Citations

Introduction Diabetes mellitus is the most common metabolic complication of pregnancy and its prevalence worldwide is rising. The number of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) being conducted in people with diabetes is also increasing. Many studies preferentially publish findings on clinical endpoints and do not report patient-reported outcomes (PROs). In studies that do include PROs, PRO reporting is often of poor quality. Methods We will conduct this systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Using a combination of medical subject headings and keywords (combined using Boolean operators), we will search web-based databases (PubMed, Cochrane and EMBASE) for RCTs published in English between 2013 and 2021. Two reviewers will review titles and abstracts. We will review the full texts of any relevant abstracts and extract the following data: date of publication or recruitment period, journal of publication, country of study, multicentre or single centre, population and number of participants, type of intervention, frequency of PRO assessment and type of PRO (or PRO measurement) used. We will also record if the PRO was a primary, secondary or exploratory outcome. We will exclude reviews, observational studies, unpublished data for example, conference abstracts and trial protocols. Any published RCT that includes data on a PRO as a primary or secondary outcome will then be compared against the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials—Patient-Reported Outcome extension checklist, a structured and approved framework for the publication of results of PROs. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval to conduct this study was obtained from the ethics committee at Galway University Hospitals on 24 March 2021 (CA 2592). We aim to publish our findings in a peer-reviewed journal and present our findings at national and international conferences. Systematic review registration This systematic review was registered prospectively with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). Registration number CRD42021234917.

In prediabetes, anthropometric characteristics as well as insulin action do not alter the hepatic response to glucagon. The postprandial suppression or lack of suppression of glucagon secretion is an important factor governing postprandial glucose tolerance independent of insulin secretion.

Abstract Background and aims Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are uncommon, but highly lethal, gastrointestinal malignancies. Gemcitabine/cisplatin is a standard‐of‐care systemic therapy, but has a modest impact on survival and harbors toxicities, including myelosuppression, nephropathy, neuropathy, and ototoxicity. Whereas BTCs are characterized by aberrations activating the cyclinD1/cyclin‐dependent kinase (CDK)4/6/CDK inhibitor 2a/retinoblastoma pathway, clinical use of CDK4/6 inhibitors as monotherapy is limited by lack of validated biomarkers, diffident preclinical efficacy, and development of acquired drug resistance. Emerging studies have explored therapeutic strategies to enhance the antitumor efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors by the combination with chemotherapy regimens, but their mechanism of action remains elusive. Approach and results Here, we report in vitro and in vivo synergy in BTC models, showing enhanced efficacy, reduced toxicity, and better survival with a combination comprising gemcitabine/cisplatin and CDK4/6 inhibitors. Furthermore, we demonstrated that abemaciclib monotherapy had only modest efficacy attributable to autophagy‐induced resistance. Notably, triplet therapy was able to potentiate efficacy through elimination of the autophagic flux. Correspondingly, abemaciclib potentiated ribonucleotide reductase catalytic subunit M1 reduction, resulting in sensitization to gemcitabine. Conclusions As such, these data provide robust preclinical mechanistic evidence of synergy between gemcitabine/cisplatin and CDK4/6 inhibitors and delineate a path forward for translation of these findings to preliminary clinical studies in advanced BTC patients.

BackgroundPregestational diabetes mellitus (PGDM) is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Studies assessing interventions to improve maternal and infant outcomes have increased exponentially over recent years. Several outcomes in this field of maternal diabetes are rare, making it difficult to synthesise evidence.ObjectivesTo collect outcomes reported in studies assessing treatment interventions in pregnant women with PGDM.Search strategyCENTRAL, Web of Science, Medline, CINAHL, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov from their inception until 27 January 2020.Selection criteriaAny randomised controlled trial assessing treatment interventions in pregnant women with PGDM reported in English.Data collection and analysisTwo independent reviewers assessed the suitability of articles and retrieved the data. Outcomes extracted from the literature were broadly categorised into maternal, fetal/infant or other outcomes by the study advisory group.Main resultsSixty‐seven of the 1475 studies identified fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The median number of outcomes reported per study was 15 (range 1–46). The majority of studies were from North America and Europe. Insulin and metformin were the most commonly investigated pharmacological interventions. Glucose monitoring was the most assessed technological intervention. In all, 131 unique outcomes were extracted: maternal (n = 69), fetal/infant (n = 61) and other (n = 1).ConclusionsOutcome reporting in treatment interventions trials of pregnant women with PGDM is varied, making it difficult to synthesise evidence, especially for rare outcomes. Systems are needed to standardise outcome reporting in future clinical trials and so facilitate evidence synthesis in this area of maternal diabetes.RegistrationThe systematic review was registered prospectively with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database (Registration number CRD42020173549).Tweetable abstractOutcome reporting is heterogeneous in intervention trials of pregnant women with diabetes existing before pregnancy.

Objective To develop a core outcome set (COS) for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effectiveness of interventions for the treatment of pregnant women with pregestational diabetes mellitus (PGDM). Design A consensus developmental study. Setting International. Population Two hundred and five stakeholders completed the first round. Methods The study consisted of three components. (1) A systematic review of the literature to produce a list of outcomes reported in RCTs assessing the effectiveness of interventions for the treatment of pregnant women with PGDM. (2) A three‐round, online eDelphi survey to prioritise these outcomes by international stakeholders (including healthcare professionals, researchers and women with PGDM). (3) A consensus meeting where stakeholders from each group decided on the final COS. Main outcome measures All outcomes were extracted from the literature. Results We extracted 131 unique outcomes from 67 records meeting the full inclusion criteria. Of the 205 stakeholders who completed the first round, 174/205 (85%) and 165/174 (95%) completed rounds 2 and 3, respectively. Participants at the subsequent consensus meeting chose 19 outcomes for inclusion into the COS: trimester‐specific haemoglobin A1c, maternal weight gain during pregnancy, severe maternal hypoglycaemia, diabetic ketoacidosis, miscarriage, pregnancy‐induced hypertension, pre‐eclampsia, maternal death, birthweight, large for gestational age, small for gestational age, gestational age at birth, preterm birth, mode of birth, shoulder dystocia, neonatal hypoglycaemia, congenital malformations, stillbirth and neonatal death. Conclusions This COS will enable better comparison between RCTs to produce robust evidence synthesis, improve trial reporting and optimise research efficiency in studies assessing treatment of pregnant women with PGDM. Tweetable abstract 165 key stakeholders have developed #Treatment #CoreOutcomes in pregnant women with #diabetes existing before pregnancy.

Abstract BackgroundIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic, progressive pulmonary disease characterized by aberrant tissue remodeling, formation of scar tissue within the lungs and continuous loss of lung function. The areas of fibrosis seen in lungs of IPF patients share many features with normal aging lung with cellular senescence being one. The contribution of the immune system to the etiology of IPF remains poorly understood. Evidence obtained from animal models and human studies suggests that innate and adaptive immune processes can orchestrate existing fibrotic responses. Currently, there is only modestly effective pharmacotherapy for IPF. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)-based therapies have emerged as a potential option treatment of IPF. This study explores the possibility of using autologous MSCs as an IPF therapy and present an attempt to determine if the disease occurring in the lungs can be reflected on peripheral blood immune status. MethodsComprehensive characterization of autologous adipose derived MSCs (aMSCs) from five IPF patients and five age and gender matched Healthy Controls (HC) was done using flow cytometry, Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR), Multiplex Luminex xMAP technology and confocal microscopy. For assessing the self renewal capacity and osteogenic differentiation IncuCyte Live Cell Imaging technology was used. Multi-parameter quantitative flow cytometry of un-manipulated whole blood of another group of 15 IPF patients and 87 (30 age and gender matched) HC was used to analyze 110 peripheral phenotypes.ResultsThere are no differences between autologous aMSCs from IPF patients and HC in their stem cell properties, self renewal capacity, plasticity for osteogenic differentiation, secretome content, cell cycle inhibitor marker levels and mitochondrial health. IPF patients had altered peripheral blood immunophenotype including reduced B cells subsets, increased T cell subsets, and increased granulocytes among others demonstrating clear and significant differences.ConclusionsOur results indicate that there is no difference in aMSCs properties from IPF patients and HC, suggesting that autologous aMSCs may be an acceptable option for IPF therapy.Characterization of peripheral immune phenotype may be a valuable indicator for successful therapy, and for potentially staging the disease.

e16185 Background: Comprehensive sequencing efforts have identified fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) translocations in numerous cancers. FGFR2 fusions were recently identified as an actionable therapeutic target in ̃17% of cholangiocarcinoma patients, predominantly found in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Genomic partners for FGFR fusions are variable. In addition, obtaining high yield tissue biopsies for CCA remains challenging and tumor tissue available for molecular analyses is scarce. When combined, these two factors make detection of FGFR fusions in CCA challenging. An accurate molecular assay to detect FGFR fusions in CCA could improve utilization of FGFR-targeted therapies. Methods: The objective of our study was to develop an approach for targeted RNA analysis to improve sensitivity for FGFR fusion detection from limited tumor material. We adapted the sensitive targeted digital sequencing (TARDIS) approach recently developed in our lab for analysis of RNA. This approach utilizes a combination of open-ended targeted amplification followed by ligation, enabling detection of tyrosine kinase fusions without prior knowledge of the precise sequence of the fusion breakpoint or identity of the fusion partner. For evaluation of analytical performance, we analyzed RNA from a CCA organoid model with a known FGFR2 fusion, and Seraseq Fusion RNA Mix v3 Reference Material with two known FGFR3 fusions. Results: Without prior knowledge the partner or coordinates of the fusion breakpoint, we detected an FGFR2-KIF5C fusion in RNA from a CCA organoid model. The fusion breakpoint coordinates predicted by TARDIS-RNA were validated by comparison with RNA-Seq. To assess sensitivity and quantitative performance of the assay, we analyzed a serial dilution of the reference RNA sample from Seraseq with concentration of RNA molecules representing candidate fusions verified by digital PCR. Using TARDIS-RNA to analyze replicates with 5 ng RNA input, we were able to detect candidate fusions represented by as few as 2.7 fusion molecules on average. Concentrations of fusion molecules measured using the two methods were highly correlated (R = 0.96). Conclusions: These results demonstrate sensitivity and quantitative performance of a targeted RNA sequencing assay to detect and quantify FGFR fusions in tumor specimen from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. On-going work is focused on further evaluating assay performance and characterizing FGFR fusions using additional tissue specimen.