Citations

AbstractBackgroundUsing an objective mathematical algorithm to assess corticolimbic involvement of neurofibrillary tangle pathology, we identified three AD subtypes: hippocampal sparing (HpSp) AD, typical AD, and limbic predominant AD. Typical AD brains were representative of the expected patterns of hippocampal and cortical involvement as outlined by Braak tangle stage. In contrast, we discovered an extreme phenotype that exists outside of the Braakian‐concept of neurofibrillary tangle patterns. Hippocampal sparing AD cases demonstrate unexpected sparing of the hippocampus relative to severely involved association cortices and limbic predominant AD cases demonstrate inundation of the hippocampus relative to mildly involved association cortices. Using these AD subtypes, our objective was to leverage our understanding of disease spectrum to uncover transcriptomic changes that underlie selective vulnerability of the hippocampus in AD.MethodWe performed RNA‐sequencing in 40 neuropathologically diagnosed AD cases (10 HpSp, 20 Typical and 10 Limbic) and 15 controls to uncover gene expression changes associated with phenotype differences allowing us to prioritize 44 genes for further exploration. Validation with NanoString and quantification with digital pathology were performed in an expanded cohort of 158 AD cases (36 HpSp, 79 Typical and 35 Limbic) and 32 controls. We quantified digital pathology measures of early tangle pathology (CP13), mature tangle pathology (Ab39), amyloid‐β (33.1.1). In addition, we measured cellular markers for microglia (CD68), endothelia (CD34), and astroglia (GFAP). Deep learning based prediction models were employed, which nominated the SLC38A2 gene as a predictor of AD.ResultThe SLC38A2 gene was originally prioritized in our RNA‐sequencing data based upon differential expression between controls and typical AD. We observed upregulation of SLC38A2 in all AD subtypes. RNA‐seq gene expression measures validated well with NanoString for SLC38A2 (R=0.97, p<0.001). Regression analysis identified early tangle (p=0.011) and late tangle measures (p=0.026) as significant predictors of gene expression, but not amyloid measures (p=0.74). Microgliosis approached significance (p=0.052), but with no contribution from endothelial cell burden (p=0.17) or astrogliosis (p=0.58). Age approached significance (p=0.06), but not sex (p=0.88) or APOE‐ε4 status (p=0.10).ConclusionOur data supports consideration of intra‐disease divergence with regard to case stratification and may reveal genes previously masked by heterogeneity of cohorts.

Background: Myocardial injury results in release of cardiac troponin (cTn) into the bloodstream, readily detected by high-sensitivity cTn (hs-cTn) assays. A noninvasive, rapid, home-based test to exclude acute myocardial injury at the time of the test and for the next 7 hours would help manage patients with suspected myocardial infarction. Since myocyte injury is associated with ECG changes, we hypothesized an artificial intelligence ECG (AI-ECG) could identify absence of injury. Objective: To train and test an AI-ECG convolutional neural network (CNN) to identify patients using a single ECG who are suspected of myocardial infarction who are low risk, with hs-cTn levels below the 99 th percentile at test time and for the subsequent 7 hours. Methods: A CNN tuned to identify the absence of a hs-cTnT (5 th Gen cTnT Roche Diagnostics) >15ng/L for men and >10ng/L for women was developed. All ECGs were recorded within one hour of the hs-cTnT assay. We used 73,012 ECGs and hs-cTnT pairs from 47,542 unique patients to train the network, 9031 ECGs from 5,811 patients for internal validation to optimize hyperparameters, and 11,904 ECGs with 21,191 hs-cTnT measurements up to 7 hours after the ECG, from 11,904 different patients as a holdout test set. Results: The mean age was 63.9±17.5 years, and 30,348 of the 59,446 patients (51%) were male. 5,852 patients (49.1%) had no elevation of hs-cTnT and 6,052 (50.9%) had an hs-cTnT above the 99 th percentile at baseline or within 7 hours of the test. Of the 11,904 patients in the test set, using a sensitive threshold, the 12 lead AI ECG identified 1037 patients (8.7%) likely to have a low risk for subsequent hs-cTnT increases > 99 th % (AUC 0.86), and the single lead ECG identified 685 patients. Of the 1037 low risk pts, 59 had an hs-cTnT > 99 th percentile within 7 hours. The mean maximum hs-cTnT among the 59 low-risk patients was 53 ng/L ± 92 vs 184 ng/L ± 1474 in the others. None of these low risk patients died within 14 days of the test. Conclusion: Use of the AI ECG to identify patients without cardiac injury at the time of the test and for 7 subsequent hours is feasible. This may permit rapid, point of care, home-based, bloodless, painless testing to exclude cardiac injury, facilitating care and management of patients with suspected ischemia.

Background: High-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays quantify cTn in patients at very low concentrations. Myocyte injury due to ischemia or other pathologies cause blood levels to increase, which is prognostic. A noninvasive, rapid, broadly available, home-based test to detect hs-cTn increases would facilitate risk-stratification. Since myocyte injury is associated with ECG changes, we hypothesized an artificial intelligence ECG (AI-ECG) could non-invasively predict current or impending hs-cTnT elevations. Objective: To develop an AI-ECG convolutional neural network (CNN) to detect an abnormal hs-cTnT (5 th Gen cTnT, Roche Diagnostics) concentration using a 12-lead ECG, and a single lead ECG (lead I), which would enable smartphone, home-based detection. Methods: We developed single lead and 12-lead ECG CNNs to detect a) hs-cTnT concentrations that were at or above the 6ng/L limit that can be reported b) above the 99 th percentile upper limits of >15ng/L for men and >10ng/L for women. All ECGs were recorded within one hour of the hs-cTnT measurements. We used 73,012 ECG and hs-cTnT pairs from 47,542 unique patients to train the network, 9031 ECGs from 5,811 patients for internal validation to optimize hyperparameters, and 18,276 ECG and hs-cTnT pairs from 11,904 different patients as a holdout test set to determine the area under the receiver-operator curve (AUC). Results: The mean age was 63.9±17.5 years, and 30,348 of the 59,446 patients (51%) were male. Of the 91,288 hs-cTnT pairs 73,271 (80.2%) were above 6ng/L and 50,799 (55.6%) are above the 99 th percentile. In the test set, the AUC for the detection of a hs-cTnT level higher than 6ng/L was 0.88 using the 12 lead ECG and 0.834 with the single lead. For the detection of hs-cTnT level above of 99 th percentile, the 12 lead ECG AUC was 0.853 and the single lead was 0.806. Conclusion: The AI-ECG permits detection of levels of hs-cTnT consistent with myocardial injury. This may allow a home-based, non-invasive test that would be massively scalable and could further enhance rapid-risk stratification and patient triage with potentially significant cost reductions and enable novel triage strategies at sites without hs-cTn assays.

Background: Identification of systolic heart failure among patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute dyspnea is challenging. The reasons for dyspnea are often multifactorial. A focused physical evaluation and diagnostic testing can lack sensitivity and specificity. The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of an artificial intelligence-enabled ECG to identify patients presenting with dyspnea who have left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD). Methods: We retrospectively applied a validated artificial intelligence-enabled ECG algorithm for the identification of LVSD (defined as LV ejection fraction ≤35%) to a cohort of patients aged ≥18 years who were evaluated in the ED at a Mayo Clinic site with dyspnea. Patients were included if they had at least one standard 12-lead ECG acquired on the date of the ED visit and an echocardiogram performed within 30 days of presentation. Patients with prior LVSD were excluded. We assessed the model performance using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Results: A total of 1606 patients were included. Median time from ECG to echocardiogram was 1 day (Q1: 1, Q3: 2). The artificial intelligence-enabled ECG algorithm identified LVSD with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.86–0.91) and accuracy of 85.9%. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value were 74%, 87%, 97%, and 40%, respectively. To identify an ejection fraction <50%, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.85 (95% CI, 0.83–0.88), 86%, 63%, and 91%, respectively. NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) alone at a cutoff of >800 identified LVSD with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.76–0.84). Conclusions: The ECG is an inexpensive, ubiquitous, painless test which can be quickly obtained in the ED. It effectively identifies LVSD in selected patients presenting to the ED with dyspnea when analyzed with artificial intelligence and outperforms NT-proBNP. Graphic Abstract: A graphic abstract is available for this article.

Background: Comorbidity-driven microvascular inflammation is posited as a unifying pathophysiologic mechanism for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Obesity is proinflammatory and common in HFpEF. We hypothesized that unique obesity-inflammation HFpEF phenotypes exist and are associated with differences in clinical features, fibrosis biomarkers, and functional performance. Methods: Patients (n=301) from 3 HFpEF clinical trials were studied. Unsupervised machine learning (hierarchical clustering) with obese status and 13 inflammatory biomarkers as input variables was performed. Associations of clusters with HFpEF severity and fibrosis biomarkers (PIIINP [procollagen III N-terminal peptide], CITP [C-telopeptide for type I collagen], IGFBP7 [insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-7], and GAL-3 [galectin-3]) were assessed. Results: Hierarchical clustering revealed 3 phenotypes: pan-inflammatory (n=129; 64% obese), noninflammatory (n=83; 55% obese), and obese high CRP (C-reactive protein; n=89; 98% obese). The pan-inflammatory phenotype had more comorbidities and heart failure hospitalizations; higher left atrial volume, NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide), and fibrosis biomarkers; and lower glomerular filtration rate, peak oxygen consumption, 6-minute walk distance, and active hours/day ( P <0.05 for all). The noninflammatory phenotype had the most favorable values for all measures. The obese high CRP phenotype resembled the noninflammatory phenotype except for isolated elevation of CRP and lower functional performance. Hierarchical cluster assignment was independent of CRP genotype combinations that alter CRP levels and more biologically plausible than other clustering approaches. Multiple traditional analytic techniques confirmed and extended the hierarchical clustering findings. Conclusions: Unique obesity-inflammation phenotypes exist in HFpEF and are associated with differences in comorbidity burden, HFpEF severity, and fibrosis. These data support comorbidity-driven microvascular inflammation as a pathophysiologic mechanism for many but not all HFpEF patients.

OBJECTIVE To distinguish the effects of hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia on exercise-induced increases in Rd and endogenous glucose production (EGP) in type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We studied six participants without diabetes and six participants with type 1 diabetes on three visits in random order for the following: euglycemia, low insulin (EuLoI); euglycemia, high insulin (EuHiI); and hyperglycemia, low insulin (HyLoI). Glucose fluxes were measured using [6,6-2H2] glucose before, during, and after 60 min of exercise. RESULTS Rd increased (P &lt; 0.01) with exercise within groups, while peak Rd during exercise was lower (P &lt; 0.01) in participants with type 1 diabetes than participants without diabetes during all visits. In type 1 diabetes participants, EGP increased (P &lt; 0.001) with exercise during EuLoI and HyLoI but not during EuHiI. This demonstrates that hyperinsulinemia, but not hyperglycemia, blunts the compensatory exercise-induced increase in EGP in type 1 diabetes. CONCLUSIONS The data from this pilot study indicate that 1) exercise-induced compensatory increase in EGP was inhibited in participants with type 1 diabetes with hyperinsulinemia but not with hyperglycemia; 2) in contrast, in participants without diabetes, exercise-induced increase in EGP was inhibited only during combined hyperinsulinemia and hyperglycemia. Taken together, these results suggest that low insulin coupled with euglycemia or modest hyperglycemia appear to be the most favorable milieu for type 1 diabetes during exercise.