Phillips, Andrew

Background: Distal femoral osteotomy (DFO) may be performed via either a lateral opening-wedge (LOW) or medial closing-wedge (MCW) osteotomy with meaningful clinical improvements; however, the effects of each DFO technique on leg length have not been well characterized. Purpose: To (1) validate a radiographic measurement technique to predict leg length changes after DFO and (2) compare the change in leg length after DFO for the LOW and MCW techniques. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Preoperative and postoperative full-length standing radiographs obtained from patients who underwent DFO at 1 of 2 academic medical centers were evaluated. The region on the medial (for LOW) or lateral (for MCW) distal femur cortex that would be the “hinge point” during DFO was identified on the radiographs. The distance from the center of the femoral head to the hinge point ( A ), the distance from the hinge point to the center of the talus ( B ), and the resultant angle (α) were measured. The equation presented within the text was used to plot the predicted leg length changes corresponding to the change in alpha angle produced by DFO. Comparisons were made between (1) the predicted and measured leg length changes after DFO and (2) the measured leg length change after LOW versus MCW osteotomies. Results: For both LOW (n = 10) and MCW (n = 10) osteotomies, the predicted leg length change was equivalent to the true change measured on postoperative radiographs (LOW: P = .16; MCW: P = .85). There was a mean lengthening of 0.85 mm (range, 0.5-1.3 mm) for every 1° of mechanical axis correction with LOW DFO, compared to a mean shortening of 0.45 mm (range, 0.1-1.4 mm) per 1° of MCW correction. Conclusion: Preoperative radiographic imaging can be used to predict leg length change after DFO with high reliability. Surgeons can expect approximately 0.85 mm of lengthening per 1° of DFO correction when performing LOW osteotomies, compared to 0.45 mm of shortening per 1° of correction for MCW osteotomies. However, the most accurate prediction results from patient-specific calculations.

Background: Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction is frequently indicated for recurrent lateral patellar instability. The preoperative presence and severity of a J-sign have been associated with poorer postoperative outcomes. Purpose: To determine the underlying anatomic factors that contribute to the presence, severity, and jumping quality of the J-sign. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: All patients undergoing evaluation for patellar instability at a single institution between 2013 and 2023 and healthy controls without patellar instability were included. Patients with a history of knee osteotomies were excluded. The presence of a jumping J-sign and its relationship to patellofemoral measures including the Caton-Deschamps Index (CDI), trochlear dysplasia (Dejour grade), tibial tubercle–trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, tibial tubercle lateralization, trochlear bump height, mechanical alignment, femoral anteversion, tibial torsion, trochlear medialization, patellar width, axial patellar/trochlear overlap, patellar height, trochlear height, and knee rotation angle (KRA) were measured using standardized 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Univariate pairwise and multivariable analyses were performed to determine the factors associated with J-sign presence, severity, and quality. Results: Of the 130 knees with patellar instability, 89 (68.5%) demonstrated a J-sign on physical examination. In total, 44 (33.8%) patients demonstrated a 1-quadrant J-sign, 32 (24.6%) demonstrated a 2-quadrant smooth J-sign, and 13 (10.0%) demonstrated a jumping J-sign. A total of 22 control, noninstability cases were included. On multivariable analysis, increasing TT-TG distance (OR, 1.1 increase per millimeter; P = .04), external KRA (OR, 1.1 increase per degree; P = .02), and increasing CDI (OR, 1.3 increase per 0.1 increase in CDI; P = .02) were associated with J-sign presence. Increasing bump height (OR, 1.72 increase per millimeter; P = .007) and decreasing patellar width (OR, 0.89 decrease per millimeter; P = .076) were associated with a larger J-sign, when present. Increasing bump height (OR, 1.80 increase per millimeter; P = .018), increasing patellar width (OR, 1.33 increase per millimeter; P = .047), and decreasing CDI (OR, 0.009 decrease per 0.01 increase in ratio; P = .008) were associated with a jumping J-sign in comparison with a smooth 2-quadrant J-sign. A KRA of 10° (AUC, 0.70) and a cartilaginous bump height of 6.6 mm (AUC, 0.73) were thresholds associated with jumping J-sign presence. Conclusion: The presence of a J-sign is associated with MRI findings of relatively greater external tibiofemoral rotation, increased TT-TG distance, and increased patellar height, while J-sign severity and jumping quality are associated with the presence of additional underlying trochlear factors such as increased bump height. The anatomic drivers identified in this study should be further evaluated as possible factors associated with suboptimal outcomes after surgical management.

Objectives: A DFO can be performed via two techniques: a lateral opening wedge (LOW) osteotomy and a medial closing wedge (MCW) osteotomy. Small case series have looked at how leg length is affected by a lateral opening wedge DFO, however, there is a lack of research comparing these leg length changes to medial closing DFO. Additionally, no studies have presented a model for predicting the leg length changes that will occur following DFO of either technique. Given that limb length differences can lead to accelerated osteoarthritis, back pain, hip pain, and other issues, being able to predict which technique can help prevent this pathology without a secondary procedure would be an important finding. Finally, the medial closing wedge osteotomy can allow for immediate weight-bearing while the lateral opening wedge does not and typically has associated cost with bone grafting. Therefore, we designed this study to validate a tool designed to predict leg length changes after distal femoral osteotomy (DFO) and compare changes following medial closing wedge (MCW) and lateral opening wedge (LOW) techniques. Methods: A collaborative retrospective review was performed of patients from Rush and Mayo Clinic databases who received a DFO and had full-length standing radiographs both pre-and postoperatively. For each preoperative radiograph, the region on the medial (for LOW) or lateral (for MCW) distal femur cortex that would be the “hinge point” during DFO was identified. The distances from the center of the femoral head to the hinge point (“A”), from the hinge point to the center of the tibial plafond (“B”), and the resultant angle at the hinge point (“α”) were measured (Figure 1). Figure 2 demonstrates the equation used to plot a graph of the predicted leg length changes corresponding to the change in α angle produced by DFO. Final leg length was calculated on postoperative radiographs, and the difference between predicted and true leg length changes was compared using paired Wilcoxon signed rank exact tests. Results: 10 MCW and 10 LOW patients were included. For both LOW (n=10) and MCW (n=10) osteotomies, the predicted leg length change was equivalent to the true change measured on postoperative radiographs (LOW P=0.16; MCW P=0.85). LOW DFO’s had 5.10 ± 2.77 mm (range: 1.45-10.87 mm) of leg lengthening, compared to 2.61 ± 1.25 mm (range: 0.50-4.56 mm) of leg shortening (p<0.001) for MCW (Figure 3). On average, there was 0.85 mm of lengthening (range 0.5-1.3 mm) for every 1° of mechanical axis correction with LOW DFO, compared to 0.45 mm of shortening (range: 0.1-1.4 mm) per 1° of MCW correction. Conclusions: This study presents a tool to accurately and reliably predict the leg length changes seen after both medial closing and lateral opening wedge DFO’s. Knowing what leg length changes to expect with each DFO technique is a useful tool that surgeons can utilize during surgical planning. Preoperative radiographic imaging can be used to predict leg length change following DFO with high reliability and accuracy. Surgeons can expect approximately 0.85mm of lengthening per 1° of DFO correction when performing LOW, compared to 0.45mm of shortening per 1° correction for MCW osteotomies.