Citations

ABSTRACT Pediatric radiation therapy presents unique challenges compared to adult treatments, including those of immobilization, potential need for sedation, and the critical importance of accurate, reproducible positioning. Additionally, heightened attention to imaging doses is necessary to minimize long‐term toxicity in survivors. Many of these challenges must be addressed during the process of simulation. This report provides guidelines for pediatric radiotherapy simulation from the Children's Oncology Group. These guidelines cover all anatomic sites and include recommendations for photon and proton therapies, as well as specialized procedures such as stereotactic body radiation therapy, brachytherapy, and total body irradiation. These guidelines are presented as recommendations rather than prescriptive standards as the practice will vary depending on patient age, diagnosis, clinical judgment, and institutional resources.

Abstract Purpose/Objective(s) To report outcomes for disseminated Medulloblastoma (stage M1-M3) who received radiation (RT) on the Pediatric Proton/Photon Consortium Registry (PPCR). Materials/Methods 71 patients were included with either M1 (6), M2 (21), or M3 (44) Medulloblastoma on PPCR. Survival (OS, Overall; EFS, Event Free) analyses were performed using the Kaplan Meier method and log rank p-values from RT start. Median follow up was calculated using the reverse Kaplan Meier method. Results Median age at RT was 7.5 years (range 2.4-21.89) and the median follow up was 4.3 years. Histology was classic (52), diffuse anaplasia (12), focal anaplasia (5), desmoplastic nodular (1), or other (1). Treatment included surgery, chemotherapy with or without stem cell support, and RT. 54 patients had gross total resection (GTR) or near total resection (NTR); 14 had subtotal resection (STR). Pre-RT chemotherapy was given in 69 (97.1%) patients; 23 had myeloablative chemotherapy with stem cell support. The 5 and 10-year OS of the entire cohort were 73% and 65%, and 5 and 10-year EFS were 65% and 59%. Patients with progression prior to RT (10 patients) had inferior OS (5-year OS 44%) compared to patients without progression pre-RT (5-year OS 78%, p = 0.045). There was a trend for better OS (p = 0.07) and improved EFS (p = 0.043) for M2 stage. GTR/NTR did not impact OS (p = 0.75) or EFS (p = 0.97) compared to STR. Craniospinal (CSI) radiation (70 patients, 99%) doses were: £ 23.4Gy (11.4%), 23.5Gy-36Gy (11.4%), or ³ 36Gy (74.3%). Patients receiving CSI ³ 36Gy had superior OS (p = 0.043), with 5 and 10-year OS of 82% and 71% compared to 5 and 10-year OS of 52% and 52% for lower dose CSI. Conclusion Full dose CSI (36Gy) for M1-M3 medulloblastoma was associated with excellent long-term survival this series, whereas lower dose CSI and progression prior to RT had inferior outcomes.

ABSTRACT Background Proton beam therapy (PBT) offers dosimetric advantages in pediatric radiotherapy by reducing radiation exposure to healthy tissues. However, broad implementation raises important ethical, logistical, and equity considerations, especially in settings with limited access to advanced technologies. Procedure This position paper by the Paediatric Radiation Oncology Society (PROS) reviews the clinical rationale for selecting radiotherapy modalities in children, with a specific focus on ethical utilization of PBT. The document synthesizes evidence on the benefits and limitations of modern photon and proton therapies, explores disparities in access, outlines the role of local pediatric radiation oncologists, and addresses the impact of industry‐driven messaging on family decision‐making. Results While PBT offers clinical benefit in selecting pediatric cancers, high‐quality photon‐based treatments such as IMRT and VMAT remain effective and widely accessible alternatives. The referral and evaluation process for PBT is complex and may introduce treatment delays. Travel and financial burdens can exacerbate disparities. PROS underscores the critical role of local pediatric radiation oncologists in counseling families, and calls for balanced, evidence‐based communication from providers and industry stakeholders. Conclusions PROS advocates for an ethical, equitable, and evidence‐informed approach to radiotherapy modality selection in children, reflecting holistic considerations beyond dosimetry. Proton therapy should be pursued when clinically indicated and accessible without compromising timely care. Investment in a comprehensive radiation therapy infrastructure, including professional education, collaborative research, and responsible public messaging, is essential to optimize pediatric cancer outcomes globally.

ABSTRACTIntroductionProton beam therapy (PT) offers a targeted approach to treating pediatric tumors by minimizing radiation exposure to surrounding healthy tissue. However, the specific toxicity profile associated with it remains underexplored. This study aims to investigate the incidence and risk factors of acute and late treatment‐related toxicities following PT in pediatric patients with pelvic tumors.MethodsUsing data from the Pediatric Proton Consortium Registry (PPCR), we analyzed 126 pediatric patients who underwent PT for pelvic tumors. We assessed the incidence of gastrointestinal (GI), genitourinary (GU), and musculoskeletal (MSK) toxicities at baseline, during treatment, and across follow‐up intervals.ResultsAcute toxicities were observed in 61.9% of patients posttreatment, with new GI, GU, and MSK toxicities occurring in 54.3%, 9.7%, and 7.0% of baseline toxicity‐free patients, respectively. Follow‐up indicated that 20.6%, 22.2%, and 13.5% of patients developed late GI, GU, and MSK toxicities, respectively. Use of passive scattering proton therapy and radiation to the abdomen were significant predictors of GI toxicity development, while higher radiation dose was associated with MSK toxicity development.ConclusionOur findings demonstrate the safety profile of PT among pediatric patients while identifying specific risk factors, such as passive scattering proton therapy and abdominal irradiation, that contribute to increased GI toxicity. While proton therapy appears to be a well‐tolerated treatment option, the observed toxicity rates highlight the need for continued monitoring and long‐term follow‐up.

ABSTRACT In 2005, the Paediatric Radiation Oncology Society (PROS), a multi‐professional association to promote radiotherapy for children and young people, was created. Its mission has been to educate those involved in this field, and to improve the standards of radiation oncology care for children, adolescents, and young adults across the globe, not least in less privileged settings where the majority of the world's children, and most with cancer, live. Through regular congresses, and joint meetings with the International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP), PROS has facilitated a focus on this treatment modality, and advocated on behalf of those who might benefit from it.

ABSTRACT Background Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) carries a poor prognosis with a median survival of less than 12 months. Key molecular features include histone H3 mutation (K27M) and AKT pathway dysregulation. There is currently no curative treatment. Methods This is a Phase I study of vorinostat and temsirolimus in newly diagnosed (Stratum 1) and progressive (Stratum 2) DIPG (NCT02420613). The primary aims are to determine the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and toxicities. A modified 3 + 3 design was used to establish the MTD, where the first three patients were assigned the first dose level regardless of stratum. Stratum 1 received radiotherapy with vorinostat, followed by up to 10 cycles of vorinostat and temsirolimus. Stratum 2 received up to 12 cycles of vorinostat and temsirolimus. Vorinostat was administered at a fixed dose of 230 mg/m 2 daily on Days 1–8, and temsirolimus was administered on Days 1 and 8 at 25 mg/m 2 (Dose level 1) or 35 mg/m 2 (Dose level 2). Results Six patients were enrolled, three in each stratum. No dose‐limiting toxicity was observed, and most adverse effects were limited to Grades 1 or 2, including fatigue, myelosuppression, hyperlipidemia, hyperglycemia, elevated creatinine, nausea, vomiting, and headache. One patient experienced Grade 3 leukopenia. In the study, the MTD with acceptable toxicity was vorinostat 230 mg/m 2 and temsirolimus 35 mg/m 2 . Conclusions Overall, the combination of temsirolimus and vorinostat is well‐tolerated and safe, prompting the need for larger studies to investigate its efficacy.

Abstract BACKGROUND Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) carries a poor prognosis with a median survival of less than 12 months. Histone mutation, K27M, and AKT pathway dysregulation play key roles in tumorigenesis. There is no curative treatment with radiation therapy, which currently remains the standard treatment. METHODS This is a phase I study of vorinostat and temsirolimus in newly diagnosed (stratum 1) and progressive (stratum 2) DIPG. The primary aims are to determine the safety, maximum tolerated dose, and toxicities (NCT02420613). Stratum 1 received radiation concurrently with vorinostat, followed by vorinostat and temsirolimus for up to 10 cycles. Stratum 2 received vorinostat and temsirolimus for up to 12 cycles. In stratum 1, vorinostat was administered daily at 230 mg/m2. The maintenance phase (both strata) included concurrent vorinostat 230 mg/m2 daily and temsirolimus 25 or 35 mg/m2 (Days 1 and 8). RESULTS Six patients were enrolled, three in each stratum. Three of the six patients had confirmed H3 K27M mutations. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed, and most adverse effects were limited to grades 1 or 2, including fatigue, nausea, vomiting, myelosuppression, hyperlipidemia, hyperglycemia, elevated liver enzymes, and creatinine. However, one patient experienced grade 3 leukopenia. Two of the three patients in stratum 1 showed evidence of radiographic response after the chemoradiation phase, of whom one patient had progression-free survival of 12 months and completed the 10 maintenance cycles. All patients at stratum 2 had disease progression with no radiographic response. CONCLUSION Overall, the combination of temsirolimus and vorinostat is well tolerated and safe, prompting the need for larger studies to investigate its efficacy. Due to the small number of patients, the study’s findings are limited, and trends in efficacy should be interpreted with caution.

AbstractRadiation oncology is an integral part of the multidisciplinary team caring for children with cancer. The primary goal of our committee is to enable the delivery of the safest dose of radiation therapy (RT) with the maximal potential for cure, and to minimize toxicity in children by delivering lower doses to normal tissues using advanced technologies like intensity‐modulated RT (IMRT) and proton therapy. We provide mentorship for y ators and are actively involved in educating the global radiation oncology community. We are leaders in the effort to discover novel radiosensitizers, radioprotectors, and advanced RT technologies that could help improve outcomes of children with cancer.