Citations

Introduction: Four randomized clinical trials have not demonstrated the superiority of anticoagulation over antiplatelet therapy in the prevention of recurrent embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS). In this multicenter observational cohort study, we evaluated long-term outcomes associated with various antithrombotic strategies according to potential embolic sources. Methods: A multicenter retrospective observational cohort of consecutive adult patients with ESUS was queried (n=27 sites). Comparisons were made between patients treated with single or combination antiplatelet therapy versus anticoagulation (direct oral anticoagulant, vitamin K antagonist, low molecular weight heparin) with or without antiplatelet therapy initiated within 7 days of stroke. The primary composite outcome of recurrent stroke, major bleeding, or death was assessed using unadjusted and adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression, with clustering by site. Causal inference was assessed using inverse probability of treatment weighted regression adjustment (IPTWRA), accounting for propensity for antiplatelet treatment, with effect estimates summarized as the average treatment effect (ATE) over time (in days). Adjusted models accounted for age, stroke severity, vascular risk factors, and major categories of potential embolic sources. Results: Of the 2201 included patients (n=218 treated with anticoagulation) followed over a median of 564 days (interquartile range [IQR] 154-1124), the median age was 65y (IQR 54-74) and 49.8% were female. Patients treated with anticoagulation were older with more frequent previous stroke, concomitant left ventricular dysfunction, and more severe deficits. Over 4541 person-years of follow-up, the annualized incidence rate of the primary outcome was 14.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.6%-15.8%). Compared to anticoagulation, antiplatelet(s) use was not associated with a lower risk of the primary outcome in the adjusted Cox model (HR 0.91, 95% CI, 0.64-1.29) or in the IPTWRA model (average treatment effect 0.14, 95% CI, -1376.6 to 1376.9). Major bleeding events trended toward significance in the adjusted Cox model (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.25-1.04) but were no different with IPTWRA (ATE 58.9, 95% CI, -125.4 to 243.2). Conclusions: These results validate the observations of randomized trials indicating a lack of benefit of anticoagulation over antiplatelet therapy in ESUS. A more detailed analysis of heterogeneity of treatment effect is under way.

Background: It is known that there are discrepancies between insurance status and access to care for a variety of health conditions. In addition, differences have been shown in initial in-hospital management of stroke as well as outcomes in the acute setting. We sought to examine the relationship between insurance status and risk of recurrent stroke, major bleeding or death following an incident cryptogenic stroke. Methods: Patients with cryptogenic stroke included in a multicenter (n=27 sites) retrospective observational cohort and complete insurance status were evaluated for a primary composite outcome of recurrent stroke, major bleeding, or death. Insurance providers were categorized by Private/Veterans Administration, Medicare, Other, and Medicaid/pending/None, with the primary carrier ranked in that order when multiple insurance carriers applied. Descriptive statistics and an adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression were used to associate the primary insurance provider with the composite outcome, and with each unique secondary outcome, adjusting for age, stroke severity, pre-stroke disability, atherosclerotic risk factors, and potential embolic sources (e.g., patent foramen ovale). Results: Of the 2201 patients, 2006 (91.1%) had reported insurance information and were followed for a median of 1.50 years (interquartile range [IQR 0.41 - 2.99y]). The majority of patients were primary Medicare beneficiaries (42.3%), followed by private insurance (36.7%), Medicaid/none (18.1%) and Other (2.9%). Although there were important differences in demographic and neurodiagnostic results across insurance groups, compared to Private/VA beneficiaries, beneficiaries for Medicaid/pending/none had a higher rate of the composite outcome in adjusted regression (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.35, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.69) which was driven largely by the higher rate of recurrent stroke (adjusted HR 1.33, 95%CI, 1.02-1.73) with no significant difference in rate of major bleeding or death (p>0.05 for both). Conclusions: Independent of age, race, pre-existing disability, and atherosclerotic risk factors, insurance status was independently predictive of recurrent stroke in this diverse cohort of cryptogenic stroke.

AbstractINTRODUCTIONPlasma amyloid beta42/amyloid beta40 (Aβ42/Aβ40) and phosphorylated tau217 (p‐tau217) identify individuals with primary Alzheimer's disease (AD). They may detect AD co‐pathology in the setting of other primary neurodegenerative diseases, but this has not been systematically studied.METHODSWe compared the clinical, neuroimaging, and neuropathological associations of plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 (mass spectrometry), p‐tau217 (electrochemiluminescence), and neurofilament light ([NfL], single molecule array [Simoa]), as markers of AD co‐pathology, in a sporadic frontotemporal dementia (FTD) cohort (n = 620).RESULTSAβ42/Aβ40 showed no clinicopathological associations. High p‐tau217 was present in amnestic dementia (AmD) presumed to be due to FTD, logopenic primary progressive aphasia (lvPPA), and APOEε4 carriers, and correlated with worse baseline and longitudinal clinical scores, lower hippocampal volumes, and more severe AD co‐pathology (Braak Stage). NfL was elevated in all FTD phenotypes, and correlated with clinical scores and frontotemporal brain volumes.DISCUSSIONPlasma p‐tau217 has clinical, neuroimaging, and neuropathological correlates in sporadic FTD and may identify FTD cases with AD co‐pathology.Highlights Alzheimer's disease (AD) features could be identified with plasma phosphorylated tau217 (p‐tau217) in frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). Plasma p‐tau217 is a better discriminator of AD co‐pathology and AD‐associated features in FTLD than plasma amyloid beta42/amyloid beta40 (Aβ42/Aβ40) and neurofilament light (NfL). In FTLD, plasma p‐tau217, but not Aβ42/Aβ40 or neurofilament light, has phenotypical, neurocognitive, and neuroimaging correlates suggestive of AD co‐pathology.

Abstract Background Mycobacterium abscessus complex (MABC) is a difficult-to-treat infection due to antibiotic resistance. Our study aimed to assess omadacycline’s (OMC) clinical and microbiological outcomes for the treatment of pulmonary MABC. Methods A retrospective study was carried out across 12 US medical institutions from 1/2018-4/2023 to examine the clinical outcomes, and tolerability of OMC treatment for pulmonary MABC. Patients aged ≥ 18 years who were treated with OMC for ≥ 3 months were included. The primary outcome was clinical success at 3, 6, and 12 months. The secondary outcomes were sputum culture conversion rate, adverse effects, and clinical success by subspecies and macrolide susceptibility. Results Thirty-five patients were included in this analysis. Most patients were female (74.3%) and Caucasian (74.3%), with a median (IQR) age of 61 years (51–70). Subspeciation was performed for 22 isolates with predominant M. abscessus subspecies (77.3%). Moreover, coinfection with other NTM species was present in 28.6% of cases where Mycobacterium avium complex was present in 8 cultures. Sixty-eight percent of the MABC isolates were confirmed to be macrolide resistance; half (12/24, 50.0%) were evident by the presence of functional erm gene, while the other half by antimicrobial susceptibility (Table 3). Of the remaining isolates, 14% were macrolide-susceptible, while no information was reported in 17%. The median (IQR) treatment duration of OMC was 8 months (3.9 – 15.7). The most commonly co-administered antibiotics were intravenous amikacin, imipenem/cilastatin, inhaled amikacin and clofazimine with the same percentage (42.9%) (Table 1). Overall, MABC clinical success was observed in 71.4%, 89.7%, and 90.9% in 3-, 6- and 12 months, respectively (Table 3). Adverse effects reported in 34.3%. The most common side effects were gastrointestinal intolerance (25.7%) and hepatoxicity (11.4%), which led to drug discontinuation in 22.9%. Conclusion OMC treatment showed clinical success in > 70% of patients with pulmonary MABC including patients with macrolide resistant strains for more than 3 months. However, larger studies are needed to validate the outcomes beyond 12 months. Disclosures Kaylee E. Caniff, PharmD, BCIDP, T2Biosystems: Honoraria Michael J. Rybak, PharmD, PhD, MPH, Abbvie, Melinta, Sionogi, Merck, T2Biosystems: Advisor/Consultant|Abbvie, Melinta, Sionogi, Merck, T2Biosystems: Grant/Research Support|Abbvie, Melinta, Sionogi, Merck, T2Biosystems: Speaker

Background and Aims: Metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease affects about a third of adults worldwide and is projected soon to be the leading cause of liver cirrhosis. It occurs when fat accumulates in hepatocytes and can progress to metabolic dysfunction–associated steatohepatitis, liver cirrhosis, and HCC. Metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease pathogenesis is believed to involve a combination of genetic and environmental risk factors. Single nucleotide polymorphisms have been implicated, but non-syndromic monogenic causes are lacking. Approach and Results: We identified a novel genetic variant in a familial case of metabolic dysfunction–associated steatohepatitis and performed deep variant functional analysis, including protein modeling, dynamics, and cell-based assays to assess molecular mechanisms of dysfunction and altered cellular signaling. We analyzed exome sequencing data of 3904 individuals with steatotic liver disease (SLD) to identify additional cases and establish the link between specific gene variants and SLD diagnosis. We discovered and functionally validated the NM_000245.4:c.3505A>T; p.(Ile1169Phe) variant in the MET (mesenchymal-epithelial transition) kinase domain as a monogenic cause of SLD. Subsequently, we detected additional ultra-rare, previously uninterpreted, and likely deleterious variants in MET from screening sequencing data. Among individuals with confirmed SLD based on electronic record review, 1.1% (45/3904) had rare predicted deleterious MET variants. Eight of 45 (17.7%) individuals had predicted deleterious variants in the MET kinase domain confirmed to be functionally like the familial case variant. Conclusions: We report the first germline nonmalignant rare MET -driven disease, a monogenic form of SLD.

LBA14 Background: CALGB/SWOG 80702 previously showed that the addition of celecoxib to standard adjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFOX did not significantly improve disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with stage III colon cancer. Here, we evaluated the prognostic and predictive value of ctDNA in identifying a subpopulation of patients who may benefit from celecoxib. Methods: In the subset of patients with adequate biospecimens who participated in CALGB/SWOG 80702, a randomized phase III trial of 3 versus 6 months of adjuvant 5-FU, leucovorin, oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) +/- celecoxib, ctDNA assessment was performed using a clinically validated, tumor-informed 16-plex mPCR-NGS assay (Signatera(TM), Natera, Inc.) after surgery and before the start of adjuvant therapy (baseline). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to describe the distribution of survival time based on ctDNA positivity and log-rank testing was performed. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine unadjusted associations between ctDNA positivity and disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Two-sided P values equal to or less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant, except for interaction P values (tested with a likelihood ratio). Results: In total, 1,011 of the 2,526 patients who participated in 80702 had ctDNA testing results from baseline; 189 were ctDNA positive (18.7%). ctDNA positivity associated with male sex, higher T stage, and N2 (versus N1) stage. ctDNA positivity was significantly associated with worse DFS (hazard ratio [HR] 6.52 [95% confident interval (CI) 5.09-8.34; p<0.0001] and OS (HR 6.28 [95% CI 4.63-8.51; p<0.0001]). Three-year DFS was 86.6% in ctDNA-negative cases and 36.8% in ctDNA-positive cases. Among patients who were ctDNA negative, celecoxib use was not significantly associated with worse DFS as compared to placebo (HR 0.75 [95% CI 0.54-1.05; p=0.095]) with a three-year DFS of 87.7% versus 85.5%, respectively. Among ctDNA-positive patients, celecoxib significantly improved DFS compared to placebo (HR 0.59 [95% CI 0.42-0.85; p=0.004]) with a three-year DFS of 44.1% versus 26.6% (P interaction = 0.25). Similar results were seen for overall survival with a hazard ratio of 0.86 (95% CI 0.56-1.33; p=0.49) for ctDNA negative cases and 0.63 (95% CI 0.41-0.96; p=0.028) for ctDNA-positive cases for celecoxib versus placebo (P interaction = 0.28). Conclusion: In a randomized phase III adjuvant therapy trial for stage III colon cancer, ctDNA was highly prognostic of DFS and OS. ctDNA positivity also appeared predictive of the benefit of adjuvant celecoxib for DFS and OS. These results suggest a potential role for ctDNA in determining which patients should consider celecoxib in addition to standard FOLFOX adjuvant therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT01150045 .

668 Background: After the approval of 177Lu DOTATATE, a new generation of radiopharmaceutical therapies (RPT) utilizing alpha-emitting radiometals is being developed as front-line therapies for advanced NETs with the hope of higher clinical efficacy. In this Phase I study, [ 212 Pb]VMT-α-NET, a novel targeted alpha radionuclide therapy (TAT) to SSTR2, is being evaluated in SSTR2-expressing NETs tumors in patients with no prior PRRT treatment. Here we present interim safety and the first efficacy results from dose escalation cohorts 1 and 2. Methods: In this first-in-human dose-escalation study, safety, PK, and efficacy of [ 212 Pb]VMT-α-NET were investigated in a population of well-differentiated adult NETs of any grade which progressed after prior standard of care therapy as assessed by RECIST v1.1 (NCT05636618). No patient may have received prior 177 Lu-DOTATATE or PRRT. The dose escalation design includes four cohorts, 3 mCi, 5 mCi, 7.5 mCi and 10 mCi based on a Bayesian modified toxicity probability interval (mTPI-2) design. Subjects in cohorts 1 and 2 underwent dosimetry evaluations using the therapeutic surrogate [ 203 Pb]VMT-a-NET. Therapeutic [ 212 Pb]VMT-a-NET was administered for 4 cycles Q8W in combination with reno-protective amino acids. The DLT assessment period is defined as the first 6 weeks of cycle 1. The primary objectives include the evaluation of safety and tolerability, the PK and RP2D of [ 212 Pb]VMT-a-NET as well as ORR as assessed by RECIST 1.1 criteria. Results: The current data cut occurred on September 19 th , 2024. A total of 9 patients were enrolled (2 in cohort 1 and 7 in cohort 2). Median exposure for cohort 1 was 2.5 mCi (2.5 mCi, 2.5 mCi) and for cohort 2 was 5.1 mCi (4.7 mCi, 5.2 mCi). No DLTs were observed. Two grade 3 AEs occurred in Cohort 2 (diarrhea, syncope). The most frequent related TEAE were alopecia, fatigue, anemia, lymphopenia and nausea (all grade 1 or 2). One subject in Cohort 2 was discontinued due to progressive disease. Landmark PFS at 9 months is 89%. ORR is not yet mature and will be shown at the time of the meeting. Safety Monitoring Committee (SMC) meeting was held on July 17 th , 2024, recommended dose escalation to cohort 3 at 7.5 mCi. No nephrotoxicity was reported in either cohort. Conclusions: [ 212 Pb]VMT-α-NET is safe up to 185 MBq (5 mCi) dose level, and the SMC supported dose escalate to cohort 3 at 277.5 MBq (7.5 mCi) following a mandated FDA review in fall. Cohort 2 remains open for dose level expansion. Early efficacy results demonstrate encouraging progression-free survival. Clinical trial information: NCT05636618 .

666 Background: In the phase 3 CABINET trial (NCT03375320), cabozantinib (CABO) significantly prolonged median progression-free survival (PFS) compared to placebo (PB) in patients with advanced, previously treated, progressive extrapancreatic NET (epNET) [HR 0.38 (95% CI, 0.25-0.59, P<0.0001)] and pancreatic NET (pNET) [HR 0.23 (95% CI, 0.12-0.42, P<0.0001)] (Chan et al., NEJM, 2024). In this analysis, we focus on outcomes of patients with epNET arising in the GI tract. Methods: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic epNET or pNET were randomized 2:1 in separate cohorts to receive CABO 60 mg daily vs PB. The epNET cohort included patients with tumors arising in the GI tract (not including pancreas), lung, unknown primary, and other rare primary sites. In this subgroup analysis of the epNET cohort, patients with GI NET were included. Eligibility included progression by RECIST within 12 months (mo) prior to registration, ≥ 1 prior systemic therapy. Primary endpoint: PFS by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary endpoints: objective response rate, overall survival, safety. Results: 116 of the 203 patients in the epNET cohort had GI NET (CABO, n=70; PB, n=46). Median age was 66 yrs; females: 46%; G1/G2/G3/unknown grade: 35%/57%/6%/2%. ECOG performance status: 0/1-2: 43%/57%. White race: 86%. The most common primary tumor locations were ileum/cecum (54%), small intestine with location not specified (20%); non-cecum colon or rectum (11%), stomach (4%); duodenum (3%); jejunum and nonspecified midgut site (3% each). Prior systemic therapies included somatostatin analogs (SSA) (100%), everolimus (59%); Lu-177 dotatate (77%); temozolomide +/- capecitabine (16%). In patients with GI NET, CABO was associated with improved PFS by BICR compared to PB (stratified HR, 0.50; 95% CI: 0.28-0.88, 1-sided stratified log-rank P=0.007). Median PFS with cabozantinib was 8.5 mo (95% CI, 6.0-16.7) compared to 5.6 mo (95% CI, 3.9-11.0) with PB. CABO demonstrated potential benefit in patients with midgut GI NET and across clinical factors including grade, functional status related to hormone secretion, concurrent SSA use, and prior therapy with Lu-177 dotatate or everolimus. The most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events attributed to therapy with CABO included hypertension (19%), diarrhea (13%), fatigue (10%). Conclusions: CABO is associated with improvement in PFS compared to PB in patients with advanced GI NET. Potential benefit was observed across clinical factors including grade, functional status, concurrent SSA, and prior treatment. The safety profile for CABO in patients with GI NET is consistent with that previously reported. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882; U10CA180820 (ECOG-ACRIN), U10CA180868 (NRG Oncology), U10CA180888 (SWOG); Exelixis; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org . Clinical trial information: NCT03375320 .

766 Background: BASECAMP-1 (NCT04981119) is a pre-screening study to identify patients with tumor-associated human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A*02 loss of heterozygosity (LOH) for interventional studies, such as EVEREST-2 (NCT06051695), a phase 1/2 study of logic-gated chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy for MSLN-expressing cancers. MSLN is a cell surface protein expressed in several cancer types, including mesothelioma (MESO), colorectal (CRC), non-small cell lung (NSCLC), ovarian (OVCA), and pancreatic (PANC) cancer, which can be associated with poor prognosis (1). Longitudinal clinical, genomic, and biomarker data were collected from patients enrolled in BASECAMP-1, providing a large dataset for translational discovery and propensity scoring. The aim of this analysis was to determine whether MSLN expression measured by RNAseq and IHC are correlated among patients with solid tumors. Methods: In BASECAMP-1, tumor tissue from patients with germline heterozygous HLA-A*02 is tested for HLA-A*02 LOH using an investigational next generation sequencing device codeveloped with Tempus Labs (Lozac'hmeur, et al. NPJ Precis Oncol. 2024) that detects somatic alterations, including HLA LOH, and generates RNAseq data (eg, MSLN expression). Gene-level transcripts per million read (TPM) values were determined and the log2 TPM +1 was displayed in a scatter plot (the mean and standard deviation [SD] are provided in the Table). Patients with HLA-A*02 LOH also submit tissue for IHC testing for exploratory biomarkers (eg, MSLN expression using anti-MSLN clone 5B2). Statistical significance was determined with ANOVA or t-tests. Results: As of June 1, 2024, 314 patients had been screened for BASECAMP-1 and had RNAseq results; 34 patients also had MSLN IHC results. MSLN expression by RNAseq was consistently higher in patients with PANC or OVCA vs CRC or NSCLC ( P <0.001). MSLN expression by RNAseq and IHC were correlated overall ( P <0.001), particularly among patients with PANC and OVCA. Among the 8 patients with OVCA or PANC who were IHC+ for MSLN, only 1 had an RNAseq value below 6 log2 TPM+1; this patient had mesonephric-like ovarian adenocarcinoma, which may account for the low value. The one MESO sample with both RNAseq and IHC available was IHC+ and had a high RNAseq value. Conclusions: This analysis demonstrated high correlation between RNAseq and IHC MSLN expression in tumor tissue. 1. Faust, et al. Cancers. 2022. Clinical trial information: NCT04981119 . MSLN expression by RNASeq by tumor type and IHC status. Tumor Overall (N=314) IHC data available (n=34) MSLN Positive MSLN Negative n Mean TPM a (SD) n Mean TPM a (SD) n Mean TPM a (SD) All 314 5.1 (2.3) 20 6.0 (2.1) 14 2.3 (1.7) adNSCLC 33 3.8 (2.4) 2 4.7 (1.7) 7 1.5 (1.3) sqNSCLC 4 3.1 (1.8) 0 0 MESO 4 4.5 (4.2) 1 5.7 0 CRC 148 4.4 (2.0) 8 5.1 (2.1) 7 3.1 (1.6) PANC 100 6.1 (1.8) 3 7.8 (0.6) 0 OVCA 25 7.2 (2.1) 5 6.6 (2.8) 0 a MSLN log2 transcripts per million+1. ad, adenocarcinoma; sq, squamous.

TPS788 Background: MSLN is a desirable candidate for targeted therapy given its limited expression in normal tissues and its overexpression in several malignancies, including PANC, mesothelioma, non-small cell lung, and ovarian cancers (TCGA 2022). MSLN-targeted CAR T and T-cell receptor therapies have shown promising clinical activity; however, on-target, off-tumor toxicity, including fatal events, have occurred (1-3). Autologous logic-gated Tmod CAR T therapies address the challenges of on-target, off-tumor toxicity by combining 2 CARs: activating and blocking receptors. The activator recognizes a tumor-associated antigen present on the surface of both tumor and normal cells; the blocker prevents CAR T activity when it binds HLA-A*02, which is present in normal cells and often lost in tumor cells. Thus, in patients with tumor-associated HLA-A*02 LOH, the blocker prevents on-target, off-tumor toxicity on normal cells due to retained HLA-A*02 expression (4). HLA-A*02 LOH is observed in various solid tumors, including ~20% of PANC (5). Two autologous CAR T therapies are currently under investigation: A2B530, targeting carcinoembryonic antigen, in the EVEREST-1 trial, and A2B694, targeting MSLN, in the EVEREST-2 trial, described herein. A2B694 may provide a therapeutic window to treat patients with PANC and other MSLN-expressing solid tumors exhibiting HLA-A*02 LOH due to its unique discriminatory mechanism. Methods: EVEREST-2 (NCT06051695) is a first-in-human, phase 1/2, open-label, nonrandomized study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of A2B694 for recurrent unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic cancers with MSLN expression, including PANC. Eligible patients must have exhausted options of potentially curative therapy and have recurrent disease. Enrollment to EVEREST-2 occurs through the prescreening study BASECAMP-1 (NCT04981119), in which patients with tumor-associated HLA-A*02 LOH are identified via next-generation sequencing (Tempus AI, Inc) and leukapheresis product is collected. A2B694 is manufactured from cryopreserved T cells when clinically appropriate for patients. The primary objective of phase 1 is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of A2B694 and identify the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). The dose-expansion phase will confirm RP2D and collect biomarker data to further characterize A2B694. Phase 2 will assess the primary endpoint overall response rate per RECIST v1.1 and secondary endpoints progression-free survival and overall survival. The first patient was dosed on April 24, 2024 and dose escalation is ongoing. 1. Beatty, et al. Gastroenterology . 2018. 2. Haas, et al. Mol Ther . 2023. 3. Hong, et al. ESMO 2021. Abstr 9590. 4. Hamburger, et al. Mol Immunol . 2020. 5. Hecht, et al. J Clin Oncol . 2022. Clinical trial information: NCT06051695 .