Citations

Pleomorphic adenoma of the breast is a rare tumor, with fewer than 100 patients described in the English literature, mainly as case reports and small case series. Histologically, breast pleomorphic adenoma resembles its more common salivary gland counterpart; however, it can present diagnostic challenges, particularly on core needle biopsy and fine-needle aspiration. The differential diagnosis includes benign and malignant tumors, which carry major treatment implications, from the extent of surgical intervention to the potential use of chemotherapy. Herein we describe a tumor that was initially diagnosed as a triple-negative matrix-producing metaplastic carcinoma, but a secondary review led to the diagnosis of pleomorphic adenoma of the breast. Prior to the secondary review, the patient underwent an excisional biopsy, sentinel lymph node biopsy, and one round of chemotherapy. This report adds to the limited literature surrounding this entity and discusses the differential diagnosis along with histopathologic and immunohistochemical findings that aid in the diagnosis and reviews the radiologic findings observed throughout the patient's clinical course. This patient underscores the difficulty of diagnosis and highlights the need for multidisciplinary consideration and communication to avoid overtreatment.

Abstract Objective β-Catenin–mutated hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs) carry an increased malignant transformation risk and are screened by interpreting glutamine synthetase (GS) and β-catenin by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Our study aims to assess GS and β-catenin interpretation guidelines for applicability and reproducibility in predicting high-risk HCA and other relevant molecular alterations. Methods Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), β-catenin, GS, and CD34 stains from 75 HCAs were interpreted by three pathologists using Method A (GS interpretation: negative, perivenular patchy, map-like, diffuse, and indeterminate) and Method B criteria (similar GS interpretation scheme based on a recent publication, with and without CD34 expression patterns). Ease of application and interpretation confidence level were assessed. High-risk IHC was defined as nuclear β-catenin and/or diffuse homogeneous GS. Molecular testing was performed on a subset of HCAs and controls. Results There were 57 resections and 18 biopsy specimens examined. Methods A and B (GS only) were rated as easy to apply, with high interpretation confidence (≥90% using both methods). Consensus rate was comparable in biopsy specimens (100% for both methods) and resections (88% for Method A, 93% for Method B). While the same cases were stratified into high-risk GS categories using both systems, clinically significant genetic alterations (TERT promoter, EGFR, MTOR, and TP53) were identified in 25% of cases stratified as not high risk by IHC. Conclusions Both methods have a similar ease of application and level of interpretation confidence, and they also detected β-catenin mutations as expected. Other relevant molecular alterations associated with risk of neoplastic progression and/or bleeding were detected in 25% of HCAs with the non-high-risk IHC phenotype, suggesting the value of molecular testing in this subset.

ABSTRACT Background Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is largely a disease of individuals older than 50 years; its occurrence in patients aged 50 years and younger is rare. The authors sought to characterize the clinicopathologic features and genetic profile of young‐onset (age 50 years and younger) CMML (y‐CMML) compared with older onset (older than 50 years) CMML (o‐CMML). Methods The authors conducted a multi‐institutional study of 32 patients with y‐CMML and 119 patients with o‐CMML, analyzing clinical, morphologic, cytogenetic, and molecular data. Results Patients who had y‐CMML frequently presented with splenomegaly (59% vs. 11%; p < .001) and hepatomegaly (25% vs. 2%; p < .001) compared with those who had o‐CMML. Although the overall incidence of cytogenetic abnormalities was similar, patients who had y‐CMML exhibited distinct mutational patterns. PTPN11 mutations were significantly more common in y‐CMML (13% vs. 3%; p = .034) than in o‐CMML, whereas TET2 (6% vs. 57%; p < .001) and SRSF2 (16% vs. 46%; p = .002) mutations were significantly less frequent. In addition, multi‐hit TET2 (6% vs. 34%; p = .002) and TET2‐SRSF2 (3% vs. 29%; p = .003) co‐mutations were rare in y‐CMML. However, the molecular differences did not affect the CMML‐specific risk‐stratification categories because the clinical outcomes, including overall survival and leukemia‐free survival, did not differ between the two groups. Conclusions CMML in patients aged 50 years and younger is rare and presents with unique clinical and mutational features, suggesting a distinct pathogenesis.

Purpose of review Cardiac amyloidosis is an infiltrative cardiomyopathy with characteristic echocardiographic findings. Echocardiography is the initial imaging test to identify restrictive cardiomyopathies, and timely diagnosis is important for treatment and prognosis. This review outlines key echocardiographic “red flags,” structural and functional findings, and emerging diagnostic tools that enhance early recognition and monitoring of cardiac amyloidosis. Recent findings Classic echocardiographic red flags for cardiac amyloidosis include increased ventricular wall thickness, biatrial enlargement, pericardial effusion, and a granular myocardial appearance. Tissue Doppler imaging shows reduced mitral annular velocities, while advanced disease presents with restrictive filling patterns. Global longitudinal strain with apical sparing is a hallmark finding that distinguishes cardiac amyloidosis from other cardiomyopathies. Left atrial strain has been proposed as a prognostic marker for thromboembolism in cardiac amyloidosis. Evidence shows variability in strain measurements across different vendors, which is an important consideration when comparing results between institutions in both research and clinical practice. Echocardiography can be used in conjunction with multimodal imaging techniques in order to monitor disease progression. Summary Echocardiography is the initial diagnostic test of choice and several findings can suggest cardiac amyloidosis. Advances in echocardiographic techniques have enabled earlier detection of cardiac involvement and now play a central role in both diagnosis and ongoing treatment monitoring.

Objective: The Complete Cochlear Implant Care (CCIC) model is a highly coordinated care delivery model reducing and condensing in-person visits for cochlear implant (CI) patients, leveraging telehealth and remote programming. Clinical, quality-of-life, implementation, patient experience, and financial outcomes of the clinical trial are reported. Study design: Prospective, nonrandomized, 2-arm clinical trial Setting: Tertiary referral CI center Patients: Adult CI candidates Interventions: Cochlear implantation Main outcome measures: Speech perception, quality of life, implementation, patient experience, and financial outcomes for both CCIC and traditional care delivery models. Results: Patients participating in the traditional and CCIC delivery models demonstrated 12-month postoperative speech perception scores comparable to nationally reported outcomes (CNC 61% and 72% and AzBio in quiet 75% and 87% for traditional and CCIC cohorts, respectively). Quality-of-life evaluation using the CIQOL-10 demonstrated similar 12-month postoperative scores between groups (52 and 54 for traditional and CCIC cohorts, respectively). The CI Patient Experience Survey demonstrated high satisfaction outcomes in ease of communication, preparedness for surgery, and overall care in both cohorts. Implementation analysis of the CCIC model revealed perceived benefits from staff and clinicians; however, support for expansion of the program was contingent upon the availability of app-based or web-based remote programming technology. Finally, financial analysis revealed decreased out-of-pocket costs for CCIC patients. Conclusion: The CCIC model has the potential to dramatically streamline hearing health care delivery and reduce out-of-pocket costs for CI recipients. Clinical outcomes between cohorts were comparable in this feasibility study; however, a sufficiently powered trial is required to definitively comment on clinical outcomes with the new care delivery model.