Citations

Abstract Dermatomyositis is driven by overactivation of type I and II interferons and other proinflammatory cytokines that signal via the JAK-STAT pathway. We conducted a 12-week, open-label study of brepocitinib, an oral TYK2/JAK1 inhibitor, in five adults with severe cutaneous dermatomyositis. Treatment was associated with rapid, clinically meaningful improvement in cutaneous disease activity. Single-cell and spatial transcriptomic profiling of lesional skin showed marked suppression of interferon-responsive pathways and inflammatory cell states by week 4. Together with findings from a Phase 3 randomized trial in DM patients with skin and muscle involvement (VALOR, NCT05437263 ), these data support TYK2/JAK1 inhibition as a promising therapeutic strategy for DM.

Abstract Objectives Carbapenem resistance is a growing public health crisis with regional variability in incidence. We characterized the susceptibility of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative rods (CR-GNRs) from the Pacific Northwest to five reserve beta-lactam agents including cefiderocol and aztreonam-avibactam. Methods A panel of 162 CR-GNRs from unique patients were tested against cefiderocol, aztreonam-avibactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam, with a subset of isolates derived from patients with bacteraemia (n = 55). Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was performed on representative Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates displaying a range of cefiderocol MICs (n = 9). Results Among all isolates, the MIC50 and MIC90 to cefiderocol was 0.25 and 4 mg/L, respectively, compared with 4 and >64 mg/L for aztreonam-avibactam. Overall, 98.3% of S. maltophilia (n = 60), 91.2% of Enterobacterales (n = 34) and 88.5% of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 26) isolates were susceptible to cefiderocol, while 78.6% of other non-fermenters had MICs ≤4 mg/L. Aztreonam-avibactam and cefiderocol exhibited similar activity against Enterobacterales and S. maltophilia, but aztreonam-avibactam was less active against other organisms. WGS of S. maltophilia isolates with elevated cefiderocol MICs identified disruptive mutations in PBP-encoding genes (mrcB/PBP1b and pbpC/PBP1c) that were not observed in highly susceptible isolates. The bacteraemia cohort had many comorbidities and a 29% 30 day all-cause mortality. In this cohort, cefiderocol demonstrated the highest in vitro activity as extrapolated from MICs, followed by ceftazidime-avibactam, aztreonam-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam, respectively. Conclusions Cefiderocol exhibited the greatest in vitro activity against various CR-GNRs species in a Pacific Northwest population enriched for severely ill patients. Susceptibility to other agents was more variable among tested organisms.

Abstract Background Small vessel vasculitides (SVV) comprise a heterogeneous group of cutaneous SVV (CSVV) that can be skin‐limited or systemic. Given their diverse forms and symptoms and the lack of a standardized diagnostic approach, it is crucial to establish clear and consensus‐driven recommendations for diagnosis. Objectives To standardize diagnosis for the detection of the type, extent, potential causes or underlying conditions of CSVV. Methods International experts comprised the panel. The Delphi panel data was collected through two rounds of questionnaires. Agreement was measured using an 11‐point Likert scale (0 = strongly disagree, 10 = strongly agree). A 7‐vote minimum was required for agreement on each statement. Delphi panel statements scoring 3–7 were discussed during the meeting. Results 20 experts participated in the first round of the Delphi panel, while 17 experts took part in the second. They agreed that the diagnosis of CSVV relies on a combination of clinical manifestations, laboratory findings and histopathology. Palpable purpura on the lower extremities is recognized as the most reliable hallmark for most SVV and a sign of immune complex vasculitis. When the latter is suspected, a skin biopsy for direct immunofluorescence (DIF) should be obtained from an early, partially blanchable macule because the type of perivascular immunoglobulin is important for further diagnosis. The proper selection of biopsy sites for routine HE biopsy depends on the morphology of lesions. A comprehensive medical history and selected laboratory testing should be conducted to investigate organ involvement, potential causes and associated conditions. The extent of diagnostic procedures should be based on the severity, duration, systemic symptoms and recurrence of SVV. Conclusions Experts reached a strong consensus on the management of CSVV patients, culminating in the first International Consensus Statement for adult CSVV. This statement proposes a practical management algorithm and underscores the importance of collaboration in rare diseases management.

Objective To provide evidence‐based and expert guidance for the treatment and management of non‐renal systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); treatment and management of lupus nephritis are addressed in a separate guideline. Methods Clinical questions for treatment and management of SLE were developed in the PICO format (population, intervention, comparator, and outcome). Systematic literature reviews were developed for each PICO question, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to assess evidence quality and formulate recommendations. The Voting Panel achieved a consensus of ≥70% agreement on the direction (for or against) and strength (strong or conditional) of each recommendation. Results We present recommendations and ungraded, consensus‐based good practice statements for the treatment and management of SLE that are applicable to pediatric and adult patients. Recommendations emphasize uniform treatment with hydroxychloroquine, limiting duration of glucocorticoid use, and early introduction of conventional and/or biologic immunosuppressive therapies to achieve and maintain control of SLE inflammation (remission or a low level of disease activity), reduce SLE‐related morbidity and mortality, and minimize medication‐related toxicities. Conclusion This guideline presents direction regarding treatment and management of SLE and provides a foundation for well‐informed, shared clinician–patient decision‐making. These recommendations should not be used to limit or deny access to therapies, as treatment decisions may vary due to the unique clinical situation and personal preferences of each person with SLE.

Objective To provide evidence‐based and expert guidance for the treatment and management of non‐renal systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); treatment and management of lupus nephritis are addressed in a separate guideline. Methods Clinical questions for treatment and management of SLE were developed in the PICO format (population, intervention, comparator, and outcome). Systematic literature reviews were developed for each PICO question, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to assess evidence quality and formulate recommendations. The Voting Panel achieved a consensus of ≥70% agreement on the direction (for or against) and strength (strong or conditional) of each recommendation. Results We present recommendations and ungraded, consensus‐based good practice statements for the treatment and management of SLE that are applicable to pediatric and adult patients. Recommendations emphasize uniform treatment with hydroxychloroquine, limiting duration of glucocorticoid use, and early introduction of conventional and/or biologic immunosuppressive therapies to achieve and maintain control of SLE inflammation (remission or a low level of disease activity), reduce SLE‐related morbidity and mortality, and minimize medication‐related toxicities. Conclusion This guideline presents direction regarding treatment and management of SLE and provides a foundation for well‐informed, shared clinician–patient decision‐making. These recommendations should not be used to limit or deny access to therapies, as treatment decisions may vary due to the unique clinical situation and personal preferences of each person with SLE.

Objective A patient‐centered approach for chronic disease management, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), aligns treatment with patients’ values and preferences, leading to improved outcomes. This paper summarizes how patient experiences, perspectives, and priorities informed the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 2024 Lupus Nephritis (LN) and 2025 SLE screening, treatment guidelines. Methods We completed a cross‐sectional qualitative study using content analysis of two Patient Panel meetings for the ACR LN and SLE guidelines. Key themes were presented by Patient Panel representatives during Voting Panel Meetings along with evidence for each recommendation, to ensure comprehensive discussions and align treatment recommendations with patients’ priorities and values. Results Nineteen people (90% women) with diagnoses of SLE and/or LN participated in the Patient Panels and 17 consented to use their feedback for analysis. Thematic analysis of their discussions revealed nine patient‐reported key themes in three domains: (1) treatment and monitoring of LN and SLE: medication side effects, daily function, treatment goals, and monitoring and screening; (2) clinical communication: strategies to optimize communication and provider and structural impediments to effective communication; and (3) improving transparency and information sharing: clinical trial participation, and medical costs and insurance coverage. These themes were actively incorporated into discussions during the Voting Panels for the ACR LN and SLE guidelines. Conclusion This work supported the integration of patient experiences in the clinical practice guideline development process and aligned recommendations with real‐world patient experiences and priorities, thereby enhancing the clinical applicability of the ACR LN and SLE guidelines. image

Abstract Objectives The lack of uniform terminology and abbreviations for anti-synthetase syndrome has led to significant challenges in research and clinical practice. This study aimed to establish an international consensus on a standardized nomenclature and abbreviation among a diverse group of global myositis experts and patient representatives. Methods This qualitative project was approved by the International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Group (IMACS). Based on the outcomes of a literature review and preliminary survey, list of terms for nomenclature and abbreviations was finalized. Subsequently, two rounds of the Delphi survey were conducted among myositis experts and patient participants to ascertain current practices and preferences. Using Nominal Group Technique (NGT), the project steering committee developed a consensus nomenclature and abbreviation. Results A total of 241 and 132 myositis experts from six continents, 35 countries and 9 specialities participated in round 1 and round 2 of the Delphi survey, respectively. The results indicated a preference for the terms anti-synthetase syndrome, antisynthetase syndrome and anti-tRNA synthetase syndrome. The abbreviations ASS, ASyS and ASSD were most used, though ASS received notable disapproval. The steering committee, including twenty-five myositis experts and three patient representatives from diverse backgrounds and geographical locations, reached a consensus on ‘anti-synthetase syndrome’ as the preferred nomenclature and ASyS as the preferred abbreviation, with 100% and 93.1% votes, respectively. Conclusion The terms anti-synthetase syndrome and ASyS should be adopted as the standard nomenclature and abbreviation in both research and clinical practice. This standardization is expected to increase consistency within the literature.