Citations

Abstract Approximately 5% of Alzheimer’s disease cases have an early age at onset (<65 years), with 5–10% of these cases attributed to dominantly inherited mutations and the remainder considered as sporadic. The extent to which dominantly inherited and sporadic early-onset Alzheimer’s disease overlap is unknown. In this study, we explored the clinical, cognitive and biomarker profiles of early-onset Alzheimer’s disease, focusing on commonalities and distinctions between dominantly inherited and sporadic cases. Our analysis included 117 participants with dominantly inherited Alzheimer’s disease enrolled in the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network and 118 individuals with sporadic early-onset Alzheimer’s disease enrolled at the University of California San Francisco Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center. Baseline differences in clinical and biomarker profiles between both groups were compared using t-tests. Differences in the rates of decline were compared using linear mixed-effects models. Individuals with dominantly inherited Alzheimer’s disease exhibited an earlier age-at-symptom onset compared with the sporadic group [43.4 (SD ± 8.5) years versus 54.8 (SD ± 5.0) years, respectively, P < 0.001]. Sporadic cases showed a higher frequency of atypical clinical presentations relative to dominantly inherited (56.8% versus 8.5%, respectively) and a higher frequency of APOE-ε4 (50.0% versus 28.2%, P = 0.001). Compared with sporadic early onset, motor manifestations were higher in the dominantly inherited cohort [32.5% versus 16.9% at baseline (P = 0.006) and 46.1% versus 25.4% at last visit (P = 0.001)]. At baseline, the sporadic early-onset group performed worse on category fluency (P < 0.001), Trail Making Test Part B (P < 0.001) and digit span (P < 0.001). Longitudinally, both groups demonstrated similar rates of cognitive and functional decline in the early stages. After 10 years from symptom onset, dominantly inherited participants experienced a greater decline as measured by Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes [3.63 versus 1.82 points (P = 0.035)]. CSF amyloid beta-42 levels were comparable [244 (SD ± 39.3) pg/ml dominantly inherited versus 296 (SD ± 24.8) pg/ml sporadic early onset, P = 0.06]. CSF phosphorylated tau at threonine 181 levels were higher in the dominantly inherited Alzheimer’s disease cohort (87.3 versus 59.7 pg/ml, P = 0.005), but no significant differences were found for t-tau levels (P = 0.35). In summary, sporadic and inherited Alzheimer’s disease differed in baseline profiles; sporadic early onset is best distinguished from dominantly inherited by later age at onset, high frequency of atypical clinical presentations and worse executive performance at baseline. Despite these differences, shared pathways in longitudinal clinical decline and CSF biomarkers suggest potential common therapeutic targets for both populations, offering valuable insights for future research and clinical trial design.

ObjectiveMicrotubule‐associated protein tau (MAPT) mutations cause frontotemporal lobar degeneration, and novel biomarkers are urgently needed for early disease detection. We used task‐free functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) mapping, a promising biomarker, to analyze network connectivity in symptomatic and presymptomatic MAPT mutation carriers.MethodsWe compared cross‐sectional fMRI data between 17 symptomatic and 39 presymptomatic carriers and 81 controls with (1) seed‐based analyses to examine connectivity within networks associated with the 4 most common MAPT‐associated clinical syndromes (ie, salience, corticobasal syndrome, progressive supranuclear palsy syndrome, and default mode networks) and (2) whole‐brain connectivity analyses. We applied K‐means clustering to explore connectivity heterogeneity in presymptomatic carriers at baseline. Neuropsychological measures, plasma neurofilament light chain, and gray matter volume were compared at baseline and longitudinally between the presymptomatic subgroups defined by their baseline whole‐brain connectivity profiles.ResultsSymptomatic and presymptomatic carriers had connectivity disruptions within MAPT‐syndromic networks. Compared to controls, presymptomatic carriers showed regions of connectivity alterations with age. Two presymptomatic subgroups were identified by clustering analysis, exhibiting predominantly either whole‐brain hypoconnectivity or hyperconnectivity at baseline. At baseline, these two presymptomatic subgroups did not differ in neuropsychological measures, although the hypoconnectivity subgroup had greater plasma neurofilament light chain levels than controls. Longitudinally, both subgroups showed visual memory decline (vs controls), yet the subgroup with baseline hypoconnectivity also had worsening verbal memory and neuropsychiatric symptoms, and extensive bilateral mesial temporal gray matter decline.InterpretationNetwork connectivity alterations arise as early as the presymptomatic phase. Future studies will determine whether presymptomatic carriers' baseline connectivity profiles predict symptomatic conversion. ANN NEUROL 2023;94:632–646

AbstractBackgroundWhite matter signal abnormalities (WMSA) are frequently observed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of people with frontotemporal dementia (FTD). We hypothesized that carriers of mutations in progranulin (GRN+), chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9orf72+) and microtubule associated protein tau (MAPT+) have increased rates of progression of WMSA compared to non‐carrier individuals prior to onset of dementia, and that different mutations may have different rates of WMSA accumulation.MethodParticipants were recruited through the ARTFL‐LEFFTDS Longitudinal Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ALLFTD) Study. We selected participants with Clinical Dementia Rating scale (CDR) scores of 0 and 0.5. If a participant developed FTD during the follow‐up, we only analyzed observations collected before the conversion. WMSA were defined as hyperintensities on FLAIR MRI. Total WMSA volumes were normalized to the respective intracranial volumes. We used a linear mixed effects model, with random intercepts and slopes, to compare the baseline burden and the longitudinal progression of total WMSA volumes between mutation carriers and controls. The model was adjusted for baseline age, sex, education, baseline Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores, and MRI acquisition sites.ResultWe analyzed MRI data from 199 participants who had at least two MRI visits (46 C9orf72+, 17 GRN+, 35 MAPT+, 101 non‐carrier controls; up to five years of follow‐up). We did not find significant group differences in baseline demographic features, except that MAPT+ was younger than non‐carrier controls (average age: C9orf72+ = 47, GRN+ = 56, MAPT+ = 40, controls = 47). Baseline WMSA volumes were not significantly different between mutation carriers and controls. Longitudinally, the rates of WMSA volume increase in C9orf72+ and MAPT+ were comparable to controls; whereas, GRN+ had higher rates of WMSA volume increases compared to controls (p = 0.01).ConclusionWMSA may accumulate at higher rates in GRN+ prior to the onset of FTD, which is consistent with the frequent presence of white matter diseases observed in symptomatic FTD patients with GRN mutations. Future work is warranted to investigate the association between white matter structural changes and cognitive/psychiatric changes in FTD mutation carriers.

AbstractBackgroundNeuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) often occur during the prodromal stage of frontotemporal dementia (FTD), as evidenced by the presence of early psychiatric diagnosis in approximately 50% of bvFTD patients prior to their dementia diagnosis. We hypothesized that carriers of mutations in progranulin (GRN+), chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9orf72+) and microtubule associated protein tau (MAPT+) have increased baseline burden and rates of progression of NPS compared to non‐carrier individuals prior to onset of dementia symptoms based on the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale.MethodParticipants were recruited through the ARTFL‐LEFFTDS Longitudinal Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ALLFTD) Study. NPS were assessed with Neuropsychiatric Inventory‐Questionnaire (NPI‐Q), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI), Social Behaviour Checklist (SBOCL), and Behavioral Inhibition Scale (BIS) annually for up to five years. We selected participants with CDR scores of 0 and 0.5. If a participant’s CDR changed to above 0.5 during the follow‐up, we only analyzed observations collected before the conversion. We used mixed effects models to compare the baseline burden and the longitudinal progression of NPS measures between carriers and controls, adjusted for baseline age, sex, education, and baseline Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores.ResultWe analyzed data from 607 participants (111 C9orf72+, 47 GRN+, 67 MAPT+ and 382 non‐carrier controls). There were no significant group differences in baseline demographic features, except that MAPT+ was significantly younger than other groups (average age: C9orf72+ = 45, GRN+ = 53, MAPT+ = 41, controls = 54). Baseline NPS scores were not significantly different between carriers and controls, except that C9orf72+ had significantly lower GDS compared to controls (p = 0.002). Longitudinally, GRN+ (p = 0.02) and MAPT+ (p = 0.009) had significantly higher rates of NPI‐Q increases compared to controls, while the progression of NPI‐Q in C9orf72+ was comparable to controls. The rates of GDS, IRI, SBOCL and BIS progression were not significantly different between carriers and controls.ConclusionPrior to the onset of dementia, GRN+ and MAPT+ have a faster progression of NPS, as measured by NPI‐Q, compared to controls. Future work will investigate whether different mutation carriers are affected by specific type/cluster of symptoms.

AbstractBackgroundThe ARTFL‐LEFFTDS Longitudinal Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ALLFTD) study is designed to characterize both sporadic and familial FTLD (f‐FTLD) through annual detailed clinical, neuropsychological, biomarker, and neuroimaging assessments to capture disease onset and trajectory in preparation for therapeutic trails in FTLD. Transitions from asymptomatic to mild disease, or from mild to overt, may reveal critical windows for intervention.Method169 f‐FTLD participants carrying mutations in the main FTLD‐associated genes (79 C9orf72; 37 GRN; 53 MAPT) with at least two clinical assessments were included for analysis of phenoconversion from asymptomatic or mild disease. [CDRÒ + NACC FTLD global scores (Miyagawa et al, 2020) were used to define baseline status at first visit: “asymptomatic” = 0 and “mild” = 0.5. Conversion was defined as “partial” (asymptomatic to mild), “definite” (asymptomatic to overt [CDRÒ + NACC FTLD > = 1) and “mild to overt” (0.5 to > = 1).ResultDefinite conversion occurred most often in MAPT mutation carriers, with 5/43 asymptomatic carriers transitioning through mild to overt across multiple visits. Definite conversion was also seen in 2/65 C9orf72 expansion carriers and 1/30 GRN mutation carriers. All definite converters were assessed as mild (CDRÒ + NACC FTLD = 0.5) for at least one intermediate visit; definite conversion was observed from 2‐4 years from initial assessment. Partial conversions also occurred in all three genetic groups (MAPT: 6; C9orf72: 5; GRN: 5). Further conversion is expected to be observed in these participants in additional follow‐up visits. C9orf72 expansion carriers were less likely to progress from a baseline of mild to overt (3/14) than GRN carriers (4/6) or MAPT (7/10).ConclusionLongitudinal assessment through natural history studies can capture early phenoconversion in carriers of FTLD‐associated genetic mutations; corresponding imaging, cognitive, and biomarker profiles captured may provide insights into disease mechanisms and trajectories.

AbstractBackgroundThe ARTFL‐LEFFTDS Longitudinal Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ALLFTD) research consortium is actively enrolling participants across 23 North American centers to characterize sporadic and familial frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and prepare for disease‐modifying clinical trials. The ability to identify, otherwise unknown, relatives among these participants is critical to rigorously build family structures for downstream clinical and genetic research studies.MethodsGenome‐wide SNP genotyping data from ALLFTD participants was used to perform lineage analyses using PLINK. Briefly, QC was performed to remove individuals with low call rate and filter autosomal SNPs for missingness, allele frequency, and deviation from Hardy‐Weinberg equilibrium, before pruning SNPs for linkage disequilibrium. Identity‐by‐descent (IBD) estimates were then calculated for determining relatedness, followed by family‐network identification and pedigree reconstruction using PRIMUS.ResultsAbout 46% of ALLFTD participants that were genotyped and passed QC (n = 1,453) had reported a family history, while 50% (n = 721) did not and were considered sporadic. We identified a total of 460 participants that had at least one relative who was second degree or closer (PI_HAT>0.1875) based on IBD sharing, resulting in 150 family networks. This included 9 participants who self‐identified as sporadic, demonstrating the utility of direct genetic characterization to determine familiality in FTD. Most of the predicted families were associated with disease causing variants in the 3 major FTD‐causing genes: 66 families with known C9orf72 repeat expansion carriers, 35 with MAPT (including 11 families with the variant historically known as p.P301L) and 30 with GRN pathogenic variant carriers, as well as 2 families with carriers of both a C9orf72 expansion and a GRN pathogenic variant. We also identified 5 families with carriers of pathogenic variants in other familial dementia genes (2 TARDBP, 2 VCP and 1 PSEN1), as well as 12 families with yet unknown genetic etiology.ConclusionsThis dataset sets up a crucial resource to increase statistical accuracy and power in downstream association studies using the clinical, neuropsychological, neuroimaging and biomarker data currently being generated by the ALLFTD consortium. It will also facilitate genetic studies aimed at novel gene discovery, and identification of haplotypes and genetic modifiers associated with the 3 major FTD causal genes.

AbstractIntroductionRemote smartphone assessments of cognition, speech/language, and motor functioning in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) could enable decentralized clinical trials and improve access to research. We studied the feasibility and acceptability of remote smartphone data collection in FTD research using the ALLFTD Mobile App (ALLFTD‐mApp).MethodsA diagnostically mixed sample of 214 participants with FTD or from familial FTD kindreds (asymptomatic: CDR®+NACC‐FTLD = 0 [N = 101]; prodromal: 0.5 [N = 49]; symptomatic ≥1 [N = 51]; not measured [N = 13]) were asked to complete ALLFTD‐mApp tests on their smartphone three times within 12 days. They completed smartphone familiarity and participation experience surveys.ResultsIt was feasible for participants to complete the ALLFTD‐mApp on their own smartphones. Participants reported high smartphone familiarity, completed ∼ 70% of tasks, and considered the time commitment acceptable (98% of respondents). Greater disease severity was associated with poorer performance across several tests.DiscussionThese findings suggest that the ALLFTD‐mApp study protocol is feasible and acceptable for remote FTD research.HIGHLIGHTS The ALLFTD Mobile App is a smartphone‐based platform for remote, self‐administered data collection. The ALLFTD Mobile App consists of a comprehensive battery of surveys and tests of executive functioning, memory, speech and language, and motor abilities. Remote digital data collection using the ALLFTD Mobile App was feasible in a multicenter research consortium that studies FTD. Data was collected in healthy controls and participants with a range of diagnoses, particularly FTD spectrum disorders. Remote digital data collection was well accepted by participants with a variety of diagnoses.