah, Alberta , Kim, Jiyu , Lopez-Jimenez, Carlos, Laury, Sarah, Jeng, Bennie H., Weissbart, Sarah B. , Abazari, Azin, Chou, Timothy , Chang, Eileen , Amescua, Guillermo , Koo, Ellen, Galor, Anat , Berestka, John S., Nanji, Afshan, Stutzman, Richard D., Clements, John, Davies, Emma , Saeed, Hajirah N. , Ciralsky, Jessica, Fernández, A. Gómez-Bastero , Sippel, Kimberly C. , Perez-Quinones, Victor L, Daluvoy, Melissa B. , Liu, Katy C., Ewald, M., Groos, Erich B, Chang, Bernard, Shivitz, Ira A., Hill, Jordan , Fowler, Priscilla G., Read, Russell W. , Geggel, Harry S. , Rony, Sayegh, Rapuano, Christopher J. , Meghpara, Beeran, Holland, Gary N. , Irvine, John, Aldave, Anthony J. , Edmund, Tsui, Chen, Judy , Honig, Marc A, Snyder, Lee A, Lubniewski, Anthony J., Katz, Douglas, Capoor, Seema, Gonzales, John, Keenan, Jeremy, Morkin, Melina I., Kenyon, Kenneth R., Lee, William B., Christenbury, Joseph, LaMattina, Kara C. , Negahban, Kambiz, Rao, Ronihi, Ament, Christine S, Lopatynsky, Marta O., Barbato, John D, Sarkar, Jayati S, Macsai, Marian S., Herz, Joshua B, Al-Mohtaseb, Zaina , Matoba, Alice Y., Cooney, Theresa, Sugar, Alan , Shtein, Roni M., Nehls, Sarah, Warner, Evan J. , Nettune, Greg, Bowman, Brad, Gelender, Henry, Alexander, Jamie K. , McCall, Tyrone, Zaffos, Joshua, Beebe, Walter E., Potts, Luke B. , Lustbader, Jay M., Oboh-Weilke, Aruoriwo, Hammersmith, K.M., Orlin, Stephen E., Nagra, Parveen K., Sulewski, Michael E., Bunya, Vatinee Y. , Shafer, Brian M. , Viriya, Elizabeth T., Qureshi, Anam, Lazzaro, Douglas R., Palazzolo, Laura , Goyal, Himani , Schrack, Katie E, Raber, Irving M. , Ayres, Brandon D. , Finklea, Brenton, Reeves, Sherman W., Awad, Omar E, Hardten, David R., Reilly, Charles, Flynn, William J., Rashid, Edward D, Wen, Angie E, Harris, David J. , Shaik, Neha, Seedor, John A., Rosenfeld, Steven I., Winnick, Marc , Amir, Ahmad Fitri , Sherman, Mark D., Chaon, Benjamin, Soukiasian, Sarkis H., Rao, Naveen K. , Steiner, Anne, Winokur, Jules , Udell, Ira J., Shih, Carolyn, Gorski, Matthew , Schrier, Amilia, Lobo-Chan, Ann-Marie , Sugar, Joel, Munir, Wuqaas W, Sunshine, Sarah B. , Miller, Donald M. , Gensheimer, William G. , Zegans, Michael E. , Weiss, Jayne S. , Bernal, María José , Barron, Bruce J., Hindman, Holly B. , Wise, R., Gelston, Christopher D. , Taravella, Michael J. , Davidson, Richard S. , Tran, Uyen, Bartley, Jeremy, McCulley, James P., Verity, Steven M., Bowman, Wayne, Blomquist, Preston H. , Mootha, V. Vinod , Thorne, George, Renucci, Ann M, Verdier, David D. , Sivaraman, K. R., Nordlund, Michael L., Hwang, Frank S. , Affeldt, John E., Ingraham, Herbert J., Guibord, Nathalie M., Dobbins, Kendall, Thareja, Tarika , Zaugg, Brian , Mifflin, Mark D., FORSTOT, S. LANCE, Fish, Robert A, Repine, Karen, Wildes, Michael, Estopinal, Christopher B., Brown, Donna, Koreishi, Aaleya, Ple-plakon, Patricia, Clemons, Carol S., Ashe, S, Bonaffini, Sarah G. , Houser, Kourtney, Wallace, M. Christopher , Wesberry, Jesse M, Yeung, Sonia N. , Noordeh, Nima, Faucher, Anne, Robert, Marie‐Claude , Rullo, Jacob, Johnson, Davin , Mah, Dean, Chew, Hall F., Hassonlou, Mojgan, Liu, Shaohui , Eikenberry, Jennifer , Yung, Chi-Wah, Shen, Joanne F , Yu, Charles, Ta, Christopher N. , Goins, Kenneth M., Sutphin, John E., Svanda, Kerri, Keppol, Stacy, Rostov, Audrey Talley, Vyas, Neil , Hsu, Kimberly , Goodman, Gerri, McHam, Lisa, Oates, Dale, Rizkalla, Ramy, Shukla, Anita N. , Veena, Mathew , See, Craig W. , Feder, Robert S., Baqai, Jeanine, Basti, Surendra, Haddadin, Ramez I., You, Jae Young , Dixit, Lena, Patel, Ravi H, Golde, Kimberly T, Zaidman, Gerald W., Mahesh, Sankara, Wesolosky, Jason D., Jeffrey, Helen, Mannis, Mark J., Meyer, Jay J. , Niederer, Rachael L. , Colby, Kathryn , McLeod, Stephen D. , Melia, Michele , Sugar, Elizabeth A. , Taylor, Carol R., Nagel, Maria A. , Lass, Jonathan H. , Lu, Ying , Jeng, Bennie H. , Troxel, Andrea B. , Hochman, Judith S. , Mian, Shahzad I. , Warner, David B., Lu, Ying, Lee, Ting‐Fang , Tonk, Rahul Singh , Martinez, Jaime D. , Patel, Sanjay V. , Chamberlain, Winston , Chodosh, James , Fernandez, Ana G Alzaga, Hill, Jordan, Omar, Ahmed F. , Syed, Zeba A. , Lee, Olivia, Irvine, John, Deng, Sophie X. , Huang, Andrew , Margolis, Todd P. , Seitzman, Gerami D. , Hamrah, Pedram , Lee, Hyunjoo, Weikert, Mitchell P. , Hood, Christopher T. , Woodward, Maria A. , Shtein, Roni Mintz , Zaffos, Joshua, Prescott, Christina R. , Haberman, Ilyse D. , Ritterband, David C. , Harris, David J, Ahmad, Sumayya , Amir, Ahmad, Srikumaran, Divya S. , Akpek, Esen K. , Tu, Elmer Yuchen , Miller, Donald M, Bernal, Maria, Barron, Bruce, Wise, Ronald, Shieh, Christine , Thorne, George, Renucci, A., Sivaraman, Kavitha, Affeldt, John, Guibord, Nathalie M, Lin, Amy , Patel, Ravi, Asbell, Penny A. , Wallace, Michael, Iovieno, Alfonso , Teichman, Joshua C. , Robert, Marie-Claude , Harissi‐Dagher, Mona , Baxter, Stephanie A. , Benson, Matthew, Tone, Stephan Ong , Yung, C.–W., Lin, Charles C. , Vyas, Neil M, Oates, Dale, Veena, Mathew, Goshe, Jeffrey M. , Sharma, Vikas , Miller, Darby D. , Ma, Jeffrey H, Dupps, William Joseph

Mayo Clinic

JAMA Ophthalmology | March 6, 2025 | Volume: 143 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 269

10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.6114 | PMID 40048183 Get It

Importance High-quality evidence regarding suppressive valacyclovir treatment in herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO) is necessary to guide care. Objective To determine whether suppressive valacyclovir compared with placebo delays the occurrence of new or worsening stromal keratitis (SK), endothelial keratitis (EK), iritis, or dendriform epithelial keratitis (DEK) during 12 months of treatment and if treatment benefit persisted at 18 months (secondary end point). Design, Setting, and Participants The Zoster Eye Disease Study (ZEDS) was a randomized clinical trial conducted in 95 sites from November 2017 to June 2024. Immunocompetent, nonpregnant adults with a history of an HZO rash, documented active keratitis or iritis within 1 year, and an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 or greater were eligible. After determined to be eligible, participants were randomized in 4 strata: age at onset (<60 years vs ≥60 years) and disease duration (<6 months vs ≥6 months). Interventions A total of 12 months of double-masked daily valacyclovir, 1000 mg, or placebo. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was time to first occurrence within 12 months of new or worsening SK, EK, iritis, or DEK. Results A total of 527 participants (median [IQR] age, 60 [50-68] years; 266 female [50.5%]; 266 in the valacyclovir group; 261 in the placebo group) were randomized in 4 strata; 481 completed 12 months, and 460 completed 18 months. Data were analyzed by intention to treat. At 12 months, primary end points occurred in 86 participants (33%) assigned to placebo and 74 (28%) assigned to valacyclovir, and at 18 months in 104 participants (40%) assigned to placebo and 86 (32%) assigned to valacyclovir. The hazard ratio (HR) of the primary end point at 12 months was 0.77 for participants taking valacyclovir vs placebo (HR, 0.77; adjusted 95% CI, 0.56-1.05; P = .09) and 0.73 at the secondary end point at 18 months (HR, 0.73; adjusted 95% CI, 0.55-0.97; P = .03). There was a reduction of multiple other secondary end points at 12 months (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.52-0.95; P = .02) and 18 months (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.55-0.95; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance Although the primary outcome did not show a benefit of suppressive valacyclovir treatment, secondary study outcomes showed treatment superiority at the 18-month end point and reduced number of multiple episodes of keratitis or iritis at both 12 and 18 months. These results support consideration of 1 year of suppressive valacyclovir treatment for HZO. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03134196
Low-Dose Valacyclovir for Postherpetic Neuralgia in the Zoster Eye Disease Study
Warner, David, Jeng, Bennie H., Kim, Jiyu , Liu, Mengling , Baratz, Keith H. , Mian, Shahzad I., Choulakian, Mazen Y., Meyer, Jay J. , Lu, Ying , Twi-Yeboah, Alberta , Lopez-Jimenez, Carlos, Laury, Sarah, Cohen, Elisabeth J. , Weissbart, Sarah B. , Abazari, Azin, Chou, Timothy , Chang, Eileen , Amescua, Guillermo , Koo, Ellen, Galor, Anat , Berestka, John S., Nanji, Afshan, Stutzman, Richard D., Clements, John, Davies, Emma , Saeed, Hajirah N. , Ciralsky, Jessica, Fernández, A. Gómez-Bastero , Sippel, Kimberly C. , Perez-Quinones, Victor L, Daluvoy, Melissa B. , Liu, Katy C., Ewald, M., Groos, Erich B, Chang, Bernard, Shivitz, Ira A., Hill, Jordan , Fowler, Priscilla G., Read, Russell W. , Geggel, Harry S. , Rony, Sayegh, Rapuano, Christopher J. , Meghpara, Beeran, Holland, Gary N. , Irvine, John, Aldave, Anthony J. , Edmund, Tsui, Chen, Judy , Honig, Marc A, Snyder, Lee A, Lubniewski, Anthony J., Katz, Douglas, Capoor, Seema, Gonzales, John, Morkin, Melina I., Kenyon, Kenneth R., Lee, William B., Christenbury, Joseph, LaMattina, Kara C. , Negahban, Kambiz, Rao, Ronihi, Ament, Christine S, Lopatynsky, Marta O., Barbato, John D, Sarkar, Jayati S, Macsai, Marian S., Herz, Joshua B, Al-Mohtaseb, Zaina , Matoba, Alice Y., Cooney, Theresa, Hood, Christopher , Sugar, Alan M., Shtein, Roni M., Nehls, Sarah, Warner, Evan J. , Nettune, Greg, Bowman, Brad, Gelender, Henry, Alexander, Jamie K. , McCall, Tyrone, Zaffos, Joshua, Beebe, Walter E., Potts, Luke B. , Lustbader, Jay M., Oboh-Weilke, Aruoriwo, Hammersmith, K.M., Orlin, Stephen E., Nagra, Parveen K., Sulewski, Michael E., Bunya, Vatinee Y. , Shafer, Brian M. , Viriya, Elizabeth T., Qureshi, Anam, Lazzaro, Douglas R., Palazzolo, Laura , Goyal, Himani , Schrack, Katie E, Raber, Irving M. , Ayres, Brandon D. , Finklea, Brenton, Reeves, Sherman W., Awad, Omar E, Hardten, David R., Reilly, Charles, Flynn, William J., Rashid, Edward D, Wen, Angie E, Shaik, Neha, Seedor, John A., Rosenfeld, Steven I., Winnick, Marc , Amir, Ahmad, Sherman, Mark D., Chaon, Benjamin, Soukiasian, Sarkis H., Rao, Naveen K. , Steiner, Anne, Winokur, Jules , Udell, Ira J., Shih, Carolyn, Gorski, Matthew , Schrier, Amilia, Lobo-Chan, Ann-Marie , Sugar, Joel, Munir, Wuqaas W, Sunshine, Sarah B. , Miller, Donald M. , Gensheimer, William G. , Zegans, Michael E. , Weiss, Jayne S. , Bernal, M.L. , Barron, Bruce, Hindman, Holly B. , Wise, Ronald E. , Gelston, Christopher D. , Taravella, Michael J. , Davidson, Richard S. , Tran, Uyen, Bartley, Jeremy, McCulley, James P., Verity, Steven M., Bowman, Wayne, Blomquist, Preston H. , Mootha, V. Vinod , Thorne, George, Renucci, A., Verdier, David D. , Sivaraman, K. R., Nordlund, Michael L., Hwang, Frank S. , Affeldt, John, Ingraham, Herbert J., Guibord, Nathalie M, Dobbins, Kendall, Thareja, Tarika , Zaugg, Brian , Mifflin, Mark D., Forstot, S. Lance, Fish, Robert A, Repine, Karen, Wildes, Michael, Estopinal, Christopher B., Brown, Donna, Koreishi, Aaleya, Ple-plakon, Patricia, Clemons, Carol S., Patel, Ravi , Ashe, Sanda, Bonaffini, Sarah G. , Houser, Kourtney, Wallace, Michael A., Wesberry, Jesse M, Yeung, Sonia N. , Noordeh, Nima, Faucher, Anne, Rullo, Jacob, Johnson, Davin , Mah, Dean, Benson, Matthew , Chew, Hall F., Hassonlou, Mojgan, Liu, Shaohui , Eikenberry, Jennifer , Yung, Chi-Wah, Shen, Joanne F , Lin, Charles C. , Yu, Charles, Ta, Christopher N. , Goins, Kenneth M., Sutphin, John E., Svanda, Kerri, Keppol, Stacy, Rostov, Audrey Talley, Vyas, Neil , Hsu, Kimberly, Goodman, Gerri, McHam, Lisa, Oates, Dale, Rizkalla, Ramy, Shukla, Anita N. , Veena, Mathew , See, Craig W. , Feder, Robert S., Baqai, Jeanine, Basti, Surendra, Haddadin, Ramez I., You, Jae Young , Dixit, Lena, Patel, Ravi H, Golde, Kimberly T, Zaidman, Gerald W., Mahesh, Sankara, Sharma, Vikas, Wesolosky, Jason D., Jeffrey, Helen, Mannis, Mark J., Niederer, Rachael L. , Lu, Ying , Jeng, Bennie H. , Troxel, Andrea B. , Hochman, Judith S. , Mian, Shahzad I. , Lee, Ting‐Fang , Tonk, Rahul Singh , Martinez, Jaime D. , Patel, Sanjay V. , Chamberlain, Winston , Chodosh, James , Fernandez, Ana G Alzaga, Perez-Quinones, Victor L, Hill, Jordan, Omar, Ahmed F. , Syed, Zeba A. , Lee, Olivia, Irvine, John, Deng, Sophie X. , Edmund, Tsui, Huang, Andrew , Margolis, Todd P. , Seitzman, Gerami D. , Keenan, Jeremy David , Hamrah, Pedram , Lee, Hyunjoo, Barbato, John D, Weikert, Mitchell P. , Hood, Christopher, Woodward, Maria A. , Sugar, Alan, Shtein, Roni Mintz , Prescott, Christina R. , Haberman, Ilyse D. , Schrack, Katie E, Ritterband, David C. , Harris, David J, Ahmad, Sumayya , Srikumaran, Divya S. , Akpek, Esen K. , Tu, Elmer Yuchen , Miller, Donald M, Bernal, Maria, Shieh, Christine , Thorne, George, Sivaraman, Kavitha, Lin, Amy , Repine, Karen, Asbell, Penny A. , Ashe, S, Wallace, Michael, Iovieno, Alfonso , Teichman, Joshua C. , Robert, Marie-Claude , Harissi‐Dagher, Mona , Baxter, Stephanie A. , Benson, Matthew, Tone, Stephan Ong , Hassonlou, Mojgan, Yung, C.–W., Svanda, Kerri, Keppol, Stacy, Vyas, Neil M, McHam, Lisa, Veena, Mathew, Goshe, Jeffrey M. , Miller, Darby D. , Ma, Jeffrey H

Mayo Clinic

JAMA Ophthalmology | March 6, 2025 | Volume: 143 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 277

10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.6113 | PMID 40048191 Get It

Importance Evidence regarding suppressive valacyclovir treatment on postherpetic neuralgia is necessary to guide care. Objective To test the hypothesis that suppressive treatment with 1000 mg/d of oral valacyclovir for 12 months reduces the prevalence, severity, and duration of postherpetic neuralgia compared with placebo at 12 and 18 months in participants with herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO). Design, Setting, and Participants Multicenter, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial including 527 immunocompetent, nonpregnant adults with history of HZO rash, documented keratitis, or iritis within 1 year and an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 or greater. The study was conducted at 95 participating sites (in Canada, New Zealand, and the US) from November 2017 to June 2024 and participant visits occurred every 3 months. Intervention Treatment with 1000 mg/d of valacyclovir or placebo for 12 months. Main Outcomes and Measures Prevalence of postherpetic neuralgia, severity as determined by pain score (a score of ≥3 on a scale of 1-10), pain duration (≥3 months after HZO onset), and total daily dose of pain medication. Results Of the 527 participants (490 completed 12 months of treatment and 460 completed 18 months), 73 (14%) had postherpetic neuralgia and were analyzed by age at HZO onset (<60 years or ≥60 years) and disease duration (recent [<6 months] or chronic [≥6 months]). Of the 73 participants with postherpetic neuralgia (34 in the valacyclovir group and 39 in the placebo group), the mean age was 62.4 years (SD, 13.6 years), 59% were female, 5% were Black or African American, and 10% were Hispanic. The prevalence of postherpetic neuralgia at 12 months was not reduced by valacyclovir (12/32 [38%]) compared with placebo (14/35 [40%]) (between-group difference, 2.5% [95% CI, −20.8% to 25.8%]; P >.99). The participants who were younger than 60 years at HZO onset and had a chronic disease duration had lower pain scores in the valacyclovir group (mean score, 0.3 [SD, 0.9]) vs the placebo group (mean score, 0.8 [SD, 1.9]) at 12 months ( P = .045) and at 18 months (mean score, 0.2 [SD, 0.9] vs 1.0 [SD, 2.3], respectively; P = .02). There was a decrease in pain duration in the valacyclovir group at 18 months (mean, 13.6 [SD, 11.4] months) vs the placebo group (mean, 18.7 [SD, 29.5] months) (linear mixed-effects model between-group difference, −3.39 months [95% CI, −6.73 to −0.04 months]; P = .046). The total daily dose of neuropathic pain medication was lower in the valacyclovir group (mean, 271.4 [SD, 593.8] mg/d) vs the placebo group (mean, 363.4 [SD, 592.2] mg/d) at 12 months (linear mixed-effects model P = .006) and at 18 months (mean, 209.0 [SD, 412.8] mg/d vs 286.2 [SD, 577.9] mg/d, respectively; linear mixed-effects model P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance One year of suppressive treatment with valacyclovir was associated with a lower dosage of neuropathic pain medication. Participants in the valacyclovir group, who were younger at HZO onset and had a chronic disease duration, had lower pain scores. These secondary outcomes support consideration of 1 year of suppressive treatment with valacyclovir to reduce dosage of pain medications and pain due to HZO. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03134196
Evaluation of Etiologic Heterogeneity for Risk of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Subtype Defined by the Cell of Origin
Kleinstern, Geffen , Robinson, Dennis P. , Rimsza, Lisa M. , Larson, Melissa C. , King, Rebecca L. , Nowakowski, Grzegorz S. , Thompson, Carrie A. , Ansell, Stephen M. , Maurer, Matthew J. , Feldman, Andrew L. , Novak, Anne J. , Slager, Susan L , Novak, Anne J , Habermann, Thomas , Cerhan, James R , Feldman, Andrew L , Maurer, Matthew , Rimsza, Lisa M , Larson, Melissa C , Slager, Susan L. , Habermann, Thomas M. , Cerhan, James R.

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | March 6, 2025 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 780-787

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-24-1610 | PMID 40047811 Get It

Abstract Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is clinically heterogeneous, and gene expression profiling has identified at least two biologically distinct DLBCL subtypes defined by their cell of origin (COO): germinal center B cell (GCB) and activate B cell (ABC) or non-GCB. We evaluated a variety of putative DLBCL risk factors for etiologic heterogeneity by the COO in a clinic-based study of newly diagnosed DLBCL cases (N = 638) and frequency-matched controls (N = 2,253). Methods: The COO was determined on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissue, with DLBCL classified as GCB (N = 283), non-GCB (N = 188), or undetermined/missing (N = 167; mainly because of lack of tissue). Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: We identified heterogeneity by the COO for low socioeconomic status (SES), which was only associated with non-GCB DLBCL (OR = 1.88 for low vs. average SES; 95% CI, 1.08–3.27); alcohol use, which was only associated with GCB DLBCL (OR = 0.48 for former drinkers; 95% CI, 0.29–0.80 and OR = 0.47 for current drinkers; 95% CI, 0.32–0.71); and borderline heterogeneity for the regular use of regular/extra-strength aspirin, which was only associated with non-GCB DLBCL (OR = 0.36; 95% CI, 0.16–0.85). In contrast, there was no significant heterogeneity by the COO for family history, medical history, or other lifestyle factors. Conclusions: Although requiring confirmation, most risk factors for DLBCL did not show etiologic heterogeneity by the COO, with some notable exceptions including alcohol use, SES, and perhaps regular use of regular/extra-strength aspirin showing associations. Impact: Mechanistically, these findings suggest that most of the DLBCL risk factors evaluated here influence lymphomagenesis prior to differentiation into COO subtypes, with selected factors acting later.
An Evaluation Into the Robustness of Grading of Pleural Mesothelioma Outside of Specialist Centres
Prabhakaran, Sarita , Hocking, Ashleigh , Irani, Yazad , Hussey, Matthew, Alexeyenko, Andrey , Dobra, Katalin , Micsík, Tamás , Duhig, Edwina , Walts, Ann E. , Vanwalleghem, Lieve, Chhut, Vathana, Roden, Anja C. , Roggli, Victor L., Hertoghs, Marjan, Brčić, Luka , Moffat, David, Klebe, Sonja , Hussey, Matthew, Galateau-Sallé, Françoise

Mayo Clinic

APMIS | March 4, 2025 | Volume: 133 | Issue: 3 | Pages: No page available

10.1111/apm.70006 | PMID 40017229 Get It

ABSTRACTThe 2021 WHO classification of thoracic tumours recommends grading pleural mesothelioma to aid prognostication. Robustness of grading and morphological characterisation is key to its clinical utility, though validation of this grading system has largely been conducted by expert thoracic pathologists. We conducted a survey inviting pathologists across a range of practices and expertise to grade digitised images of 50 epithelioid pleural mesotheliomas that had been graded by an expert in thoracic pathology. We included slides that were considered potentially problematic such as small biopsies, focal necrosis, and rare subtypes that may affect grading (small cell and deciduoid features). Using the Sectra Uniview web viewer, participants were asked to score atypia, mitotic count, and necrosis and choose from a list of cytological and architectural features. Seventy‐four pathologists anonymously participated. There was 90% agreement of consensus scores with expert opinion using the WHO 2‐tier grade and 72% for the 3‐tier nuclear grade but only 70% for nuclear atypia, 56% for mitoses, and 84% for necrosis. Both 3‐tier nuclear grade and WHO 2‐tier grading systems were significantly associated with survival. Our study affirms the overall robustness and utility of grading for pleural mesothelioma, reveals variances, and suggests the need for dedicated training.
End points and outcomes in follicular lymphoma: what should we measure, how, and why?
Di, Mengyang , Maurer, Matthew J. , Flowers, Christopher R. , Maurer, Matthew , Di, Mengyang

Mayo Clinic

Blood | February 28, 2025 | Volume: 146 | Issue: 15 | Pages: 1802-1811

10.1182/blood.2024026978 | PMID 40019453 Get It

Abstract Overall survival (OS) and quality of life (QoL) are clinically relevant outcomes/end points during examination of therapies. However, with median OS approaching 20 years for patients with follicular lymphoma (FL), it is often not feasible to use OS as a primary end point in clinical studies. Although validated tools exist for assessing QoL in patients with lymphoma, QoL data are rarely the sole basis for drug approvals in FL. Therefore, other survival end points, surrogates, and intermediate clinical end points have all been used to measure outcomes in FL trials. In this review, we discuss the strengths and limitations of these commonly used traditional end points in FL trials and examine the current gaps, including delayed availability of results and suboptimal sensitivity in distinguishing difference in therapeutic effects. To help address the identified gaps, well-validated surrogates, such as complete remission 30 months after starting frontline immunochemotherapy, may be used as the primary or co-primary end point in confirmatory randomized trials. Emerging intermediate end points like minimal residual disease may be useful in early phase trials and in guiding accelerated approvals after appropriate validation. As patient preference plays a crucial role in treatment decisions in FL, it is critical to include QoL as an important secondary trial end point and to measure nonmedical burdens, including time and financial toxicities. End points that are clinically relevant, timely, and patient-centered may identify new drugs that help patients with FL live longer and better lives.