Citations

e16229 Background: Liver cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with rising incidence linked to metabolic disorders. Conditions such as obesity, diabetes mellitus, and metabolic syndrome contribute substantially to non-viral liver carcinogenesis. However, long-term temporal trends and mortality disparities among adults with metabolic disorders in the United States remain incompletely characterized. Methods: Mortality data for liver cancer among adults with metabolic disorders were obtained from the centers for disease control and prevention (CDC) mortality database. Adults aged 25 years and older were included and age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) per 100,000 were calculated. Temporal trends were evaluated using joinpoint regression and average annual percent change (AAPC) with 95% confidence intervals. Results: From 1999–2023, AAMR for liver cancer in adults with metabolic disorders rose from 0.17 to 0.65 per 100,000 in the U.S., with an overall AAPC of 5.95% [95% CI 5.2–6.7]. Men had higher absolute mortality (0.25→0.93; AAPC 5.68%), while women showed a sharper recent rise (0.11→0.41; AAPC 7.08%), peaking at 11.86% annually after 2016. Hispanic/Latino (0.27→0.89; AAPC 6.73%) and Black populations (0.15→0.75; AAPC 6.15%) experienced steady increases, whereas White mortality accelerated post-2011 (AAPC 9.37%). Regionally, the West had highest rates, the South showed highest growth, and Northeast/Midwest had sharp recent increases. Rural mortality overtook urban by 2020 (0.50 vs. 0.48). Most deaths occurred in medical facilities (48.2%) or home (33.1%), with highest state rates in Hawaii (0.56), Texas (0.47), and Rhode Island (0.47). Conclusions: Mortality from liver cancer in adults with metabolic disorders rose sharply in the U.S. since 1999, with accelerating trends and marked disparities by sex, race/ethnicity, region, and urbanization. These findings highlight an urgent need for targeted metabolic risk reduction and equity-focused prevention strategies. Trends in Age-Adjusted Mortality Rates (AAMR) from 1999 to 2023 by demographic and geographic variables. Variable AAMR 1999 (per 100,000) AAMR 2023 (per 100,000) AAPC (95% CI) Overall 0.16 0.64 5.94* (5.22 – 6.67) Males 0.25 0.92 5.67* (4.82 – 6.5) Females 0.11 0.40 7.08* (5.79 – 8.38) White 0.16 0.63 6.12* (5.41 – 6.82) Black 0.15 0.75 6.15* (5.11 – 7.19) Hispanic or Latino 0.27 0.89 6.73* (5.98 – 7.48) Variable AAMR 1999 (per 100,000) AAMR 2020 (per 100,000) AAPC (95% CI) Urban 0.16 0.47 5.38* (4.43 – 6.33) Rural 0.19 0.50 5.73* (4.48 – 6.99) AAPC denotes the average annual percent change; * indicates p < 0.05.

Objective To comprehensively examine hypertension- and heart failure–related mortality rates in the United States to develop a targeted approach to health policy development. Methods We analyzed death certificates from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research database, focusing on mortality caused by hypertensive heart failure in adults aged ≥25 years from 2006 to 2020. Age-adjusted mortality rates per 1,000,000 and annual percent changes were calculated and categorized by year, sex, race, urban status, age group, and census region. Results A total of 268,545 deaths occurred due to hypertensive heart failure between 2006 and 2020. The overall age-adjusted mortality rates increased from 60.5 in 2006 to 134.9 in 2020. Males had higher age-adjusted mortality rates than women (76.6 vs. 73.8). Older-aged people exhibited significantly higher age-adjusted mortality rates than young and middle-aged adults. Age-adjusted mortality rates were highest in non-Hispanic Blacks/African Americans and lowest in non-Hispanic Asians/Pacific Islanders (126.8–43.6). Furthermore, age-adjusted mortality rates were highest in individuals from nonmetropolitan areas and the Western region. Conclusion Following a period of decline, the age-adjusted mortality rates increased until 2020. The highest age-adjusted mortality rates were observed in non-Hispanic Blacks and nonmetropolitan areas. An urgent restructuring of healthcare policy is needed to reduce heart failure-associated mortality.

Abstract Disclosure: H. Ahmad: None. M. Kakakhel: None. A. Ullah: None. M. Saeed: None. J. Ikram: None. A. Qadeer: None. M. Khawar: None. H. Jawad: None. S. Haider: None. R. Haider: None. F. Ahmed: None. R.W. Kirchoff: None. Background: Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is an autoimmune disease characterized by the destruction of insulin-producing cells in the pancreas. It is a global health concern with regional variation in incidence and prevalence. This study aims to analyze the regional incidence and prevalence of T1DM among adolescents and young adults (15-39 years) from 1990 to 2021 in 26 regions. Methods: Global Burden of Disease (GBD) data for 2021 were analyzed to assess regional incidence and prevalence of T1DM among adolescents and young adults. The Annual Average Percentage Change (AAPC) was calculated to evaluate trends from 1990 to 2021, with statistical significance determined using p-values. Results: In 2021, middle socio-demographic index (SDI) has the highest incidence (54541) as well as prevalence (1.86 million), followed by Low-middle SDI (I: 48416, P: 1.80 million) and South Asia (I: 46310, P: 1.73 million). Oceania has the lowest incidence (356) as well as prevalence (12885), followed by Andean Latin America (I: 911, P: 31954) and Caribbean regions (I: 1214, P: 54610), respectively. The largest increase in AAPC of incidence was showed by Southern Latin America (2.23, CI: 2.11-2.30), High-income Asia Pacific (2.22, CI: 2.18-2.26), and Western Europe (1.80, CI: 1.73-1.84) regions, while Western Europe (1.72, CI: 1.66-1.75), Eastern Europe (1.64, CI: 1.63-1.66), and Australasia (1.38, CI: 1.36-1.40) showed largest increase in AAPC of prevalence. The Caribbean region had the greatest decline in AAPC of prevalence (-0.11, CI: -0.08 to -0.12) followed by Eastern Sub-Saharan Africa (-0.07, CI: -0.06 to -0.09) and Central Latin America (-0.04, CI: -0.02 to -0.07). There was no region with decline in incidence. All AAPC values were statistically significant (p &lt; 0.000001). Conclusion: Middle SDI region exhibited the highest incidence and prevalence, highlighting the vulnerability of these populations, while Oceania and Andean Latin America bore the least burden. Notably, several regions, particularly in Europe, experienced substantial increases in both incidence and prevalence, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions. Conversely, some regions, such as the Caribbean, showed encouraging declines in prevalence, suggesting that effective prevention and control strategies can be implemented. These findings underscore the importance of tailored approaches to address the evolving burden of T1DM. Presentation: Saturday, July 12, 2025

e16001 Background: Esophageal carcinoma ranks among the top 10 malignancies in the world, contributing to high morbidity and mortality. With radiotherapy being one of the most administered treatment options, different variations of administration have evolved. Two such variations include intensity-modulated radiotherapy and 3D conformational radiotherapy. These modalities have been investigated for their efficacy and rate of adverse events. However, conclusions from the trials conducted have been variable. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aim to collate these findings to assess the exposure of cancerous cells and rates of adverse events following IMRT or 3D-CRT. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across three databases for all articles published from inception till September 2024. All primary studies evaluating the comparative efficacy of IMRT vs 3D-CRT were included. Outcomes assessed include dose volume histograms (DVHs) at heart and lung, Dmax at the spinal cord, and irradiation toxicity. Data analysis was conducted in RevMan 5.4 using a random-effects model. Results: A total of twenty records were included in the study, with a sample size of 3090 patients. Radiation dosage, estimated as DVHs, was equal across both regimens at heart (MD: 2.67; 95%CI: –0.15 to 5.48; P = 0.06), except at 40 Gy of radiation, where a lower DVH was noted among patients being administered IMRT (MD: 6.64; 95%CI: 0.25 to 13.03; P = 0.04). At the lung, a higher DVH was noted, especially for doses of 20 Gy or above, on using IMRT. Similarly, a lower dosage in the spinal cord was noted in the IMRT group (MD: 2.87; 95%CI: 1.04 to 4.70; P = .002). Consequently, a lower risk of esophagitis was noted among the IMRT group (OR: 1.54; 95%CI: 1.14 to 2.07; p = 0.009]). While considering patient outcomes, the odds of survival were higher in the IMRT group at 3 years post-treatment (OR: 0.53; 95%CI: 0.31 to 0.92; P = 0.02). Conclusions: IMRT was superior to 3D-CRT in terms of volume of tissue irradiated and lower spinal toxicity. A higher chance of survival was noted in the IMRT group. Further trials are needed to strengthen these findings. Outcome Mean Difference (MD) 95% confidence interval (CI) P value Mean dosage at lung 1.14 0.6, 1.68 <0.0001 Mean dosage at heart 2.67 -0.15, 5.48 0.06 Radiation esophagitis Odds ratio, OR: 1.38 1.09, 1.76 0.009 Radiation pneumonitis OR:1.37 0.62, 3.01 0.43 3-year OS OR: 0.69 0.56, 0.84 0.0003 5-year OS OR: 0.53 0.31, 0.92 0.02 Maximum dosage at spinal cord 2.87 1.04, 4.7 0.0002