Citations

Background: Ketamine and esketamine are increasingly used for treatment-resistant depression (TRD), yet their hepatic safety profile with repeated or long-term use remains poorly characterized. Chronic recreational ketamine abuse has been linked to cholestasis and cholangiopathy, raising concern that therapeutic use may carry similar risks. No systematic data exist on liver enzyme trajectories or biliary injury at subanesthetic doses used for depression. Methods: This historical cohort study included adults with TRD receiving IV ketamine or intranasal (IN) esketamine at the Mayo Clinic Ketamine Clinic (2017 to 2024). Patients were eligible if they had at least one liver enzyme value (AST, ALT, ALP, or bilirubin) within 12 months before through 3 months after treatment. Longitudinal enzyme trajectories were modeled using generalized linear-mixed models with a Gamma distribution. Clinically significant elevation was defined as ≥2× the upper limit of normal (ULN). Wilcoxon signed-rank tests compared pretreatment and post-treatment paired values. Results: Of 104 enrolled patients, 74 had liver enzyme data available; 51 had post-initiation data. Median age was 51.5 years; 72% were female. Most (78.4%) received IV ketamine. No clinically meaningful changes in enzyme trajectories were observed. Three patients (5.9%) had elevations ≥2× ULN, all attributable to alcohol use, myalgias, or pre-existing hepatic steatosis rather than (es)ketamine. Conclusions: Subanesthetic IV ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) and FDA-approved IN esketamine doses were not associated with clinically significant liver enzyme elevations in this real-world TRD cohort. Current evidence does not support routine hepatic monitoring for asymptomatic patients, although prospective, larger-scale studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Although structured reporting of adverse events related to medical therapies is a critical aspect of clinical trials, the current practice fails to capture postoperative complications accurately or systematically, which precludes our ability to fully assess the impact of the risks of surgical interventions on oncologic outcomes. The incorporation of standardized, procedure‐specific definitions and severity classifications for postoperative complications into adverse event reporting in trials conducted through the National Clinical Trials Network is proposed.

Background Traumatic injury is the fourth leading cause of death nationally; rural residents are twice as likely to die from injury as urban counterparts. On-scene mortality coverage gaps across regional trauma systems remain poorly characterized. Objective To identify geographic blind spots and time-critical, spatially advantageous on-scene deaths (2019-2023) that fall outside modeled 10-minute drive-time service areas across seven North Central state trauma regions. Methods This retrospective analysis geocoded death certificate records to ZIP Code Tabulation Areas and modeled 10-minute drive-time service areas in ArcGIS Online. EMS agency headquarters and staffing classification (volunteer, mixed, paid) were obtained from the DHS EMS Service Map. Candidate sites were identified by maximizing coverage of weighted, uncovered death centroids per region. Results Of 11,868 decedents (60.7% male; mean age 64.4 years [SD 25.6]; 49.9% fall, 26.4% firearm), 7815 had geocodable addresses. Coverage ranged from 53.5% (Western) to 87.0% (North Central); 5492 (70.3%) fell within a 10-minute service area. One candidate site per region could extend modeled coverage to 4-321 additional death locations (480 combined). Volunteer-dominant regions, where 63% of agencies reported scheduling gaps, had the lowest coverage, suggesting headquarters presence overstates availability. Conclusion Geospatial analysis identified actionable blind spots where one additional EMS resource per region could extend modeled coverage to hundreds of death locations. Because these are modeled coverage gains, not demonstrated mortality reductions, and depend in volunteer-dominant regions on staffing reliability that placement alone cannot resolve, the identified locations warrant further evaluation, not presumed survival benefit.

Abstract In response to a Cochrane review (published in April 2026) on the clinical trials of monoclonal antibodies targeting beta amyloid, this perspective outlines a number of critiques. The scientists, methodologists, subject‐matter experts, and clinicians on this perspective strongly recommend that the Cochrane editorial board consider a call for editorial response, correction of press materials, or commissioned reply to this review for four overarching reasons: (1) decision to pool antibodies that do and do not clear beta amyloid, (2) decision to include studies from a time when biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease were not available, (3) analytical and methodological limitations of the approach used, (4) conflating the distinct roles and methodological processes of systematic review and guideline methodologies, (5) contextualizing the present critique within the existing evidence‐synthesis literature, and (6) mechanistic inference beyond the scope of the presented analyses. Conclusions that may not accurately reflect treatment‐specific effects could cause significant downstream clinical and psychosocial harm to those currently undergoing treatment and their family members as well as individuals considering participation in Alzheimer's clinical trials.

Purpose of review To review the clinical, educational, academic, and institutional value of a dedicated neuroanesthesiology division beyond its practical role in scheduling neurosurgical and neurointerventional cases. Recent findings Neuroanesthesiology has matured into a recognized subspecialty with dedicated societies, journals, fellowship pathways, educational milestones, and defined research priorities. Recent observational studies suggest that dedicated neuroanesthetic care, formal fellowship training, and surgeon–anesthesiologist dyad familiarity may be associated with fewer neurologic complications, lower in-hospital morbidity, shorter length of stay, and reduced admission costs in high-acuity neurosurgical populations. Concurrently, quality improvement reports identify recurring challenges in medication management, communication, documentation, and equipment readiness that a focused division is well positioned to address. For instance, division-led initiatives at select institutions have successfully integrated The SNACC Neuroanesthetic Emergencies Critical Event Treatment Guides and Cognitive Aids into clinical and educational workflows. Cultivating this subspecialty identity may be a protective factor against clinician burnout. However, current evidence remains largely retrospective and context-dependent. Summary: A neuroanesthesiology division can provide infrastructure for clinical expertise, care pathways, simulation-based education, mentorship, research, quality improvement, and collaboration with neuroscience programs. Its core value lies in creating a reliable structure that supports both neuroanesthesiologists and general anesthesiologists caring for neurologically vulnerable patients.

Background High‐risk non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer (HRNMIBC) has a variable prognosis, managed predominantly by local surgical resection and intravesical Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG), or radical cystectomy (RC). Current treatments are poorly tolerated, have supply limitations and often fail to control the disease. Treatments overcoming these limitations are needed to improve HRNMIBC outcomes. Many novel agents have been approved in recent years (including systemic pembrolizumab, nogapendekin alfa inbakicept‐pmln, N‐803), but long‐term efficacy is unknown. Given advanced bladder cancer findings, we believe direct intravesical administration of atezolizumab may aid with managing HRNMIBC or muscle‐invasive bladder cancer in patients who are ineligible for cisplatin‐based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Study design The INtraVESical immunoTherapy (INVEST) trial is a UK‐based, open‐label, non‐randomised, single‐centre, Phase Ib dose escalation, window of opportunity study exploring atezolizumab administration via intravesical routes (passive instillation and direct injection [sub‐urothelial]) in patients with bladder cancer with all stages undergoing RC. For both routes, an initial dose confirmation stage will determine toxicity and recommended atezolizumab dosage, followed by a dose expansion stage to further evaluate safety and toxicity at the recommended dose. Endpoints We aim to investigate safety (primary) and preliminary activity (secondary) of intravesical atezolizumab delivered by passive instillation and direct injection into the tumour/bladder wall in patients with bladder urothelial cell carcinoma prior to RC. Primary endpoints include dose limiting toxicities and adverse events. Secondary endpoints include progression‐free survival, pathological complete response rate and treatment compliance. Exploratory endpoints include pharmacokinetic profile (assessed by serum and urine concentrations at prespecified timepoints), spatial analysis of atezolizumab distribution within RC tissue by imaging mass spectrometry and overall survival. Patients and Methods Atezolizumab will be administered intravesically by either passive instillation or direct injection into the tumour/bladder wall. Cohorts will receive either 600 mg or 1200 mg doses administered as a single dose or as multiple doses (weekly for 3–6 weeks). Trial Registration International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number: ISRCTN15842444 , registered 2 December 2022.

Abstract Frailty influences treatment outcomes in older patients with multiple myeloma (MM), yet existing frailty tools capture limited geriatric domains and are incompletely studied in the context of contemporary therapies. We prospectively evaluated patient-reported comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) domains and their associations with treatment toxicity and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in older adults with MM. Patients aged ≥60 years with newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory MM initiating a new therapy completed electronic CGA and PRO questionnaires at baseline and 4 months. Outcomes included clinician- and patient-reported treatment toxicity, treatment adaptations, health care use, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). A cumulative deficit frailty index (FI) was derived from CGA and HRQOL domains. Among 90 patients (mean age, 72 years), geriatric impairments were common, particularly physical function domains. High-grade nonhematologic toxicities were significantly associated with older age, comorbidities, patient-reported functional limitations, and anxiety. Toxicity rates on the PRO version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) were higher than on CTCAE, highlighting a discordance between physician- and patient-reported treatment toxicity. Frailty was present in 22% and associated with worse baseline HRQOL and increased high-grade nonhematologic toxicity but not treatment adaptations or health care use. Average CGA and HRQOL scores remained stable over 4 months, although individual trajectories varied. Patient-reported geriatric impairments are prevalent in older adults with MM and strongly associated with nonhematologic toxicities even in the contemporary treatment era. Physician-reported CTCAE may not fully reflect patients' symptom burden. Heterogeneity in individual geriatric trajectories during treatment emphasize the need for longitudinal assessment. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT05918185.

Abstract Measurable residual disease (MRD) is a powerful prognostic tool in multiple myeloma, but predictors of achieving MRD negativity after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) are not well defined. We studied 814 patients who achieved at least a very good partial response after ASCT between January 2016 and January 2023 and underwent MRD assessment by next-generation flow cytometry. Overall, 387 (48%) achieved MRD negativity after ASCT. The presence of t(11;14) (odds ratio [OR], 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4–3.2; P< .01) and pretransplant response less than complete remission (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.2-3.7; P< .01) independently predicted MRD positivity. Patients who were MRD positive had inferior progression-free survival (PFS; hazard ratio [HR], 1.99; 95% CI, 1.53-2.58; P< .001) and overall survival (HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.10-2.28; P = .009). Despite lower MRD-negative rate, 5-year PFS was similar among t(11;14) MRD positive (58%) and patients who were MRD negative (63%; P = .12). In patients who were MRD negative, the 5-year PFS was 73% in those without ≥2 HRCA compared with 55% in those with ≥2 HRCA (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2–3.3; P = .01). In the MRD-positive cohort, 5-year PFS was 53% in patients without ≥2 HRCA vs 17% in those with ≥2 HRCA (HR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.6-3.6; P< .01). In addition, higher residual clonal plasma cell burden within MRD-positive disease was associated with inferior PFS (HR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.2-6.9; P = .002). This study highlights that the presence of t(11;14) independently predicts MRD positivity after ASCT, although it does not significantly affect prognosis in this subgroup.

PURPOSE Bone metastases (BM) occur in approximately 30% of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and are associated with poor survival and symptomatic skeletal events (SSEs). Radium-223, an alpha-emitting bone-seeking radioisotope, and cabozantinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, have demonstrated activity in BM. RADICAL (Alliance A031801; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04071223 ) evaluated cabozantinib ± radium-223 in mRCC with BM. METHODS This phase II trial enrolled patients with mRCC of any histology with ≥1 BM. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to cabozantinib ± radium-223, stratified by osteoclast-targeted therapy (OTT), prior therapy, opioid use, and International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk. The primary end point was SSE-free survival (SSE-FS). Secondary end points included safety, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS). A target of 124 evaluable patients was planned, with a prespecified interim futility analysis at 50% of expected SSE-FS events; the trial would stop if the stratified hazard ratio (sHR) > 1.0. RESULTS The prespecified interim futility analysis was conducted after 90 patients were enrolled and crossed the futility boundary, leading to closure at 98 patients. The final analysis included all 98 patients. Median age was 63 years, 82.7% had clear cell histology, and 79.6% were using an OTT. IMDC risk was favorable (18.4%), intermediate (67.3%), and poor (14.3%). Median follow-up was 13.1 months. Median SSE-FS for cabozantinib with radium-223 versus cabozantinib was 16.7 versus 17.6 months (sHR, 1.46 [90% CI, 0.86 to 2.51]). Median OS was 28.3 versus 19.7 months (sHR, 1.40 [95% CI, 0.70 to 2.79]). ORR was 19.4% versus 25.0% ( P = .78). Grade ≥3 adverse events were similar across arms (69.6% v 75.5%). CONCLUSION Radium-223 did not improve SSE-FS when added to cabozantinib. The combination demonstrated a manageable safety profile.

Abstract Background Corticobasal syndrome (CBS) is a neurodegenerative syndrome that often results from a 4-repeat tauopathy. Abnormalities on tau PET, structural MRI, and diffusion MRI (dMRI) have been observed in CBS, although no prior work has systematically compared the relative sensitivity of these modalities. In addition, the relationships between tau uptake, volume loss, and white matter degeneration remain incompletely understood. Objective To compare the sensitivity of tau PET, structural volume, and dMRI metrics to differentiate CBS from controls, and to characterize relationships between regional tau uptake, volume loss, and white matter tract abnormalities. Methods Thirty-two participants meeting criteria for possible or probable CBS and 35 healthy controls underwent standardized 3T dMRI, 18 F-flortaucipir tau PET, and detailed neurologic assessment. Diffusion data were processed using complementary diffusion tensor, free-water, and Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging (NODDI) pipelines, with tract-level metrics extracted using the Johns Hopkins University-Eve (JHU EVE) White Matter atlas. Regional gray matter volumes and flortaucipir standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs) were calculated. Global tau PET uptake, represented by the first principal component (PC1), was removed in a secondary tau analysis. Modality-level discrimination was assessed using area under the curve (AUC) analyses. Cross-modality relationships were evaluated using regional correlations and covariate-adjusted models comparing volume- and tau-related predictors of white matter abnormalities. Results Relative to controls, CBS showed widespread higher mean diffusivity (MD) and lower intracellular volume fraction (ICVF), especially in sensorimotor and projection white matter pathways. Structural volume reductions were most prominent in precentral cortex and subcortical regions including putamen, thalamus, and pallidum, whereas tau PET abnormalities were weaker and less spatially extensive. MD showed the strongest overall discrimination between CBS and controls, followed by ICVF, structural volume, PC1-removed tau PET, and original tau PET. In targeted sensorimotor analyses, higher DTI-MD was most strongly associated with lower gray matter volume. PC1-removed sensorimotor tau uptake was also associated with higher sensorimotor DTI-MD, whereas original tau uptake and broader cortical or subcortical tau measures were not significant predictors. Conclusions White matter microstructural disruption is a dominant imaging signature of CBS and is more closely linked to gray matter volume loss than to measurable uptake on tau PET. dMRI, particularly MD and ICVF, may provide greatest sensitivity for detecting disease-related changes in CBS.