Citations

Showing 10 of 107868 citations.

Migraine and Ischaemic Heart Disease and Stroke: Potential Mechanisms and Treatment Options
Swanson, JW

Mayo Clinic

Cephalalgia | July 26, 2007 | Volume: 27 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 988-990

10.1111/j.1468-2982.2007.01408.x Get It

Safety and Efficacy of Yttrium-90 Ibritumomab Tiuxetan in Older Patients With Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
Emmanouilides, Christos, Wiseman, Gregory A., Gordon, Leo I. , Schilder, Russell J., Saville, M. Wayne, Flinn, Ian W. , Molina, Arturo , Witzig, Thomas E. , Wang, Hua , Gordon, Leo I , Flinn, Ian W

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals | July 26, 2007 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 684-691

10.1089/cbr.2007.359 | PMID 17979571 Get It

Medline: A Guide to Effective Searching in PubMed & Other Interfaces, 2nd Edition.
Erwin, Patricia J., Perkins, William J., Warner, Mark A.

Mayo Clinic

Anesthesiology | July 25, 2007 | Volume: 107 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 360-361

10.1097/01.anes.0000271865.33903.be Get It

The Impact of Lack of Standardized Definitions on the Specialty
Warner, Mark A. , Monk, Terri G.

Mayo Clinic

Anesthesiology | July 25, 2007 | Volume: 107 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 198-199

10.1097/01.anes.0000271863.20091.60 | PMID 17667561 Get It

Impairment at rehabilitation admission and 1 year after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: A prospective multi-centre analysis
Brown, Allen W. , Malec, James F. , Diehl, Nancy N. , Englander, Jeffrey, Cifu, David X.

Mayo Clinic

Brain Injury | July 25, 2007 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 673-680

10.1080/02699050701468925 | PMID 17653941 Get It

Busulfan
Betcher, Donna L., O’Marcaigh, Aengus

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing | July 24, 2007 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 150-152

10.1177/104345429601300308 | PMID 8755444 Get It

Cyclosporine
Betcher, Donna L., O’Marcaigh, Aengus

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing | July 24, 2007 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 98-100

10.1177/104345429601300209 | PMID 8854993 Get It

Detection of Hypo‐N‐Glycosylation Using Mass Spectrometry of Transferrin
Lacey, Jean M., Bergen, H. Robert, O’Brien, John F.

Mayo Clinic

Current Protocols in Human Genetics | July 24, 2007 | Volume: 54 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/0471142905.hg1704s54 | PMID 18428410 Get It

AbstractMany congenital disorders of glycosylation (CDG) can be diagnosed by observing the extent of glycosylation of the abundant serum glycoprotein transferrin (Trf). Trf is an N‐glycosylated protein with two asparagine glycation sites. CDG types I are those genetic defects which occur prior to transfer of the complex oligosaccharide to the acceptor asparagine in the cotranslated polypeptide chain. CDG Ia constitutes by far the most frequent form of CDG and is the result of mutations in the phosphomannomutase gene. CDG Ia and the Ib subtype (Phosphomannoisomerase deficiency) result in low cellular mannose‐1‐phosphate levels, a required precursor for oligosaccharide assembly in the endoplasmic reticulum. The deficiency in oligosaccharides with branched mannose structures is thereafter expressed by the appearance of glycoproteins with unoccupied N‐glycosylation sites (hypoglycosylation). Currently, there have been at least 11 Type I defects, type Ia being by far the most frequently occurring. Most, if not all type I defects result in unoccupied N‐glycation sites. Hypoglycosylated Trf, also known as carbohydrate‐deficient Trf (CDT), can be detected using mass spectrometry (MS) to measure the masses of the serum Trf. The methods for sample preparation using affinity chromatography and MS analysis are described in this unit. Curr. Protoc. Hum. Genet. 54:17.4.1‐17.4.9 © 2007 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Structural basis of natural ligand binding and activation of the Class II G-protein-coupled secretin receptor
Dong, Maoqing , Gao, Fan , Miller, Laurence J. , Harikumar, Kaleeckal G.

Mayo Clinic

Biochemical Society Transactions | July 24, 2007 | Volume: 35 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 709-712

10.1042/bst0350709 | PMID 17635130 Get It

The secretin receptor is prototypic of Class II GPCRs (G-protein-coupled receptors), based on its structural and functional characteristics and those of its natural agonist ligand. Secretin represents a linear 27-residue peptide with diffuse pharmacophoric domain. The secretin receptor includes the typical signature sequences for this receptor family within its predicted transmembrane segments and the highly conserved six cysteine residues contributing to three intradomain disulfide bonds within its long N-terminus. This domain is critical for secretin binding based on receptor mutagenesis and photoaffinity labelling studies. Full agonist analogues of secretin incorporating a photolabile moiety at various positions throughout the pharmacophore covalently label residues within this region, while only N-terminal probes have labelled the core helical bundle domain. Combining insights coming from receptor structural studies, peptide structure–activity relationship considerations, photoaffinity labelling, and application of fluorescence techniques has resulted in the development of a working model of the secretin–receptor complex. This supports the initial docking of the peptide agonist within a cleft in the receptor N-terminus, providing the opportunity for an endogenous sequence within that domain to interact with the core of the receptor. This interaction is believed to be key in the molecular basis of conformational change associated with activation of this receptor. The site of action of this endogenous agonist could also provide a possible target for small molecule agonists to act.
Dynamic FoxO transcription factors
Tindall, Donald J., Huang, Haojie

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Cell Science | July 23, 2007 | Volume: 120 | Issue: 15 | Pages: 2479-2487

10.1242/jcs.001222 | PMID 17646672 Get It

Forkhead box O (FoxO) transcription factors FoxO1, FoxO3a, FoxO4 and FoxO6, the mammalian orthologs of Caenorhabditis elegans DAF-16, are emerging as an important family of proteins that modulate the expression of genes involved in apoptosis, the cell cycle, DNA damage repair, oxidative stress, cell differentiation, glucose metabolism and other cellular functions. FoxO proteins are regulated by multiple mechanisms. They undergo inhibitory phosphorylation by protein kinases such as Akt, SGK, IKK and CDK2 in response to external and internal stimuli. By contrast, they are activated by upstream regulators such as JNK and MST1 under stress conditions. Their activities are counterbalanced by the acetylases CBP and p300 and the deacetylase SIRT1. Also, whereas polyubiquitylation of FoxO1 and FoxO3a leads to their degradation by the proteasome, monoubiquitylation of FoxO4 facilitates its nuclear localization and augments its transcriptional activity. Thus, the potent functions of FoxO proteins are tightly controlled by complex signaling pathways under physiological conditions; dysregulation of these proteins may ultimately lead to disease such as cancer.