Citations

Background: Hepatorenal syndrome–acute kidney injury (HRS-AKI) is associated with high mortality in cirrhosis. Recent FDA approval of terlipressin and updated clinical guidance have expanded management options, but real-world practice patterns remain unknown. Methods: We conducted a nationwide survey of U.S. hepatology providers regarding HRS-AKI management practices. The 33-question survey assessed provider demographics, vasoconstrictor selection, treatment timing, and adherence to guideline recommendations. Results: Among 162 respondents, most were hepatologists (94%) at academic centers (83%). Only 11% obtained a nephrology consultation at AKI detection, with 44% waiting until worsening renal function. Terlipressin was available at 80% of institutions but more commonly at academic centers (84% vs. 53%, p =0.003). Consistent with guideline recommendations, 77% of providers initiate vasoconstrictors only after completing a trial of volume expansion (if no renal improvement), particularly in academic centers (80% vs. 60% non-academic, p =0.03). Terlipressin (49%) and midodrine/octreotide (44%) were preferred first-line treatments, with providers at academic centers more likely to use midodrine/octreotide (46% vs. 30%, p =0.008). Mean arterial pressure was used by 62% of providers to guide vasoconstrictor dosing. Most providers (73%) discontinued vasoconstrictor treatment after 4 days if no improvement. Conclusions: Significant variations exist between guideline recommendations and real-world HRS-AKI management, especially first-line treatment choice, treatment monitoring, and nephrology consultation. These findings highlight opportunities to improve guideline implementation and identify areas where practice patterns might inform provider education and future guidance updates.

Background: A 2-stage approach is most commonly used to treat periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Some successful studies of the 1-stage approach were underpowered, lacked a 2-stage comparative group, and excluded patients with draining sinuses, comorbidities, and/or antibiotic-resistant organisms. Given the morbidity and expense associated with 2-stage treatment, we conducted a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial to compare the results of 1- and 2-stage PJI treatment, specifically including patients with draining sinuses, comorbidities, and resistant organisms. Methods: Patients presenting for surgical treatment of a chronic PJI with a known organism following primary total hip or knee arthroplasty were included (with infection defined by Musculoskeletal Infection Society [MSIS] criteria). Patients with prior revision, culture-negative infection, or fungal infection, or who were immunosuppressed or had soft-tissue involvement precluding wound closure, were excluded. Patients were classified according to the McPherson host staging system. Clinical success was defined as (1) no clinical failure or reinfection with the same or new organism; (2) no reoperation for PJI; and (3) no PJI-related death. A double-instrument setup was used for all patients, as were similar irrigation and antibiotic protocols. A total of 323 patients (166 one-stage; 157 two-stage) were randomized. Groups were similar with respect to demographics and host classification. After excluding patients who died or were lost to follow-up, 258 of the 323 patients had 2-year follow-up (135 one-stage and 123 two-stage). The rate of patient loss to follow-up was similar between the treatment groups. Results: Sixteen patients in the 1-stage group and 9 patients in the 2-stage group died prior to 2-year follow-up. Overall, the 2-year success rate of 1-stage treatment was 97% (131 of 135), while the success of 2-stage treatment was 91% (112 of 123) (p = 0.04). Compared with the 2-stage group, the 1-stage group had 3-times the odds of overall success in a regression analysis (unadjusted odds ratio = 3.22 [95% confidence interval = 1.0 to 10.38]). After adjusting for specific variables (McPherson host grade, resistant organism, and draining sinuses), 1-stage treatment also had 3-times the odds of success. Conclusions: The results of this prospective randomized trial indicated that 1-stage treatment (97% success) was statistically noninferior to 2-stage treatment (91% success) when treating chronic PJI following primary total hip or knee arthroplasty, provided the protocols described here are explicitly followed. Extrapolation to other patient cohorts and clinical situations should be avoided. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The underlying immunopathogenesis of inflammatory arthritis (IA) immune-related adverse event (irAE) remains obscure. Unlike rheumatoid arthritis (RA), where autoantibodies and B cell dysfunction are central features, the contribution of humoral immunity to IA-irAE is unclear. Here, we performed immunophenotyping of peripheral blood from patients with IA-irAE and compared them with patients with seronegative RA, immune checkpoint inhibition–treated patients without irAE, and healthy controls. IA-irAE was marked with increased cytotoxic gene expression and metabolic activation in T cells and reduced CXCR3 and CCR6 expression in CD4 + T cells. Contrary to seronegative RA, patients with IA-irAE displayed no substantial elevation in autoantibody levels or atypical CD11c + CD21 − B cells. IA-irAE was further characterized by elevated levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-12, and type I interferon, which correlated with the T cell activation phenotypes. Together, our findings define IA-irAE as a disease with certain immunological features distinctive from RA, representing a potentially T cell–driven, autoantibody-independent autoimmunity. These results offer insights into immune tolerance breakdown and therapeutic targeting in irAEs.

Abstract Purpose Consensus recommendations and guidelines for reporting quantitative research in health professions education (HPE) research are lacking. This study synthesizes available quantitative reporting recommendations and guidelines to present a harmonized framework and derive quantitative standards for reporting HPE research. Method The authors identified existing standards, recommendations, and guidelines from peer-reviewed scientific journals in medicine, education, and social sciences by searching PubMed, Web of Science, and Google from August 2006 through April 2025. The authors also requested input from experts in HPE (scholars and journal editors) via electronic communication over 6 months (November 2024 to April 2025). The articles identified were then used to synthesize and generate an initial list of standards for reporting quantitative research in HPE. Two authors reviewed each article to rate its alignment with HPE research. All authors independently evaluated the full list of standards and discussed them as a group for their relevance and alignment for reporting in HPE; all authors also made recommendations for each standard (to report as is, report but modify, or drop). The group subsequently reviewed and collectively reached consensus on the final set of quantitative reporting standards. Results The authors reviewed a total of 34 articles, with 19 identified as having alignment with HPE quantitative research standards. Mean interrater agreement among author pairs was 98% (kappa = .96). Authors initially generated 40 reporting standards, of which 18 (45%) were modified and 1 (3%) was identified to be dropped. The final set of quantitative guidelines consisted of 39 standards, with each standard nested in one of 28 topic areas. Conclusions The quantitative reporting standards identified in this study provide guidance to ensure rigor in reporting expectations for HPE research. These standards may also facilitate critical appraisal of articles and enhance the quality and impact of quantitative HPE research.

Background: Distal femoral osteotomy (DFO) may be performed via either a lateral opening-wedge (LOW) or medial closing-wedge (MCW) osteotomy with meaningful clinical improvements; however, the effects of each DFO technique on leg length have not been well characterized. Purpose: To (1) validate a radiographic measurement technique to predict leg length changes after DFO and (2) compare the change in leg length after DFO for the LOW and MCW techniques. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Preoperative and postoperative full-length standing radiographs obtained from patients who underwent DFO at 1 of 2 academic medical centers were evaluated. The region on the medial (for LOW) or lateral (for MCW) distal femur cortex that would be the “hinge point” during DFO was identified on the radiographs. The distance from the center of the femoral head to the hinge point ( A ), the distance from the hinge point to the center of the talus ( B ), and the resultant angle (α) were measured. The equation presented within the text was used to plot the predicted leg length changes corresponding to the change in alpha angle produced by DFO. Comparisons were made between (1) the predicted and measured leg length changes after DFO and (2) the measured leg length change after LOW versus MCW osteotomies. Results: For both LOW (n = 10) and MCW (n = 10) osteotomies, the predicted leg length change was equivalent to the true change measured on postoperative radiographs (LOW: P = .16; MCW: P = .85). There was a mean lengthening of 0.85 mm (range, 0.5-1.3 mm) for every 1° of mechanical axis correction with LOW DFO, compared to a mean shortening of 0.45 mm (range, 0.1-1.4 mm) per 1° of MCW correction. Conclusion: Preoperative radiographic imaging can be used to predict leg length change after DFO with high reliability. Surgeons can expect approximately 0.85 mm of lengthening per 1° of DFO correction when performing LOW osteotomies, compared to 0.45 mm of shortening per 1° of correction for MCW osteotomies. However, the most accurate prediction results from patient-specific calculations.

Importance The management of infectious and inflammatory lesions of the breast remains controversial. The expert panel focused on management recommendations for 3 of the most common infectious breast conditions, as very few evidence-based guidelines for the management of these conditions exist. Observations Clinicians should distinguish between infectious and noninfectious lactational mastitis (LM) because the former often requires interventions whereas the latter requires supportive care only. Patients with infectious LM often have thick fluid collections that are not amenable to aspiration and usually require a stab incision with drain placement (but no packing) to resolve the infection. Operative drainage is only required if the patient cannot tolerate an office procedure. If a phlegmon is present, antibiotics should be prescribed for at least 10 days. The diagnosis of granulomatous mastitis (GM) requires pathology confirmation with characteristic findings on core biopsy. Cystic neutrophilic granulomatous mastitis (CNGM) is a specific form of GM associated with a granulomatous reaction to Corynebacterium infection and should be empirically treated with doxycycline. For patients without findings characteristic of CNGM and no other associated bacterium identified, there is no role for empiric antibiotic use. Granulomatous mastitis cases often recur and can take up to 18 months to resolve. Patients who have GM cases with worsening symptoms should be treated with repeated intralesional steroid injections; surgical excision or repeated aspirations should be avoided. Cases refractory to intralesional steroid injection may require oral steroids or even advanced biologic agents such as methotrexate or azathioprine. Periductal mastitis with squamous metaplasia of lactiferous ducts (PDM-SMOLD) is a distinct entity from other periductal mastitis cases that can present with recurrent abscesses and should be treated with antibiotics and aspiration for fluid collections. Operative excision for PDM-SMOLD is required for those patients who present with a fistula or recurrent episodes typically using a radial incision to remove the diseased ducts within and below the nipple. Conclusions and Relevance Evidence-informed, consensus-, and expert opinion–based guidelines for the management of infectious and inflammatory conditions of the breast were developed. Clinicians can use these guidelines to appropriately manage these conditions for which clinical care often varied in the past.

Abstract Professional identity is defined as the attitudes, behaviors, values, and experiences by which individuals define themselves in a professional role and is influenced by socialization during training and in the workplace. As professional identity develops and is integrated with one's personal identities, it allows an individual to think, act, and feel like a member of their chosen profession and to develop a sense of meaning, confidence, and satisfaction in their work. Conflicts may arise due to perceived differences between one's professional identity and the collective identity of the profession, resulting in stress, burnout, and attrition, all of which can negatively impact patient care and the collective identity of the genetic counseling profession. Using Social Identity Theory (SIT) as a theoretical framework to develop the semi‐structured interview protocol, recorded interviews were conducted with 50 genetic counselors who were purposefully sampled to ensure diversity of personal demographics (gender, race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, disability, and caregiver status), as well as years, settings, and roles in genetic counseling practice. Transcripts were coded and subjected to codebook thematic analysis using NVivo. Genetic counselors described their professional identity in terms of who they are (characteristics and attributes), what they do (actions and skills), and what they have (training and knowledge). The majority of participants had a multidimensional perspective of what it means to be a genetic counselor, noting the transferability of their skills to a broad set of roles and settings, which supported their sense of professional identity, particularly for those who were no longer seeing patients. Yet many expressed tension with the collective identity of the profession. Expanded opportunities for genetic counselors to work in new settings and roles require review and revision of key professional documents to ensure they are reflective of the collective identity of the genetic counseling profession.