Psychosocial Stressors and Psychiatric Morbidity Among Afghan Refugees Attending a Psychiatry Clinic in Islamabad, Pakistan: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND War refugees are prone to psychiatric ailments due to multiple psychosocial stressors. Afghan refugees remain underrepresented in psychiatric studies. Therefore, a study exploring factors contributing to their mental health disorders is essential to guide rehabilitation efforts worldwide. METHODS This descriptive cross-sectional study evaluates the demographics, psychosocial stressors, psychiatric illnesses, and psychotropic drug use among Afghan refugees visiting the Psychiatry Outpatient Department (OPD) in Islamabad, Pakistan. Convenience sampling was employed on a sample population (n) of 75 participants. Data was collected via a structured questionnaire and analyzed using SPSS v21.0. Qualitative and quantitative variables were analyzed statistically. RESULTS Nearly 64%(n=48) of the participants were female. About 46.7%(n=35) of participants were uneducated, and 53.3%(n=40) were unemployed. 86.7%(n=65) of participants were married, while 2.7%(n=2) were divorced. 91%(n=61) of the married and divorced participants had an arranged marriage, 46.3%(n=31) had 5-8 children, and 67.2%(n=45) had experienced physical and/or emotional abuse. 74.7%(n=56) of the total participants reported a loss in the family, while 77.3%(n=58) had experienced trauma. 62.7%(n=47) had depression and associated psychotropic use, e.g., SSRIs (42.7%), TCAs (16%), and Benzodiazepines (13.3%). Alarmingly, 37.3%(n=28) reported a previous suicide attempt. CONCLUSION This study explores the psychosocial stressors faced by Afghan refugees in Pakistan, including displacement, abuse, trauma, and family/income loss. It emphasizes the importance of evidence-based psychiatric care, rehabilitative interventions, and culturally sensitive care to counter psychiatric morbidities and underscores the need for future research to improve the mental health of refugees globally.
Impact of Post-transplant Fungal Infection on Mortality and Graft Outcomes in Lung Transplant Recipients: A Multicenter Propensity-Matched Analysis
Abstract Rationale Fungal infections remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality post lung transplant due to unique exposure of the allograft to the external environment and the intensity of immunosuppression. Single-center studies have described variable rates of fungal infections. Contemporary population-level data with temporal trends, pathogen distribution, and associated outcomes are limited. Leveraging a large multicenter real-world dataset, we aimed to characterize incidence, prevalence and clinical outcomes of fungal infections among adult lung-transplant recipients. Methods Data were obtained from the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network (160 HCOs). Adult lung-transplant recipients (≥18 years) were identified between 2005 and 2024, using ICD and CPT procedure codes. Patients with solid organ transplants other than lung, combined-organ transplant or stem-cell transplant and HIV patients were excluded. Patients with pre transplant fungal infections were also excluded. Pre-transplant characteristics included demographics, comorbidities within a year, laboratory values within seven days, and medication within 90 days before transplantation. Post-transplant fungal infections were identified using ICD-10 codes for Aspergillus, Candida, Cryptococcus, Mucorales, Histoplasma, Blastomyces, Coccidioides, and Pneumocystis. TriNetX platform was utilized for statistical analysis. Incidence and prevalence of infections, all-cause mortality and transplant rejection were analyzed. Results A total of 12,857 adult lung-transplant recipients were identified. The mean age at transplantation was 57.6 ± 13.4 years, with a male predominance of (57%) and majority were white (65%). Average BMI was 26.8 ± 5.7 kg/m². The most common pulmonary conditions were COPD (15%), pulmonary fibrosis (17%), pulmonary hypertension (9%), bronchiectasis (3%), and cystic fibrosis (3%). Pre-transplant fungal and viral screening assays were rarely available (<1%). Medication exposure within 90 days prior to transplant demonstrated prednisone prescription (17%) methylprednisolone (7%), tacrolimus (6%), and mycophenolate mofetil (7%). Azathioprine and basiliximab were used in 2% each. Systemic antifungals (voriconazole, posaconazole, or fluconazole) in approximately 1% each.The overall incidence of post-transplant fungal infection was 3 % across full study period, rising to 7% in the modern era (2015-2024). Most frequently identified pathogens were Candida spp. (4.8%) and Aspergillus spp. (2.9%), followed by Pneumocystis Jirovecii (0.5%). Infection rates increased from 22 per 1,000 (2005-2014) to 75 per 1,000 (2015-2024) suggestive of improved diagnostic sensitivity and data capture, and longer post-transplant survival. All-cause mortality 5-year post transplant was 22.1%, and rejection rate was 22.5%. Conclusion Our study highlights a rising burden of fungal infections among lung-transplant recipients with potential implications for early post-transplant surveillance and antifungal prophylaxis strategies. This abstract is funded by: None
C27-17 Impact of Post-Transplant Fungal Infection on Mortality and Graft Outcomes in Lung Transplant Recipients: A Multicenter Propensity-Matched Analysis
Abstract Rationale Fungal infections are common after lung transplantation and may adversely affect graft function and survival, but long-term outcomes remain incompletely defined. Using a large multicenter real-world dataset, we aimed to study the impact of post-transplant fungal infections on clinical outcomes of lung transplant recipients. Methods We conducted a retrospective, cohort study using the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network, which aggregates de-identified electronic health records from >160 healthcare organizations across North America, Europe, and Asia. Adult lung transplant recipients (≥18 years) between 2005 and 2024 were identified using ICD-10 and CPT codes. Patients with post-transplant fungal infection (aspergillosis, candidiasis, mucormycosis, histoplasmosis, coccidioidomycosis, blastomycosis) and matched controls without fungal infection within one year before or any time after transplant were identified. The index date was the date of transplantation. Propensity-score matching was performed on demographics, comorbidities, laboratory values, procedures and immunosuppressive medications. Outcomes included all-cause mortality (primary), allograft rejection, and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) at 6 months, 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate risk ratios (RRs), hazard ratios (HRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Analyses were conducted in TriNetX Analytics (v25.0, Cambridge, MA). Results A total of 3,083 patients with post-transplant fungal infection and 11,625 patients without infection were identified. Mean age was 58 ± 13 years, and 56% were male. The most common pulmonary comorbidities were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified pulmonary fibrosis, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and bronchiectasis. Immunosuppression exposure was similar across groups. After propensity score matching across 56 clinical variables, both groups (1,790 per group) were well balanced. Mortality was higher in the fungal infection cohort at all follow-up points: 13.% vs 9% at 6 months (RR 1.45, 95% CI 1.2-1.75, p = 0.001), 17.8% vs 13% at 1 year (RR 1.36, p = 0.0001), 27.7% vs 21% at 3 years (RR 1.28, p < 0.0001), and 33 % vs 25% at 5 years (RR 1.32, p < 0.0001). Allograft rejection remained consistently higher (46-61% vs 22-34%), while CLAD occurred two- to three-fold more frequently (1.8-5.7% vs 0.7-2%). Conclusion Post-transplant fungal infection is independently associated with significantly increased mortality, acute rejection, and CLAD following lung transplantation. These findings underscore the need for early fungal surveillance, optimized antifungal prophylaxis, and individualized immunosuppression strategies to improve long-term patient outcomes. This abstract is funded by: None
552: THE IMPACT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON MRSA PNEUMONIA ADMISSIONS: A NATIONAL INPATIENT STUDY
Pre-hospital Use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Agents Is Associated With Lower Risk of Major Bleeding Events in Critically Ill Patients: A Single Academic Center Experience
B46. OTHER SPECIALTIES IN THE ICU: TOPICS IN NEPHROLOGY, HEMATOLOGY/ONCOLOGY, AND MORE | May 1, 2023 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: A3455-A3455
ABSTRACT Objective: To identify and describe characteristics of patients with sepsis who could be treated with minimally invasive sepsis (MIS) approach without intensive care unit (ICU) admission and to develop a prediction model to select candidates for MIS approach. Methods: A secondary analysis of the electronic database of patients with sepsis at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. Candidates for the MIS approach were adults with septic shock and less than 48 hours of ICU stay, who did not require advanced respiratory support and were alive at hospital discharge. Comparison group consisted of septic shock patients with an ICU stay of more than 48 hours without advanced respiratory support at the time of ICU admission. Results: Of 1795 medical ICU admissions, 106 patients (6%) met MIS approach criteria. Predictive variables (age >65 years, oxygen flow >4 L/min, temperature <37°C, creatinine >1.6 mg/dL, lactate >3 mmol/L, white blood cells >15 × 109/L, heart rate >100 beats/min, and respiration rate >25 breaths/min) selected through logistic regression were translated into an 8-point score. Model discrimination yielded the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 79% and was well fitted (Hosmer-Lemeshow P = 0.94) and calibrated. The MIS score cutoff of 3 resulted in a model odds ratio of 0.15 (95% confidence interval, 0.08–0.28) and a negative predictive value of 91% (95% confidence interval, 88.69–92.92). Conclusions: This study identifies a subset of low-risk septic shock patients who can potentially be managed outside the ICU. Once validated in an independent, prospective sample our prediction model can be used to identify candidates for MIS approach.
59: PREDICTION MODEL TO IDENTIFY SEPSIS PATIENTS FOR MINIMALLY INVASIVE MANAGEMENT OUTSIDE THE ICU
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common disease with a high degree of association with and possible etiological factor for several cardiovascular diseases. Patients who are admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) are incredibly sick, have multiple co-morbidities, and are at substantial risk for mortality. A study of cardiovascular manifestations and disease processes in patients with OSA admitted to the ICU is very intriguing, and its impact is likely significant. Although much is known about these cardiovascular complications associated with OSA, there is still a paucity of high-quality evidence trying to establish causality between the two. Studies exploring the potential impact of therapeutic interventions, such as positive airway pressure therapy (PAP), on cardiovascular complications in ICU patients are also needed and should be encouraged. This study reviewed the literature currently available on this topic and potential future research directions of this clinically significant relationship between OSA and cardiovascular disease processes in the ICU and beyond.