Citations

Background Costosternal cartilages and the costal margin, collectively termed costal cartilage, are hyaline cartilage connecting ribs to the sternum and to adjacent ribs, respectively. Presence of intact costal cartilage is essential for elasticity of the chest wall. Anecdotally, costal cartilage injuries are underdiagnosed on trauma CT scan in patients with rib fractures. Our aim was to determine a baseline frequency of acute costal cartilage injury among patients presenting with rib fractures. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of injured adult patients admitted to Level I/II trauma centers with rib fractures from January 2020 to July 2024. CT images obtained at admission were manually reviewed by chest wall surgeons for presence of costal cartilage injury. Concordance with the original radiology report was obtained. Multivariable regression was used to analyze factors associated with costal cartilage injury and missed cartilage fractures. Results 1441 patients were identified; 197 (14%) had a costal cartilage fracture. A plurality of injuries included falls (n=667, 46%). Median ISS (Injury Severity Score) was 13 (IQR: 9 to 21), median Abbreviated Injury Scale thorax score was 3 (IQR: 3 to 3), and median number of fractured ribs was 3 (IQR: 3 to 7). 294 (21%) patients had radiographic flail segments, and 136 (9%) had sternal fractures. 172 (87%) patients had a costal cartilage fracture missed on initial trauma chest CT. On multivariable analysis, ISS (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.02 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.04), radiographic flail segment (aOR 1.6 (95% CI 1.10 to 2.31)) and presence of sternal fracture (aOR 1.85 (95% CI 1.19 to 2.89)) were associated with costal cartilage fractures. Only the total number of rib fractures was associated with a missed costal cartilage fracture on univariate analysis (OR 1.17 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.36)). Conclusions Costal cartilage injuries are common and frequently are not identified during interpretation of the initial trauma CT. A higher index of suspicion is warranted for costal cartilage fractures among patients with greater injury burden, radiographic flail segment, and sternal fractures. Level of evidence Level III.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Minimum clinically important differences (MCIDs) for patient-reported outcome metrics (PROMs) in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) lack consensus on the most appropriate calculation method. This retrospective study aimed to identify the optimal MCIDs for commonly used PROMs in CSM. METHODS: The CSM database from the Quality Outcomes Database SpineCORe Study Group was analyzed. Baseline, 3-month, and 24-month PROM values for Neck Disability Index (NDI), 5-dimension Euro-quality of life (EQ-5D) in quality-adjusted life years, modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score, and neck/arm pain numeric rating scale (NRS) were collected. MCIDs were calculated for each PROM using previously validated techniques. MCID values were compared using the area under the curve (AUC) with the North American Spine Society satisfaction scale as an anchor. RESULTS: A total of 1141 patients with CSM undergoing surgery were included in this analysis. Improvement of ≥30% from baseline was the optimal MCID for NDI and neck/arm NRS. At 24 months, the optimal percentage cutoff MCID for these instruments resulted in AUCs of 0.76, 0.72, and 0.67, similar to the 30% improvement method, with AUCs of 0.73, 0.71, and 0.67, respectively. Numeric cutoffs (0.065 at 3 months; 0.149 at 24 months) were the superior MCIDs for EQ-5D. For mJOA score, a severity-adjusted MCID outperformed other methods, yielding an AUC of 0.67 at 24 months. MCIDs were achieved in 63% of patients for NDI, 59% for neck pain NRS, 61% for arm pain NRS, 52% for EQ-5D, and 59% for mJOA score at 24 months. CONCLUSION: Using the Quality Outcomes Database SpineCORe data set, we defined optimal MCIDs for key PROMs in CSM. A ≥30% improvement from baseline was optimal in NDI and arm/neck NRS. An absolute numeric cutoff was superior for EQ-5D (0.149 at the 24-month follow-up). A severity-adjusted MCID performed best for mJOA score. These redefined benchmarks better capture the treatment impact and guide care decisions for patients with CSM.

Patzelt et al. previously characterized dermal-binding autoantibodies using an indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) mosaic assay with cells transfected with p200-laminin β4, laminin-332 or collagen VII subunits among specimens showing a dermal pattern on IIF using salt-split skin (IIF-SSS) and IgG. This study expanded testing to include specimens with either a dermal or mixed pattern on IIF-SSS and demonstrated improved test sensitivity with modified testing methods.

Background/objectives: Improvements in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) treatment have reduced mortality. While chemoradiation before surgery was previously a standard of care, updated guidelines recommend peri-operative chemotherapy without chemoradiation. Continued investigation into optimal non-operative treatment paradigms for patients who defer surgery or are not candidates for surgery and certain chemotherapy regimens is needed. The impact of induction chemotherapy prior to chemoradiation on survival and surgical outcomes remains unclear. This study assessed survival and surgical outcomes in a real-world cohort of EAC patients receiving induction chemotherapy before chemoradiation. Methods: This single-institution, IRB-approved, retrospective cohort study included patients with newly diagnosed stage II-IVb (oligometastatic for IVb) EAC who received definitive chemoradiation (radiation ≥ 40 Gy and two cycles of chemotherapy) +/− esophagectomy from 2007 to 2022. Patients receiving induction chemotherapy were compared to those who did not. Endpoints included survival and surgical outcomes. Results: A total of 141 EAC patients received definitive chemoradiation; 83 received induction chemotherapy before chemoradiation. Patients receiving induction chemotherapy were younger (p < 0.01) with slightly lower performance status (p = 0.27) and presented at a more advanced stage (p < 0.001). Median OS was 3.5 years in the induction chemotherapy group compared to 2.2 years (p = 0.10). There was no difference in pathologic complete response (p = 0.81), esophagectomy frequency (p = 0.87), or surgical downstaging between treatment groups (p = 0.84). Conclusions: In this real-world, single-institutional patient cohort investigating induction chemotherapy prior to chemoradiation in EAC, patients receiving induction chemotherapy did well but did not have a statistically significant improvement in survival outcomes or surgical outcomes. This study showed that significant numbers of real-world patients may not receive esophagectomy. Thus, prospective, randomized clinical trials are warranted to better delineate the efficacy and selection of patients for induction chemotherapy when non-operative approaches are favored.

Background: While much of cancer research has historically centered on innovations within clinical or laboratory settings, most of the factors shaping equity in cancer outcomes reside outside hospital walls—in neighborhoods, workplaces, and community networks. This reality underscores the need for community-involved and community-living interventions: programs co-designed and delivered within communities to meet people where they live, work, and socialize . Such interventions hold the greatest promise for sustainability because they are embedded in the daily lives, cultures, and resources of the populations they serve. Methods: This special collection brings together research that illuminates the power of community-centered and community co-led strategies for prevention, early detection, treatment, and survivorship across diverse settings. Results: The articles in this series illustrate how innovation, cultural humility, and local engagement can bridge persistent gaps in cancer care. Conclusion: Together, they highlight how communities themselves are essential partners in dismantling disparities and achieving lasting cancer control.

Coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3) is a picornavirus that causes systemic inflammatory diseases including myocarditis, pericarditis, pancreatitis, and meningoencephalitis. We have previously reported that CVB3 induces mitochondrial fission and mitophagy while inhibiting lysosomal degradation by blocking autophagosome-lysosome fusion. This promotes the release of virus-laden mitophagosomes from host cells as infectious extracellular vesicles (EVs), enabling non-lytic viral egress. Transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1), a heat and capsaicin-sensitive cation channel, regulates mitochondrial dynamics by inducing mitochondrial membrane depolarization and fission. In this study, we found that TRPV1 activation by capsaicin dramatically enhances CVB3 egress from host cells via EVs. Released EVs revealed increased levels of viral capsid protein VP1, mitochondrial protein TOM70, and fission protein phospho-DRP1. Moreover, these EVs were enriched in heat shock protein HSP70, suggesting its role in facilitating infectious EV release from cells. Furthermore, TRPV1 inhibition with capsazepine and SB-366791 significantly reduced viral infection in vitro. Our in vivo studies also found that SB-366791 significantly mitigates pancreatic damage and reduces viral titers in a mouse model of CVB3 pancreatitis. Given the lack of understanding regarding factors that contribute to diverse clinical manifestations of CVB3, our study highlights capsaicin and TRPV1 as potential exacerbating factors that facilitate CVB3 dissemination via mitophagy-derived EVs.