Citations

AbstractLearning ObjectivesAfter completing this course, the reader will be able to:Explain the side effects of hormonal ablation therapy for prostate cancer. Provide a list of potential non-hormonal therapies for treatment of vasomotor symptoms. Appreciate the impact of hormonal ablation therapy on bone mineral density.Access and take the CME test online and receive one hour of AMA PRA category 1 credit at CME.TheOncologist.comAndropause, or the age-related decline in serum testosterone, has become a popular topic in the medical literature over the past several years. Andropause includes a constellation of symptoms related to lack of androgens, including diminished libido, decreased generalized feeling of well-being, osteoporosis, and a host of other symptoms. The andropause syndrome is very prominent in men undergoing hormonal ablation therapy for prostate cancer. Most significant in this population are the side effects of hot flashes, anemia, gynecomastia, depression, cognitive decline, sarcopenia, a decreased overall quality of life, sexual dysfunction, and osteoporosis with subsequent bone fractures. The concept of andropause in prostate cancer patients is poorly represented in the literature. In this article, we review the current literature on the symptoms, signs, and possible therapies available to men who cannot take replacement testosterone.

Abstract Learning Objectives After completing this course, the reader will be able to: Identify appropriate candidates for consideration of genetic testing for mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2. Explain the importance of appropriate patient counseling prior to proceeding with genetic testing for mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2, including genetic counseling and education regarding interpretation and implications of test results. Discuss risk management options for BRCA mutation carriers and the available evidence regarding their effectiveness. Access and take the CME test online and receive one hour of AMA PRA category 1 credit at CME.TheOncologist.com It is estimated that 5%–10% of all breast cancers in women are associated with hereditary susceptibility due to mutations in autosomal dominant genes, such as BRCA1 and BRCA2, p53, pTEN, and STK11/LKB1. Another 15%–20% of female breast cancers occur in women with a family history but without an apparent autosomal dominant inheritance pattern, and are probably due to other genetic factors with environmental influence. Approximately 7%–10% of ovarian cancers occur in women with hereditary susceptibility, primarily secondary to mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2, with smaller contributions from mutations in mismatch repair genes associated with the hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer and other, as yet undiscovered, genes.

AbstractLearning ObjectivesAfter completing this course, the reader will be able to:Derive a conceptual understanding of the classification as well as the pathogenesis of chronic myeloproliferative disorders with emphasis on myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia. Recognize how myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia is diagnosed and know what the differential diagnosis constitutes. Be familiar with current therapeutic options in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia.Access and take the CME test online and receive one hour of AMA PRA category 1 credit at CME.TheOncologist.comMyelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia is a hematologic disorder currently classified with polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia as a chronic myeloproliferative disease. The median age at diagnosis is 60 years, and more than 90% of patients are diagnosed after age 40 years. Clinical manifestations include massive splenomegaly, progressive anemia, profound constitutional symptoms, and extramedullary hematopoiesis. The diagnosis is confirmed by bone marrow examination after other causes of myelofibrosis are ruled out. Median survival is 5 years and causes of death include leukemic transformation. Prognosis is adversely affected by the presence of anemia (hemoglobin <10 g/dl), leukopenia or leukocytosis (white blood cells >30,000/μl), circulating blasts, and hypercatabolic symptoms. Conventional treatment is palliative and does not improve survival. In this regard, androgen preparations, corticosteroids, and erythropoietin are useful for the treatment of disease-associated anemia. Symptomatic splenomegaly is best managed by cytoreductive therapy or surgical removal. Radiation therapy is most useful in the treatment of nonhepatosplenic extramedullary hematopoiesis. New treatment approaches include the use of thalidomide alone or in combination with prednisone and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Abstract Learning Objectives After completing this course, the reader will be able to: Understand how evaluation of risk of relapse, results of clincial trials, risk/benefit ratio, and patient preference each contribute to the selection of appropriate adjuvant therapy of breast cancer. Understand the important prognostic and predictive factors in the adjuvant therapy of breast cancer. Understand the roles of local therapy, hormonal treatment, and chemotherapy in the adjuvant therapy of breast cancer. Understand the recommendations of the 2000 NIH Consensus Development Conference: Advances in Breast Cancer. Access and take the CME test online and receive one hour of AMA PRA category 1 credit at CME.TheOncologist.com Determining the optimal individual adjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer patients is a challenging undertaking because it requires translating data from clinical trials that have involved thousands of patients into a highly individualized, risk-adjusted approach for the patient at hand. Choosing adjuvant therapy for women with breast cancer includes consideration of four issues: A) evaluation of risk of relapse; B) extrapolation of results from clinical trials; C) therapeutic ratio, and D) the patient's preferences following a thorough discussion with her physician. Data from recently completed phase III adjuvant trials and worldwide consensus conferences document the benefits of adjuvant therapy in improving disease-free survival and overall survival for patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer >1.0 cm in size. The benefits of hormonal therapy are clear, but limited to patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Anthracyclines lead to improved outcomes compared with nonanthracycline regimens. Taxanes appear to improve disease-free survival in patients with node-positive disease, although longer follow-up is required to assess their impact on overall survival. Some countries have reported a reduction in the mortality rate from breast cancer over the past several years. The improved survival rate is due, at least in part, to the use of adjuvant systemic therapy. Ongoing studies are evaluating targeted therapies, with the potential of remarkably improving patient outcome.