Citations

Background: For women in the United States desiring implant-based breast reconstruction, the maximum volume of commercially available silicone breast implants has, to date, been 800 cc. The authors evaluated the safety of Mentor larger-size MemoryGel Ultra-High Profile breast implants (≥930 cc) in women undergoing postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Methods: This 10-year, multicenter, open-label, prospective, investigational study assessed the safety and effectiveness of larger-volume implants in women undergoing postmastectomy 2-stage primary or revision reconstruction. Three-year Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox regression analyzed the association between patient and treatment characteristics and surgical outcomes. The BREAST-Q was used to assess effectiveness at 3 years. Results: A total of 400 women were enrolled (225 primary and 175 revision reconstruction). Mean body mass index was 35.8 kg/m 2 ; 81% had a body mass index greater than or equal to 30 kg/m 2 . At 3 years, the cumulative incidence of postoperative complications (excluding rupture) was 63.0% (95% confidence interval, 58.1% to 67.9%). The reoperation rate was 24.5% (95% CI, 20.4% to 29.1%), and the explantation rate was 15.8% (95% CI, 23.5% to 19.9%). Independent predictors of complications included radiation therapy and a history of smoking. There were no significant associations between postoperative complications and implant volume greater than or equal to 1135 cc or less than 1135 cc. BREAST-Q scores at year 3 showed significant improvements from baseline in Satisfaction with Breasts, Psychosocial Well-Being, Sexual Well-Being, and Physical Well-Being (all P < 0.0001). The mean score for Satisfaction with Outcome was 79.9. Conclusions: These 3-year results demonstrate that larger-volume silicone breast implants represent a safe and effective option for patients with larger breasts who are requesting postmastectomy implant-based reconstruction.

AbstractIntroductionComputable biomedical knowledge artifacts (CBKs) are digital objects conveying biomedical knowledge in machine‐interpretable structures. As more CBKs are produced and their complexity increases, the value obtained from sharing CBKs grows. Mobilizing CBKs and sharing them widely can only be achieved if the CBKs are findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable, and trustable (FAIR+T). To help mobilize CBKs, we describe our efforts to outline metadata categories to make CBKs FAIR+T.MethodsWe examined the literature regarding metadata with the potential to make digital artifacts FAIR+T. We also examined metadata available online today for actual CBKs of 12 different types. With iterative refinement, we came to a consensus on key categories of metadata that, when taken together, can make CBKs FAIR+T. We use subject‐predicate‐object triples to more clearly differentiate metadata categories.ResultsWe defined 13 categories of CBK metadata most relevant to making CBKs FAIR+T. Eleven of these categories (type, domain, purpose, identification, location, CBK‐to‐CBK relationships, technical, authorization and rights management, provenance, evidential basis, and evidence from use metadata) are evident today where CBKs are stored online. Two additional categories (preservation and integrity metadata) were not evident in our examples. We provide a research agenda to guide further study and development of these and other metadata categories.ConclusionA wide variety of metadata elements in various categories is needed to make CBKs FAIR+T. More work is needed to develop a common framework for CBK metadata that can make CBKs FAIR+T for all stakeholders.