Citations

ABSTRACTBackgroundThe Pediatric Oncology Group P9262 Phase 2 study of single‐agent paclitaxel demonstrated one complete response (CR), one partial response (PR), and four with stable disease (SD) among 15 patients with recurrent Wilms tumor (WT). Based on this activity, paclitaxel‐containing regimens have been used as salvage therapy for treatment‐refractory WT. We conducted a multi‐institutional retrospective study to further characterize the clinical activity of paclitaxel‐containing regimens in recurrent WT.MethodsTwelve institutions submitted anonymized data from patients with relapsed WT treated with paclitaxel. Response after one or two cycles of a paclitaxel‐containing regimen was reported according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors.ResultsTwenty‐eight patients with a median age at diagnosis of 5.5 years (range: 3 months to 31.9 years) were reported. Twenty had non‐anaplastic WT; eight had diffuse anaplasia (DA). Stage at diagnosis was I (n = 1), II (n = 1), III (n = 11), IV (n = 14), and V (n = 1). Patients received a mean of 8.5 anticancer drugs (range: 6–12) before paclitaxel, including eight who received high‐dose therapy/stem cell transplant. Paclitaxel (n = 13) or nab‐paclitaxel (n = 15) were predominantly administered in combination with other agents, most commonly doxorubicin and/or gemcitabine. Eleven of 26 patients with measurable disease had a partial response (7 = non‐anaplastic; 4 = DA), four had stable disease, and 11 had progressive disease. Two patients without measurable disease maintained a complete response for 12 and 16 months. The mean duration without progression was 7.6 months (range: 1–35 months).ConclusionsPaclitaxel‐containing regimens appear to be active against heavily pretreated WT with either non‐anaplastic or DA histology. Prospective studies are warranted to formally evaluate the efficacy of paclitaxel‐based therapies.

ABSTRACTAccurate staging of nodal involvement in pediatric sarcoma patients is important to determine correct systemic and local therapy, with the goal to reduce subsequent recurrences. However, differences in lymph node staging strategies, definitions, and treatment protocols between the Children's Oncology Group (COG), European paediatric Soft tissue sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG), and the Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studiengruppe (CWS) complicate comparisons. In this article, we aim to establish internationally recognized recommendations for lymph node assessment and treatment of children and adolescents diagnosed with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) and non‐rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma (NRSTS) according to the Consensus Conference Standard Operating Procedure methodology.

Accurate staging of nodal involvement in pediatric sarcoma patients is important to determine correct systemic and local therapy, with the goal to reduce subsequent recurrences. However, differences in lymph node staging strategies, definitions, and treatment protocols between the Children’s Oncology Group (COG), European Pediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG), and the Cooperative Weichteil Sarkom Studiengruppe (CWS), complicate comparisons. In this article we try to establish internationally recognized recommendations for lymph node assessment and treatment of children and adolescents diagnosed with RMS and NRSTS according to the Consensus Conference Standard Operating Procedure methodology.

Abstract The Children's Oncology Group (COG) uses Clinical Group (CG) and modified Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) stage to classify rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). CG is based on surgicopathologic findings and is determined after the completion of initial surgical procedure(s) but prior to chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. The modified TNM stage is based on clinical and radiographic findings and is assigned prior to any treatment. These systems have evolved over several decades. We review the history, evolution, and rationale behind the current CG and modified TNM classification systems used by COG for RMS. Data from the seven most recently completed and reported frontline COG trials (D9602, D9802, D9803, ARST0331, ARST0431, ARST0531, ARST08P1) were analyzed, and confirm that CG and modified TNM stage remain relevant and useful for predicting prognosis in RMS. We propose updates based on recent data and discuss factors warranting future study to further optimize these classification systems.

Abstract Paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma (PT‐RMS) carries a favorable prognosis, but questions persist regarding optimal management. Our goal was to determine the importance of primary tumor resection and surgical assessment of retroperitoneal lymph nodes during staging in patients with PT‐RMS. We analyzed patients with localized PT‐RMS enrolled onto one of four Children's Oncology Group studies (D9602, ARST0331, D9803 or ARST0531). Surgical resection of the primary tumor prior to chemotherapy and radiotherapy was encouraged when possible with retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) recommended for patients ≥10 years of age. Among 279 patients (median 8.1 years old), most tumors were resected with negative margins (78.5%) and most patients did not have radiographic enlargement of regional lymph nodes (90.3%). In patients older than 10 years, imaging alone will miss over 51.5% of nodal disease. Five‐year event‐free survival (EFS) was 92.0% (95% CI 88.4%‐95.6%). Sampling ≥7 to 12 retroperitoneal lymph nodes appeared optimal for detecting positive nodes; while there was a trend toward improved EFS among those undergoing template RPLND, this was not statistically significant ( P = .068). Age ( P = .28), N‐stage ( P = .39), T‐stage ( P = .11) and pathologic node involvement ( P = .53) were not associated with overall survival. However, older age and larger tumor size had an additive impact on EFS ( P = .027) though not overall survival ( P = .13). In conclusion, outcomes for patients with PT‐RMS are excellent. Reliance on imaging to detect nodal involvement will miss pathologic node involvement and may result in undertreatment. Surgical nodal staging requires at least 7 to 12 nodes to accurately identify patients with regional nodal disease.

AbstractBackgroundVaginal/uterine rhabdomyosarcoma (VU RMS) is one of the most favorable RMS sites. To determine the optimal therapy, the experience of four cooperative groups (Children's Oncology Group [COG], International Society of Pediatric Oncology (SIOP) Malignant Mesenchymal Tumor Group [MMT], Italian Cooperative Soft Tissue Sarcoma Group [ICG], and European pediatric Soft tissue sarcoma Study Group [EpSSG]) was analyzed.ProcedureFrom 1981 to 2009, 237 patients were identified. Median age (years) at diagnosis differed by tumor location; it was 1.9 for vagina (n = 160), 2.7 for uterus corpus (n = 26), and 13.5 for uterus cervix (n = 51). Twenty‐eight percent of patients received radiation therapy (RT) as part of primary therapy (23% COG, 27% MMT, 46% ICG, and 42% EpSSG), with significant differences in the use of brachytherapy between the cooperative groups (23% COG, 76% MMT, 64% ICG, and 88% EpSSG).ResultsTen‐year event‐free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 74% (95% CI, 67–79%) and 92% (95% CI, 88–96%), respectively. In univariate analysis, OS was inferior for patients with uterine RMS and for those with regional lymph node involvement. Although EFS was slightly lower in patients without initial RT (71% without RT vs. 81% with RT; P = 0.08), there was no difference in OS (94% without RT vs. 89% with RT; P = 0.18). Local control using brachytherapy was excellent (93%). Fifty‐one (51.5%) of the 99 survivors with known primary therapy and treatment for relapse were cured with chemotherapy with or without conservative surgery.ConclusionsAbout half of all patients with VU RMS can be cured without systematic RT or radical surgery. When RT is indicated, modalities that limit sequelae should be considered, such as brachytherapy.

Ectomesenchymomas (EM) are rare malignant neoplasms usually consisting of rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) with a neural component. Only 21 cases have been previously reported. Here we extend the clinicopathologic spectrum of EM by describing our findings in 15 cases. Only 5 patients were infants; 10 were ≤3 years old and 5 were ≥6 years old. No male predilection was observed; 7 were female. The originating institutional diagnoses were; RMS (12), undifferentiated sarcoma (1), or EM (2), suggesting underdiagnosis of this entity. The primary tumor sites included external genital (5), pelvis/abdomen (6), head and neck (3), and extremity (1). The size of the primary neoplasm was usually ≥5 cm at diagnosis but dissemination only occurred in a minority. Local infiltration was not uncommon. These neoplasms were typically multilobate, thinly encapsulated, hemorrhagic, and necrotic. Light microscopic features were highly variable, but embryonal RMS with scattered or clustered ganglion cells, often in lacunae, was characteristic. In some cases, primitive neuroblastic or neuroectodermal areas were found and/or a component of alveolar RMS was seen. Focal anaplasia was occasionally observed. Mitotic activity appears higher than previously appreciated and some necrosis was invariably present. Electron microscopy was performed in 11 cases, which confirmed skeletal muscle ± neural differentiation. Cytogenetic studies performed in five cases revealed no specific abnormality. Monoclonal neuron-specific enolase was the best marker of ganglion cells and primitive neural elements. MIC-2 (CD99) membrane expression was not definitively present in any of the six cases examined. A number of the above parameters appear to be of some prognostic significance, but overall, these neoplasms appear to have a similar outcome as would be predicted for their RMS element alone (exclusive of any neural component), with respect to the RMS subtype, age of the patient, and anatomic location of the neoplasm.