Citations

PURPOSE For patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC), cancer-related time spent in health care systems, time toxicity, represents a critical but understudied burden affecting quality of life. This study aimed to quantify time toxicity in patients receiving first-line systemic therapy and evaluate whether the addition of durvalumab to gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) increases health care contact time. METHODS This international, multicenter, retrospective cohort study included patients with advanced BTC seen between January 2019 and April 2024 at Mayo Clinic Enterprise (US), and between January 2021 and April 2024 at Kyorin University Hospital (Japan), and Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein (Brazil). Patients received GC plus durvalumab (GCD) or GC. Time toxicity was recorded from treatment initiation until discontinuation or last follow-up during first-line systemic therapy. Multiple regression analysis identified factors associated with high time toxicity. RESULTS Among 193 patients (102 GCD, 91 GC; median age 65 years; 50% male; 49% Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status [PS] 0), median time on treatment (TOT) was 156 days (95% CI, 122 to 190). The median proportion of total time toxicity was 14.4% (IQR, 10.9-20.6). Planned visits accounted for 11.9%, while unplanned visits were infrequent (1.8%). Time toxicity strongly correlated with TOT ( r = 0.824) and progression-free survival ( r = 0.827). Despite longer treatment in the GCD group than the GC group (212 v 134 days; P = .027), total time toxicity was similar (27 v 18 days; P = .19). Younger age and poor PS were independent factors of higher time toxicity. CONCLUSION Time toxicity represents a meaningful metric that allows for more comprehensive integration of the net benefit in patients with advanced BTC with a limited lifespan.

Abstract Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is an aggressive malignancy with poor outcomes. To investigate novel therapeutic strategies, we characterized three new metastatic prostate cancer patient derived-tumor xenograft (PDTX) models and developed 3D spheroids from each to investigate molecular targeted therapy combinations including CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) with AKT inhibitors (ATKi). Metastatic prostate cancer tissue was collected and three PDTX models were established and characterized using whole-exome sequencing. PDTX 3D spheroids were developed from these three PDTXs to show resistance patterns and test novel molecular-targeted therapies. CDK4/6i's were combined with AKTi's to assess synergistic antitumor response to prove our hypothesis that blockade of AKT overcomes drug resistance to CDK4/6i. This combination was evaluated in PDTX three-dimensional (3D) spheroids and in vivo experiments with responses measured by tumor volumes, PSA, and Ga-68 PSMA-11 PET-CT imaging. We demonstrated CDK4/6i's with AKTi's possess synergistic antitumor activity in three mCRPC PDTX models. These models have multiple unique pathogenic and deleterious genomic alterations with resistance to single-agent CDK4/6i's. Despite this, combination therapy with AKTi's was able to overcome resistance mechanisms. The IHC and Western blot analysis confirmed on target effects, whereas tumor volume, serum PSA ELISA, and radionuclide imaging demonstrated response to therapy with statistically significant SUV differences seen with Ga-68 PSMA-11 PET-CT. These preclinical data demonstrating antitumor synergy by overcoming single-agent CDK 4/6i as well as AKTi drug resistance provide the rational for a clinical trial combining a CDK4/6i with an AKTi in patients with mCRPC whose tumor expresses wild-type retinoblastoma 1.

Background: Morreton virus (MORV) is an oncolytic Vesiculovirus , genetically distinct from vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV). Aim: To report that MORV induced potent cytopathic effects (CPEs) in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in vitro models. Approach and Results: In preliminary safety analyses, high intranasal doses (up to 10 10 50% tissue culture infectious dose [TCID 50 ]) of MORV were not associated with significant adverse effects in immune competent, non–tumor‐bearing mice. MORV was shown to be efficacious in a Hep3B hepatocellular cancer xenograft model but not in a CCA xenograft HuCCT1 model. In an immune competent, syngeneic murine CCA model, single intratumoral treatments with MORV (1 × 10 7 TCID 50 ) triggered a robust antitumor immune response leading to substantial tumor regression and disease control at a dose 10‐fold lower than VSV (1 × 10 8 TCID 50 ). MORV led to increased CD8 + cytotoxic T cells without compensatory increases in tumor‐associated macrophages and granulocytic or monocytic myeloid‐derived suppressor cells. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that wild‐type MORV is safe and can induce potent tumor regression via immune‐mediated and immune‐independent mechanisms in HCC and CCA animal models without dose limiting adverse events. These data warrant further development and clinical translation of MORV as an oncolytic virotherapy platform.

PURPOSE This investigation sought to evaluate the prognostic value of pretreatment of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in metastatic biliary tract cancers (BTCs) treated with platinum-based first-line chemotherapy treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of 67 patients who underwent ctDNA testing before platinum-based chemotherapy for first-line treatment for metastatic BTC. For analysis, we considered the detected gene with highest variant allele frequency as the dominant clone allele frequency (DCAF). Results of ctDNA analysis were correlated with patients' demographics, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS The median age of patients was 67 (27-90) years. Fifty-four (80.6%) of 67 patients evaluated had intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; seven had extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and six gallbladder cancers. Forty-six (68.6%) of the patients were treated with cisplatin plus gemcitabine, and 16.4% of patients received gemcitabine and other platinum (carboplatin or oxaliplatin) combinations, whereas 15% of patients were treated on a clinical trial with gemcitabine and cisplatin plus additional agents (CX4945, PEGPH20, or nab-paclitaxel). TP53, KRAS, FGFR2, ARID1A, STK11, and IDH1 were the genes with highest frequency as DCAF. The median DCAF was 3% (0%-97%). DCAF > 3% was associated with worse OS (median OS: 10.8 v 18.8 months, P = .032). Stratifying DCAF in quartiles, DCAF > 10% was significantly related to worse PFS (median PFS: 3 months, P = .014) and worse OS (median OS: 7.0 months, P = .001). Each 1% increase in ctDNA was associated with a hazard ratio of 13.1 in OS when adjusting for subtypes, metastatic sites, size of largest tumor, age, sex, and CA19-9. CONCLUSION DCAF at diagnosis of advanced BTC can stratify patients who have worse outcomes when treated with upfront platinum-based chemotherapy. Each increase in %ctDNA decreases survival probabilities.

Abstract Background and aims Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are uncommon, but highly lethal, gastrointestinal malignancies. Gemcitabine/cisplatin is a standard‐of‐care systemic therapy, but has a modest impact on survival and harbors toxicities, including myelosuppression, nephropathy, neuropathy, and ototoxicity. Whereas BTCs are characterized by aberrations activating the cyclinD1/cyclin‐dependent kinase (CDK)4/6/CDK inhibitor 2a/retinoblastoma pathway, clinical use of CDK4/6 inhibitors as monotherapy is limited by lack of validated biomarkers, diffident preclinical efficacy, and development of acquired drug resistance. Emerging studies have explored therapeutic strategies to enhance the antitumor efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors by the combination with chemotherapy regimens, but their mechanism of action remains elusive. Approach and results Here, we report in vitro and in vivo synergy in BTC models, showing enhanced efficacy, reduced toxicity, and better survival with a combination comprising gemcitabine/cisplatin and CDK4/6 inhibitors. Furthermore, we demonstrated that abemaciclib monotherapy had only modest efficacy attributable to autophagy‐induced resistance. Notably, triplet therapy was able to potentiate efficacy through elimination of the autophagic flux. Correspondingly, abemaciclib potentiated ribonucleotide reductase catalytic subunit M1 reduction, resulting in sensitization to gemcitabine. Conclusions As such, these data provide robust preclinical mechanistic evidence of synergy between gemcitabine/cisplatin and CDK4/6 inhibitors and delineate a path forward for translation of these findings to preliminary clinical studies in advanced BTC patients.

Abstract Purpose: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a highly lethal malignancy that often presents at advanced stages. Gemcitabine/cisplatin (GP) represents the standard-of-care but provides only a modest response rate and survival benefit. Loss of the CDK4/6 inhibitor CDKN2A is a prevalent genetic event in CCA, thus CDK4/6 inhibitors, FDA-approved in some breast cancer regimens, are hypothesized to have a role in treating CCA. Clinical challenges to target cell cycle dysregulation and exploit cytotoxic chemotherapy include predictive biomarkers for selecting patients most likely to respond. We hypothesized autophagy is involved in therapeutic resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors, and plays a role in the activity of GP in CCA. Thus, we investigated CDK4/6 inhibitors as monotherapy, and combined with GP in CCA, measuring multiple readouts pertaining to drug synergy, putative pathway biomarkers and autophagy. Methods: The activity of 3 FDA approved CDK4/6 inhibitors, palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib, as monotherapy (N=24), and combined with GP (N=10), was assessed in CCA cell lines by measuring relative cell number with Cell TiterGlo, and apoptosis with Annexin/PI and cleaved caspase3 quantification via flow cytometry. To characterize RB status for biomarker potential, protein levels of CCND1, CDK4, CDK6, RB, and CDKN2A were measured by western blot. Autophagy was measured using an autophagy flux assay, LysoTracker confocal staining, and by quantifying protein levels of LC3B, p62 and Beclin1A. Results: 22/24 (92%) of CCA cell lines were found to have at least one defect likely relevant to CDK4/6 inhibition: CDKN2A (92%), Rb1 (63%), CDK4 (23%) and cyclin D1 (32%). Protein levels of CDKN2A and RB1 showed moderate correlation with CDK4/6 inhibitor activity. Abemaciclib was the most potent CDK inhibitor in vitro (IC50≤0.5uM; palbociclib IC50>1uM; ribociclib IC50>5uM). Combined abemaciclib and GP showed higher cytotoxicity and synergy at lower doses compared to chemotherapy alone or single-agent abemaciclib. Compared to CDK4/6 inhibitors or chemotherapy alone, combination therapy enhanced growth inhibition, cell cycle arrest and caspase-dependent apoptotic cell death. Abemaciclib triggered autophagy mediated by significant increases in reactive oxygen species (ROS). Combination therapy reduced ROS production and thus autophagy, as seen by reduced autophagic flux, reduced LysoTracker mean fluorescence intensity, a decrease in the expression of LC3B-II, Beclin1A and an increase in p62. Conclusion: These results suggest CDK4/6 inhibitors interact synergistically with GP in CCA and mechanistically disrupt autophagy. This suggests potential to further explore CDKN2A and RB as biomarkers for preclinical sensitivity in CCA. Pre-clinical data supports ongoing clinical studies of this concept, as well as planned clinical studies of GP and alternative CDK4/6 inhibitors. Citation Format: Mansi Arora, James Bogenberger, Nagalo Bolni, Yumei Zhou, Latha Kannan, Jan Egan, Raquel Yokoda, Daniel H. Ahn, Mitesh J. Borad. Synergy of cyclin dependentkinase 4/6 inhibitors with cytotoxic chemotherapy in cholangiocarcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4417.

218 Background: Evidence from mouse studies shows that Oncolytic viral mode of tumor cell killing can boost the cytotoxic T lymphocyte response against tumor associated antigens (TAA), leading to ‘bystander’ killing of uninfected tumor cells. Methods: To investigate whether oncolytic virotherapy can boost immune responses to tumor antigens in human subjects we studied T cell responses to 10 different TAA reported to have high expression in patients with multiple myeloma (n = 10) before and after intravenous administration of an oncolytic measles virus (MV-NIS). Baseline and 6 week post-therapy PBMC samples were stimulated with peptides specific to each of the selected TAA and their responses to this antigenic stimulation were measured using IFNγ ELISPOT. Results: Despite their prior exposure to multiple immunosuppressive treatment regimens, some of the tested patients had higher T cell responses to some of the TAA even prior to MV-NIS. Baseline T cell responses against MAGEc1 were present in 50% of the patients, and against hTERT and NYESO-1 in 30% of the patients. Furthermore, MV-NIS treatment significantly boosted T cell responses against NYESO-1, MAGEc1, MAGEA1 and MUC1 in 40% of the patients. Interestingly, in one outlier patient who achieved a stringent and durable complete disease remission after MV-NIS therapy, strong baseline T cell responses were present against 8 of the 10 tested TAA but did not change significantly after virotherapy. Based on the T cell responses to the TAA, three distinct phenotypes can be identified. Phenotype 1 was characterized by positive T cell responses to TAA prior and post therapy, Phenotype 2 was characterized by positive T cell responses to TAA only post therapy and phenotype 3 was characterized by negative T cell responses to TAA prior and post therapy. Conclusions: Our data suggests oncolytic measles virotherapy boosted the cytotoxic T lymphocyte response against tumor associated antigens in some of the patients. Identifying patient’s phenotype based on responsiveness to the TAA could be useful marker for identifying the immune responsive state in multiple myeloma patients and identify patients who can be most responsive to oncolytic measles virotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT00450814.