Arora, Mansi

Background: Morreton virus (MORV) is an oncolytic Vesiculovirus , genetically distinct from vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV). Aim: To report that MORV induced potent cytopathic effects (CPEs) in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in vitro models. Approach and Results: In preliminary safety analyses, high intranasal doses (up to 10 10 50% tissue culture infectious dose [TCID 50 ]) of MORV were not associated with significant adverse effects in immune competent, non–tumor‐bearing mice. MORV was shown to be efficacious in a Hep3B hepatocellular cancer xenograft model but not in a CCA xenograft HuCCT1 model. In an immune competent, syngeneic murine CCA model, single intratumoral treatments with MORV (1 × 10 7 TCID 50 ) triggered a robust antitumor immune response leading to substantial tumor regression and disease control at a dose 10‐fold lower than VSV (1 × 10 8 TCID 50 ). MORV led to increased CD8 + cytotoxic T cells without compensatory increases in tumor‐associated macrophages and granulocytic or monocytic myeloid‐derived suppressor cells. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that wild‐type MORV is safe and can induce potent tumor regression via immune‐mediated and immune‐independent mechanisms in HCC and CCA animal models without dose limiting adverse events. These data warrant further development and clinical translation of MORV as an oncolytic virotherapy platform.

PURPOSE This investigation sought to evaluate the prognostic value of pretreatment of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in metastatic biliary tract cancers (BTCs) treated with platinum-based first-line chemotherapy treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of 67 patients who underwent ctDNA testing before platinum-based chemotherapy for first-line treatment for metastatic BTC. For analysis, we considered the detected gene with highest variant allele frequency as the dominant clone allele frequency (DCAF). Results of ctDNA analysis were correlated with patients' demographics, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS The median age of patients was 67 (27-90) years. Fifty-four (80.6%) of 67 patients evaluated had intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; seven had extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and six gallbladder cancers. Forty-six (68.6%) of the patients were treated with cisplatin plus gemcitabine, and 16.4% of patients received gemcitabine and other platinum (carboplatin or oxaliplatin) combinations, whereas 15% of patients were treated on a clinical trial with gemcitabine and cisplatin plus additional agents (CX4945, PEGPH20, or nab-paclitaxel). TP53, KRAS, FGFR2, ARID1A, STK11, and IDH1 were the genes with highest frequency as DCAF. The median DCAF was 3% (0%-97%). DCAF > 3% was associated with worse OS (median OS: 10.8 v 18.8 months, P = .032). Stratifying DCAF in quartiles, DCAF > 10% was significantly related to worse PFS (median PFS: 3 months, P = .014) and worse OS (median OS: 7.0 months, P = .001). Each 1% increase in ctDNA was associated with a hazard ratio of 13.1 in OS when adjusting for subtypes, metastatic sites, size of largest tumor, age, sex, and CA19-9. CONCLUSION DCAF at diagnosis of advanced BTC can stratify patients who have worse outcomes when treated with upfront platinum-based chemotherapy. Each increase in %ctDNA decreases survival probabilities.

Abstract Background and aims Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are uncommon, but highly lethal, gastrointestinal malignancies. Gemcitabine/cisplatin is a standard‐of‐care systemic therapy, but has a modest impact on survival and harbors toxicities, including myelosuppression, nephropathy, neuropathy, and ototoxicity. Whereas BTCs are characterized by aberrations activating the cyclinD1/cyclin‐dependent kinase (CDK)4/6/CDK inhibitor 2a/retinoblastoma pathway, clinical use of CDK4/6 inhibitors as monotherapy is limited by lack of validated biomarkers, diffident preclinical efficacy, and development of acquired drug resistance. Emerging studies have explored therapeutic strategies to enhance the antitumor efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors by the combination with chemotherapy regimens, but their mechanism of action remains elusive. Approach and results Here, we report in vitro and in vivo synergy in BTC models, showing enhanced efficacy, reduced toxicity, and better survival with a combination comprising gemcitabine/cisplatin and CDK4/6 inhibitors. Furthermore, we demonstrated that abemaciclib monotherapy had only modest efficacy attributable to autophagy‐induced resistance. Notably, triplet therapy was able to potentiate efficacy through elimination of the autophagic flux. Correspondingly, abemaciclib potentiated ribonucleotide reductase catalytic subunit M1 reduction, resulting in sensitization to gemcitabine. Conclusions As such, these data provide robust preclinical mechanistic evidence of synergy between gemcitabine/cisplatin and CDK4/6 inhibitors and delineate a path forward for translation of these findings to preliminary clinical studies in advanced BTC patients.

Abstract Purpose: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a highly lethal malignancy that often presents at advanced stages. Gemcitabine/cisplatin (GP) represents the standard-of-care but provides only a modest response rate and survival benefit. Loss of the CDK4/6 inhibitor CDKN2A is a prevalent genetic event in CCA, thus CDK4/6 inhibitors, FDA-approved in some breast cancer regimens, are hypothesized to have a role in treating CCA. Clinical challenges to target cell cycle dysregulation and exploit cytotoxic chemotherapy include predictive biomarkers for selecting patients most likely to respond. We hypothesized autophagy is involved in therapeutic resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors, and plays a role in the activity of GP in CCA. Thus, we investigated CDK4/6 inhibitors as monotherapy, and combined with GP in CCA, measuring multiple readouts pertaining to drug synergy, putative pathway biomarkers and autophagy. Methods: The activity of 3 FDA approved CDK4/6 inhibitors, palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib, as monotherapy (N=24), and combined with GP (N=10), was assessed in CCA cell lines by measuring relative cell number with Cell TiterGlo, and apoptosis with Annexin/PI and cleaved caspase3 quantification via flow cytometry. To characterize RB status for biomarker potential, protein levels of CCND1, CDK4, CDK6, RB, and CDKN2A were measured by western blot. Autophagy was measured using an autophagy flux assay, LysoTracker confocal staining, and by quantifying protein levels of LC3B, p62 and Beclin1A. Results: 22/24 (92%) of CCA cell lines were found to have at least one defect likely relevant to CDK4/6 inhibition: CDKN2A (92%), Rb1 (63%), CDK4 (23%) and cyclin D1 (32%). Protein levels of CDKN2A and RB1 showed moderate correlation with CDK4/6 inhibitor activity. Abemaciclib was the most potent CDK inhibitor in vitro (IC50≤0.5uM; palbociclib IC50>1uM; ribociclib IC50>5uM). Combined abemaciclib and GP showed higher cytotoxicity and synergy at lower doses compared to chemotherapy alone or single-agent abemaciclib. Compared to CDK4/6 inhibitors or chemotherapy alone, combination therapy enhanced growth inhibition, cell cycle arrest and caspase-dependent apoptotic cell death. Abemaciclib triggered autophagy mediated by significant increases in reactive oxygen species (ROS). Combination therapy reduced ROS production and thus autophagy, as seen by reduced autophagic flux, reduced LysoTracker mean fluorescence intensity, a decrease in the expression of LC3B-II, Beclin1A and an increase in p62. Conclusion: These results suggest CDK4/6 inhibitors interact synergistically with GP in CCA and mechanistically disrupt autophagy. This suggests potential to further explore CDKN2A and RB as biomarkers for preclinical sensitivity in CCA. Pre-clinical data supports ongoing clinical studies of this concept, as well as planned clinical studies of GP and alternative CDK4/6 inhibitors. Citation Format: Mansi Arora, James Bogenberger, Nagalo Bolni, Yumei Zhou, Latha Kannan, Jan Egan, Raquel Yokoda, Daniel H. Ahn, Mitesh J. Borad. Synergy of cyclin dependentkinase 4/6 inhibitors with cytotoxic chemotherapy in cholangiocarcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4417.