Citations 3

Investigation of a Corynebacterium amycolatum Sternal Surgical Site Infection Cluster in Cardiac Surgery

Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology | July 17, 2026 | Volume: 6 | Issue: S1 | Pages: s180-s181

10.1017/ash.2026.10718

Background: We describe an investigation of a cluster of eight Corynebacterium amycolatum sternal surgical site infections (SSIs) that occurred among cardiac surgery patients from February to October 2025. Although C. amycolatum is a member of the skin microbiota, clinically significant infections caused by this organism may occur in cardiac surgery patients. Methods: The investigation included retrospective reviews of SSIs, clinical cultures and medical records, surgical observations, and operating room (OR) assessment. Line lists of surgical case criteria and infection prevention practices were created to assess common factors among cases (e.g., staffing, instrumentation, equipment, skin preparation and antisepsis, nasal decolonization, antibiotic protocols, and closure). Whole genome sequencing of isolates was performed and analyzed using SNIPPY for single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based phylogenetic analysis. Results: Phylogenetic analysis indicated isolates from five of eight case patients who had cardiac surgeries occurring over a six-week period from February to April 2025 were genetically related (?7 SNPs across the genome), suggesting a common source of infection. These five isolates were ceftriaxone, meropenem, and penicillin resistant. The other three case patient isolates were unrelated (<3181 to <15,000 SNPs); two were ceftriaxone, meropenem and penicillin resistant (one also doxycycline intermediate resistant), and the third penicillin resistant. Use of sternal tape for closure was identified as a recent practice change. Four of five genetically related cases involved the same surgeons and suture tape for sternal closure (wire for all other cases). Sternal tape was discontinued with three cases occurring afterwards. Seven patients completed chlorhexidine gluconate bathing and nasal decolonization. Hair was removed in the OR with reusable surgical clippers. All received the same skin antiseptic, and antibiotic prophylaxis was appropriate. No trends were identified in instrument or equipment use. Broad infection control measures were implemented, including surgical clipper replacement, OR cleaning and ultraviolet light disinfection, headlamp cleaning, and environmental repairs. Leadership was engaged through frequent meetings and audits. Infection control practices such as minimizing OR traffic, double gloving, glove changes, and strict adherence to hand hygiene and attire were reinforced. Two of eight cases occurred after these recommendations were completed but were not genetically related to the primary cluster. Conclusion: We describe a cluster of invasive C. amycolatum sternotomy SSIs. Only two genetically unrelated cases of C. amycolatum occurred following infection control investigation and interventions, underscoring the effectiveness of a comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach. This organism has rarely been reported as a cause of SSIs and may be an emerging pathogen.
Optimizing Pediatric ICU Central Line Maintenance and Removal Through Weekly Multidisciplinary CLABSI Prevention Rounds

Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology | July 17, 2026 | Volume: 6 | Issue: S1 | Pages: s82-s83

10.1017/ash.2026.10555

Background: Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) remain a challenge in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs); central line days have been directly correlated with risk of CLABSI. The Mayo Clinic PICU is a 23-bed multidisciplinary unit including dedicated bone marrow transplant beds with an average of 1048 admissions annually. In 2024, the unit’s CLABSI rate was 0.82 per 1,000 central line days or approximately 1–3 CLABSIs per year. Weekly multidisciplinary CLABSI Prevention Rounds were piloted from August 2024 to March 2025 with the aim of reducing central line device utilization rate as a method to reduce CLABSI risk. Methods: A multidisciplinary team of Clinical Nurse Specialists (CNS), Nurse Managers, and off-service PICU physicians conducted weekly CLABSI rounds on PICU beds (excluding 4 BMT beds), meeting with each bedside nurse as well as the on-service providers. The CLABSI team assessed central line necessity using a standard questionnaire and provided education to physicians and nurses regarding central line care and CLABSI prevention. Monthly data were compared for the same 8 calendar months pre versus post intervention for central line days, patient days, and device utilization rate (DUR; central line days/patient days), both unadjusted and adjusted for PRISM (Pediatric Risk of Mortality) 3 severity of illness score. Pre- and post-implementation staff surveys assessed confidence in line management and interdisciplinary communication using Likert scales. Results: Thirty-two CLABSI rounds with a total of 118 individual patients and 45 discrete interventions were noted over 8 months and compared to the 8 pre-intervention corresponding months. Pre versus post monthly DUR was 0.42 [0.32–0.57] vs 0.46 [0.30–0.55], p = 0.49 (PRISM 3–adjusted p = 0.97). Nursing confidence in ‘discussing central line need’ significantly improved post-implementation, 5 [4–5] vs 5 [5–5], p = 0.035. Nurses also positively perceived third-party involvement in need assessment, 4 [3–4] vs 4 [3–4], p = 0.06. All surveyed clinicians trended toward being less likely to think a central line was left in too long, 3 [3–4] vs 3 [2–4], p = 0.06. Conclusion: Structured weekly multidisciplinary CLABSI rounds are a feasible intervention that empowers bedside nurses and improves confidence in line maintenance and interdisciplinary communication. Median DUR was not significantly altered by the intervention, but nursing perception of central line management improved qualitatively in pre- versus post-implementation surveys. Continued expansion of multidisciplinary initiatives addressing central line necessity and management is needed to further evaluate overall effects on DUR and CLABSI incidence.
Postoperative Surgical Site Infections

Annals of Surgery | April 18, 2018 | Volume: 271 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 94-99

10.1097/sla.0000000000002780 | PMID 29672402

Objective: To characterize agreement in the ascertainment of surgical site infections (SSIs) between the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP), National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN), and administrative data. Background: The NSQIP, NHSN, and administrative data are the primary systems used to monitor and report SSIs for the purpose of quality control and benchmarking of hospitals and surgeons. These systems have different methods for identifying SSIs. Methods: We queried the NHSN, NSQIP, and administrative data systems for patients who had an operation at 1 of 4 hospitals within a single health system between January 2013 and September 2015. The detection of an SSI during a postoperative hospitalization was the outcome of analysis. Any SSI detected by one (or more) of these systems was analyzed by 2 reviewers to determine the presence of discrete elements of documentation constituting evidence of SSI. Concordance between the 3 systems (NHSN, NSQIP, and administrative data) was analyzed using Cohen's kappa. Results: After application of appropriate exclusion criteria, a cohort of 9447 inpatient operations was analyzed. In total, 130 SSIs were detected by 1 or more of the 3 systems, with reported SSI rates of 0.5% (NHSN), 0.7% (administrative data), and 1.0% (NSQIP). Of these 130 SSIs, only 17 SSIs were reported by all 3 systems. The concordance between these 3 systems was moderate (kappa values NSQIP-NHSN = 0.50 [0.40–0.60], administrative-NHSN = 0.36 [0.24–0.47], and administrative-NSQIP = 0.47 [0.38–0.57]). Chart review found that reasons for discordance were related to issues of different criteria as well as inaccuracies. Conclusion: There is significant discordance in the determination of SSIs reported by the NHSN, NSQIP, and administrative data. The differences and limitations of each of these systems have to be recognized, especially when using these data for quality reports and pay for performance.