Citations

Abstract Everolimus 10 mg daily is the standard dose for advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), but adverse events frequently necessitate dose reduction. As a result, oncologists often adopt a dose‐escalation strategy starting at 5 mg and increasing the dose as tolerated. In this multicenter study, we evaluated the effect of reduced dose (RD) and standard dose (SD) everolimus on survival, progression, and toxicity in patients with advanced NETs. We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients with advanced NETs treated with everolimus at Mayo Clinic and University Hospitals (Cleveland, OH). Patients were grouped by starting dose (5 mg vs. 10 mg). Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), real‐world progression‐free survival (rwPFS), and adverse events. Multivariable Cox models, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), and time‐varying dose sensitivity analysis were used to account for confounding and dose crossover. Among 170 patients (48 started on 5 mg; 122 on 10 mg), the 5 mg cohort was older, had worse ECOG PS, and was more heavily pretreated. Median OS was 43.7 months (5 mg) versus 81.5 months (10 mg; log‐rank p = .02). However, after multivariable adjustment ( N = 124 G1–G2 patients; 51 events), the association was no longer statistically significant (adjusted HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.31–1.12; p = .11). Median rwPFS was 7.0 versus 12.4 months (log‐rank p = .05); the adjusted rwPFS difference was not statistically significant (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.56–1.61; p = .84). Nearly half (46.7%) of 10 mg starters required dose reduction. Any‐grade toxicity was more common with 10 mg (89% vs. 75%; p = .05). The apparent survival advantage of standard‐dose everolimus was substantially attenuated after adjustment. These findings do not establish dose equivalence and should be interpreted in the context of limited statistical power. Given its more favorable observed tolerability profile, RD everolimus warrants prospective evaluation as a starting strategy for patients at increased risk of treatment‐related toxicity who may not tolerate SD.

PURPOSE Gastroesophageal carcinoma (GEC) is increasingly managed using biomarker-guided therapies. Although both tissue DNA (tDNA) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing are used clinically, the concordance of genomic alterations between primary tumors, metastatic sites, and liquid biopsy remains incompletely understood. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 345 patients with GEC who underwent ctDNA testing at Mayo Clinic. tDNA next-generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)/erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 ( ERBB2 ) and mismatch repair (MMR) were collected. Concordance was evaluated between ctDNA and tDNA, ctDNA and IHC, and across all three modalities, using 60-day and 30-day intervals. RESULTS Among 345 patients with ctDNA testing, 186 had tDNA testing, and 310 underwent IHC. ctDNA testing showed a shorter turnaround time than tDNA (median 6 v 13 days). The most frequent alteration in ctDNA, primary tDNA, and metastatic tDNA was TP53. Concordance between ctDNA and primary tDNA was ≥78.8% for key genes; between ctDNA and metastatic tDNA, it was ≥84.8%. IHC-ctDNA concordance was higher in metastatic tumors, with 91.1% for HER2/ ERBB2 and 97.7% for mismatch repair (MMR)/microsatellite instability (MSI) compared with 81.1% and 95.8%, respectively, in primary tumors. Triplet concordance for MSI/MMR was 97.6% in primary tumors and 100% in metastatic tumors, while ERBB2 /HER2 showed 84.4% and 93.9% concordance, respectively. ctDNA temporal heterogeneity analysis revealed 14 patients with fluctuating ERBB2 status and 3 with fluctuating MSI-H status. CONCLUSION ctDNA testing demonstrates high concordance with tDNA and IHC and offers faster turnaround. Given its minimally invasive nature and strong concordance with tissue-based testing, ctDNA is a reliable tool for genomic profiling and longitudinal monitoring in GEC.

Abstract Background The increasing reliance on accelerated approvals and surrogate endpoints for Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of gastrointestinal (GI) cancer therapies raises concerns about their clinical benefit and long-term patient outcomes. The shift toward single-arm trials in regulatory decisions further complicates treatment evaluation. Material and Methods This retrospective observational study evaluated all FDA approvals for GI cancer therapies from January 2006 through January 2025. Data were extracted from FDA archives, ClinicalTrials.gov, and PubMed. Approvals were categorized by regulatory pathway (accelerated vs regular), trial design (single-arm vs randomized), and primary endpoint (surrogate vs overall survival [OS]). Clinical benefit was assessed based on OS improvement and the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS). The primary outcome was the proportion of approvals based on surrogate versus OS endpoints. Secondary outcomes included use of single-arm designs, frequency of accelerated approvals, OS gain, and the proportion meeting ESMO-MCBS substantial benefit (score ≥ 4). Results The FDA granted 60 GI cancer drug approvals from 67 trials. Approvals rose from 15 (25%) in 2006-2014 to 45 (75%) in 2015-2025. Single-arm trials increased to 24%, and surrogate endpoints were used in 41.8% (ORR 20.9%, PFS 19.4%). Median OS improvement was 2.1 months (IQR: 1.6-2.65). Only 24.3% of trials met ESMO-MCBS substantial benefit. Of 15 accelerated approvals, 66.7% remained pending, 13.3% received full approval, and 20% were withdrawn. Conclusion Expedited approvals have improved drug access in GI oncology, but modest benefits highlight the need to balance speed with outcomes that truly matter to patients.

PURPOSE Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (nICIs) have demonstrated high response rates in deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability–high (dMMR/MSI-H) gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA). The NEONIPIGA and INFINITY trials demonstrated high rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) in this patient population. Furthermore, the INFINITY trial explored the feasibility of managing these patients nonoperatively, demonstrating promising results. This study aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes of nICIs in resectable dMMR/MSI-H GEA, with a focus on the feasibility of nonoperative management (NOM). MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective cohort study included patients with resectable dMMR/MSI-H GEA and treated with nICIs ± surgery at the Mayo Clinic. Patients were identified from institutional records, and clinical data were retrospectively reviewed. Primary outcomes were clinical complete response (cCR) and pCR. Secondary outcomes included event-free survival (EFS), radiologic complete response (rCR), and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). RESULTS A total of 26 patients treated between April 1, 2017, and July 30, 2025, were identified. Nine patients (34.6%) underwent surgery, of whom six (66.7%) achieved pCR. Seventeen patients (65.4%) pursued NOM, with 10 (71.4%) of 14 evaluable patients achieving cCR and 14 (82.4%) of 17 evaluable achieving rCR. One patient who initially achieved cCR had a local recurrence on surveillance endoscopy and underwent salvage endoscopic resection. At a median follow-up of 19.3 months, 15 (88.2%) of 17 patients in the NOM cohort were alive and metastasis-free, with EFS rates of 87.3% at 12 and 24 months for all patients. irAEs occurred in nine patients (34.6%), with no grade ≥3 toxicities. CONCLUSION In this retrospective cohort study, nICIs led to high cCR and pCR rates in resectable dMMR/MSI-H GEA, supporting the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in this setting and the feasibility of NOM in select patients.

The role of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) has expanded in recent years. In resectable disease, postoperative ctDNA is able to detect patients at highest risk of recurrence months before scans. Tumor-informed assays provide the best sensitivity and emerging methylation assays are useful when tissue is scarce. In metastatic GEA, baseline ctDNA burden correlates with prognosis, and a decrease in ctDNA level after treatment initiation reflects therapeutic response. It can also uncover actionable targets, including ERBB2, FGFR2, and MSI-H, and detect resistance that can arise after starting treatment. Limitations include variable assay performance, low shedding in some tumors, clonal hematopoiesis confounding, and a lack of randomized data showing that ctDNA-guided changes improve outcomes. Ongoing trials are testing MRD-guided escalation/de-escalation and ctDNA-directed biomarker therapy. In this review, we evaluate the role of ctDNA in GEA cancers over recent years.

Background: Noncompaction cardiomyopathy (NCCM) is a distinct myocardial disorder associated with a high risk of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Although implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are frequently used in this population, data on predictors of shock therapy remain limited. Aim: Evaluation of a large cohort of patients with NCCM and ICDs to identify incidence and clinical factors associated with ICD shock Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients with confirmed NCCM between 2002 and 2023 at all Mayo Clinic sites. Baseline clinical data, genetic findings, cardiac imaging parameters, and device-related outcomes were collected through detailed chart review. Multivariable Logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors. Results: Among 145 patients with NCCM who received ICDs, the median age was 45 years (IQR: 34–56), with 75 (52%) female and 120 (83%) White. The median left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 35% (IQR: 22.5–47.5%), and the median follow-up from ICD implantation was 6.4 years (IQR: 2.9–11.0). Most ICDs (124, 85.5%) were implanted for primary prevention. Appropriate shocks were observed in 37 patients (25.5%), with 14 (9.8%) experiencing three or more appropriate shocks. Inappropriate shocks occurred in 15 patients (10.3%). Device-related complications were reported in 22 patients (15.2%), including infections in 4 (2.8%), lead fractures or dislodgement in 17 (11.9%), and pneumothorax in 1 (0.7%). Clinical predictors of shocks are illustrated in the figure. Conclusion: ICD therapy for NCCM patients prevented SCD in 25.5% of patients. Syncope, RBBB, troponin T >30 ng/L, and imaging-based apical trabeculations were independently associated with ICD shocks in patients with NCCM. These factors may aid in risk stratification and clinical decision-making.

ABSTRACT Sjögren's syndrome (SS) is a chronic autoimmune disorder characterized by lymphocytic infiltration and destruction of exocrine glands, commonly involving the salivary and lacrimal glands, leading to dry mouth and eyes. While SS primarily affects the upper gastrointestinal tract, this case presents a rare small intestine involvement. This patient was diagnosed with SS in 2018 with positive antinuclear antibodies (ANA), rheumatoid factor (RF), SSA antibodies, and salivary lip gland biopsy. By 2021, she developed unusual cyclic episodes of nausea, vomiting, and poor oral intake, resulting in significant weight loss and recurrent hospitalizations. She had frequent hospitalizations due to her recurrent symptoms. Evaluations included esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy, but pathology was nondiagnostic. Several abdominal and pelvic computed tomography (CT) scans demonstrated bladder edema, pancolitis, and terminal ileitis with mucosal hyperenhancement of the bowel and moderate ascites, likely inflammatory. Her gastric emptying study showed hypermotility. Multiple teams, including Rheumatology, Allergy/Immunology, Gastroenterology, Hematology, and Surgery, were involved. C1 esterase antigen was normal, ruling out hereditary angioedema. PET‐CT scan did not show lymphadenopathy or significant inflammation. Full biopsy for definitive diagnosis was deferred due to concerns of decreased healing with an edematous intestine. She was trialed on Icatibant without benefit. Differentials included lupus peritonitis, protein‐losing enteropathy, and SS intestinal lymphoma. She was discharged on a trial of empiric high‐dose steroids with Rheumatology follow‐up. Symptoms recurred with steroid tapering. Her complement levels decreased with flares and increased with treatment. Rituximab was added, leading to steady clinical improvement and reduced hospitalizations. Bowel involvement has been predominantly described in lupus, often referred to as lupus enteritis or bowel vasculitis. To our knowledge, this represents the first reported case of Sjögren's syndrome. Bowel biopsies are not typically subjected to routine immunohistochemical staining. Consequently, standard testing may be limited in detecting autoimmune processes. This case highlights the diagnostic challenges of SS‐related gastrointestinal manifestations and underscores the importance of considering autoimmune enteropathy, particularly in patients who respond to immunosuppressive therapy.

Abstract Introduction Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is an autosomal dominant disorder with a pathogenic mutation identified in approximately 50% of cases. The MYH7 and MYBPC3 genes account for over half of these cases, while dozens of other genes can be pathogenic(1). Genetic test results are not independently used to determine which people with HCM benefit from implanted cardiac defibrillators (ICDs)(2, 3). Little is known about the additive role of genetic testing results to existing indications for ICD insertion. Purpose This study aims to examine the interaction between genetic testing results and existing ICD indications and imaging results on defibrillator discharge rates in HCM. Methods Patients who underwent an ICD for HCM, who underwent a cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) study and who underwent genetic testing were included across 3 sites. The outcome was the incidence rate of appropriate ICD discharges, calculated using cox regression controlling for current age and primary vs secondary prevention. Interaction analysis between genetic risk factors and existing ICD indications, and with CMR quantification of LGE and septal thickness, was performed, and stratum specific estimates calculated using linear computation. Results 177 patients were included in the study, of whom 70 (39.55%) had a pathogenic mutation, 5 (2.82%) had a variant likely pathogenic (VLP), 44 (24.86%) had a variant of undetermined significance (VUS) and 58 (39.55%) had no identifiable mutation. The event rate was 3.32 {2.28 to 4.84) per 100 person years. There was no association between genetic variables and ICD discharge rate. There was an 80% reduction in ICD discharge rate in people who underwent ICD insertion exclusively for family history of sudden cardiac death or for syncope who had no pathogenic or likely pathogenic mutation, however this change was not statistically significant (table 2). Conclusion There is no strong association between genetic characteristics and ICD discharge rates among people with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with an existing ICD indication. There is a nonsignificant trend towards fewer ICD discharges among people who underwent ICD insertion for family history alone or for a history of syncope and did not have a pathologic variant.Table 1 Table 2

Abstract Biliary tract cancer (BTC) remains among the most challenging malignancies with a poor prognosis and limited treatment options, particularly in pretreated patients. As most patients experience disease progression after first-line treatment, effective second-line and subsequent treatments are required. Although the addition of modified FOLFOX (fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) to active symptom control improved the overall survival of patients with progressing advanced BTC despite gemcitabine plus cisplatin treatment, its efficacy was modest. Moreover, most clinical trials demonstrated modest efficacy of molecular-targeted agents for molecularly unselected pretreated advanced BTC. Patients with advanced BTC carry a relatively high druggable genetic alteration rate and have shown promising responses to molecular-matched therapies targeting gene alterations such as FGFR2 fusions/rearrangements, IDH1 mutation, and HER2 overexpression/amplification. Additionally, tumor-agnostic approaches, including BRAF V600E, NTRK fusion, and RET fusion, have expanded the treatment options for some patients. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown limited efficacy as mono- or combination therapy in patients with pretreated advanced BTC. Therefore, developmental efforts have shifted to immune checkpoint inhibitor and other combinations such as vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors or radiation. In addition to refining combination strategies to enhance the therapeutic potential of immune checkpoint inhibitor, future research should focus on elucidating the tumor microenvironment. This review delineates the evolution of systemic therapies in patients with pretreated advanced BTC. By examining past developments and recent advances through prospective trials, it highlights novel approaches that may improve outcomes in this challenging disease.