Citations

Intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) accumulates in the lower leg musculature of healthy older adults. IMAT was negatively associated with the rate of glucose infusion during a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp and muscle oxidative capacity. Exercise training decreased IMAT to a greater extent in young compared with older adults. Together these data support the implication that IMAT accumulation is linked with metabolic derangements in older adults but the restorative potential of exercise in older adults needs further evaluation.

Background Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) can be associated with ventricular arrhythmias (VA), but little is known about the relationship between VA and exercise in these patients. The aim of this study was to assess the occurrence and severity of VA during exercise tests in patients with MVP, and to explore the association between VA during exercise and the occurrence of arrhythmic events during follow-up. Methods In this multicentre study, 375 patients with MVP (58 (48–69) years, 53% male) who underwent a clinically indicated exercise test were included. Severity of VA during exercise was defined as: (1) no VA, (2) minor VA (premature ventricular contractions ≥5% or non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (nsVT) <120 beats per minute) and (3) major VA (nsVTs ≥120 beats per minute). Results During exercise test, 242 (65%) patients showed no VA, 88 (24%) minor VA and 45 (12%) major VA. Patients with minor and major VAs showed more often bileaflet prolapse and mitral annular disjunction (MAD) than patients with no VA (p<0.001). Over a median follow-up of 101 months (IQR 58–138 months), 35 patients (9%) developed a severe arrhythmic event, defined as sustained VA or ventricular fibrillation, implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and VA ablation. At the Kaplan-Meier curve analysis, patients with major VA showed the worst arrhythmic event-free survival (log-rank p<0.001). On multivariable analysis, left ventricular end-systolic diameter, MAD and VA severity during exercise were independently associated with this outcome. Conclusions In patients with MVP, the occurrence of VA during exercise is associated with more advanced mitral valve abnormalities, including MAD, and with higher rates of severe arrhythmic events during follow-up. Performing an exercise test, combined with the clinical and echocardiographic assessments, may therefore offer important complementary information useful for patient management.

Objectives: This trial served as a proof-of-concept for whether inhibition of protein kinase C iota (PKCι) with auranofin and sirolimus provide antineoplastic effects in patients with recurrent high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Methods: This drug combination was administered to patients with recurrent high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Dosing was based on unpublished phase 1 data and consisted of auranofin 6 mg and sirolimus 5 mg both orally per day of a 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint was tumor response. Available tumor tissue was assessed for PKCι protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and PRKCI copy number by fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) after the start of cancer therapy. Results: Twenty-two patients were enrolled, and 21 were evaluable for all clinical trial endpoints. One patient was unevaluable because she did not receive a full chemotherapy cycle. No tumor responses were seen in the first 21 patients, resulting in early trial termination per a priori trial design. The median progression-free survival was 2.1 months (95% CI: 1.8-3.7). The median overall survival was 4.4 months (95% CI: 2.6-12.5). Fourteen (67%) patients had at least one grade 3 or worse adverse event. Nineteen of 21 evaluable patients had available tumor tissue, which showed the median PKCι copy number averaged per cell of 3 (range: 2 to 7), and PKCι expression (at least 1+) in all. Conclusions: As prescribed here, auranofin and sirolimus manifested no antineoplastic activity in patients with recurrent high-grade serous ovarian cancer that expressed PKCι.

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and perceived efficacy of cannabidiol (CBD) products in patients presenting to an orthopedic hand and upper extremity clinic. Materials and Methods: New patients seen for an initial surgical consultation between July and December 2022 were surveyed regarding CBD use, pain, and function. Pain was measured with the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS, 0–10) and function with the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE, 0–100). Demographic and clinical factors were collected via chart review. Results: A total of 918 patients completed the survey (53% female; mean age 63 years, range 18–97). Joints involved included elbows (106), wrists (335), and hands/fingers (667). Common diagnoses included arthritis (199), tendinopathy (273), and nerve-related conditions (160). Overall, 15% (135/918) reported prior CBD use, and 39% (53/135) perceived pain relief. CBD users were more likely to be female (65% vs 51%; P =0.003), to present with wrist pathology (44% vs 35%; P =0.038), and to have arthritis (36% vs 19%; P <0.001). Compared to non-users, CBD users reported higher pain scores (mean NPRS 6.2 vs 5.1; P <0.001) and lower contralateral function (mean SANE 77.3 vs 87.4; P <0.001). Conclusions In this cohort, CBD use was uncommon, and only a minority of users reported subjective benefit. CBD users tended to report higher pain and worse function, particularly in the setting of wrist arthritis. CBD products did not appear to provide measurable objective improvement in pain or function. Further studies are needed to clarify optimal dosing, administration, and potential role in upper extremity care.

Background/Objectives: Treating critically ill patients is complex and often subjective. This study investigates adherence to clinical guidelines for sepsis among different providers. Considering the strengths of the recommendations, we hypothesize that heterogeneity in the decision-making process will be low and independent of provider background and psychological makeup. Methods: This cohort study used two clinical vignettes of sepsis. Providers were given standardized treatment plans for 7 days, and their responses were recorded. Demographical, professional, and psychological (ambiguity tolerance, defensiveness, anxiety due to uncertainty, risk-taking behavior, decision styles, and optimism) variables were acquired. Results: Crystalloids were commonly used in both vignettes. Pressor engagement, especially norepinephrine, increased significantly after the third day. Providers recommended antibiotics and no provider stopped antibiotic therapy. Cluster analysis revealed no differences in therapy implementation among provider types, but some differences existed between the two vignettes. Cluster #1 was characterized by the implementation of early light bundle therapy combined with the use of pressors and a notable enhancement in therapies by the fifth day (Early Cluster). Cluster #2 (Minimalists) involved consistent engagement only in light bundle therapy throughout the treatment period. Cluster #3 (Escalation) comprised providers who rapidly escalated treatment using multiple different modalities. Cluster #3 stood out as most providers were female, non-MD, with significant ICU duties, and enhanced rational thinking. Conclusions: Providers differ in implementation styles of the sepsis treatment standard based on types of therapies selected not studied psychological variables.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic exenteration is the treatment of choice for selected patients with locally advanced primary and recurrent rectal cancer. Involvement of major pelvic neurovascular structures and bone was historically considered a contraindication due to unacceptably high rates of morbidity and low R0 resection rates. OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of these “high-complexity” exenterative resections to those of “conventional” pelvic exenteration. DESIGN: International multicenter retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS: Sixteen specialized exenteration centers. PATIENTS: Those who underwent total pelvic exenteration for locally advanced primary and recurrent rectal cancer between 2018 and 2023 at participating centers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Perioperative resource utilization, morbidity, mortality, and R0 resection rates were reported. RESULTS: Seven hundred sixty-three patients underwent total pelvic exenteration, of whom 478 (63%) and 285 (37%) required conventional and high-complexity procedures, respectively. High-complexity pelvic exenteration was associated with longer operating time (600 vs 480 minutes, p < 0.001 for locally advanced primary rectal cancer, 623 vs 480 minutes, p < 0.001 for locally recurrent rectal cancer), intensive care stay (2 vs 1 day, p < 0.001 and 3 vs 1 day, p < 0.001), hospital stay (19 vs 15 days, p = 0.008 and 23 vs 15 days, p < 0.001), and higher blood loss (2000 vs 1236 mL, p < 0.001 and 3000 vs 1600 mL, p < 0.001). Morbidity and mortality outcomes and R0 resection rates were similar between the groups. LIMITATIONS: Generalizability of findings outside of expert units. CONCLUSIONS: High-complexity pelvic exenteration for the treatment of rectal cancer is associated with similar morbidity, mortality, and R0 resection rates, but it has a significantly higher operative time, blood loss, and hospital resource utilization compared to conventional pelvic exenteration. In high-volume, specialized centers, these techniques are considered the standard of care for appropriately selected patients with tumors that involve major pelvic bone or neurovascular structures. See Video Abstract . EXENTERACIÓN PÉLVICA TOTAL CONVENCIONAL FRENTE A EXENTERACIÓN PÉLVICA TOTAL DE ALTA COMPLEJIDAD PARA EL CÁNCER RECTAL LOCALMENTE AVANZADO Y LOCALMENTE RECURRENTE: UN ESTUDIO MULTICÉNTRICO INTERNACIONAL ANTECEDENTES: La exenteración pélvica es el tratamiento de elección para determinados pacientes con cáncer rectal primario y recurrente localmente avanzado. La afectación de las principales estructuras neurovasculares y óseas pélvicas se consideraba históricamente una contraindicación debido a las tasas inaceptablemente altas de morbilidad y a las bajas tasas de resección R0. OBJETIVO: Comparar los resultados de estas resecciones exenteración «de alta complejidad» con los de la exenteración pélvica «convencional». DISEÑO: Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo multicéntrico internacional. ENTORNOS: Dieciséis centros especializados en exenteración. PACIENTES: Aquellos que se sometieron a una exenteración pélvica total por cáncer rectal primario y recurrente localmente avanzado entre 2018 y 2023 en los centros participantes. PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADOS: Se informaron la utilización de recursos perioperatorios, la morbilidad, la mortalidad y las tasas de resección R0. RESULTADOS: 763 pacientes se sometieron a una exenteración pélvica total, de los cuales 478 (63 %) y 285 pacientes (37 %) requirieron procedimientos convencionales y de alta complejidad, respectivamente. La exenteración pélvica de alta complejidad se asoció con un tiempo quirúrgico más prolongado (600 frente a 480 minutos, p < 0,001 para el cáncer rectal primario localmente avanzado, 623 frente a 480 minutos, p < 0,001 para el cáncer rectal localmente recurrente), estancia en cuidados intensivos (2 frente a 1 día, p < 0,001 y 3 frente a 1 día, p < 0,001), estancia hospitalaria (19 frente a 15 días, p = 0,008 y 23 frente a 15 días, p < 0,001) y mayor pérdida de sangre (2000 frente a 1236 ml, p < 0,001 y 3000 frente a 1600 ml, p < 0,001). Los resultados de morbilidad y mortalidad, así como las tasas de resección R0, fueron similares entre los grupos. LIMITACIONES: Generalización de los resultados fuera de las unidades especializadas CONCLUSIONES: La exenteración pélvica de alta complejidad para el tratamiento del cáncer de recto se asocia con tasas similares de morbilidad, mortalidad y resección R0, pero con un tiempo quirúrgico, una pérdida de sangre y una utilización de recursos hospitalarios significativamente mayores en comparación con la exenteración pélvica convencional. En centros especializados con un gran volumen de casos, estas técnicas se consideran el tratamiento estándar para pacientes adecuadamente seleccionados con tumores que afectan a los huesos pélvicos principales o a las estructuras neurovasculares. ( AI-generated translation )

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a medical emergency affecting up to 25% of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), with colectomy required in approximately 25–30% of cases during the initial admission. Intravenous corticosteroids remain the first-line therapy, though one-third of patients do not respond, necessitating rescue with infliximab or calcineurin inhibitors, which are both supported by randomized trials and guideline recommendations. Comparative studies and meta-analyses have shown similar efficacy between these agents, while sequential use is associated with higher adverse event rates and should be restricted to specialized centers. Recent data have refined infliximab use, with the PREDICT-UC trial showing no superiority of intensified dosing over standard regimens. Emerging therapies are under investigation: vedolizumab has been used as maintenance following calcineurin induction; ustekinumab has shown benefits in retrospective UC cohorts, particularly after cyclosporine; and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors represent the most recent addition. The randomized TACOS trial and the prospective TRIUMPH study demonstrated an improved short-term response with tofacitinib in steroid-refractory ASUC, and real-world reports suggest promising outcomes with upadacitinib. While infliximab and cyclosporine remain as standard rescue therapies, ongoing trials with novel agents are likely to broaden treatment options. This review summarizes the clinical features, initial management, and the role of advanced therapies in ASUC.