Citations

Background: Measles is a highly transmissible virus. A single case can result in significant exposures within a healthcare facility and prompt action is needed to prevent secondary cases. In October 2025, Infection Prevention and Control (IPAC) was notified of a patient being admitted to our facility with recent international travel and symptoms consistent with measles. The patient was unvaccinated and had five healthcare facility visits prior to measles being suspected and subsequently confirmed. Objective: To describe our facility’s effective identification, prioritization, and prophylaxis of individuals exposed to measles. Methods: IPAC leveraged the electronic medical record to identify potentially exposed patients. Patients were quickly assessed for age and immune status, then prioritized and assigned to primary care teams. These teams promptly contacted patients and coordinated PEP administration. Results: Across five encounters, the index patient exposed 539 other patients. Due to delayed notification, our teams had less than four days to administer PEP for those exposed and still within PEP window. PEP administration began within hours of the index case’s positive test and patients received PEP within three days (Table 1). No secondary measles cases occurred within our facility. Conclusion: Timely and coordinated multidisciplinary effort enabled us to rapidly respond to our first measles case and control secondary transmission. Although the index case resulted in a large exposure, patients that were exposed and eligible for PEP were quickly prioritized to prevent secondary transmission.

Background: Advanced planning and adaptable response strategies are essential for preventing measles transmission in healthcare facilities. Objective: To describe a measles management plan and subsequent modifications in response to a cluster of measles cases. Methods: Drawing on previously published work (doi:10.1017/ice.2025.49), the Infection Prevention and Control (IPAC) team initiated a multi-disciplinary team and developed a measles preparedness plan with the following domains: Guidance and education; early detection and testing; isolation and patient movement; contact tracing and exposure management (Table 1). In October 2025, a patient was admitted during their fifth healthcare encounter and was diagnosed with measles. Two family members were later hospitalized with measles. Delayed recognition of the first case prompted enhancements to our preparedness framework (Table 1). Results: The first case resulted in 539 exposed patients. The second resulted in 87 exposures, and the third resulted in no exposure. Despite the extensive exposure, zero secondary measles were reported. Conclusion: Proactive planning enabled rapid response to our first case and controlled secondary transmission. Despite extensive planning, delayed identification of the first case caused significant exposures. As the cluster unfolded, we refined our plan, resulting in zero exposures from the last patient and zero secondary cases, despite over 850 exposures. These efforts may guide other healthcare facilities in improving their measles preparedness and response.

Background: Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) remain a challenge in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs); central line days have been directly correlated with risk of CLABSI. The Mayo Clinic PICU is a 23-bed multidisciplinary unit including dedicated bone marrow transplant beds with an average of 1048 admissions annually. In 2024, the unit’s CLABSI rate was 0.82 per 1,000 central line days or approximately 1–3 CLABSIs per year. Weekly multidisciplinary CLABSI Prevention Rounds were piloted from August 2024 to March 2025 with the aim of reducing central line device utilization rate as a method to reduce CLABSI risk. Methods: A multidisciplinary team of Clinical Nurse Specialists (CNS), Nurse Managers, and off-service PICU physicians conducted weekly CLABSI rounds on PICU beds (excluding 4 BMT beds), meeting with each bedside nurse as well as the on-service providers. The CLABSI team assessed central line necessity using a standard questionnaire and provided education to physicians and nurses regarding central line care and CLABSI prevention. Monthly data were compared for the same 8 calendar months pre versus post intervention for central line days, patient days, and device utilization rate (DUR; central line days/patient days), both unadjusted and adjusted for PRISM (Pediatric Risk of Mortality) 3 severity of illness score. Pre- and post-implementation staff surveys assessed confidence in line management and interdisciplinary communication using Likert scales. Results: Thirty-two CLABSI rounds with a total of 118 individual patients and 45 discrete interventions were noted over 8 months and compared to the 8 pre-intervention corresponding months. Pre versus post monthly DUR was 0.42 [0.32–0.57] vs 0.46 [0.30–0.55], p = 0.49 (PRISM 3–adjusted p = 0.97). Nursing confidence in ‘discussing central line need’ significantly improved post-implementation, 5 [4–5] vs 5 [5–5], p = 0.035. Nurses also positively perceived third-party involvement in need assessment, 4 [3–4] vs 4 [3–4], p = 0.06. All surveyed clinicians trended toward being less likely to think a central line was left in too long, 3 [3–4] vs 3 [2–4], p = 0.06. Conclusion: Structured weekly multidisciplinary CLABSI rounds are a feasible intervention that empowers bedside nurses and improves confidence in line maintenance and interdisciplinary communication. Median DUR was not significantly altered by the intervention, but nursing perception of central line management improved qualitatively in pre- versus post-implementation surveys. Continued expansion of multidisciplinary initiatives addressing central line necessity and management is needed to further evaluate overall effects on DUR and CLABSI incidence.

Abstract Importance Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) hospitalization rates are highest among children <2 years of age. RSV immunization with infant monoclonal antibody or maternal vaccine is recommended to protect all U.S. infants in their first RSV season. For certain high-risk children aged 8−19 months entering their second RSV season, the monoclonal antibody nirsevimab is recommended. Little is known regarding preexisting health conditions as risk factors for RSV-associated respiratory failure in children during their second season. Objectives To describe children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) for RSV during their second RSV season by preexisting health conditions, and to compare demographic and clinical characteristics across groups. Design, Setting, and Participants Surveillance registry of children 8-<24 months old admitted to the PICU in 30 pediatric hospitals in the 2023-2024/2024-2025 RSV seasons. All children had an RSV-positive respiratory sample and received respiratory support with high flow nasal cannula, noninvasive ventilation, or invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Exposure Preexisting health conditions potentially increasing risk of severe RSV disease. Main Outcomes and Measures Patients were classified into four mutually exclusive groups by preexisting health conditions: 1) U.S. nirsevimab eligible criteria, 2) other identified RSV risk conditions (with some evidence of increased risk for severe RSV), 3) other preexisting conditions, and 4) no preexisting conditions. Patient demographic characteristics and level of respiratory support received were compared. Results Among 574 children: 47 (8.2%) had U.S. nirsevimab eligibility criteria, 76 (13.2%) had other RSV risk conditions, 96 (16.7%) had other preexisting conditions, and 355 (61.8%) had none. A higher proportion of children with nirsevimab eligibility factors (40.4%) than those with other identified RSV risk conditions (17.1%) required IMV, which was higher than other (10.4%) or no (5.9%) preexisting health conditions (p trend <0.001). Conclusions and Relevance Approximately 20% of children admitted to the PICU with severe RSV were in the defined groups that met U.S. nirsevimab-eligibility criteria or that had an identified RSV risk condition associated with known risk for severe RSV. A considerable proportion of both groups of children required IMV for respiratory support. These findings may help inform future deliberations regarding U.S. second season nirsevimab-eligibility recommendations. Key Points Question What preexisting health conditions are present in children aged 8–<24 months admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit for severe RSV disease in their second RSV season and how do clinical outcomes differ? Findings Among 574 children, 8% were eligible for nirsevimab in the U.S. and 13% had other preexisting conditions with known risk for severe RSV. Children with preexisting conditions, particularly those eligible for nirsevimab, were more likely to require invasive mechanical ventilation than those without. Meaning These findings may inform future deliberations regarding which children in their second RSV season might benefit from RSV preventive products.

Background: Prophylactic antimicrobials for pediatric patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support are not well delineated; there are no consistent guidelines nationally or internationally. We analyzed antimicrobial use before and after implementing a narrow-spectra ECMO antimicrobial prophylaxis protocol intended to standardize prophylaxis by risk related to ECMO type and configuration. Methods: This retrospective, single-center study included children under 18 years old requiring ECMO between May 2018 and December 2021. Medical and cardiac surgical patients requiring open-chested (central) or peripheral veno-venous or veno-arterial ECMO were included. We evaluated the impact of an ECMO antimicrobial prophylaxis protocol by comparing the appropriateness of antimicrobial use as well as nosocomial infections in the pre versus post protocol. Results: Our study included 55 children with 58 individual ECMO episodes. More than 50% of the patients were open-chested during ECMO support, and the majority of ECMO support was veno-arterial. In the post protocol period, patients were 4 times as likely to have appropriate antimicrobial prescribing (Odds ratio 4.4; 95% confidence interval: 1.1–19; P = 0.036), including both prophylactic (per protocol) and therapeutic (chart documentation of an infection with appropriate therapeutic antimicrobials, including drug and duration). There was no difference in the odds of nosocomial infection occurring during ECMO pre protocol versus post protocol (pre vs. post protocol, P = 0.71 for invasive infections, P = 0.73 for all infections including potential colonization). Conclusions: After implementation of a standardized narrow-spectra ECMO antimicrobial prophylaxis protocol, we observed an increase in appropriate and standardized antimicrobial prescribing without concomitant increase in nosocomial infections.

A 10-year-old girl with a past medical history significant for prematurity at 29 weeks, short bowel syndrome secondary to necrotizing enterocolitis, prior episodes of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth complicated by D-lactic acidosis, and gastric tube dependence presented to an emergency department with emesis, slurred speech, somnolence, and unsteady gait. Workup was initiated, and she was started on broad-spectrum antibiotics and transferred to our pediatric intensive care unit for further evaluation and treatment. Differential diagnosis on admission was broad, and, through thorough laboratory evaluation, imaging, and multiple subspecialty inputs, an unusual diagnosis was confirmed.

Abstract Background Pharmacokinetics of beta-lactams vary widely in neonatal and pediatric patients due to developmental biology and critical illness. Cefepime (FEP), meropenem (MEM), and piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP) are highly susceptible to pharmacokinetic changes as hydrophilic, small molecules with renal clearance. Subtherapeutic levels are associated with clinical and microbiologic failure, and supratherapeutic levels associated with toxicity. Beta-lactam therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may optimize the effectiveness and safety of these agents. The purpose of this investigation is to describe the % of pediatric and neonatal patients with beta-lactam serum levels within target range. Methods In August 2023, TDM launched at the Mayo Clinic Children’s Center for select patients treated with FEP, MEM, or TZP with expected durations ≥ 48 hours, or who were on kidney replacement therapy (KRT), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), weighed &gt; 120 kg, had a BMI &gt; 95th percentile, or at the discretion of pediatric ID team. Validated drug assays were performed daily, Monday through Friday. A two-level sampling strategy was preferred with a peak 1 hour after the end of the infusion and a trough 30 minutes before the next dose. Empiric trough target ranges were set at FEP 8-50 mg/L, MEM 2-30 mg/L, and piperacillin 16-150 mg/L. These target ranges were adjusted with confirmed microbiology to a time above the minimum inhibitory concentration of the organism for 100% of the dosing interval (100%T &gt; MIC). Results From August 2023 to April 2024, 74 episodes of TDM were performed on 45 patients. Thirty-seven (82%) patients were in an intensive care unit (ICU) at the time of TDM, 8/45 (22%) of whom were in the neonatal ICU. Target range was achieved in 67% of patients on FEP, 50% on MEM, and 52% on TZP. Median (IQR) trough values were 22.1 (8.6, 44.2) mg/L for FEP, 0.6 (0, 4.1) mg/L for MEM, and 15.5 (3.8, 27.1) mg/L for TZP. Seven levels were above target for FEP and 0 for MEM and TZP. Seven levels were below target for FEP, 4 for MEM, and 11 for TZP. Conclusion Implementation of a TDM program for FEP, MEM and TZP in pediatric and neonatal patients revealed drug levels frequently outside target range. TDM may facilitate dose individualization to optimize medication efficacy and minimize toxicity. Disclosures Raymond Stetson, MD, MS, Moderna: Grant/Research Support Christina G. Rivera (O'Connor), Pharm.D, Gilead Sciences: Board Member Erin F. Barreto, PharmD, MSc, Baxter Health: Advisor/Consultant|Wolters Kluwer: Advisor/Consultant

As survival after ECMO improves and use of ECMO support increases in both pediatric and adult population, there is a need to focus on both the morbidities and complications associated with ECMO and how to manage and prevent them. Infectious complications during ECMO often have a significant clinical impact, resulting in increased morbidity or mortality irrespective of the underlying etiology necessitating cardiorespiratory support. In this review article, we discuss the prevention, management, challenges, and differences of infectious complications in adult and pediatric patients receiving ECMO support.

Abstract Background We aimed to determine if pre-existing immunocompromising conditions (ICCs) were associated with the presentation or outcome of patients with acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) admitted for pediatric intensive care. Methods Fifty-five hospitals in 30 US states reported cases through the Overcoming COVID-19 public health surveillance registry. Patients &lt;21 years admitted 12 March 2020–30 December 2021 to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) or high-acuity unit for acute COVID-19 were included. Results Of 1274 patients, 105 (8.2%) had an ICC, including 33 (31.4%) hematologic malignancies, 24 (22.9%) primary immunodeficiencies and disorders of hematopoietic cells, 19 (18.1%) nonmalignant organ failure with solid-organ transplantation, 16 (15.2%) solid tumors, and 13 (12.4%) autoimmune disorders. Patients with ICCs were older, had more underlying renal conditions, and had lower white blood cell and platelet counts than those without ICCs, but had similar clinical disease severity upon admission. In-hospital mortality from COVID-19 was higher (11.4% vs 4.6%, P = .005) and hospitalization was longer (P = .01) in patients with ICCs. New major morbidities upon discharge were not different between those with and without ICC (10.5% vs 13.9%, P = .40). In patients with ICCs, bacterial coinfection was more common in those with life-threatening COVID-19. Conclusions In this national case series of patients &lt;21 years of age with acute COVID-19 admitted for intensive care, existence of a prior ICCs were associated with worse clinical outcomes. Reassuringly, most patients with ICCs hospitalized in the PICU for severe acute COVID-19 survived and were discharged home without new severe morbidities.