Citations

Aortic dilation following single ventricle palliation is increasingly recognized, although its long-term clinical implications remain unclear. We present the case of a 38-year-old male born with a bicuspid aortic valve, d-transposition of the great arteries, ventricular septal defect, right ventricular hypoplasia with a straddling right atrioventricular valve. He was palliated with Fontan circulation and developed severe neo-aortic root and arch dilation with native aortic valve stenosis, requiring surgical intervention. His neo-aortic root measured 81 × 65 mm, necessitating a Bentall procedure with total arch and native aortic valve replacement. This case underscores the variable progression of aortic dilation in patients with palliated single ventricle physiology and the need for strict surveillance and individualized management. Larger cohort studies are needed to further refine the criteria for surgical intervention in this unique population.

When encountering diseases of the anterior vitreous and peripheral retina (ie, the “middle segment” of the eye), vitreoretinal (VR) surgeons are specifically trained in surgical techniques for managing the vitreous and visualizing the peripheral retina during anterior vitrectomy, and therefore, they are well equipped to address the complications of surgery involving the anterior vitreous space. This clinical update reviews and compares the current literature discussing techniques and patient outcomes related to complete pars plana vitrectomy versus incomplete, subtotal pars plana vitrectomy, and addresses the proposition of developing an abridged training curriculum for non-VR surgeons to acquire the knowledge and skills required to perform these procedures. Recent studies confirmed that operating in the anterior vitreous carries potential risk of retinal tear, retinal detachment, and other adverse events that may cause vision loss. To mitigate these risks, studies suggest that the use of dedicated visualization equipment and illumination instruments is necessary for surgeons to safely perform anterior vitrectomy and recognize complications, should any occur. Performing VR surgery in the absence of wide-angle viewing systems, endoillumination, careful peripheral examinations, modern vitrectomy platforms, and appropriate training may lead to outcomes that are detrimental to patient safety.

Introduction: Life-support limits (i.e., code status), the first step in the continuum of palliation and end-of-life (EoL) care, stem from decisions made by patients and their providers to align care near the EoL with patients’ wishes. The pandemic created health care strain that may have influenced life-support limitation practices among patients with serious COVID-19. In this study, we examine variations in life-support limitations (do-not-resuscitate, DNR; do-not-intubate, DNI) depending on the hospital and period of hospitalization. Methods: We included all adults admitted to a hospital in the United States with COVID-19 from January 2020 to December 2021 using the VIRUS registry. Our outcome was any life-support limitation on admission (DNR, DNI, or both) using regression modeling. Main exposures were hospital and period of hospitalization (early vs. late pandemic). Covariates included age, sex, race/ethnicity, comorbidities, and hospitalization diagnoses. Results: There were 42,383 patients from 75 hospitals in the US. The median age was 63 (interquartile range: 50–75), 46.5% were female, and 37.5% were non-Hispanic White. The life-support limitation rate was 7.9%, and the palliative care consultation rate was 2.3%. The odds of life-support limitation were 1.86 (95% CI: 1.6–2.1) depending on the hospital, but the period of hospitalization was not associated with odds of life-support limitation. Older age was associated with the greatest increased odds (4.1 per standard deviation ∼ 17.9 years, 95% CI: 3.9–4.4), followed by comorbidities including paralysis (2.4, 95% CI: 1.8–3.0) and dementia (2.3, 95% CI: 2.0–2.6). Conclusions: After adjusting for patient-level factors, we report significant inter-hospital but no temporal variation in life-support limitation upon admission with COVID-19. Future studies should investigate specific practices that led to health care resilience to temporal practice variations in life-support limitation during the pandemic.

Abstract Matrix-producing tumors of the sinonasal region are diagnostically challenging, with a large number of similar-appearing neoplasms having different prognoses, treatment strategies, and genetic syndrome associations. Osteochondromyxoma (OCM) is a very rare tumor known to be associated with Carney complex. Since its initial description in 2001, fewer than 20 cases have been reported, with the sinonasal tract being an apparently favored site. Herein we describe 6 new cases of sinonasal OCM.OCM cases with available slides were retrieved from the surgical pathology files of the authors’ practices. The tumors arose in 4 boys and 2 girls, ranging from 4 to 17 years (mean, 9.5 years). All presented with nasal obstruction and a mass. Radiologically the tumors presented as indolent-appearing, heterogeneous, calcified, expansile masses. Histologically the tumors all consisted of bland, normochromatic spindled to stellate cells in a myxoid to collagenized stroma, with variable amounts of cartilage and bone formation. Mitotic activity was very low and necrosis was absent. All demonstrated complete loss of PRKAR1A expression by immunohistochemistry. Of these 6 cases, 3 had been originally diagnosed as nasal chondromesenchymal hamartomas, and one as osteosarcoma. Treatment and follow up information were available for 5 patients: all were treated with surgery, with one also receiving chemotherapy after an initial osteosarcoma diagnosis. At the time of last clinical follow-up, all 5 patients were alive, one with residual disease. No patient was known to have other stigmata of Carney complex.Although rare, OCM preferentially occurs in the sinonasal tract, and therefore may be encountered by head and neck pathologists. Given their predilection for young patients and overlapping morphologic features, OCM are easily misdiagnosed as other matrix-forming sinonasal tumors, especially nasal chondromesenchymal hamartoma. Immunohistochemical demonstration of PRKAR1A loss is valuable for confirming an OCM diagnosis, which should prompt clinical investigation for the possibility of Carney complex.