Citations

Abstract Wide-necked aneurysms often pose challenges for distal access to the distal vasculature. This 64-yr-old woman without neurological deficits presented with atypical headaches of gradual onset. MRI revealed a large, symptomatic, unruptured carotid terminus aneurysm incorporating the origin of both the middle (MCA) and anterior cerebral arteries (ACA). Its wide neck created significant risks to coil prolapse and parent vessel compromise, risking stroke. With other options of higher risks, we recommended an around-the-world technique. Standard transfemoral access was used to the right internal carotid artery (ICA) with a 6F-Shuttle sheath and intracranial carotid with a 6F-Sofia distal access catheter. With dual-microcatheter access, 1 catheter was placed in the aneurysm dome, a second in the MCA for stent placement. Advancing the wire around the aneurysm first formed a loop from the lateral to medial wall for access to the MCA. The microcatheter was then advanced around the wire into the MCA, keeping the loop within the dome. With the loop's distal tip anchored, the distal end of the stent was deployed and anchored into the MCA. Both pitfalls (ie, lack of sufficient distal access, collapse of stent device during deployment) were resolved using a balloon catheter. With the balloon positioned and inflated as the anchor, the wire and catheter were pulled together. The loop in the aneurysm's dome straightened out across the neck, the stent was advanced into the MCA, and coiling proceeded. A large neck remnant had partially closed on 6-mo follow-up angiogram. Patient consented to undergo the procedure. Illustrations in video published/printed with permission from Mayfield Clinic.

Abstract Sidewall aneurysm treatment often requires complex management strategies. These can include advanced clipping techniques or stent-assisted coiling techniques. Endovascular coiling alone has been associated with high recurrence rates and is often not feasible. 1-4 Flow-diversion embolization has recently become a standard of care for many aneurysms, demonstrating high occlusion rates. 4,5 However, the third generation of coil-assist stents can be delivered with 0.0165” microcatheters, being an ideal adjunct to manage this group of aneurysms in more distal locations. In this video, a 16-yr-old teenager with Parry-Romberg syndrome and congenital adrenal hyperplasia had an incidental finding of a 6.5-mm sidewall aneurysm arising off the angular branch of the left middle cerebral artery, found during the work-up of complex partial seizures. The patient consented to the procedure. Due to his young age and aneurysm size, a decision was made to treat the aneurysm through an endovascular approach. Under general anesthesia, a transfemoral approach was carried out using a 6-French short sheath. A 6-French guiding catheter was left in the distal cervical left internal carotid artery; a 0.0165” microcatheter was used to first deploy a 3.0 × 15 mm Neuroform Atlas stent, completely covering the length of the aneurysm. Then, the stent was traversed with the microcatheter to coil the aneurysm. Follow-up cerebral angiogram confirmed complete occlusion of the aneurysm.

Abstract Background: Upamostat is an orally available small molecule serine protease inhibitor that is a highly potent inhibitor of trypsin 1, trypsin 2 and trypsin 3 (PRSS1/2/3) as well as urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) which are expressed in many cancers and mediate cell migration, invasion and tissue remodeling. Opaganib (ABC294640), a novel, orally available small molecule is a specific inhibitor of sphingosine kinase 2 (SPHK2), which phosphorylates sphingosine to sphingosine-1-phosphate (S-1-P). While proliferation induced by S-1-P is regulated by both sphingosine kinase 1 (SPHK1) and SPHK2, SPHK2 appears to be more involved in cancer. We aimed to investigate the potential antitumor effect of upamostat and opaganib, individually and in combination, on cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) patient derived xenografts (PDX) in nude mice. Methods: PAX165, a PDX from a surgically resected CCA, expresses substantial levels of SPHK2, PRSS1, PRSS2 and PRSS3. 4 groups of 18 mice were treated with either drug or both. Mouse weights and tumor volumes were measured. In addition, experiments were conducted using the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) of chicken embryos. Results: Table 1 shows the average tumor size for the control, upamostat, opaganib, and upamostat+opaganib groups at the study end point (Day 42). Tumor volumes in the upamostat, opaganib, and upamostat+opagnib groups were significantly decreased compared to the control group. The CAM experiments are ongoing and will be presented at the AACR Annual Meeting. Change in tumor volumes (mean) of CCA PDX after opaganib, upamostat or combination treatmentControlOpaganibUpamostatOpaganib+UpamostatPre-treatment129.9128.7118.8126.8Day 42198.6102.093.3186.09Percent change Day 0-42+53%-21%-21%-32%P value vs. control0.00020.00100.0008 Conclusion: This preclinical study demonstrated that upamostat and opaganib resulted in tumor regression in mice. Body weights of the mice showed no significant inter- or intra- group differences. The combination of upamostat and opaganib treatment showed greater regression compared to either upamostat or opaganib alone. Studies are underway to identify the molecular mechanisms of their interaction. Citation Format: Faizal Z. Asumda, Mohamed A. Hassan, Yo Han Kim, Nellie A. Campbell, Xin Luo, Daniel R. O'Brien, Sarah A. Buhrow, Joel M. Reid, Michael J. Moore, Vered Katz Ben-Yair, Reza Fathi, Mark L. Levitt, Fabrice Lucien-Matteoni, Jennifer L. Leiting, Mark J. Truty, Lewis R. Roberts. Effects of upamostat and opaganib on cholangiocarcinoma patient derived xenografts [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 3078.

Background The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted established care paths worldwide. Patient awareness of the pandemic and executive limitations imposed on public life have changed the perception of when to seek care for acute conditions in some cases. We sought to study whether there is a delay in presentation for acute ischemic stroke patients in the first month of the pandemic in the US. Methods The interval between last-known-well (LKW) time and presentation of 710 consecutive patients presenting with acute ischemic strokes to 12 stroke centers across the US were extracted from a prospectively maintained quality database. We analyzed the timing and severity of the presentation in the baseline period from February to March 2019 and compared results with the timeframe of February and March 2020. Results There were 320 patients in the 2-month baseline period in 2019, there was a marked decrease in patients from February to March of 2020 (227 patients in February, and 163 patients in March). There was no difference in the severity of the presentation between groups and no difference in age between the baseline and the COVID period. The mean interval from LKW to the presentation was significantly longer in the COVID period (603±1035 min) compared with the baseline period (442±435 min, P<0.02). Conclusion We present data supporting an association between public awareness and limitations imposed on public life during the COVID-19 pandemic in the US and a delay in presentation for acute ischemic stroke patients to a stroke center.

AbstractBackgroundThe optimal radiation dose for adult supratentorial low-grade glioma is unknown. The aim of this study was to provide a final update on oncologic and cognitive outcomes of high-dose versus low-dose radiation for low-grade glioma.MethodsBetween 1986 and 1994, 203 patients with supratentorial low-grade glioma were randomized (1:1) to 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions versus 64.8 Gy in 36 fractions after any degree of resection.ResultsFor all patients, median overall survival (OS) was 8.4 years (95% CI: 7.2–10.8). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.2 years (95% CI: 4.3–6.6). Median follow-up is 17.2 years for the 33 patients still alive. High-dose radiation did not improve 15-year OS (22.4%) versus low-dose radiation (24.9%, log-rank P = 0.978) or 15-year PFS (high dose, 15.2% vs low dose, 9.5%; P = 0.7142). OS was significantly better for patients with preoperative tumor diameter &lt;5 cm and baseline Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) &gt;27 and who underwent gross total resection. PFS was improved for patients with oligodendroglioma versus astrocytoma, preoperative tumor diameter &lt;5 cm, patients who had gross total resection, and patients with baseline MMSE &gt;27. For patients who had normal MMSE at baseline, at 7 years only 1 patient (5%) had a clinically significant decrease in MMSE from the previous time point, with the remainder (95%) stable. None had decrease in MMSE at 10, 12, or 15 years.ConclusionsLong-term follow-up indicates no benefit to high-dose over low-dose radiation for low-grade gliomas. Cognitive function appeared to be stable after radiation as measured by MMSE.

Abstract PURPOSE To provide a final update on oncologic and cognitive outcomes of high dose versus low dose radiation for low-grade glioma. METHODS Between 1986 and 1994, 203 patients with supratentorial low grade glioma were randomized to 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions versus 64.8 Gy in 36 fractions after any degree of resection. Histologic subtype was oligodendroglioma (71%) or astrocytoma (29%). Primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Cognitive status was followed using Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). RESULTS For the entire cohort of 203 patients, median OS was 8.4 years (95% CI: 7.2 – 10.8). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.2 years (95% CI: 4.3 – 6.6). Median follow-up is 17.2 years for the 33 patients still alive. High-dose radiation did not improve OS (15-yr OS: 22.4% vs. 24.9%, log rank p=0.978) or PFS (15-yr PFS: 15.2% vs. 9.5%, p=0.7142). OS was significantly better for patients with pre-operative tumor diameter < 5 cm (15-yr OS: 39.4% vs. 15.2%, p< 0.001), baseline MMSE > 27 (15-yr OS: 27.3% vs. 9.8%, p=0.001), and for patients who underwent gross total resection (GTR) (15-yr OS: 39.3% GTR vs. 16.4% subtotal resection vs. 24.5% biopsy only, p=0.0119). PFS was improved for patients with oligodendroglioma versus astrocytoma (15-yr PFS: 13.8% vs. 8.6%, p=0.0221). PFS was also improved for patients with pre-operative tumor diameter < 5 cm, patients who had GTR, and patients with baseline MMSE > 27. For patients who had normal MMSE at baseline, at 7 years only 1 patient (5%) had a clinically significant decrease in MMSE from the previous time point, with the remainder (95%) stable. None had decrease in MMSE at 10, 12, or 15 years. CONCLUSIONS Long-term follow-up indicates no benefit to high-dose over low-dose radiation for low-grade gliomas. Minimal late decline in cognitive function after radiation was seen by MMSE. SUPPORT: U10CA180821,U10CA180882. https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org

Objectives: Effective pharmacologic treatments directly targeting lung injury in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome are lacking. Early treatment with inhaled corticosteroids and beta agonists may reduce progression to acute respiratory distress syndrome by reducing lung inflammation and enhancing alveolar fluid clearance. Design: Double-blind, randomized clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01783821). The primary outcome was longitudinal change in oxygen saturation divided by the F io 2 (S/F) through day 5. We also analyzed categorical change in S/F by greater than 20%. Other outcomes included need for mechanical ventilation and development of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Setting: Five academic centers in the United States. Patients: Adult patients admitted through the emergency department at risk for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Interventions: Aerosolized budesonide/formoterol versus placebo bid for up to 5 days. Measurements and Main Results: Sixty-one patients were enrolled from September 3, 2013, to June 9, 2015. Median time from presentation to first study drug was less than 9 hours. More patients in the control group had shock at enrollment (14 vs 3 patients). The longitudinal increase in S/F was greater in the treatment group ( p = 0.02) and independent of shock ( p = 0.04). Categorical change in S/F improved ( p = 0.01) but not after adjustment for shock ( p = 0.15). More patients in the placebo group developed acute respiratory distress syndrome (7 vs 0) and required mechanical ventilation (53% vs 21%). Conclusions: Early treatment with inhaled budesonide/formoterol in patients at risk for acute respiratory distress syndrome is feasible and improved oxygenation as assessed by S/F. These results support further study to test the efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids and beta agonists for prevention of acute respiratory distress syndrome.

PURPOSE: Randomized studies have suggested that sucralfate is effective in mitigating diarrhea during pelvic radiation therapy (RT). This North Central Cancer Treatment Group study was undertaken to confirm the antidiarrheal effect of sucralfate. Several other measures of bowel function were also assessed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients receiving pelvic RT to a minimum of 45 Gy at 1.7 to 2.1 Gy/d were eligible for the study. Patients were assigned randomly, in double-blind fashion, to receive sucralfate (1.5 g orally every 6 hours) or an identical looking placebo during pelvic RT. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-three patients were randomly assigned and found assessable. Overall, there was no significant difference in patient characteristics between those receiving sucralfate and those receiving placebo. Moderate or worse diarrhea was observed in 53% of patients receiving sucralfate versus 41% of those receiving placebo. Compared with patients receiving placebo, more sucralfate-treated patients reported fecal incontinence (16% v 34%, respectively; P = .04) and need for protective clothing (8% v 23%, respectively; P = .04). The incidence and severity of nausea were worse among those taking sucralfate (P = .03). Analysis of patient-reported symptoms 10 to 12 months after RT showed a nonsignificant trend toward more problems in patients taking sucralfate than in those taking placebo (average, 2.3 v 1.9 problems, respectively; P = .34). CONCLUSION: Sucralfate did not decrease pelvic RT-related bowel toxicity by any of the end points measured and seems to have aggravated some gastrointestinal symptoms.