Citations

Background The current classification of pulmonary hypertension (PH), based largely on expert opinion, has limitations in prognostication and guiding therapies. We hypothesize that novel PH clusters that predict survival will reveal mechanistic phenotypes associated with biomarkers of vascular health across all PH groups. Methods We first identify novel PH clinical clusters by performing unsupervised clustering analysis on the CC‐PH (Cleveland Clinic PH) registry (N=1529). We develop classification models to predict the new PH clusters and then apply them to the multicenter PVDOMICS (Pulmonary Vascular Diseases Phenomics) cohort (N=853) for validation. We compare transplantation‐free survival across the new PH clusters. We quantify metabolites of the arginine‐nitric oxide pathway and D‐dimer levels and calculate global arginine bioavailability (arginine/[ornithine+citrulline]) to assess endothelial function and activation in the new clusters and link these biomarkers to clinical outcomes. Results Clustering analysis identify 3 clear clusters in CC ‐ PH that are validated in PVDOMICS and outperform conventional classifications in predicting transplantation‐free survival. The phenotype associated with the worst survival is characterized by reduced lung diffusion capacity, decreased arginine bioavailability and nitrate levels, and elevated D‐dimer levels, consistent with loss of pulmonary microcirculation and endothelial dysfunction. Conclusions We identify new informative PH phenotypes associated with mortality and defined by biomarkers of endothelial function and activation. Loss of endothelial health and pronounced pulmonary vascular rarefication contribute more substantially to mortality across the spectrum of PH than right heart function. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02980887.

Background: We had a large-scale measles exposure event affecting 626 patients. Management of exposed patients was urgent, involving quarantine, post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP), and symptom monitoring on a case-by-case basis. Cases were initially tracked and managed using a combination of multiple spreadsheets amongst stakeholders as well as lists within the electronic health record (EHR). Using shared spreadsheets and lists created significant challenges with maintaining and editing multiple copies and updating workbooks simultaneously. Methods: Infection Prevention and Control (IPAC) worked with primary care personnel and EHR developers to create a shared registry that would prioritize communication and follow-up for exposed patients based on age and immunity. Patients are initially added to the shared registry within the EHR by reviewing non-registry reports and tagging patients, identified using exposure timeframes that overlapped with the index measles cases, in a manner that transferred them to the shared registry. From this registry, measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine status can be confirmed, immune status can be identified, and criteria for PEP assigned. High-risk patients are then contacted with recommendations from IPAC and primary care. Communication and follow-up are tracked directly within the shared registry to ensure appropriate patient management. The exposure management registry is further leveraged throughout the measles outbreak timeframe by allowing real-time monitoring of patients that require additional precautions or guidance related to their exposure. Result: The shared registry enhanced documentation accuracy and transparency between stakeholders. It led to availability of real-time status of exposed patients for the duration of the measles outbreak timeframe. Overall, the registry enabled time-sensitive patient communication to all exposed patients and rapid identification of those who needed PEP. Communication could happen rapidly and seamlessly between care teams within the organization, and the necessary information could be shared quickly with public health authorities as required. Conclusion: Large scale exposures are a challenge to manage and ensure appropriate action and communication occurs. Errors can be prevented by having a single shared exposure management registry. A registry enables care teams to quickly identify and prioritize patients for measles follow-up, communication, PEP, and ongoing management across outbreak timeframes. This process reduces both time and operational burdens of exposure follow-up tracking outside of the EHR.

Background: We describe an investigation of a cluster of eight Corynebacterium amycolatum sternal surgical site infections (SSIs) that occurred among cardiac surgery patients from February to October 2025. Although C. amycolatum is a member of the skin microbiota, clinically significant infections caused by this organism may occur in cardiac surgery patients. Methods: The investigation included retrospective reviews of SSIs, clinical cultures and medical records, surgical observations, and operating room (OR) assessment. Line lists of surgical case criteria and infection prevention practices were created to assess common factors among cases (e.g., staffing, instrumentation, equipment, skin preparation and antisepsis, nasal decolonization, antibiotic protocols, and closure). Whole genome sequencing of isolates was performed and analyzed using SNIPPY for single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based phylogenetic analysis. Results: Phylogenetic analysis indicated isolates from five of eight case patients who had cardiac surgeries occurring over a six-week period from February to April 2025 were genetically related (?7 SNPs across the genome), suggesting a common source of infection. These five isolates were ceftriaxone, meropenem, and penicillin resistant. The other three case patient isolates were unrelated (<3181 to <15,000 SNPs); two were ceftriaxone, meropenem and penicillin resistant (one also doxycycline intermediate resistant), and the third penicillin resistant. Use of sternal tape for closure was identified as a recent practice change. Four of five genetically related cases involved the same surgeons and suture tape for sternal closure (wire for all other cases). Sternal tape was discontinued with three cases occurring afterwards. Seven patients completed chlorhexidine gluconate bathing and nasal decolonization. Hair was removed in the OR with reusable surgical clippers. All received the same skin antiseptic, and antibiotic prophylaxis was appropriate. No trends were identified in instrument or equipment use. Broad infection control measures were implemented, including surgical clipper replacement, OR cleaning and ultraviolet light disinfection, headlamp cleaning, and environmental repairs. Leadership was engaged through frequent meetings and audits. Infection control practices such as minimizing OR traffic, double gloving, glove changes, and strict adherence to hand hygiene and attire were reinforced. Two of eight cases occurred after these recommendations were completed but were not genetically related to the primary cluster. Conclusion: We describe a cluster of invasive C. amycolatum sternotomy SSIs. Only two genetically unrelated cases of C. amycolatum occurred following infection control investigation and interventions, underscoring the effectiveness of a comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach. This organism has rarely been reported as a cause of SSIs and may be an emerging pathogen.

Background: Measles is a highly transmissible virus. A single case can result in significant exposures within a healthcare facility and prompt action is needed to prevent secondary cases. In October 2025, Infection Prevention and Control (IPAC) was notified of a patient being admitted to our facility with recent international travel and symptoms consistent with measles. The patient was unvaccinated and had five healthcare facility visits prior to measles being suspected and subsequently confirmed. Objective: To describe our facility’s effective identification, prioritization, and prophylaxis of individuals exposed to measles. Methods: IPAC leveraged the electronic medical record to identify potentially exposed patients. Patients were quickly assessed for age and immune status, then prioritized and assigned to primary care teams. These teams promptly contacted patients and coordinated PEP administration. Results: Across five encounters, the index patient exposed 539 other patients. Due to delayed notification, our teams had less than four days to administer PEP for those exposed and still within PEP window. PEP administration began within hours of the index case’s positive test and patients received PEP within three days (Table 1). No secondary measles cases occurred within our facility. Conclusion: Timely and coordinated multidisciplinary effort enabled us to rapidly respond to our first measles case and control secondary transmission. Although the index case resulted in a large exposure, patients that were exposed and eligible for PEP were quickly prioritized to prevent secondary transmission.

Background: Advanced planning and adaptable response strategies are essential for preventing measles transmission in healthcare facilities. Objective: To describe a measles management plan and subsequent modifications in response to a cluster of measles cases. Methods: Drawing on previously published work (doi:10.1017/ice.2025.49), the Infection Prevention and Control (IPAC) team initiated a multi-disciplinary team and developed a measles preparedness plan with the following domains: Guidance and education; early detection and testing; isolation and patient movement; contact tracing and exposure management (Table 1). In October 2025, a patient was admitted during their fifth healthcare encounter and was diagnosed with measles. Two family members were later hospitalized with measles. Delayed recognition of the first case prompted enhancements to our preparedness framework (Table 1). Results: The first case resulted in 539 exposed patients. The second resulted in 87 exposures, and the third resulted in no exposure. Despite the extensive exposure, zero secondary measles were reported. Conclusion: Proactive planning enabled rapid response to our first case and controlled secondary transmission. Despite extensive planning, delayed identification of the first case caused significant exposures. As the cluster unfolded, we refined our plan, resulting in zero exposures from the last patient and zero secondary cases, despite over 850 exposures. These efforts may guide other healthcare facilities in improving their measles preparedness and response.

Background: In 2025, 50 measles outbreaks drove 87% of confirmed cases reported in the United States. As a highly infectious virus with an estimated R ranging from 12-18, we sought rapidly scalable and implementable measles preparedness measures for our facilities. Methods: The electronic health record (EHR) has flags that can be placed on patient records to denote the presence of, or concern for, active, transmissible infections. These flags are highly visible in the EHR and represent a good usability heuristic as front line providers are already trained to look for this information. Infection Prevention and Control (IPAC) worked with nursing informatics to develop measles-specific flags for suspected, confirmed and exposed patients in the EHR, expanding flagging functionality in preparation for potential measles cases and exposures. The flagging was tied to registry functionality to allow for tracking of exposed and confirmed cases longitudinally for supporting IPAC investigations in addition to clinical operations. Results: Three different flags were developed in the EHR to address measles. Specific criteria were created for each flag, as shown in Table 1. Table 1: Attached as Image Conclusion: As a highly contagious virus, measles presents unique challenges to healthcare facilities managing both cases and exposures. Measles flags within the EHR can be leveraged to assist facilities with case tracking, exposure management, and infection prevention and control.

Background: Candida auris is a globally emerging, multidrug-resistant fungal pathogen that causes serious, difficult-to-treat infections in hospitalized patients. C. auris cases in the United States have been linked to receipt of healthcare overseas. Outbreaks have also occurred in New York City, New Jersey, Illinois, Nevada, and California. We provide care to patients from all 50 states and 138 countries and are therefore, at risk for encountering C.auris within our facility. Methods: A case-finding tool was created by Infection Prevention and Control (IPAC) within the electronic medical record (EMR) to identify patients for screening. Inclusion criteria was centric to patients who were admitted in the previous 24 hours with a primary address in a foreign country or in areas of the United States with known C. auris transmission. Patients who are positive for Carbapenamase-producing organisms (CPO) are also included in screening criteria. In 2020, Clinical Microbiology validated a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test in partnership with the State Health Department and IPAC. In January 2022, IPAC created a protocol that allows IPAC staff to order C. auris screening directly in the EMR utilizing the validated PCR test. The order is paired with communication from IPAC alerting the patient care team that C.auris screening is indicated. Instructions on test collection and information on C. auris are also included in messaging. The patient’s primary nurse then obtains verbal consent from the patient to collect a composite axilla–groin skin swab. Swabs are sent to Clinical Microbiology for testing, and results are reported directly into the EMR. Results: Since the introduction of the nursing protocol in January 2022, 2,660 patients have been identified for C. auris screening through November 2025. Of the 2,660 patients identified for testing, 1,111 patients had screening completed. Two patients tested positive for C. auris on screening. Both patients had prolonged travel to regions with known C. auris transmission. Conclusion: The EMR can be leveraged for early identification and screening of patients at risk of C.auris colonization. Case finding tools, combined with nursing protocols and communication strategies within the EMR can be effectively replicated and modified to respond to emerging infections.

Background: Carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPO) are a serious public health threat. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for combating CPO includes a recommendation to screen selected high risk patients. We describe a program to identify and screen patients at risk for CPO. Setting: An academic, tertiary care center with 2,059 licensed beds and 74,359 admissions a year. Methods: A report was created in the electronic medical record (EMR) to identify adult patients admitted in the previous 24 hours who were from countries and states with known CPO transmission based on address and zip code. A nursing protocol was subsequently developed in the EMR to facilitate CPO screening for eligible patients at admission. After the CPO order is placed, an electronic communication is sent via the EMR alerting the patient care team of the order, the rationale for screening, details on swab collection, and links to a toolkit with resources to help answer patient questions. A single perirectal swab is obtained by the patient’s primary nurse and is tested for Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase (KPC), New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM), oxacillinase-48 (OXA-48), and Verona integron-encoded metallo-β-lactamase (VIM) by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Patients may refuse testing. Results: From May 2018 through November 2025, 6,039 patients were identified for CPO screening using case-finding report. Of these patients, 2,424 had CPO swabs completed. Eighteen patients with CPO were identified with an overall yield of 0.75% on admission screening. There was one patient who tested positive for KPC, 10 patients who tested positive for NDM, and 5 patients who tested positive for OXA-48. Two patients were identified to have both NDM and OXA-48. Conclusions: The EMR can be leveraged for early identification and screening of patients with epidemiologically significant pathogens. Use of the nursing protocol has enabled IPAC to complete timely CPO surveillance and prevent transmission to other patients. Protocols within the EMR can be effectively replicated for a timely response to emerging infections.

Background: Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) remain a challenge in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs); central line days have been directly correlated with risk of CLABSI. The Mayo Clinic PICU is a 23-bed multidisciplinary unit including dedicated bone marrow transplant beds with an average of 1048 admissions annually. In 2024, the unit’s CLABSI rate was 0.82 per 1,000 central line days or approximately 1–3 CLABSIs per year. Weekly multidisciplinary CLABSI Prevention Rounds were piloted from August 2024 to March 2025 with the aim of reducing central line device utilization rate as a method to reduce CLABSI risk. Methods: A multidisciplinary team of Clinical Nurse Specialists (CNS), Nurse Managers, and off-service PICU physicians conducted weekly CLABSI rounds on PICU beds (excluding 4 BMT beds), meeting with each bedside nurse as well as the on-service providers. The CLABSI team assessed central line necessity using a standard questionnaire and provided education to physicians and nurses regarding central line care and CLABSI prevention. Monthly data were compared for the same 8 calendar months pre versus post intervention for central line days, patient days, and device utilization rate (DUR; central line days/patient days), both unadjusted and adjusted for PRISM (Pediatric Risk of Mortality) 3 severity of illness score. Pre- and post-implementation staff surveys assessed confidence in line management and interdisciplinary communication using Likert scales. Results: Thirty-two CLABSI rounds with a total of 118 individual patients and 45 discrete interventions were noted over 8 months and compared to the 8 pre-intervention corresponding months. Pre versus post monthly DUR was 0.42 [0.32–0.57] vs 0.46 [0.30–0.55], p = 0.49 (PRISM 3–adjusted p = 0.97). Nursing confidence in ‘discussing central line need’ significantly improved post-implementation, 5 [4–5] vs 5 [5–5], p = 0.035. Nurses also positively perceived third-party involvement in need assessment, 4 [3–4] vs 4 [3–4], p = 0.06. All surveyed clinicians trended toward being less likely to think a central line was left in too long, 3 [3–4] vs 3 [2–4], p = 0.06. Conclusion: Structured weekly multidisciplinary CLABSI rounds are a feasible intervention that empowers bedside nurses and improves confidence in line maintenance and interdisciplinary communication. Median DUR was not significantly altered by the intervention, but nursing perception of central line management improved qualitatively in pre- versus post-implementation surveys. Continued expansion of multidisciplinary initiatives addressing central line necessity and management is needed to further evaluate overall effects on DUR and CLABSI incidence.

Background: Handshake antimicrobial stewardship (AMS), characterized by regular, face-to-face interactions with antimicrobial prescribers with broad review of all active antimicrobials, is considered an AMS best practice. This approach fosters relationship building and increases opportunities for targeted education compared to traditional AMS activities. Reports of handshake AMS within surgical services are limited. We evaluated the impact of once-weekly handshake AMS rounds among general surgery teams in a 368-bed academic medical center. Methods: An infectious diseases physician and pharmacist conducted weekly rounds in general surgery offices with surgical residents, chief residents, advanced practice providers (APPs), medical students, and occasionally attending surgeons. All patients on antimicrobials and without an active ID consult were reviewed and recommendations with targeted education were provided. The number, type, and acceptance rate of recommendations were collected prospectively. Antimicrobial utilization within general surgery was reviewed pre- (1/1/2024-12/31/2024) and post-implementation (1/1/2025-12/31/2025) of handshake AMS rounds. Antimicrobial use data are presented as days of therapy (DOT)/1000 days present (DP). Results: From January 7, 2025, through January 6, 2026, 47 handshake AMS sessions were performed. Over this period, 215 recommendations were provided, and 173 recommendations were implemented, yielding a recommendation implementation rate of 80.5% and an average of 4.6 recommendations/session. The most common accepted recommendation types were duration modification (n=42, 24.3%), antibiotic stop (n=38, 22.0%), and de-escalation (n=33, 19.1%). Average DOT/1000 DP on general surgery teams for all agents dropped from 481.3 pre- to 462.8 post-implementation (3.8% relative reduction, p=0.578). Broad-spectrum antibiotic use dropped by 17.5%, from 369.2 pre- to 304.6 post-implementation (p=0.055). Anti-MRSA agent utilization remained stably low, with an average of 45.4 pre- vs 49.0 DOT/1000 DP post-implementation. The use of enteral metronidazole increased, from 4.9% pre- to 18.2% enteral/IV DOT post-implementation. Surgical providers consistently expressed appreciation for the practice-changing education provided during handshake AMS rounds and the resulting enhancements in antimicrobial decision-making and patient care. Conclusion: Targeted, once-weekly handshake AMS rounds with general surgery resulted in high-yield interventions with a high acceptance rate. Handshake AMS rounds could be an effective stewardship intervention in surgical practices and is doable despite the challenges of unpredictable operating room/provider schedules.