Kane, William J.

Background: For women in the United States desiring implant-based breast reconstruction, the maximum volume of commercially available silicone breast implants has, to date, been 800 cc. The authors evaluated the safety of Mentor larger-size MemoryGel Ultra-High Profile breast implants (≥930 cc) in women undergoing postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Methods: This 10-year, multicenter, open-label, prospective, investigational study assessed the safety and effectiveness of larger-volume implants in women undergoing postmastectomy 2-stage primary or revision reconstruction. Three-year Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox regression analyzed the association between patient and treatment characteristics and surgical outcomes. The BREAST-Q was used to assess effectiveness at 3 years. Results: A total of 400 women were enrolled (225 primary and 175 revision reconstruction). Mean body mass index was 35.8 kg/m 2 ; 81% had a body mass index greater than or equal to 30 kg/m 2 . At 3 years, the cumulative incidence of postoperative complications (excluding rupture) was 63.0% (95% confidence interval, 58.1% to 67.9%). The reoperation rate was 24.5% (95% CI, 20.4% to 29.1%), and the explantation rate was 15.8% (95% CI, 23.5% to 19.9%). Independent predictors of complications included radiation therapy and a history of smoking. There were no significant associations between postoperative complications and implant volume greater than or equal to 1135 cc or less than 1135 cc. BREAST-Q scores at year 3 showed significant improvements from baseline in Satisfaction with Breasts, Psychosocial Well-Being, Sexual Well-Being, and Physical Well-Being (all P < 0.0001). The mean score for Satisfaction with Outcome was 79.9. Conclusions: These 3-year results demonstrate that larger-volume silicone breast implants represent a safe and effective option for patients with larger breasts who are requesting postmastectomy implant-based reconstruction.

Intranasal sphenoethmoidectomy is one of the most frequently performed operations in otorhinolaryngology. Surgical indications and techniques have evolved with advances in medical technology. Clinical reports describing complications relating to sphenoethmoidectomy, either by traditional or endoscopic technique, have elucidated the potentially dangerous nature of this procedure. 1–6 Intraoperative complications are avoided through a detailed knowledge of anatomy and a technique guided by structural landmarks. We present a case of sphenoethmoidectomy complicated by cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea and a nasal encephalocele.