Citations

ABSTRACT Aldose reductase inhibitors (ARI) have been identified as a potential treatment for phosphomannomutase‐2 congenital disorder of glycosylation (PMM2‐CDG), a serious condition for which no treatments are approved. We treated a single patient for 36 months 30 months of age at enrollment, under a single‐patient investigational new drug expanded access request, with govorestat (AT‐007), a novel, highly selective, once daily, brain penetrant ARI at a starting dose of 1 mg/kg oral suspension, which was escalated to 30 mg/kg. The primary endpoint was safety. Secondary assessments included liver transaminases, factor XI, antithrombin III, and whole blood and urine sorbitol. Clinical outcomes were also assessed, including Nijmegen Pediatric CDG Rating Scale (NPCRS), Bayley Scales of Infant Development, and Vineland Adaptive Behavioral Scale. Govorestat was well tolerated; no adverse effects were noted. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels improved from a pre‐treatment 12‐month average of 205 and 268 U/L to 63 and 68 U/L, respectively, averaged over 36 months of govorestat treatment at 30 mg/kg. Antithrombin III and factor XI fluctuated with illness throughout the study period but overall increased by 60%–100%, approaching the normal range (> 83% activity) at the 5 mg/kg dose. Whole blood sorbitol decreased in a dose‐dependent fashion, normalizing at the 30 mg/kg dose. The NPCRS improved by 9 points (46%) over the course of treatment. In conclusion, our patient tolerated govorestat without safety concerns. Improvements in liver transaminases, clotting factors, and whole blood sorbitol were observed along with improvements in clinical measures. These findings support further study of govorestat as a potential treatment for PMM2‐CDG.

Abstract Molecular profiling reveals that up to 40% of advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs) harbor actionable genomic alterations amenable to matched targeted therapies. However, conventional trial designs typically evaluate these agents in pretreated populations, resulting in approvals for later-line use. Notably, 25–44% of patients with advanced BTC may become ineligible for treatment after first-line therapy due to disease progression or functional decline, thus the real-world survival outcomes with matched therapies remains poorly characterized. This international collaborative study includes data from Mayo Clinic, Duke Cancer Institute, and National Cancer Center East (Japan), as well as a combined dataset from the SCRUM-Japan GOZILA, MONSTAR-SCREEN-1, and MONSTAR-SCREEN-2 projects. We assessed overall survival (OS) of patients based on the presence of actionable alterations and the receipt of matched therapy. To adjust for confounding, we applied propensity score weighting with inverse probability of treatment and multivariate Cox regression modeling, controlling for age, sex, tumor location, prior resection, and mutational subgroup. Among 1,049 patients that were analyzed, 358 (34.1%) harbored actionable alterations, with 160 (44.7%) receiving matched targeted therapy. The matched group (patients with actionable tumors who received a matched therapy) were significantly associated with longer median OS (23.3 months; 95% CI: 19.5–30.4) compared to the unmatched group (14.7 months; 95% CI: 12.8–17.9) and those with non-actionable tumors (17.1 months; 95% CI: 15.5–18.7; HR 0.57, 95% CI: 0.46–0.71; p < 0.0001). The unmatched group also was associated with the lowest three-year OS rate (13% vs. 35% in matched and 19% in actionable groups, respectively; p<0.0001). On multivariable analysis with patients who received ≥2 lines of therapy, receipt of matched therapy remained an independent predictor of improved OS (HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.43–0.90). These findings support the early integration of targeted therapies in BTC management and underscore the need to overcome systemic barriers to treatment access.

The clinical courses of 51 patients with postherpetic pain who were referred to the Pain Clinic were reviewed. Twenty-three patients were treated on a trial basis with an intensive series of sensory and sympathetic blocks, whereas 28 control patients, who were seen before the initiation of this study, were treated with other modalities. Fifteen control patients (54%) were disabled by postherpetic neuralgia, as compared with four patients (17%) in the trial group.

Background and Objectives Epinephrine-containing test doses for detection of intravascular injection during epidural anesthesia may be unreliable or hazardous in beta-blocked, elderly, or pregnant patients. Subtoxic injections of lidocaine have been used as an alternative marker of intravascular injection in unpremedicated patients. We studied two groups of premedicated patients and unpremedicated subjects to evaluate the reliability of the local anesthetics bupivacaine (B) and 2-chloroprocaine (2-CP) as test dose injections. Methods Thirty ASA I and II subjects received blinded randomized injections of 2-CP, B, or normal saline via a peripheral vein. Results In group I, 10 healthy unpremedicated volunteers universally recognized injection of 90 mg 2-CP or 25 mg B, but did not reliably detect the injection of 60 mg 2-CP. In group II, 20 patients premedicated with 1 μg/kg fentanyl and 30 μg/kg midazolam could not reliably detect similar injections. Sixteen responded to the injection of 90 mg 2-CP, while 13 detected the 25 mg B test dose. A blinded observer rated only 12 of the subjective reports as conclusive of detection of intravascular injection after each drug. There were no false-positive reports in any group. Conclusions While 90 mg 2-CP or 25 mg B may be reliable alternatives to epinephrine test doses in unpremedicated subjects, they are unreliable indicators of intravascular injection in the premedicated patient.

Morphine sulfate, a narcotic analgesic, possesses the undesirable side effects of central depression, tolerance, and dependency. Opiate receptors have been found in the brain and the spinal cord. Intrathecally applied opiates produce potent analgesia that can be antagonized by naloxone. The time-response study with tail-flick response after intrathecal injections of a small dosage of morphine (25 μg) demonstrated a long-lasting analgesia. Intrathecal injections of morphine or opiate-like peptides may become a predictable modality of pain relief without attendant loss of other neurologic function.

During a 3-year period, 51 patients with upperextremity reflex sympathetic dystrophy were studied. Of 20 patients managed by conservative methods, nine (45%) showed signs of improvement 3 years after onset of the syndrome. Of 31 patients treated with repeated stellate ganglion blocks, 23 (74%) had improved at the 3-year evaluation. Management of both the potential causes and the symptoms of reflex sympathetic dystrophy is necessary. Although sympathetic blocks failed to improve all cases, they should be considered as one of the important methods for the management of reflex sympathetic dystrophy.